Libs heads explode: 235,000 jobs created vs 190,000 expected

How will Libs spin this news?

  • Bad news because fewer people can receive Unemployment Insurance that drives the economy.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    5
If you'd just stop being retired you could let people do your jobs..But still no reduction on the people not in the workforce category...And the GNP has not increased...
 
If you'd just stop being retired you could let people do your jobs..But still no reduction on the people not in the workforce category...And the GNP has not increased...
/---- That makes no sense even by your low standards of communication.
 
US and Foreign Corporations have already began moving to THE US. And this is before any tax reform has even passed.

Even the most Hardcore Paid DemNazi Marxist Paid Internet Troll will admit this.

Marxist Radicals need jobs too.....well the ones that aren't sitting on their government couch in their government apartment, eating their government cheese, and watching GOV-TV.
 
US and Foreign Corporations have already began moving to THE US. And this is before any tax reform has even passed.

Even the most Hardcore Paid DemNazi Marxist Paid Internet Troll will admit this.

Marxist Radicals need jobs too.....well the ones that aren't sitting on their government couch in their government apartment, eating their government cheese, and watching GOV-TV.
C-Span?
 
If you'd just stop being retired you could let people do your jobs..But still no reduction on the people not in the workforce category...And the GNP has not increased...
/---- BTW Snowflake, the GNP and GDP advance estimates are prepared about 1 month after the end of the quarter. So we won't learn about Trumps GNP until the end of April and that will only account for about 9 weeks of his presidency. .
 
If you'd just stop being retired you could let people do your jobs..But still no reduction on the people not in the workforce category...And the GNP has not increased...
/---- BTW Snowflake, the GNP and GDP advance estimates are prepared about 1 month after the end of the quarter. So we won't learn about Trumps GNP until the end of April and that will only account for about 9 weeks of his presidency. .
Explain the increase in UE claims then..
 
Why would liberal heads explode? We're in an ongoing expansion that started almost 8 years ago.

The exploding heads will be those of the Trumptards when, inevitably, a recession hits on Trump's watch.
 
About the first thing out of Chris Matthews' mouth last night was "the economy Trump inherited from Obama".

Normal stuff. Partisans take all credit and deflect all blame. I'm sure we all know that by now, right?
.
No, not at all...

We are consistent in the numbers we use.



When Obama began, he inherited the trending economy and fiscal numbers of the previous administration, until Oct 1st, when the new President is responsible for his first fiscal budget.

When Trump began, he inherited the trending economy and fiscal numbers of the previous administration, until Oct 1st, when this new President is responsible for his first Fiscal Budget.

As we said with Obama, the first handful of months that a President is in office, there is not much legislation that can affect the economy before the end of the fiscal year, Sept 30....losing 700k jobs a month trend, was not going to change the day he got in to office.

Even the Stimulus Obama got passed, not even 10 percent of it was spent and used before September 30th, 2009.
 
About the first thing out of Chris Matthews' mouth last night was "the economy Trump inherited from Obama".

Normal stuff. Partisans take all credit and deflect all blame. I'm sure we all know that by now, right?
.
No, not at all...

We are consistent in the numbers we use.



When Obama began, he inherited the trending economy and fiscal numbers of the previous administration, until Oct 1st, when the new President is responsible for his first fiscal budget.

When Trump began, he inherited the trending economy and fiscal numbers of the previous administration, until Oct 1st, when this new President is responsible for his first Fiscal Budget.

As we said with Obama, the first handful of months that a President is in office, there is not much legislation that can affect the economy before the end of the fiscal year, Sept 30....losing 700k jobs a month trend, was not going to change the day he got in to office.

Even the Stimulus Obama got passed, not even 10 percent of it was spent and used before September 30th, 2009.
Partisans have to share numbers or facts or news (most of the time), but they still take all the credit and deflect all the blame.

The issue at hand is irrelevant. That is what they do, and that is one of primary symptoms of partisan ideology.

"Oh no, we're different than those other guys." Nope.
.
 
Libs heads explode: 235,000 jobs created vs 190,000 expected

Dow futures rise 100 points on news

Something is seriously wrong with you.

We've had many months under Obama with more-than-expected jobs. Did your head explode?

Economy Created 257K Jobs in December, More Than Expected: ADP

BLOWOUT! July jobs report demolishes expectations

US economy smashes expectations to add 271,000 jobs in October


As to this job growth, it is dubious that having done EXACTLY NOTHING thus far Trump has any significant impact on the job numbers. He inherited an economy in solid condition, that's the underlying basics here. Underlying basics for Obama's early tenure was a Great Recession in full swing.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top