Curried Goats
Platinum Member
- Aug 28, 2021
- 23,297
- 8,744
- 433
Let's keep in mind these words when we address your questions.To interpret a poster’s post CG, you have to read their words and not make up your own to add. I asked you 3 specific questions, point blank:
I only said that I support children being allowed to draw their families, whatever their family dynamic may be, if that is the assignment. Other than that I don't understand the question. Different children are going to have different drawings. If a child lives in a household like my grandson does, with a mother who isn't going to shy away from teaching him actual human anatomy (she's currently in nursing school), he might very well draw naked people given that assignment. Children are unpredictable.1. That family picture that you just referenced- do you support that these family images drawn by the 3rd grade and under crowd illustrate naked people with details included?
No I don't. I think it's natural for children to grow more curious about their bodies as they get older. Also I don't think there's anything boys draw more than penises. Not Pokémon, not Goku, or whatever, it's penises hands down.2. Do you think kids, 8 years old and under, who draw such details like penises and women’s privates have not been sexually abused as multiple case studies support?
I would encourage you to provide evidence this actually happened.3. Do you approve of a 3rd grade teacher in a public school encouraging the kids to leave off the clothes to draw these family pics?