ThunderKiss1965
Platinum Member
The US cuts its emissions every year while China increases its. You are making piss poor excuses.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Let's Sue China Now to cut their Emissions! Royal Dutch Shell ordered to cut their emissions
- Thread starter CrusaderFrank
- Start date
- Mar 7, 2014
- 45,067
- 9,114
- 2,030
The US cuts its emissions every year while China increases its. You are making piss poor excuses.Nope. China accounts for 28% of the worlds CO2 emissions. The US is around 15% and we cut more every year. China just keeps piling it up.No. I'm saying you're just following the current alarmist trend on co2 as opposed to understanding co2 and the planet.I don't support China being allowed to pollute the amount they do.For what?You support suing China, right?ConservativesSave the planet from what?Yes! A Dutch Court just ruled that Royal Dutch Shell must lower their carbon emissions. Now we can get the worlds bigger CO2 emitter, China, to comply as well!
Sweet!!
In A Landmark Case, A Dutch Court Orders Shell To Cut Its Carbon Emissions Faster
Crick mamooth otto105
Let's make it happen! Save the planet!
For their world leading CO2 emissions! OMG You're a denier! You're with the oil companies
Still looking for a scientific organization that supports your view on AGW? Must be one out there....
Sorry are you now denying your "science" that the additional wisp of CO2 is killing the planet?
You need to listen to the full science spectrum as opposed to listening to "bad news sells".
If you understand co2, you will know what low levels are bad for the earth, what the highest levels have been in the earth's history over the hundreds of millions and billion of years, and what current levels mean.
You will then then understand that a double increase in ppm does not mean a double in temperature. But I feel you are are ignorant of the subject, I don't mean that in a bad way, but your posts show an alarming lack of knowledge.
CO2 is killing the planet, China must be made to cut their emissions today. Where is the rest of the AGW Cult on this
Well, the US probably has worse emission than the China per capita.
China has 1.4 billion people. The US has 330 million.
Which means if the US were the size of China it's emissions would be somewhere around 60%.
The problem here is that China and the US are at different stages in their development.
China has a GDP per capita of less than $19,000. This is more than double what it was 10 years ago.
The US has more than $68,000.
Clearly Americans are able to pay for cleaner fuel than the Chinese are.
China's GDP per capita is what the US's was in about 1986.
US GDP Per Capita by Year
US GDP Per Capita table by year, historic, and current data. Current US GDP Per Capita is 79,195.56.
www.multpl.com
Obviously this figure doesn't represent real values.
I think constant levels show that based on the 2010 US dollar the Chinese economy now is at about 1961 levels for the US.
List of countries by carbon dioxide emissions per capita - Wikipedia
Let's go by carbon dioxide. It doesn't really tell the whole story, but this isn't a dissertation.
In 2018 the US was at 16.1 and China at 8.0
The US was at 20.8 in 1980. Always been higher than China.
List of countries by greenhouse gas emissions per capita - Wikipedia
For greenhouse gases the US was at 23.23 in 1990 and China was at 2.69.
Now the US is at 19.9 and China is at 8.49.
This is per capita. The US is far more polluting per capita than China has ever been.
Yes, the US is reducing its polluting. But not much. In 30 years it's dropped maybe 15-20% for greenhouse gases, but is still higher than China. For CO2 it's double China's rate now, and has dropped maybe 20% since 1980.
China is moving ahead massively with green energy.
Electric car use by country - Wikipedia
China, which has much lower car use than the US, has 3.3 per 1000 people and the US has 5.4 per 1000 (and most of this is in California).
The US has 816 cars per 1000 people and China has 204, a MASSIVE DIFFERENCE. So China's use of electric cars is actually THREE TIMES that of the US. And before you say electric cars pollute, I know they do, but what they don't pollute are their immediate surroundings. Which impacts the people in those cities.
Also
List of countries by renewable electricity production - Wikipedia
China uses 7 million GWh of renewable energy compared to the US's 4 million.
List of countries by energy consumption per capita - Wikipedia
The US's power consumption per capita is 6917 per person, in China it's 2964.
Clearly no matter how you look at it, China uses LESS energy, and is using far more of its energy consumption from renewable energy than the US, it's pushing green technology far, far, far more.
It still needs to develop and develop at a price it can afford, but it's way ahead of the US when the US was in China's developmental stage. And is still lagging China when China is massively poorer per capita than the US is.
Note that the biggest Chicken Littles Old RocksCrickmamooth are too busy reading Mao's Little Red Book to respond
You poor thing. Your sad life is now just a series of pissy personal vendettas.
You weren't always that way. The Trump cult has really done a number on you. You can't be saved. At this stage, your only purpose is to serve as a warning to others, about how fanatical cult devotion leads to self-lobotomizing.
- May 20, 2009
- 144,236
- 66,535
- 2,330
- Thread starter
- #64
Note that the biggest Chicken Littles Old RocksCrickmamooth are too busy reading Mao's Little Red Book to respond
You poor thing. Your sad life is now just a series of pissy personal vendettas.
You weren't always that way. The Trump cult has really done a number on you. You can't be saved. At this stage, your only purpose is to serve as a warning to others, about how fanatical cult devotion leads to self-lobotomizing.
Ahhh, Xi can count on your to cover for him!
- May 20, 2009
- 144,236
- 66,535
- 2,330
- Thread starter
- #65
The US cuts its emissions every year while China increases its. You are making piss poor excuses.Nope. China accounts for 28% of the worlds CO2 emissions. The US is around 15% and we cut more every year. China just keeps piling it up.No. I'm saying you're just following the current alarmist trend on co2 as opposed to understanding co2 and the planet.I don't support China being allowed to pollute the amount they do.For what?You support suing China, right?ConservativesSave the planet from what?Yes! A Dutch Court just ruled that Royal Dutch Shell must lower their carbon emissions. Now we can get the worlds bigger CO2 emitter, China, to comply as well!
Sweet!!
In A Landmark Case, A Dutch Court Orders Shell To Cut Its Carbon Emissions Faster
Crick mamooth otto105
Let's make it happen! Save the planet!
For their world leading CO2 emissions! OMG You're a denier! You're with the oil companies
Still looking for a scientific organization that supports your view on AGW? Must be one out there....
Sorry are you now denying your "science" that the additional wisp of CO2 is killing the planet?
You need to listen to the full science spectrum as opposed to listening to "bad news sells".
If you understand co2, you will know what low levels are bad for the earth, what the highest levels have been in the earth's history over the hundreds of millions and billion of years, and what current levels mean.
You will then then understand that a double increase in ppm does not mean a double in temperature. But I feel you are are ignorant of the subject, I don't mean that in a bad way, but your posts show an alarming lack of knowledge.
CO2 is killing the planet, China must be made to cut their emissions today. Where is the rest of the AGW Cult on this
Well, the US probably has worse emission than the China per capita.
China has 1.4 billion people. The US has 330 million.
Which means if the US were the size of China it's emissions would be somewhere around 60%.
The problem here is that China and the US are at different stages in their development.
China has a GDP per capita of less than $19,000. This is more than double what it was 10 years ago.
The US has more than $68,000.
Clearly Americans are able to pay for cleaner fuel than the Chinese are.
China's GDP per capita is what the US's was in about 1986.
US GDP Per Capita by Year
US GDP Per Capita table by year, historic, and current data. Current US GDP Per Capita is 79,195.56.www.multpl.com
Obviously this figure doesn't represent real values.
I think constant levels show that based on the 2010 US dollar the Chinese economy now is at about 1961 levels for the US.
List of countries by carbon dioxide emissions per capita - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Let's go by carbon dioxide. It doesn't really tell the whole story, but this isn't a dissertation.
In 2018 the US was at 16.1 and China at 8.0
The US was at 20.8 in 1980. Always been higher than China.
List of countries by greenhouse gas emissions per capita - Wikipedia
For greenhouse gases the US was at 23.23 in 1990 and China was at 2.69.
Now the US is at 19.9 and China is at 8.49.
This is per capita. The US is far more polluting per capita than China has ever been.
Yes, the US is reducing its polluting. But not much. In 30 years it's dropped maybe 15-20% for greenhouse gases, but is still higher than China. For CO2 it's double China's rate now, and has dropped maybe 20% since 1980.
China is moving ahead massively with green energy.
Electric car use by country - Wikipedia
China, which has much lower car use than the US, has 3.3 per 1000 people and the US has 5.4 per 1000 (and most of this is in California).
The US has 816 cars per 1000 people and China has 204, a MASSIVE DIFFERENCE. So China's use of electric cars is actually THREE TIMES that of the US. And before you say electric cars pollute, I know they do, but what they don't pollute are their immediate surroundings. Which impacts the people in those cities.
Also
List of countries by renewable electricity production - Wikipedia
China uses 7 million GWh of renewable energy compared to the US's 4 million.
List of countries by energy consumption per capita - Wikipedia
The US's power consumption per capita is 6917 per person, in China it's 2964.
Clearly no matter how you look at it, China uses LESS energy, and is using far more of its energy consumption from renewable energy than the US, it's pushing green technology far, far, far more.
It still needs to develop and develop at a price it can afford, but it's way ahead of the US when the US was in China's developmental stage. And is still lagging China when China is massively poorer per capita than the US is.
You can tell who the CCP Useful idiots are as soon as they mention CO2 per capita
- Mar 7, 2014
- 45,067
- 9,114
- 2,030
The US cuts its emissions every year while China increases its. You are making piss poor excuses.Nope. China accounts for 28% of the worlds CO2 emissions. The US is around 15% and we cut more every year. China just keeps piling it up.No. I'm saying you're just following the current alarmist trend on co2 as opposed to understanding co2 and the planet.I don't support China being allowed to pollute the amount they do.For what?You support suing China, right?ConservativesSave the planet from what?Yes! A Dutch Court just ruled that Royal Dutch Shell must lower their carbon emissions. Now we can get the worlds bigger CO2 emitter, China, to comply as well!
Sweet!!
In A Landmark Case, A Dutch Court Orders Shell To Cut Its Carbon Emissions Faster
Crick mamooth otto105
Let's make it happen! Save the planet!
For their world leading CO2 emissions! OMG You're a denier! You're with the oil companies
Still looking for a scientific organization that supports your view on AGW? Must be one out there....
Sorry are you now denying your "science" that the additional wisp of CO2 is killing the planet?
You need to listen to the full science spectrum as opposed to listening to "bad news sells".
If you understand co2, you will know what low levels are bad for the earth, what the highest levels have been in the earth's history over the hundreds of millions and billion of years, and what current levels mean.
You will then then understand that a double increase in ppm does not mean a double in temperature. But I feel you are are ignorant of the subject, I don't mean that in a bad way, but your posts show an alarming lack of knowledge.
CO2 is killing the planet, China must be made to cut their emissions today. Where is the rest of the AGW Cult on this
Well, the US probably has worse emission than the China per capita.
China has 1.4 billion people. The US has 330 million.
Which means if the US were the size of China it's emissions would be somewhere around 60%.
The problem here is that China and the US are at different stages in their development.
China has a GDP per capita of less than $19,000. This is more than double what it was 10 years ago.
The US has more than $68,000.
Clearly Americans are able to pay for cleaner fuel than the Chinese are.
China's GDP per capita is what the US's was in about 1986.
US GDP Per Capita by Year
US GDP Per Capita table by year, historic, and current data. Current US GDP Per Capita is 79,195.56.www.multpl.com
Obviously this figure doesn't represent real values.
I think constant levels show that based on the 2010 US dollar the Chinese economy now is at about 1961 levels for the US.
List of countries by carbon dioxide emissions per capita - Wikipedia
Let's go by carbon dioxide. It doesn't really tell the whole story, but this isn't a dissertation.
In 2018 the US was at 16.1 and China at 8.0
The US was at 20.8 in 1980. Always been higher than China.
List of countries by greenhouse gas emissions per capita - Wikipedia
For greenhouse gases the US was at 23.23 in 1990 and China was at 2.69.
Now the US is at 19.9 and China is at 8.49.
This is per capita. The US is far more polluting per capita than China has ever been.
Yes, the US is reducing its polluting. But not much. In 30 years it's dropped maybe 15-20% for greenhouse gases, but is still higher than China. For CO2 it's double China's rate now, and has dropped maybe 20% since 1980.
China is moving ahead massively with green energy.
Electric car use by country - Wikipedia
China, which has much lower car use than the US, has 3.3 per 1000 people and the US has 5.4 per 1000 (and most of this is in California).
The US has 816 cars per 1000 people and China has 204, a MASSIVE DIFFERENCE. So China's use of electric cars is actually THREE TIMES that of the US. And before you say electric cars pollute, I know they do, but what they don't pollute are their immediate surroundings. Which impacts the people in those cities.
Also
List of countries by renewable electricity production - Wikipedia
China uses 7 million GWh of renewable energy compared to the US's 4 million.
List of countries by energy consumption per capita - Wikipedia
The US's power consumption per capita is 6917 per person, in China it's 2964.
Clearly no matter how you look at it, China uses LESS energy, and is using far more of its energy consumption from renewable energy than the US, it's pushing green technology far, far, far more.
It still needs to develop and develop at a price it can afford, but it's way ahead of the US when the US was in China's developmental stage. And is still lagging China when China is massively poorer per capita than the US is.
You can tell who the CCP Useful idiots are as soon as they mention CO2 per capita
Ah, insults.
Bye, forever.
otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 34,051
- 10,833
- 1,315
I get the impression that you think you lost the argument.WowNope. China accounts for 28% of the worlds CO2 emissions. The US is around 15% and we cut more every year. China just keeps piling it up.No. I'm saying you're just following the current alarmist trend on co2 as opposed to understanding co2 and the planet.I don't support China being allowed to pollute the amount they do.For what?You support suing China, right?ConservativesSave the planet from what?Yes! A Dutch Court just ruled that Royal Dutch Shell must lower their carbon emissions. Now we can get the worlds bigger CO2 emitter, China, to comply as well!
Sweet!!
In A Landmark Case, A Dutch Court Orders Shell To Cut Its Carbon Emissions Faster
Crick mamooth otto105
Let's make it happen! Save the planet!
For their world leading CO2 emissions! OMG You're a denier! You're with the oil companies
Still looking for a scientific organization that supports your view on AGW? Must be one out there....
Sorry are you now denying your "science" that the additional wisp of CO2 is killing the planet?
You need to listen to the full science spectrum as opposed to listening to "bad news sells".
If you understand co2, you will know what low levels are bad for the earth, what the highest levels have been in the earth's history over the hundreds of millions and billion of years, and what current levels mean.
You will then then understand that a double increase in ppm does not mean a double in temperature. But I feel you are are ignorant of the subject, I don't mean that in a bad way, but your posts show an alarming lack of knowledge.
CO2 is killing the planet, China must be made to cut their emissions today. Where is the rest of the AGW Cult on this
Well, the US probably has worse emission than the China per capita.
China has 1.4 billion people. The US has 330 million.
Which means if the US were the size of China it's emissions would be somewhere around 60%.
Make China Great Again!
So your CCP Masters can build MOAR coal burning plants?
What a sham!
Your post reads like a surrender monkey.
otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 34,051
- 10,833
- 1,315
Since it puts your total volume argument to shitThe US cuts its emissions every year while China increases its. You are making piss poor excuses.Nope. China accounts for 28% of the worlds CO2 emissions. The US is around 15% and we cut more every year. China just keeps piling it up.No. I'm saying you're just following the current alarmist trend on co2 as opposed to understanding co2 and the planet.I don't support China being allowed to pollute the amount they do.For what?You support suing China, right?ConservativesSave the planet from what?Yes! A Dutch Court just ruled that Royal Dutch Shell must lower their carbon emissions. Now we can get the worlds bigger CO2 emitter, China, to comply as well!
Sweet!!
In A Landmark Case, A Dutch Court Orders Shell To Cut Its Carbon Emissions Faster
Crick mamooth otto105
Let's make it happen! Save the planet!
For their world leading CO2 emissions! OMG You're a denier! You're with the oil companies
Still looking for a scientific organization that supports your view on AGW? Must be one out there....
Sorry are you now denying your "science" that the additional wisp of CO2 is killing the planet?
You need to listen to the full science spectrum as opposed to listening to "bad news sells".
If you understand co2, you will know what low levels are bad for the earth, what the highest levels have been in the earth's history over the hundreds of millions and billion of years, and what current levels mean.
You will then then understand that a double increase in ppm does not mean a double in temperature. But I feel you are are ignorant of the subject, I don't mean that in a bad way, but your posts show an alarming lack of knowledge.
CO2 is killing the planet, China must be made to cut their emissions today. Where is the rest of the AGW Cult on this
Well, the US probably has worse emission than the China per capita.
China has 1.4 billion people. The US has 330 million.
Which means if the US were the size of China it's emissions would be somewhere around 60%.
The problem here is that China and the US are at different stages in their development.
China has a GDP per capita of less than $19,000. This is more than double what it was 10 years ago.
The US has more than $68,000.
Clearly Americans are able to pay for cleaner fuel than the Chinese are.
China's GDP per capita is what the US's was in about 1986.
US GDP Per Capita by Year
US GDP Per Capita table by year, historic, and current data. Current US GDP Per Capita is 79,195.56.www.multpl.com
Obviously this figure doesn't represent real values.
I think constant levels show that based on the 2010 US dollar the Chinese economy now is at about 1961 levels for the US.
List of countries by carbon dioxide emissions per capita - Wikipedia
Let's go by carbon dioxide. It doesn't really tell the whole story, but this isn't a dissertation.
In 2018 the US was at 16.1 and China at 8.0
The US was at 20.8 in 1980. Always been higher than China.
List of countries by greenhouse gas emissions per capita - Wikipedia
For greenhouse gases the US was at 23.23 in 1990 and China was at 2.69.
Now the US is at 19.9 and China is at 8.49.
This is per capita. The US is far more polluting per capita than China has ever been.
Yes, the US is reducing its polluting. But not much. In 30 years it's dropped maybe 15-20% for greenhouse gases, but is still higher than China. For CO2 it's double China's rate now, and has dropped maybe 20% since 1980.
China is moving ahead massively with green energy.
Electric car use by country - Wikipedia
China, which has much lower car use than the US, has 3.3 per 1000 people and the US has 5.4 per 1000 (and most of this is in California).
The US has 816 cars per 1000 people and China has 204, a MASSIVE DIFFERENCE. So China's use of electric cars is actually THREE TIMES that of the US. And before you say electric cars pollute, I know they do, but what they don't pollute are their immediate surroundings. Which impacts the people in those cities.
Also
List of countries by renewable electricity production - Wikipedia
China uses 7 million GWh of renewable energy compared to the US's 4 million.
List of countries by energy consumption per capita - Wikipedia
The US's power consumption per capita is 6917 per person, in China it's 2964.
Clearly no matter how you look at it, China uses LESS energy, and is using far more of its energy consumption from renewable energy than the US, it's pushing green technology far, far, far more.
It still needs to develop and develop at a price it can afford, but it's way ahead of the US when the US was in China's developmental stage. And is still lagging China when China is massively poorer per capita than the US is.
You can tell who the CCP Useful idiots are as soon as they mention CO2 per capita
- May 20, 2009
- 144,236
- 66,535
- 2,330
- Thread starter
- #69
Since it puts your total volume argument to shitThe US cuts its emissions every year while China increases its. You are making piss poor excuses.Nope. China accounts for 28% of the worlds CO2 emissions. The US is around 15% and we cut more every year. China just keeps piling it up.No. I'm saying you're just following the current alarmist trend on co2 as opposed to understanding co2 and the planet.I don't support China being allowed to pollute the amount they do.For what?You support suing China, right?ConservativesSave the planet from what?Yes! A Dutch Court just ruled that Royal Dutch Shell must lower their carbon emissions. Now we can get the worlds bigger CO2 emitter, China, to comply as well!
Sweet!!
In A Landmark Case, A Dutch Court Orders Shell To Cut Its Carbon Emissions Faster
Crick mamooth otto105
Let's make it happen! Save the planet!
For their world leading CO2 emissions! OMG You're a denier! You're with the oil companies
Still looking for a scientific organization that supports your view on AGW? Must be one out there....
Sorry are you now denying your "science" that the additional wisp of CO2 is killing the planet?
You need to listen to the full science spectrum as opposed to listening to "bad news sells".
If you understand co2, you will know what low levels are bad for the earth, what the highest levels have been in the earth's history over the hundreds of millions and billion of years, and what current levels mean.
You will then then understand that a double increase in ppm does not mean a double in temperature. But I feel you are are ignorant of the subject, I don't mean that in a bad way, but your posts show an alarming lack of knowledge.
CO2 is killing the planet, China must be made to cut their emissions today. Where is the rest of the AGW Cult on this
Well, the US probably has worse emission than the China per capita.
China has 1.4 billion people. The US has 330 million.
Which means if the US were the size of China it's emissions would be somewhere around 60%.
The problem here is that China and the US are at different stages in their development.
China has a GDP per capita of less than $19,000. This is more than double what it was 10 years ago.
The US has more than $68,000.
Clearly Americans are able to pay for cleaner fuel than the Chinese are.
China's GDP per capita is what the US's was in about 1986.
US GDP Per Capita by Year
US GDP Per Capita table by year, historic, and current data. Current US GDP Per Capita is 79,195.56.www.multpl.com
Obviously this figure doesn't represent real values.
I think constant levels show that based on the 2010 US dollar the Chinese economy now is at about 1961 levels for the US.
List of countries by carbon dioxide emissions per capita - Wikipedia
Let's go by carbon dioxide. It doesn't really tell the whole story, but this isn't a dissertation.
In 2018 the US was at 16.1 and China at 8.0
The US was at 20.8 in 1980. Always been higher than China.
List of countries by greenhouse gas emissions per capita - Wikipedia
For greenhouse gases the US was at 23.23 in 1990 and China was at 2.69.
Now the US is at 19.9 and China is at 8.49.
This is per capita. The US is far more polluting per capita than China has ever been.
Yes, the US is reducing its polluting. But not much. In 30 years it's dropped maybe 15-20% for greenhouse gases, but is still higher than China. For CO2 it's double China's rate now, and has dropped maybe 20% since 1980.
China is moving ahead massively with green energy.
Electric car use by country - Wikipedia
China, which has much lower car use than the US, has 3.3 per 1000 people and the US has 5.4 per 1000 (and most of this is in California).
The US has 816 cars per 1000 people and China has 204, a MASSIVE DIFFERENCE. So China's use of electric cars is actually THREE TIMES that of the US. And before you say electric cars pollute, I know they do, but what they don't pollute are their immediate surroundings. Which impacts the people in those cities.
Also
List of countries by renewable electricity production - Wikipedia
China uses 7 million GWh of renewable energy compared to the US's 4 million.
List of countries by energy consumption per capita - Wikipedia
The US's power consumption per capita is 6917 per person, in China it's 2964.
Clearly no matter how you look at it, China uses LESS energy, and is using far more of its energy consumption from renewable energy than the US, it's pushing green technology far, far, far more.
It still needs to develop and develop at a price it can afford, but it's way ahead of the US when the US was in China's developmental stage. And is still lagging China when China is massively poorer per capita than the US is.
You can tell who the CCP Useful idiots are as soon as they mention CO2 per capita
So CO2 is not causing a mass extinction. Good to know
- May 20, 2009
- 144,236
- 66,535
- 2,330
- Thread starter
- #70
I get the impression that you think you lost the argument.WowNope. China accounts for 28% of the worlds CO2 emissions. The US is around 15% and we cut more every year. China just keeps piling it up.No. I'm saying you're just following the current alarmist trend on co2 as opposed to understanding co2 and the planet.I don't support China being allowed to pollute the amount they do.For what?You support suing China, right?ConservativesSave the planet from what?Yes! A Dutch Court just ruled that Royal Dutch Shell must lower their carbon emissions. Now we can get the worlds bigger CO2 emitter, China, to comply as well!
Sweet!!
In A Landmark Case, A Dutch Court Orders Shell To Cut Its Carbon Emissions Faster
Crick mamooth otto105
Let's make it happen! Save the planet!
For their world leading CO2 emissions! OMG You're a denier! You're with the oil companies
Still looking for a scientific organization that supports your view on AGW? Must be one out there....
Sorry are you now denying your "science" that the additional wisp of CO2 is killing the planet?
You need to listen to the full science spectrum as opposed to listening to "bad news sells".
If you understand co2, you will know what low levels are bad for the earth, what the highest levels have been in the earth's history over the hundreds of millions and billion of years, and what current levels mean.
You will then then understand that a double increase in ppm does not mean a double in temperature. But I feel you are are ignorant of the subject, I don't mean that in a bad way, but your posts show an alarming lack of knowledge.
CO2 is killing the planet, China must be made to cut their emissions today. Where is the rest of the AGW Cult on this
Well, the US probably has worse emission than the China per capita.
China has 1.4 billion people. The US has 330 million.
Which means if the US were the size of China it's emissions would be somewhere around 60%.
Make China Great Again!
So your CCP Masters can build MOAR coal burning plants?
What a sham!
Your post reads like a surrender monkey.
Are you confirming that CO2 is not causing any changing in the climate or is that just the Chinese version of CO2?
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 92,428
- 57,983
- 2,645
It wouldn't matter how I asked. You are far too stupid to have come up with anything.Did you ask really nicely? Pretty please?
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 92,428
- 57,983
- 2,645
So?The US cuts its emissions every year while China increases its.
- May 20, 2009
- 144,236
- 66,535
- 2,330
- Thread starter
- #73
It wouldn't matter how I asked. You are far too stupid to have come up with anything.Did you ask really nicely? Pretty please?
I came up with that the AGW Cult must believe that there is a Chinese version of CO2 that is NOT causing any climate change
CO2: it's not causing climate change when it comes from China
otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 34,051
- 10,833
- 1,315
I have already confirmed the relationship between CO2 and Temerature.I get the impression that you think you lost the argument.WowNope. China accounts for 28% of the worlds CO2 emissions. The US is around 15% and we cut more every year. China just keeps piling it up.No. I'm saying you're just following the current alarmist trend on co2 as opposed to understanding co2 and the planet.I don't support China being allowed to pollute the amount they do.For what?You support suing China, right?ConservativesSave the planet from what?Yes! A Dutch Court just ruled that Royal Dutch Shell must lower their carbon emissions. Now we can get the worlds bigger CO2 emitter, China, to comply as well!
Sweet!!
In A Landmark Case, A Dutch Court Orders Shell To Cut Its Carbon Emissions Faster
Crick mamooth otto105
Let's make it happen! Save the planet!
For their world leading CO2 emissions! OMG You're a denier! You're with the oil companies
Still looking for a scientific organization that supports your view on AGW? Must be one out there....
Sorry are you now denying your "science" that the additional wisp of CO2 is killing the planet?
You need to listen to the full science spectrum as opposed to listening to "bad news sells".
If you understand co2, you will know what low levels are bad for the earth, what the highest levels have been in the earth's history over the hundreds of millions and billion of years, and what current levels mean.
You will then then understand that a double increase in ppm does not mean a double in temperature. But I feel you are are ignorant of the subject, I don't mean that in a bad way, but your posts show an alarming lack of knowledge.
CO2 is killing the planet, China must be made to cut their emissions today. Where is the rest of the AGW Cult on this
Well, the US probably has worse emission than the China per capita.
China has 1.4 billion people. The US has 330 million.
Which means if the US were the size of China it's emissions would be somewhere around 60%.
Make China Great Again!
So your CCP Masters can build MOAR coal burning plants?
What a sham!
Your post reads like a surrender monkey.
Are you confirming that CO2 is not causing any changing in the climate or is that just the Chinese version of CO2?
You, have offered dick pics.
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 92,428
- 57,983
- 2,645
Which is as embarrassingly stupid as everything else you come up with.I came up with that the AGW Cult must believe that there is a Chinese version of CO2 that is NOT causing any climate change
Way to puss out on my question, ya sissy.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 53
- Views
- 23K
- Replies
- 12
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 71
- Views
- 14K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 5
- Views
- 6
- Replies
- 218
- Views
- 865
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8037
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 468
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-