Karl Rove: The Election Will Not be Overturned

Dispute the fact that employment, including White Collar, was at an all time high since Trumpā€™s tax cut took effect.
You canā€™t.

It was pretty high before he gave money to Billionaires.

The thing about the Pre-Covid Unemployment rate is that the trend started in 2011, when the first Baby Boomers started retiring and there weren't enough Gen Xers to replace them. We'd have had a labor shortage regardless.

Well, Trump fixed that!!! He killed hundreds of thousands of businesses, creating all sorts of available labor. What a guy!!!
 
Dispute the fact that employment, including White Collar, was at an all time high since Trumpā€™s tax cut took effect.
You canā€™t.

It was pretty high before he gave money to Billionaires.

The thing about the Pre-Covid Unemployment rate is that the trend started in 2011, when the first Baby Boomers started retiring and there weren't enough Gen Xers to replace them. We'd have had a labor shortage regardless.

Well, Trump fixed that!!! He killed hundreds of thousands of businesses, creating all sorts of available labor. What a guy!!!
To be truthful, Chicago is one of the most well known shitholes in the world.
No one in their right mind would invest a penny, unless it's for bullet proof glass, so I suppose Chicago was not benefiting from Trump's policies as much as the rest of the US.
 
Recounts won't find enough ballots and the legal challenges will fail.

Everyone outside the cult - including Republicans feeding the fever swamp of conspiracy theories - know this.
Mr. Trump is now pursuing legal challenges in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona and Nevada, and there will be an automatic recount in Georgia, given Mr. Bidenā€™s 0.29-point lead there. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is correct that Mr. Trump is ā€œ100% within his rightsā€ to go to court over concerns about fraud and transparency. But the presidentā€™s efforts are unlikely to move a single state from Mr. Bidenā€™s column, and certainly theyā€™re not enough to change the final outcome.​
There are only three statewide contests in the past half-century in which recounts changed the outcome: the 1974 New Hampshire Senate race, the 2004 Washington governorā€™s contest, and the 2008 Minnesota Senate election. The candidates in these races were separated, respectively, by 355, 261 and 215 votes after Election Day.​
These margins arenā€™t much like todayā€™s. Mr. Biden led Wednesday in Wisconsin by 20,540 votes, Pennsylvania by 49,064, Michigan by 146,123, Arizona by 12,614, Nevada by 36,870 and Georgia by 14,108.​
To win, Mr. Trump must prove systemic fraud, with illegal votes in the tens of thousands. There is no evidence of that so far.​

Cool.

I am sure your new hero, Karl Rove won't mind if we do a quick 30-day audit, would he? Just to be sure?
Karl Rove is one of your own ā€“ a fellow rightist and conservative ideologue.

One of your own is telling you there was no ā€˜fraudā€™; one of your own is telling you Biden will be the next president in 2021.
 
To be truthful, Chicago is one of the most well known shitholes in the world.
No one in their right mind would invest a penny, unless it's for bullet proof glass, so I suppose Chicago was not benefiting from Trump's policies as much as the rest of the US.

Actually, Chicago does fine compared to the Rust Belt states that voted for Trump in 2016 but went back to Biden in 2020.
 
Recounts won't find enough ballots and the legal challenges will fail.

Everyone outside the cult - including Republicans feeding the fever swamp of conspiracy theories - know this.
Mr. Trump is now pursuing legal challenges in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona and Nevada, and there will be an automatic recount in Georgia, given Mr. Bidenā€™s 0.29-point lead there. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is correct that Mr. Trump is ā€œ100% within his rightsā€ to go to court over concerns about fraud and transparency. But the presidentā€™s efforts are unlikely to move a single state from Mr. Bidenā€™s column, and certainly theyā€™re not enough to change the final outcome.​
There are only three statewide contests in the past half-century in which recounts changed the outcome: the 1974 New Hampshire Senate race, the 2004 Washington governorā€™s contest, and the 2008 Minnesota Senate election. The candidates in these races were separated, respectively, by 355, 261 and 215 votes after Election Day.​
These margins arenā€™t much like todayā€™s. Mr. Biden led Wednesday in Wisconsin by 20,540 votes, Pennsylvania by 49,064, Michigan by 146,123, Arizona by 12,614, Nevada by 36,870 and Georgia by 14,108.​
To win, Mr. Trump must prove systemic fraud, with illegal votes in the tens of thousands. There is no evidence of that so far.​

Cool.

I am sure your new hero, Karl Rove won't mind if we do a quick 30-day audit, would he? Just to be sure?

Do your audit, recount and when it is done I believe Rove is correct and Trump will not be President on January 21st 2021...

One thing should be noted Trump legal did get a small victory yesterday which I agree with the court ruling and any Ballots with signature issues must have been corrected by November 9th and not the 12th and any ballots counted after November 9th should be tossed that had signature issues.

Also if no name is on the envelope then they should have been rejected which was required and was not change by the State Legislature and Signed by the Governor...

Fair is Fair and yet if you enforce those two rules the fact remains Trump will not be President...
 
To be truthful, Chicago is one of the most well known shitholes in the world.
No one in their right mind would invest a penny, unless it's for bullet proof glass, so I suppose Chicago was not benefiting from Trump's policies as much as the rest of the US.

Actually, Chicago does fine compared to the Rust Belt states that voted for Trump in 2016 but went back to Biden in 2020.
Chicago at least has an evil Stock Exchange runs by evil White men.
The Rust Belt should have known better than to think both parties wouldnā€™t sell them out.
 
Recounts won't find enough ballots and the legal challenges will fail.

Everyone outside the cult - including Republicans feeding the fever swamp of conspiracy theories - know this.
Mr. Trump is now pursuing legal challenges in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona and Nevada, and there will be an automatic recount in Georgia, given Mr. Bidenā€™s 0.29-point lead there. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is correct that Mr. Trump is ā€œ100% within his rightsā€ to go to court over concerns about fraud and transparency. But the presidentā€™s efforts are unlikely to move a single state from Mr. Bidenā€™s column, and certainly theyā€™re not enough to change the final outcome.​
There are only three statewide contests in the past half-century in which recounts changed the outcome: the 1974 New Hampshire Senate race, the 2004 Washington governorā€™s contest, and the 2008 Minnesota Senate election. The candidates in these races were separated, respectively, by 355, 261 and 215 votes after Election Day.​
These margins arenā€™t much like todayā€™s. Mr. Biden led Wednesday in Wisconsin by 20,540 votes, Pennsylvania by 49,064, Michigan by 146,123, Arizona by 12,614, Nevada by 36,870 and Georgia by 14,108.​
To win, Mr. Trump must prove systemic fraud, with illegal votes in the tens of thousands. There is no evidence of that so far.​

/ā€”ā€”/ Oh, thatā€™s just Carl trying to be relevant. Pay no mind.
 
Recounts won't find enough ballots and the legal challenges will fail.

Everyone outside the cult - including Republicans feeding the fever swamp of conspiracy theories - know this.
Mr. Trump is now pursuing legal challenges in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona and Nevada, and there will be an automatic recount in Georgia, given Mr. Bidenā€™s 0.29-point lead there. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is correct that Mr. Trump is ā€œ100% within his rightsā€ to go to court over concerns about fraud and transparency. But the presidentā€™s efforts are unlikely to move a single state from Mr. Bidenā€™s column, and certainly theyā€™re not enough to change the final outcome.​
There are only three statewide contests in the past half-century in which recounts changed the outcome: the 1974 New Hampshire Senate race, the 2004 Washington governorā€™s contest, and the 2008 Minnesota Senate election. The candidates in these races were separated, respectively, by 355, 261 and 215 votes after Election Day.​
These margins arenā€™t much like todayā€™s. Mr. Biden led Wednesday in Wisconsin by 20,540 votes, Pennsylvania by 49,064, Michigan by 146,123, Arizona by 12,614, Nevada by 36,870 and Georgia by 14,108.​
To win, Mr. Trump must prove systemic fraud, with illegal votes in the tens of thousands. There is no evidence of that so far.​

Cool.

I am sure your new hero, Karl Rove won't mind if we do a quick 30-day audit, would he? Just to be sure?

Do your audit, recount and when it is done I believe Rove is correct and Trump will not be President on January 21st 2021...

One thing should be noted Trump legal did get a small victory yesterday which I agree with the court ruling and any Ballots with signature issues must have been corrected by November 9th and not the 12th and any ballots counted after November 9th should be tossed that had signature issues.

Also if no name is on the envelope then they should have been rejected which was required and was not change by the State Legislature and Signed by the Governor...

Fair is Fair and yet if you enforce those two rules the fact remains Trump will not be President...
/ā€”ā€”/ Thatā€™s just your wishful thinking, Skippy.
 
Recounts won't find enough ballots and the legal challenges will fail.

Everyone outside the cult - including Republicans feeding the fever swamp of conspiracy theories - know this.
Mr. Trump is now pursuing legal challenges in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona and Nevada, and there will be an automatic recount in Georgia, given Mr. Bidenā€™s 0.29-point lead there. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is correct that Mr. Trump is ā€œ100% within his rightsā€ to go to court over concerns about fraud and transparency. But the presidentā€™s efforts are unlikely to move a single state from Mr. Bidenā€™s column, and certainly theyā€™re not enough to change the final outcome.​
There are only three statewide contests in the past half-century in which recounts changed the outcome: the 1974 New Hampshire Senate race, the 2004 Washington governorā€™s contest, and the 2008 Minnesota Senate election. The candidates in these races were separated, respectively, by 355, 261 and 215 votes after Election Day.​
These margins arenā€™t much like todayā€™s. Mr. Biden led Wednesday in Wisconsin by 20,540 votes, Pennsylvania by 49,064, Michigan by 146,123, Arizona by 12,614, Nevada by 36,870 and Georgia by 14,108.​
To win, Mr. Trump must prove systemic fraud, with illegal votes in the tens of thousands. There is no evidence of that so far.​

Actually there is evidence of this.......the Dominion 5.5 election system is known to be able to defraud voters.

And fyi, there is a difference between Rove saying UNLIKELY and you claiming that he said that the election will not be overturned.
 
ā€œKarl Rove: The Election Will Not be Overturnedā€

Even Satanā€™s little helper knows there was no fraud, that the election was fair, and that Trump was voted out of office.
You're that ignorant of Karl Rove.
He would spit on you if you were starving.
Which is exactly what the Orange Buffoon would do to his Deplorable supporters yet they kiss his feet every day.
 
ā€œKarl Rove: The Election Will Not be Overturnedā€

Even Satanā€™s little helper knows there was no fraud, that the election was fair, and that Trump was voted out of office.
You're that ignorant of Karl Rove.
He would spit on you if you were starving.
Which is exactly what the Orange Buffoon would do to his Deplorable supporters yet they kiss his feet every day.
Youā€™re not a moron; youā€™re ignorant.
The only things you know about Trump come from the anti-US media.
 
Just FYI conservatives.....the election results aren't being overturned.

You're being played so you'll fork up donations to pay off Trump's failure debt that estimates put at about a billion dollars.
 
Youā€™re not a moron; youā€™re ignorant.
The only things you know about Trump come from the anti-US media.

Actually, most of what I know from Trump is from his own mouth.
I know a lot about Rove. Unless you know him personally, then I stand corrected.
The fact that you disregard the subjective nature of how the media attacked Trump first by literally using foul language belies your lack of integrity.
 
Recounts won't find enough ballots and the legal challenges will fail.

Everyone outside the cult - including Republicans feeding the fever swamp of conspiracy theories - know this.
Mr. Trump is now pursuing legal challenges in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona and Nevada, and there will be an automatic recount in Georgia, given Mr. Bidenā€™s 0.29-point lead there. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is correct that Mr. Trump is ā€œ100% within his rightsā€ to go to court over concerns about fraud and transparency. But the presidentā€™s efforts are unlikely to move a single state from Mr. Bidenā€™s column, and certainly theyā€™re not enough to change the final outcome.​
There are only three statewide contests in the past half-century in which recounts changed the outcome: the 1974 New Hampshire Senate race, the 2004 Washington governorā€™s contest, and the 2008 Minnesota Senate election. The candidates in these races were separated, respectively, by 355, 261 and 215 votes after Election Day.​
These margins arenā€™t much like todayā€™s. Mr. Biden led Wednesday in Wisconsin by 20,540 votes, Pennsylvania by 49,064, Michigan by 146,123, Arizona by 12,614, Nevada by 36,870 and Georgia by 14,108.​
To win, Mr. Trump must prove systemic fraud, with illegal votes in the tens of thousands. There is no evidence of that so far.​

There isnā€™t anything to ā€œoverturnā€. Nothing has even been certified yet.
 
The fact that you disregard the subjective nature of how the media attacked Trump first by literally using foul language belies your lack of integrity.

I'll get down to Trump's level. "He started it"

When he says things like he did about McCain " : "I like people who weren't captured." That is all I need to know about the man. In fact, if that was the only dumb thing he said (but it's not even 1/10th of 1 per cent of the stupid shit he has said and tweeted over the past 4 years) over the past four years, then he deserves every barb and brick bat that has come his way.
 
There isnā€™t anything to ā€œoverturnā€. Nothing has even been certified yet.
You can be in denial of tonight because the sun has not yet set, but there is an ineluctable certitude that only time confirms.

Cry Baby Don will persist in pissing and moaning without any credible evidence, clinging to the lie that his defeat was illegitimate in some inexplicable fashion, thus befouling the U.S. and the democratic process as a sacrifice to mega-ego-gratification.

While constantly kvetching about his successor, he will pander to his cult of lickspittles by telling them that he will be the GOP presidential nominee in 2024, thus paralyzing the party's presidential prospects.

That putrid pachyderm in the parlor will further alienate traditional, conservative Republicans from the RINOs of Trumpery, and effectively frustrate GOP hopefuls' ambitions, while thwarting the Party's escape from its sordid Trumpy past.

Screen Shot 2020-11-17 at 9.30.44 AM.png

"What are we waiting for?"
"We're waiting for him to run again."
"Do you really think he'll run again?"
"Of course he'll run again -

There's 2024, 2028, 2032,
2036, 2040 ..."
 

Forum List

Back
Top