P@triot

Diamond Member
Jul 5, 2011
61,031
11,514
2,060
United States
The deep hate - resulting from the flawed thought process - is astounding. The group think - resulting from the indoctrination on college campuses - is frightening (and reminiscent of the Nazis).

Assuming someone is "privileged" simply because they are white is every bit as racists and ignorant as assuming someone is a thug just because they are black.

 
Regressive Leftists, not liberals.

Two different things. Regressives are illiberal leftist authoritarians.
Like it or not - the left has hijacked the term. They call themselves "liberals" even though they are actually fascists. My view on it is...let them. "A rose by any other name....". Every time they are exposed, they "rebrand". From Democrat, to Marxist, to Communist, to fascist, to socialist, to progressive, to "liberal". As long as we keep pointing out the facts, they will have to keep running and rebranding.
 
Regressive Leftists, not liberals. Two different things. Regressives are illiberal leftist authoritarians.
Like it or not - the left has hijacked the term. They call themselves "liberals" even though they are actually fascists. My view on it is...let them. "A rose by any other name...."
Understood, and you're right. But there are still real, actual, decent liberals out there.
.
 
The deep hate - resulting from the flawed thought process - is astounding. The group think - resulting from the indoctrination on college campuses - is frightening (and reminiscent of the Nazis).

Assuming someone is "privileged" simply because they are white is every bit as racists and ignorant as assuming someone is a thug just because they are black.



Sounds like a bullshit story made up by some guy that wanted to brag about what a great guy he is.
 
The deep hate - resulting from the flawed thought process - is astounding. The group think - resulting from the indoctrination on college campuses - is frightening (and reminiscent of the Nazis).

Assuming someone is "privileged" simply because they are white is every bit as racists and ignorant as assuming someone is a thug just because they are black.



Dafuck does any of this have to do with Liberalism, Buttsoiler?
 
Regressive Leftists, not liberals.

Two different things. Regressives are illiberal leftist authoritarians.
Like it or not - the left has hijacked the term. They call themselves "liberals" even though they are actually fascists. My view on it is...let them. "A rose by any other name....". Every time they are exposed, they "rebrand". From Democrat, to Marxist, to Communist, to fascist, to socialist, to progressive, to "liberal". As long as we keep pointing out the facts, they will have to keep running and rebranding.

Then how come it's only you and your co-whiners who keep misapplying the label?

And how come you go on and on and on and on misapplying the same label after you've been corrected and corrected and corrected again?

Huh Buttsoiler? Why is that?
 
Regressive Leftists, not liberals.

Two different things. Regressives are illiberal leftist authoritarians.
Like it or not - the left has hijacked the term. They call themselves "liberals" even though they are actually fascists. My view on it is...let them. "A rose by any other name....". Every time they are exposed, they "rebrand". From Democrat, to Marxist, to Communist, to fascist, to socialist, to progressive, to "liberal". As long as we keep pointing out the facts, they will have to keep running and rebranding.

So here you've whipped up a nice fruit salad of a political party, several philosophies, a couple of economic theories, and a sociopolitical movement from a hundred years ago, and insist on foisting them all on the same entity. Presumably as a way of avoiding defining that entity.

Then to top it off you've plunked this hairball of a thread into "race relations". You think "Liberal" is a race too then, Buttsoiler?

Fruit salad. With all the direction of a nice demolition derby.
 
Then to top it off you've plunked this hairball of a thread into "race relations". You think "Liberal" is a race too then, Buttsoiler?
Oh you poor ignorant little homosexual. As with everything you post - you’re 100% wrong. The mods moved the thread here, stupid. :laugh:
 
Presumably as a way of avoiding defining that entity.
This from the dimwit homosexual who insisted that progressivism was a person with a birth and a death - and that progressives didn’t exist anymore. Only to have someone post a video of Hitlery Clinton proudly declaring herself a progressive. :laugh:
 
Presumably as a way of avoiding defining that entity.
This from the dimwit homosexual who insisted that progressivism was a person with a birth and a death - and that progressives didn’t exist anymore. Only to have someone post a video of Hitlery Clinton proudly declaring herself a progressive. :laugh:

Then she's wrong.

What, you don't think that's possible?

And you still can't answer what the fuck anything in this thread has to do with "Liberalism" huh.

Poor Buttsoiler.... :itsok:
 
Even if white privilege did exist I'd say we've earned it by having a tiny fraction of the crime rate that Crybaby-Americans have.

Even black supremacist Jesse Jackson admitted that when he's walking down a street at night and hears someone behind him, he's relieved when it's a white guy and not a fellow black.
 
I've said it for over a decade now...the left has gotten so extreme/radicalized that there are no liberals left in the party. They are full-on communists. Indisputable proof when people literally cannot differentiate the doctrine of the Democrat Party platform and the Communist Manifesto...

 

Forum List

Back
Top