What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Lawyer: Capitol Cop Who Shot Ashli Babbitt ‘Ambushed’ Her on Jan. 6 Without Warning

OP
Lastamender

Lastamender

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
18,420
Reaction score
14,015
Points
2,400
Why wasn't the leader of the 1/6 insurrection shot?
First, it was not an insurrection. Second, the leader was working for the FBI.
 

Grampa Murked U

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2011
Messages
89,156
Reaction score
31,469
Points
2,275
Location
Kansas City
You think you know his Intent.
What was Babbitt's Intent?

Shake Hands with the officers?
Compliment the Law Makers?
Attack and Kill Law Makers and/or Police Officers?
With what? Her ponytail?
 

Coyote

Varmint
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
94,024
Reaction score
25,561
Points
2,180
Location
in between
Not.


Try to read the entire article before blithering back with some asinine reply.
Well, this is kind of interesting since your link relies heavily on two sources: WND and PSI.

WND is notorious for spreading debunked conspiracy theories and fake news.

PSI I never heard of. Here is what I found (ignoring their self promotion).



Apparently it was rated badly by the media bias site as well and they have yet to remove the info. So what happened with the cease and desist lawsuit? No merit probably.
 

asaratis

Uppity Senior Citizen
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2009
Messages
18,545
Reaction score
7,456
Points
390
Location
Stockbridge
Well, this is kind of interesting since your link relies heavily on two sources: WND and PSI.

WND is notorious for spreading debunked conspiracy theories and fake news.

PSI I never heard of. Here is what I found (ignoring their self promotion).



Apparently it was rated badly by the media bias site as well and they have yet to remove the info. So what happened with the cease and desist lawsuit? No merit probably.
There you go...dismissing the info because of the source. How typically liberal of you.

None of that matters at all. It merely supports my posit that ALL FACT CHECKERS ARE BIASED and present their subjective opinions and spins more often than facts.

Besides that, I didn't ask the numbnut to "watch Newsmax". I suggested she "watch the video" in the link to the Newsmax tweet. Newsmax had nothing to do with the making of the video.
 

otto105

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2017
Messages
11,698
Reaction score
2,600
Points
170
There you go...dismissing the info because of the source. How typically liberal of you.

None of that matters at all. It merely supports my posit that ALL FACT CHECKERS ARE BIASED and present their subjective opinions and spins more often than facts.

Besides that, I didn't ask the numbnut to "watch Newsmax". I suggested she "watch the video" in the link to the Newsmax tweet. Newsmax had nothing to do with the making of the video.
No, you’re mad at fact checkers because they fact checked the former president.
 

Grampa Murked U

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2011
Messages
89,156
Reaction score
31,469
Points
2,275
Location
Kansas City
No, you’re mad at fact checkers because they fact checked the former president.
The same fact checkers that labeled a cdc post FALSE?

You people are ridiculous.
 

Lesh

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2016
Messages
30,627
Reaction score
11,238
Points
1,410
Big fucking deal. Thew small businesses destroyed did more damage. No one in Congress was in any real danger. They were long gone before anyone got near them.
Not true and not relevant
 

JoeB131

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
136,753
Reaction score
17,004
Points
2,220
Location
Chicago, Chicago, that Toddling Town
Abortionists claim abortion clinics like PP provide all kinds of medical care. Where have you been?

And they have to fight and scrape for every penny to do that... and it still doesn't come close to meeting all the needs.

Bullshit. There are vaccination sites all over the place. This article and yourself are giving minorities a pass for not getting vaccinations. “Minorities NOT having access to vaccinations” is a crock of shit; an outright lie. This is a manufactured excuse so you people can put 100 percent of the blame on Conservatives not getting vaccines.

The truth is that people choosing not to get vaccinations goes way beyond those who are vocal about not getting vaccinations.

Vaccination sites? Really? HEre's the thing. When companies like Osco, CVS and Walgreens aren't setting up in the poorer areas, a vaccination site doesn't really make up for the slack.

We do a shitty job of providing basic medical services to people of color. Period. Full Stop. This crisis just put an underscore on it.

This has nothing to do with all the Bubba Rednecks refusing to get their shots because to do so would be denying the ONE TRUE GOD, Donald Trump.
 
OP
Lastamender

Lastamender

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
18,420
Reaction score
14,015
Points
2,400

LeftofLeft

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
15,464
Reaction score
6,917
Points
390
And they have to fight and scrape for every penny to do that... and it still doesn't come close to meeting all the needs.



Vaccination sites? Really? HEre's the thing. When companies like Osco, CVS and Walgreens aren't setting up in the poorer areas, a vaccination site doesn't really make up for the slack.

We do a shitty job of providing basic medical services to people of color. Period. Full Stop. This crisis just put an underscore on it.

This has nothing to do with all the Bubba Rednecks refusing to get their shots because to do so would be denying the ONE TRUE GOD, Donald Trump.
State local governments are setting up in poor neighborhoods. I see them in DC and Baltimore.
 
OP
Lastamender

Lastamender

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
18,420
Reaction score
14,015
Points
2,400

otto105

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2017
Messages
11,698
Reaction score
2,600
Points
170
There you go...dismissing the info because of the source. How typically liberal of you.

None of that matters at all. It merely supports my posit that ALL FACT CHECKERS ARE BIASED and present their subjective opinions and spins more often than facts.

Besides that, I didn't ask the numbnut to "watch Newsmax". I suggested she "watch the video" in the link to the Newsmax tweet. Newsmax had nothing to do with the making of the video.
newsmax? The actual news they present is only in their name, the rest is ass opinion.

And again, you hate fact checkers because fact checked you former ass president.
 

asaratis

Uppity Senior Citizen
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2009
Messages
18,545
Reaction score
7,456
Points
390
Location
Stockbridge
newsmax? The actual news they present is only in their name, the rest is ass opinion.

And again, you hate fact checkers because fact checked you former ass president.
You must have come in late, or haven't been reading the thread, troll.

Newsmax did not make the video that is shown in the link to their tweet. This has already been discussed in this thread.

Buzz off, gnat.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$201.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top