Kansas GOP Defeats The CoronaVirus and The Demonic DemoRats

[August West]

Social distancing laws are selectively applied. They are NOT applied to the homeless. They are not applied to riding the subway. Why? Because it's more fun to threaten Christians.

WTF would you know about a Christian, a real Christian, not one of the fakes.

 

[Flopper]

Kansas GOP Overturns Large-Gathering Ban on Worst Day of the State’s Outbreak

Lawmakers overturned the governor’s executive order banning religious groups of more than ten — though many churches have voluntarily moved online.

nymag.com

"Republican lawmakers overturned the executive order, claiming that it impedes on religious rights — even though many churches canceled Easter services voluntarily or intend to hold them online. “It appears to be out of line, extreme and clearly in violation, a blatant violation, of our fundamental rights,” said Senate president Susan Wagle."

Basically this devil-worshiping Democrat governor tried to use the day of the largest increase in coronavirus cases to date -- as a time to fearmonger and powergrab by issuing a ban on large gatherings....Obviously it was meant to attack Christians due to Easter coming up this weekend....Luckily the republicans by the force of Jesus, stopped her...Trump may not have been able to end all of this virus panic by Easter -- but at least the state of Kansas was able to stand up for God and defeat this virus hoax...

I believe the members of these churches have the legal right to assemble for worship even in an epidemic. It's pretty clear in the constitution. However to do so, brings to question the member's Christian values. Do they really think Christ would approve of them putting their family, friends, and neighbors in danger so they could physically sit in church rather than listen or view the service over the Internet. IMHO, this is not really about worshiping God but rather a show of contempt and defiance aimed at governmental authority.

Whether or not Christ would approve is not a question that government gets to answer. It's not a question that you can answer for someone else.

It's a question that these people should ask, if they really are Christians but won't because they don't care. It's all about thumbing their nose at the government and exercising their constitutional right regardless who or how many people's lives are put in danger.

The shelter in place has gone on long enough

That depends on your point of view
If you've been off work without pay for a few weeks, and need money to pay the rent and buy groceries, then ending restrictions and getting back to work has to be your priority.

If you work in a hospital and had to deal with patients dying for lack of care, and co-workers falling ill due to lack of PPEs, then that decision depends on how prepared the medical community is to deal with new infections that will come from removing restrictions.

If you're a scientist and you understand the restrictions are needed until the epidemic is under control, then it's obvious the restriction need to be in place longer.

It appears that for some of us the epidemic will never be satisfactorily under control

people will continue to die from the chinese disease no matter how long the quarantine continues

but if we destroy the economy for years to come where will people get money to live on?

Like all epidemics, the cornavirus epidemic will end but It will probably last for years. We know how to end it now but not without destroying the economy. That means we have to learn how to live with it without it killing tens of millions of people and still allowing the economy to function in a somewhat normal manner. Determining the balance between economic growth and protecting lives is going to be difficult and very contentious since there is no way of determining that balance except by trial and error.

 

[Mac-7]

Kansas GOP Overturns Large-Gathering Ban on Worst Day of the State’s Outbreak

Lawmakers overturned the governor’s executive order banning religious groups of more than ten — though many churches have voluntarily moved online.

nymag.com

"Republican lawmakers overturned the executive order, claiming that it impedes on religious rights — even though many churches canceled Easter services voluntarily or intend to hold them online. “It appears to be out of line, extreme and clearly in violation, a blatant violation, of our fundamental rights,” said Senate president Susan Wagle."

Basically this devil-worshiping Democrat governor tried to use the day of the largest increase in coronavirus cases to date -- as a time to fearmonger and powergrab by issuing a ban on large gatherings....Obviously it was meant to attack Christians due to Easter coming up this weekend....Luckily the republicans by the force of Jesus, stopped her...Trump may not have been able to end all of this virus panic by Easter -- but at least the state of Kansas was able to stand up for God and defeat this virus hoax...

I believe the members of these churches have the legal right to assemble for worship even in an epidemic. It's pretty clear in the constitution. However to do so, brings to question the member's Christian values. Do they really think Christ would approve of them putting their family, friends, and neighbors in danger so they could physically sit in church rather than listen or view the service over the Internet. IMHO, this is not really about worshiping God but rather a show of contempt and defiance aimed at governmental authority.

Whether or not Christ would approve is not a question that government gets to answer. It's not a question that you can answer for someone else.

It's a question that these people should ask, if they really are Christians but won't because they don't care. It's all about thumbing their nose at the government and exercising their constitutional right regardless who or how many people's lives are put in danger.

The shelter in place has gone on long enough

That depends on your point of view
If you've been off work without pay for a few weeks, and need money to pay the rent and buy groceries, then ending restrictions and getting back to work has to be your priority.

If you work in a hospital and had to deal with patients dying for lack of care, and co-workers falling ill due to lack of PPEs, then that decision depends on how prepared the medical community is to deal with new infections that will come from removing restrictions.

If you're a scientist and you understand the restrictions are needed until the epidemic is under control, then it's obvious the restriction need to be in place longer.

It appears that for some of us the epidemic will never be satisfactorily under control

people will continue to die from the chinese disease no matter how long the quarantine continues

but if we destroy the economy for years to come where will people get money to live on?

Like all epidemics, the cornavirus epidemic will end but It will probably last for years. We know how to end it now but not without destroying the economy. That means we have to learn how to live with it without it killing tens of millions of people and still allowing the economy to function in a somewhat normal manner. Determining the balance between economic growth and protecting lives is going to be difficult and very contentious since there is no way of determining that balance except by trial and error.

In this case liberals are trying to score a twofer

damage the economy to hurt trump politically

and damage the economy to make more Americans dependent on the government

they will resist all efforts to end shelter in place

 

[Flopper]

Kansas GOP Overturns Large-Gathering Ban on Worst Day of the State’s Outbreak

Lawmakers overturned the governor’s executive order banning religious groups of more than ten — though many churches have voluntarily moved online.

nymag.com

"Republican lawmakers overturned the executive order, claiming that it impedes on religious rights — even though many churches canceled Easter services voluntarily or intend to hold them online. “It appears to be out of line, extreme and clearly in violation, a blatant violation, of our fundamental rights,” said Senate president Susan Wagle."

Basically this devil-worshiping Democrat governor tried to use the day of the largest increase in coronavirus cases to date -- as a time to fearmonger and powergrab by issuing a ban on large gatherings....Obviously it was meant to attack Christians due to Easter coming up this weekend....Luckily the republicans by the force of Jesus, stopped her...Trump may not have been able to end all of this virus panic by Easter -- but at least the state of Kansas was able to stand up for God and defeat this virus hoax...

I believe the members of these churches have the legal right to assemble for worship even in an epidemic. It's pretty clear in the constitution. However to do so, brings to question the member's Christian values. Do they really think Christ would approve of them putting their family, friends, and neighbors in danger so they could physically sit in church rather than listen or view the service over the Internet. IMHO, this is not really about worshiping God but rather a show of contempt and defiance aimed at governmental authority.

Whether or not Christ would approve is not a question that government gets to answer. It's not a question that you can answer for someone else.

It's a question that these people should ask, if they really are Christians but won't because they don't care. It's all about thumbing their nose at the government and exercising their constitutional right regardless who or how many people's lives are put in danger.

The shelter in place has gone on long enough

That depends on your point of view
If you've been off work without pay for a few weeks, and need money to pay the rent and buy groceries, then ending restrictions and getting back to work has to be your priority.

If you work in a hospital and had to deal with patients dying for lack of care, and co-workers falling ill due to lack of PPEs, then that decision depends on how prepared the medical community is to deal with new infections that will come from removing restrictions.

If you're a scientist and you understand the restrictions are needed until the epidemic is under control, then it's obvious the restriction need to be in place longer.

It appears that for some of us the epidemic will never be satisfactorily under control

people will continue to die from the chinese disease no matter how long the quarantine continues

but if we destroy the economy for years to come where will people get money to live on?

Like all epidemics, the cornavirus epidemic will end but It will probably last for years. We know how to end it now but not without destroying the economy. That means we have to learn how to live with it without it killing tens of millions of people and still allowing the economy to function in a somewhat normal manner. Determining the balance between economic growth and protecting lives is going to be difficult and very contentious since there is no way of determining that balance except by trial and error.

In this case liberals are trying to score a twofer

damage the economy to hurt trump politically

and damage the economy to make more Americans dependent on the government

they will resist all efforts to end shelter in place

Hate to destroy your stereotype of the Left, but a collapsing economy hurts those on the Left just as much as those on the Right, loss jobs, income, and savings.

 

[Mac-7]

but a collapsing economy hurts those on the Left just as much as those on the Right, loss jobs, income, and savings.

It only hurts the little people

but it helps far left democrats in elected office

because a bad economy and people in pain creates opportunity for bigger government

 

[Flopper]

but a collapsing economy hurts those on the Left just as much as those on the Right, loss jobs, income, and savings.

It only hurts the little people

but it helps far left democrats in elected office

because a bad economy and people in pain creates opportunity for bigger government

In a time of economic crisis both parties do exactly the same thing. They put hundreds of billions of dollars in the hands of the public and businesses. This is exactly what is happening now and the support is in both parties. I don't see it helping are hurting either party.

 

[Mac-7]

but a collapsing economy hurts those on the Left just as much as those on the Right, loss jobs, income, and savings.

It only hurts the little people

but it helps far left democrats in elected office

because a bad economy and people in pain creates opportunity for bigger government

In a time of economic crisis both parties do exactly the same thing. They put hundreds of billions of dollars in the hands of the public and businesses. This is exactly what is happening now and the support is in both parties. I don't see it helping are hurting either party.

It hurts people like us that believe in limited government

you do believe in limited government, dont you?

 

[Flopper]

but a collapsing economy hurts those on the Left just as much as those on the Right, loss jobs, income, and savings.

It only hurts the little people

but it helps far left democrats in elected office

because a bad economy and people in pain creates opportunity for bigger government

In a time of economic crisis both parties do exactly the same thing. They put hundreds of billions of dollars in the hands of the public and businesses. This is exactly what is happening now and the support is in both parties. I don't see it helping are hurting either party.

It hurts people like us that believe in limited government

you do believe in limited government, dont you?

Everyone believes in limited government. The debate is about how limited.

 

[Mac-7]

but a collapsing economy hurts those on the Left just as much as those on the Right, loss jobs, income, and savings.

It only hurts the little people

but it helps far left democrats in elected office

because a bad economy and people in pain creates opportunity for bigger government

In a time of economic crisis both parties do exactly the same thing. They put hundreds of billions of dollars in the hands of the public and businesses. This is exactly what is happening now and the support is in both parties. I don't see it helping are hurting either party.

It hurts people like us that believe in limited government

you do believe in limited government, dont you?

Everyone believes in limited government. The debate is about how limited.

No

communists, socialists and their kissin cousins the progressives believe that government is the answer to all problems