King Abdullah of Jordan calls DAIISH a terrorist org - not 'Islamic' terrorists

[NotfooledbyW]

Do you conservatives condemn King Abdullah as you constantly whine about Obama using the same terminology?


Jordan Launches New Airstrikes After Vowing Harsh War On ISIS
KARIN LAUB
AP Posted: 02/05/15 08:27

. On Wednesday, Abdullah warned that Jordan's response "will be harsh because this terrorist organization is not only fighting us, but also fighting Islam and its pure values." He pledged to hit the militants "hard in the very center of their strongholds."

Jordan Launches New Airstrikes After Vowing Harsh War On ISIS

He also said the terrorist organization are "fighting Islam and its pure values."


Would you condemn Obama for saying such a thing. "They are fighting Islam and its pure values?

If so why?

 

[Kosh]

The far left shows that the programmed narrative rules over reality.

 

[HenryBHough]

Obama?

Use the word "terrorist" in combination with ANY word other than "Domestic"?

 

[Moonglow]

They don't have Abdullah Derangement Syndrome...

 

[NotfooledbyW]

The far left shows that the programmed narrative rules over reality.

Define the programmed narrative and then explain what in the OP defies reality. Your response makes no sense whatsoever.

 

[Moonglow]

The far left shows that the programmed narrative rules over reality.

Define the programmed narrative and then explain what in the OP defies reality. Your response makes no sense whatsoever.

No chance in hell of that happening...

 

[eagle1462010]

The current administration goes out of its way for the PC culture............ISIS are RADICAL ISLAMIST................they are also TERRORIST................animals...................but numb nutted Politicians like Obama have to always say it in a different tone and PC'd down.

That is the problem. He is soooooooo worried he'll OFFEND SOMEONE..............say it like it is and stop playing the word games.

 

[deltex1]

Do you conservatives condemn King Abdullah as you constantly whine about Obama using the same terminology?


Jordan Launches New Airstrikes After Vowing Harsh War On ISIS
KARIN LAUB
AP Posted: 02/05/15 08:27

. On Wednesday, Abdullah warned that Jordan's response "will be harsh because this terrorist organization is not only fighting us, but also fighting Islam and its pure values." He pledged to hit the militants "hard in the very center of their strongholds."

Jordan Launches New Airstrikes After Vowing Harsh War On ISIS

He also said the terrorist organization are "fighting Islam and its pure values."


Would you condemn Obama for saying such a thing. "They are fighting Islam and its pure values?

If so why?

I wouldn't condemn him...I would question him. And I would ask him why Jordan is out front attacking while he is standing with his dick in his hand.

 

[Kondor3]

I question anybody who claims Islam has 'pure values'.

Or, more precisely, I would question what they believe in, and how they manifest, and whether that is pure in the main, or saturated with blood, or highly and atypically susceptible to being manipulated into rationalizing bloodshed, beyond the range of its modern contemporaries.

But, verbiage aside, I'll give the Jordanian king full props for going to war against ISIS... it's about time the damned Muslims stepped-up and did something about it, and its kindred.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

eagl 10694959

He is soooooooo worried he'll OFFEND SOMEONE..............say it like it is and stop playing the word games.

Obama would offend whom by calling DAIISH scum "Islamic terrorists" rather than calling them what they are - "terrorists" ? Who is the 'someone' you have in mind?

I would think the offended would be the DAIISH terrorist scum themselves for having the religion of Islam not connected to their terrorist murderous thieving rapist ways.

 

[eagle1462010]

eagl 10694959

He is soooooooo worried he'll OFFEND SOMEONE..............say it like it is and stop playing the word games.

Obama would offend whom by calling DAIISH scum "Islamic terrorists" rather than calling them what they are - "terrorists" ? Who is the 'someone' you have in mind?

I would think the offended would be the DAIISH terrorist scum themselves for having the religion of Islam not connected to their terrorist murderous thieving rapist ways.

Whatever...............he always plays the dang word games............trying to tone it down.......putting out memos for the new word games..............

You choose to kiss his ass and I don't.

 

[deltex1]

From an old friend of yours, Foo...


"When and if, and I believe it's only a matter of time, this country gets attacked by these jihadi f*cks, there will be no one to blame except Dumbama.

When you think about it, these jihadi f*cks were cunning and savvy as far as the timing of the attacks of 9.11. Bubba, who allowed this cancer to grow for years, only got partial blame. George W. Bush, who was President for a year or so, got the majority. They waited long enough to semi-excuse Bubba and blame Bush. It was a bit of genius, whether it was planned on not to allow just enough time for Americans to blame one or the other.

And what was Bush to do? Could he have come out right from the start and talked about this growing cancer? Could he have gotten the Patriot Act passed without the attack? Could he have invaded and went after the Taliban or Buffy bin Laden unless the attacks happened? Simply, no. But because it happened on his watch, he gets the majority of the blame.

He handled it pretty damn well, all things considered.

Dumbama is not going to get a semi-pass like Bubba did. Oh no, you foolish, conceited, condescending, holier-than-thou, smartest man in the room, snarky SOB...it will fall squarely on those narrow shoulders. And when history looks at you, even with all the other shit you pulled, the wildfire of islamic terrorism you allowed on your watch will be your legacy. You better hope and pray (to allah or whomever the f*ck you pray to (maybe yourself)), that our intelligence service, the FBI and other law enforcement bail you out by doing a supremely good job in preventing attacks.

Oh yeah, f*ck you!"

 

[NotfooledbyW]

I wouldn't condemn him...I would question him. And I would ask him why Jordan is out front attacking while he is standing with his dick in his hand.

I'd think you would have read Stars and Stripes but your obsession with President Obama's manhood must have blurred your vision:

Jordan launches new airstrikesafter vowing harsh war on ...Jordan launches new airstrikes after vowing harsh war on Islamic State. ...

Interesting paragraph;

"The American military supported the latest Jordanian strike with 21 aircraft, according to the U.S. defense official. American F-22 and F-16CJs fighter jets escorted the Jordanian planes to the target area. U.S. aerial refueling, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, and personnel recovery assets were also dedicated to the mission."


Gee, Delbert don't ya think since it was a Jordanian pilot burned alive by the DAIISH terrorist scum that his Muslim brothers in arms were the ones to deliver death to the terrorist scum that killed their fellow fighter pilot.

And your smarmy reference to the suppprt mission that out brave American pilots carried out as something akin with "dick in hand" cowardice by our president is repugnant even by the low standards you have set for yourself.

 

[eagle1462010]

I wouldn't condemn him...I would question him. And I would ask him why Jordan is out front attacking while he is standing with his dick in his hand.

I'd think you would have read Stars and Stripes but your obsession with President Obama's manhood must have blurred your vision:

Jordan launches new airstrikesafter vowing harsh war on ...Jordan launches new airstrikes after vowing harsh war on Islamic State. ...

Interesting paragraph;

"The American military supported the latest Jordanian strike with 21 aircraft, according to the U.S. defense official. American F-22 and F-16CJs fighter jets escorted the Jordanian planes to the target area. U.S. aerial refueling, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, and personnel recovery assets were also dedicated to the mission."


Gee, Delbert don't ya think since it was a Jordanian pilot burned alive by the DAIISH terrorist scum that his Muslim brothers in arms were the ones to deliver death to the terrorist scum that killed their fellow fighter pilot.

And your smarmy reference to the suppprt mission that out brave American pilots carried out as something akin with "dick in hand" cowardice by our president is repugnant even by the low standards you have set for yourself.

You are under the impression that the military actually respects Obama................

Salute the rank and not the person..................was always the saying.

 

[deltex1]

I wouldn't condemn him...I would question him. And I would ask him why Jordan is out front attacking while he is standing with his dick in his hand.

I'd think you would have read Stars and Stripes but your obsession with President Obama's manhood must have blurred your vision:

Jordan launches new airstrikesafter vowing harsh war on ...Jordan launches new airstrikes after vowing harsh war on Islamic State. ...

Interesting paragraph;

"The American military supported the latest Jordanian strike with 21 aircraft, according to the U.S. defense official. American F-22 and F-16CJs fighter jets escorted the Jordanian planes to the target area. U.S. aerial refueling, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, and personnel recovery assets were also dedicated to the mission."


Gee, Delbert don't ya think since it was a Jordanian pilot burned alive by the DAIISH terrorist scum that his Muslim brothers in arms were the ones to deliver death to the terrorist scum that killed their fellow fighter pilot.

And your smarmy reference to the suppprt mission that out brave American pilots carried out as something akin with "dick in hand" cowardice by our president is repugnant even by the low standards you have set for yourself.

Where was the support mission when the Jordanian pilot was shot down Foo...a day late and an immolation short...now we are stepping it up to help the Jordanians who are pissed and taking action...while your hero mumbles about degrading the "local thugs".

 

[NotfooledbyW]

10695184

"When and if, and I believe it's only a matter of time, this country gets attacked by these jihadi f*cks, there will be no one to blame except Dumbama.

Explain why no one is to blame but Obama? I blamed the terrorists for the September 11 2001 attack. I never blamed Bush for that and just like 9 of 10 Americans I supported sending US troops into Afghanistan to remove the Taliban from power.

I still support that mission even after Bush neglected that mission to invade Iraq.

Do you want thousands of Americans to be dying and getting injured in the middle of a Shiite vs Sunni civil war since you are so impressed now with the way Bush did that to tens of thousands of US troops in Iraq. I want to see Arab men from the traumatized areas 1000 to 1 American on the ground and on the front lines killing DAIISH terrorist scum.

 

[SAYIT]

King Abdullah of Jordan calls DAIISH a terrorist org - not 'Islamic' terrorists.

Well, he got that half right.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

..now we are stepping it up to help the Jordanians who are pissed and taking action

a few posts ago you wanted to ask Obama "why Jordan is out front attacking while he is standing with his dick in his hand." and now you are claiming we are stepping it up. We're you lying in the earlier post or just ignorant of what is going on in the war zone while pretending you know it all.

Just like your ignorance about Kobane.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Well, he got that half right.

What is half wrong with King Abdullah's statement?

 

[eagle1462010]

Well, he got that half right.

What is half wrong with King Abdullah's statement?

The only statement I care about is the estimated 55 ISIS killed via their AIRSTRIKES................

The rest is PC BS.