Kellogg says it will replace striking workers after contract rejection

Who decides "adequate compensation." Literally anybody can work in a Kellogg's factory. It requires no skill or education to work on an assembly line.

Of course it does and that is not the only thing one gets compensated for.
There are tens of millions of people out there who can do that job, as opposed to someone who can do professional plumbing, electrical work, be an airline pilot, work in IT, etc. How much should a job, with a practically unlimited labor pool, pay?

If people want to earn a better living they should learn a marketable skill worth more.

If there was tens of millions we wouldn't be importing thousands and there wouldn't be the complaints from business about not being able to hire enough people.
 
If there was tens of millions we wouldn't be importing thousands and there wouldn't be the complaints from business about not being able to hire enough people.

Do away with welfare spending, with the exception of people who literally can't take care of themselves, and I'll bet those jobs fill up awfully quick.
 
Do away with welfare spending, with the exception of people who literally can't take care of themselves, and I'll bet those jobs fill up awfully quick.

There are many who work and still qualify for public assistance. pay a decent wage and far fewer do.
 
Unions can cause the demise of the work forces they “represent.”

It’s certainly true that companies have an obligation to negotiate in good faith with the unions. But that obligation isn’t a one way street. Unions also must negotiate in good faith.

Outside arbitrators can sometimes help the parties reach a middle ground. But nobody can help if one side is simply being stubbornly irrational.
 

Forum List

Back
Top