Kamala Harris Sent Packing- CALI 10-Day Gun Waiting Period Likely Unconstitututional

[Geaux4it]

ANother stupid anti-gun law in California is ruled Unconstitutional. Currently, law abiding gun owners have to wait 10 days before taking custody of a purchased firearm. It is intended as a 'cooling off' period. The buyer is cleared through NICS while still in the store, but has to come back after 10 days once he's 'cooled down'.

Liberal, communist stupidity at its best. Ig a buyer wanted to harm someone the 10 day wait on anything other than a first purchase, makes the intent moot. They could just go home and use one of their other guns to commit crimes if desired. So the 10 day wait is nothing but a road block to the execution of your second amendment rights. Slowly but surely, the courts are going to weed out the communist, socialist, anti-gun loon attacks on freedom loving Americans

So far, the lower court agrees.

-Geaux

*BREAKING* Federal Judge: California's 10-Day Gun Waiting Period Likely Unconstitutional

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Monday, December 9, 2013

Federal Judge Says California Attorney General Kamala Harris Wrong on Gun Control Laws

Court denies Harris’ arguments and agrees with gun rights group The Calguns Foundation, says state’s firearm waiting period laws fail to meet Constitutional muster

ROSEVILLE, CA -- In a rejection of California Attorney General Kamala Harris’ stance on the rights of law-abiding gun owners, Senior Federal District Court Judge Anthony W. Ishii denied Harris’ motion for summary judgement today in a federal civil rights lawsuit filed by The Calguns Foundation, indicating that California’s 10-day “waiting period” gun laws are likely unconstitutional.

“The fact that a federal judge saw these laws for what they are -- baseless restraints on the exercise of a fundamental civil right -- is monumental,” explained Gene Hoffman, Chairman of The Calguns Foundation. “California’s waiting period laws for those who own guns is not Constitutional and this order really underlines the point.”

In his order, Judge Ishii said that Harris has “not presented sufficient evidence to show that the [10-day waiting period laws] passes either intermediate or strict scrutiny.”

About the laws being challenged in the case, named plaintiff Jeff Silvester of Hanford, California, said, “I have a license to carry a loaded firearm across the State.It is ridiculous that I have to wait another 10 days to pick up a new firearm when I’m standing there in the gun store lawfully carrying one the whole time.”

 

[sealybobo]

ANother stupid anti-gun law in California is ruled Unconstitutional. Currently, law abiding gun owners have to wait 10 days before taking custody of a purchased firearm. It is intended as a 'cooling off' period. The buyer is cleared through NICS while still in the store, but has to come back after 10 days once he's 'cooled down'.

Liberal, communist stupidity at its best. Ig a buyer wanted to harm someone the 10 day wait on anything other than a first purchase, makes the intent moot. They could just go home and use one of their other guns to commit crimes if desired. So the 10 day wait is nothing but a road block to the execution of your second amendment rights. Slowly but surely, the courts are going to weed out the communist, socialist, anti-gun loon attacks on freedom loving Americans

So far, the lower court agrees.

-Geaux

*BREAKING* Federal Judge: California's 10-Day Gun Waiting Period Likely Unconstitutional

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Monday, December 9, 2013

Federal Judge Says California Attorney General Kamala Harris Wrong on Gun Control Laws

Court denies Harris’ arguments and agrees with gun rights group The Calguns Foundation, says state’s firearm waiting period laws fail to meet Constitutional muster

ROSEVILLE, CA -- In a rejection of California Attorney General Kamala Harris’ stance on the rights of law-abiding gun owners, Senior Federal District Court Judge Anthony W. Ishii denied Harris’ motion for summary judgement today in a federal civil rights lawsuit filed by The Calguns Foundation, indicating that California’s 10-day “waiting period” gun laws are likely unconstitutional.

“The fact that a federal judge saw these laws for what they are -- baseless restraints on the exercise of a fundamental civil right -- is monumental,” explained Gene Hoffman, Chairman of The Calguns Foundation. “California’s waiting period laws for those who own guns is not Constitutional and this order really underlines the point.”

In his order, Judge Ishii said that Harris has “not presented sufficient evidence to show that the [10-day waiting period laws] passes either intermediate or strict scrutiny.”

About the laws being challenged in the case, named plaintiff Jeff Silvester of Hanford, California, said, “I have a license to carry a loaded firearm across the State.It is ridiculous that I have to wait another 10 days to pick up a new firearm when I’m standing there in the gun store lawfully carrying one the whole time.”

You are the first person to start a thread on our next POTUS.

And the worst thing Republicans are saying about her is she slept her way to the top. Women will get pissed hearing Republicans bash her for this. Double standard. I hope they do it. She is going to win!!

 

[Harry Dresden]

ANother stupid anti-gun law in California is ruled Unconstitutional. Currently, law abiding gun owners have to wait 10 days before taking custody of a purchased firearm. It is intended as a 'cooling off' period. The buyer is cleared through NICS while still in the store, but has to come back after 10 days once he's 'cooled down'.

Liberal, communist stupidity at its best. Ig a buyer wanted to harm someone the 10 day wait on anything other than a first purchase, makes the intent moot. They could just go home and use one of their other guns to commit crimes if desired. So the 10 day wait is nothing but a road block to the execution of your second amendment rights. Slowly but surely, the courts are going to weed out the communist, socialist, anti-gun loon attacks on freedom loving Americans

So far, the lower court agrees.

-Geaux

*BREAKING* Federal Judge: California's 10-Day Gun Waiting Period Likely Unconstitutional

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Monday, December 9, 2013

Federal Judge Says California Attorney General Kamala Harris Wrong on Gun Control Laws

Court denies Harris’ arguments and agrees with gun rights group The Calguns Foundation, says state’s firearm waiting period laws fail to meet Constitutional muster

ROSEVILLE, CA -- In a rejection of California Attorney General Kamala Harris’ stance on the rights of law-abiding gun owners, Senior Federal District Court Judge Anthony W. Ishii denied Harris’ motion for summary judgement today in a federal civil rights lawsuit filed by The Calguns Foundation, indicating that California’s 10-day “waiting period” gun laws are likely unconstitutional.

“The fact that a federal judge saw these laws for what they are -- baseless restraints on the exercise of a fundamental civil right -- is monumental,” explained Gene Hoffman, Chairman of The Calguns Foundation. “California’s waiting period laws for those who own guns is not Constitutional and this order really underlines the point.”

In his order, Judge Ishii said that Harris has “not presented sufficient evidence to show that the [10-day waiting period laws] passes either intermediate or strict scrutiny.”

About the laws being challenged in the case, named plaintiff Jeff Silvester of Hanford, California, said, “I have a license to carry a loaded firearm across the State.It is ridiculous that I have to wait another 10 days to pick up a new firearm when I’m standing there in the gun store lawfully carrying one the whole time.”

You are the first person to start a thread on our next POTUS.

And the worst thing Republicans are saying about her is she slept her way to the top. Women will get pissed hearing Republicans bash her for this. Double standard. I hope they do it. She is going to win!!

she wasnt that great of an AG in California....and woman wont get pissed if its the truth....

 

[Geaux4it]

Black men will not vote for a black woman

-Geaux

 

[Geaux4it]

ANother stupid anti-gun law in California is ruled Unconstitutional. Currently, law abiding gun owners have to wait 10 days before taking custody of a purchased firearm. It is intended as a 'cooling off' period. The buyer is cleared through NICS while still in the store, but has to come back after 10 days once he's 'cooled down'.

Liberal, communist stupidity at its best. Ig a buyer wanted to harm someone the 10 day wait on anything other than a first purchase, makes the intent moot. They could just go home and use one of their other guns to commit crimes if desired. So the 10 day wait is nothing but a road block to the execution of your second amendment rights. Slowly but surely, the courts are going to weed out the communist, socialist, anti-gun loon attacks on freedom loving Americans

So far, the lower court agrees.

-Geaux

*BREAKING* Federal Judge: California's 10-Day Gun Waiting Period Likely Unconstitutional

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Monday, December 9, 2013

Federal Judge Says California Attorney General Kamala Harris Wrong on Gun Control Laws

Court denies Harris’ arguments and agrees with gun rights group The Calguns Foundation, says state’s firearm waiting period laws fail to meet Constitutional muster

ROSEVILLE, CA -- In a rejection of California Attorney General Kamala Harris’ stance on the rights of law-abiding gun owners, Senior Federal District Court Judge Anthony W. Ishii denied Harris’ motion for summary judgement today in a federal civil rights lawsuit filed by The Calguns Foundation, indicating that California’s 10-day “waiting period” gun laws are likely unconstitutional.

“The fact that a federal judge saw these laws for what they are -- baseless restraints on the exercise of a fundamental civil right -- is monumental,” explained Gene Hoffman, Chairman of The Calguns Foundation. “California’s waiting period laws for those who own guns is not Constitutional and this order really underlines the point.”

In his order, Judge Ishii said that Harris has “not presented sufficient evidence to show that the [10-day waiting period laws] passes either intermediate or strict scrutiny.”

About the laws being challenged in the case, named plaintiff Jeff Silvester of Hanford, California, said, “I have a license to carry a loaded firearm across the State.It is ridiculous that I have to wait another 10 days to pick up a new firearm when I’m standing there in the gun store lawfully carrying one the whole time.”

You are the first person to start a thread on our next POTUS.

And the worst thing Republicans are saying about her is she slept her way to the top. Women will get pissed hearing Republicans bash her for this. Double standard. I hope they do it. She is going to win!!

Did you notice you bumped a 5 1/2 year old post?

-Geaux

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

ANother stupid anti-gun law in California is ruled Unconstitutional. Currently, law abiding gun owners have to wait 10 days before taking custody of a purchased firearm. It is intended as a 'cooling off' period. The buyer is cleared through NICS while still in the store, but has to come back after 10 days once he's 'cooled down'.

Liberal, communist stupidity at its best. Ig a buyer wanted to harm someone the 10 day wait on anything other than a first purchase, makes the intent moot. They could just go home and use one of their other guns to commit crimes if desired. So the 10 day wait is nothing but a road block to the execution of your second amendment rights. Slowly but surely, the courts are going to weed out the communist, socialist, anti-gun loon attacks on freedom loving Americans

So far, the lower court agrees.

-Geaux

*BREAKING* Federal Judge: California's 10-Day Gun Waiting Period Likely Unconstitutional

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Monday, December 9, 2013

Federal Judge Says California Attorney General Kamala Harris Wrong on Gun Control Laws

Court denies Harris’ arguments and agrees with gun rights group The Calguns Foundation, says state’s firearm waiting period laws fail to meet Constitutional muster

ROSEVILLE, CA -- In a rejection of California Attorney General Kamala Harris’ stance on the rights of law-abiding gun owners, Senior Federal District Court Judge Anthony W. Ishii denied Harris’ motion for summary judgement today in a federal civil rights lawsuit filed by The Calguns Foundation, indicating that California’s 10-day “waiting period” gun laws are likely unconstitutional.

“The fact that a federal judge saw these laws for what they are -- baseless restraints on the exercise of a fundamental civil right -- is monumental,” explained Gene Hoffman, Chairman of The Calguns Foundation. “California’s waiting period laws for those who own guns is not Constitutional and this order really underlines the point.”

In his order, Judge Ishii said that Harris has “not presented sufficient evidence to show that the [10-day waiting period laws] passes either intermediate or strict scrutiny.”

About the laws being challenged in the case, named plaintiff Jeff Silvester of Hanford, California, said, “I have a license to carry a loaded firearm across the State.It is ridiculous that I have to wait another 10 days to pick up a new firearm when I’m standing there in the gun store lawfully carrying one the whole time.”

You are the first person to start a thread on our next POTUS.

And the worst thing Republicans are saying about her is she slept her way to the top. Women will get pissed hearing Republicans bash her for this. Double standard. I hope they do it. She is going to win!!

With Harris position on gun control she will lose bigly in purple and red states...

 

[protectionist]

This misguided law ignores the NEED for threatened people to acquire a gun ASAP.

Example : What if a young, single mother is threatened, as well as her child ? By the time TWO days passes (let alone 10), they may both be dead.

 

[sealybobo]

ANother stupid anti-gun law in California is ruled Unconstitutional. Currently, law abiding gun owners have to wait 10 days before taking custody of a purchased firearm. It is intended as a 'cooling off' period. The buyer is cleared through NICS while still in the store, but has to come back after 10 days once he's 'cooled down'.

Liberal, communist stupidity at its best. Ig a buyer wanted to harm someone the 10 day wait on anything other than a first purchase, makes the intent moot. They could just go home and use one of their other guns to commit crimes if desired. So the 10 day wait is nothing but a road block to the execution of your second amendment rights. Slowly but surely, the courts are going to weed out the communist, socialist, anti-gun loon attacks on freedom loving Americans

So far, the lower court agrees.

-Geaux

*BREAKING* Federal Judge: California's 10-Day Gun Waiting Period Likely Unconstitutional

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Monday, December 9, 2013

Federal Judge Says California Attorney General Kamala Harris Wrong on Gun Control Laws

Court denies Harris’ arguments and agrees with gun rights group The Calguns Foundation, says state’s firearm waiting period laws fail to meet Constitutional muster

ROSEVILLE, CA -- In a rejection of California Attorney General Kamala Harris’ stance on the rights of law-abiding gun owners, Senior Federal District Court Judge Anthony W. Ishii denied Harris’ motion for summary judgement today in a federal civil rights lawsuit filed by The Calguns Foundation, indicating that California’s 10-day “waiting period” gun laws are likely unconstitutional.

“The fact that a federal judge saw these laws for what they are -- baseless restraints on the exercise of a fundamental civil right -- is monumental,” explained Gene Hoffman, Chairman of The Calguns Foundation. “California’s waiting period laws for those who own guns is not Constitutional and this order really underlines the point.”

In his order, Judge Ishii said that Harris has “not presented sufficient evidence to show that the [10-day waiting period laws] passes either intermediate or strict scrutiny.”

About the laws being challenged in the case, named plaintiff Jeff Silvester of Hanford, California, said, “I have a license to carry a loaded firearm across the State.It is ridiculous that I have to wait another 10 days to pick up a new firearm when I’m standing there in the gun store lawfully carrying one the whole time.”

You are the first person to start a thread on our next POTUS.

And the worst thing Republicans are saying about her is she slept her way to the top. Women will get pissed hearing Republicans bash her for this. Double standard. I hope they do it. She is going to win!!

she wasnt that great of an AG in California....and woman wont get pissed if its the truth....

Bush wasn't that great of a GOV in Texas either.

 

[Harry Dresden]

ANother stupid anti-gun law in California is ruled Unconstitutional. Currently, law abiding gun owners have to wait 10 days before taking custody of a purchased firearm. It is intended as a 'cooling off' period. The buyer is cleared through NICS while still in the store, but has to come back after 10 days once he's 'cooled down'.

Liberal, communist stupidity at its best. Ig a buyer wanted to harm someone the 10 day wait on anything other than a first purchase, makes the intent moot. They could just go home and use one of their other guns to commit crimes if desired. So the 10 day wait is nothing but a road block to the execution of your second amendment rights. Slowly but surely, the courts are going to weed out the communist, socialist, anti-gun loon attacks on freedom loving Americans

So far, the lower court agrees.

-Geaux

*BREAKING* Federal Judge: California's 10-Day Gun Waiting Period Likely Unconstitutional

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Monday, December 9, 2013

Federal Judge Says California Attorney General Kamala Harris Wrong on Gun Control Laws

Court denies Harris’ arguments and agrees with gun rights group The Calguns Foundation, says state’s firearm waiting period laws fail to meet Constitutional muster

ROSEVILLE, CA -- In a rejection of California Attorney General Kamala Harris’ stance on the rights of law-abiding gun owners, Senior Federal District Court Judge Anthony W. Ishii denied Harris’ motion for summary judgement today in a federal civil rights lawsuit filed by The Calguns Foundation, indicating that California’s 10-day “waiting period” gun laws are likely unconstitutional.

“The fact that a federal judge saw these laws for what they are -- baseless restraints on the exercise of a fundamental civil right -- is monumental,” explained Gene Hoffman, Chairman of The Calguns Foundation. “California’s waiting period laws for those who own guns is not Constitutional and this order really underlines the point.”

In his order, Judge Ishii said that Harris has “not presented sufficient evidence to show that the [10-day waiting period laws] passes either intermediate or strict scrutiny.”

About the laws being challenged in the case, named plaintiff Jeff Silvester of Hanford, California, said, “I have a license to carry a loaded firearm across the State.It is ridiculous that I have to wait another 10 days to pick up a new firearm when I’m standing there in the gun store lawfully carrying one the whole time.”

You are the first person to start a thread on our next POTUS.

And the worst thing Republicans are saying about her is she slept her way to the top. Women will get pissed hearing Republicans bash her for this. Double standard. I hope they do it. She is going to win!!

she wasnt that great of an AG in California....and woman wont get pissed if its the truth....

Bush wasn't that great of a GOV in Texas either.

well i did not live in Texas so i wouldnt know,and i dont believe you did either....but i did live in California when she was AG so i can have an opinion on her....

 

[sealybobo]

ANother stupid anti-gun law in California is ruled Unconstitutional. Currently, law abiding gun owners have to wait 10 days before taking custody of a purchased firearm. It is intended as a 'cooling off' period. The buyer is cleared through NICS while still in the store, but has to come back after 10 days once he's 'cooled down'.

Liberal, communist stupidity at its best. Ig a buyer wanted to harm someone the 10 day wait on anything other than a first purchase, makes the intent moot. They could just go home and use one of their other guns to commit crimes if desired. So the 10 day wait is nothing but a road block to the execution of your second amendment rights. Slowly but surely, the courts are going to weed out the communist, socialist, anti-gun loon attacks on freedom loving Americans

So far, the lower court agrees.

-Geaux

*BREAKING* Federal Judge: California's 10-Day Gun Waiting Period Likely Unconstitutional

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Monday, December 9, 2013

Federal Judge Says California Attorney General Kamala Harris Wrong on Gun Control Laws

Court denies Harris’ arguments and agrees with gun rights group The Calguns Foundation, says state’s firearm waiting period laws fail to meet Constitutional muster

ROSEVILLE, CA -- In a rejection of California Attorney General Kamala Harris’ stance on the rights of law-abiding gun owners, Senior Federal District Court Judge Anthony W. Ishii denied Harris’ motion for summary judgement today in a federal civil rights lawsuit filed by The Calguns Foundation, indicating that California’s 10-day “waiting period” gun laws are likely unconstitutional.

“The fact that a federal judge saw these laws for what they are -- baseless restraints on the exercise of a fundamental civil right -- is monumental,” explained Gene Hoffman, Chairman of The Calguns Foundation. “California’s waiting period laws for those who own guns is not Constitutional and this order really underlines the point.”

In his order, Judge Ishii said that Harris has “not presented sufficient evidence to show that the [10-day waiting period laws] passes either intermediate or strict scrutiny.”

About the laws being challenged in the case, named plaintiff Jeff Silvester of Hanford, California, said, “I have a license to carry a loaded firearm across the State.It is ridiculous that I have to wait another 10 days to pick up a new firearm when I’m standing there in the gun store lawfully carrying one the whole time.”

You are the first person to start a thread on our next POTUS.

And the worst thing Republicans are saying about her is she slept her way to the top. Women will get pissed hearing Republicans bash her for this. Double standard. I hope they do it. She is going to win!!

she wasnt that great of an AG in California....and woman wont get pissed if its the truth....

Bush wasn't that great of a GOV in Texas either.

well i did not live in Texas so i wouldnt know,and i dont believe you did either....but i did live in California when she was AG so i can have an opinion on her....

Women will get pissed off if you hold her to a higher standard than Trump. You're going to bash her for having an affair in the past? Didn't seem to bother you when you voted for Trump.

Here is a great story on how we hold black men and women to a much higher standard than we do rich white men.

Boris Johnson and Donald Trump Are Peak White Male Privilege | HuffPost

 

[Marion Morrison]

ANother stupid anti-gun law in California is ruled Unconstitutional. Currently, law abiding gun owners have to wait 10 days before taking custody of a purchased firearm. It is intended as a 'cooling off' period. The buyer is cleared through NICS while still in the store, but has to come back after 10 days once he's 'cooled down'.

Liberal, communist stupidity at its best. Ig a buyer wanted to harm someone the 10 day wait on anything other than a first purchase, makes the intent moot. They could just go home and use one of their other guns to commit crimes if desired. So the 10 day wait is nothing but a road block to the execution of your second amendment rights. Slowly but surely, the courts are going to weed out the communist, socialist, anti-gun loon attacks on freedom loving Americans

So far, the lower court agrees.

-Geaux

*BREAKING* Federal Judge: California's 10-Day Gun Waiting Period Likely Unconstitutional

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Monday, December 9, 2013

Federal Judge Says California Attorney General Kamala Harris Wrong on Gun Control Laws

Court denies Harris’ arguments and agrees with gun rights group The Calguns Foundation, says state’s firearm waiting period laws fail to meet Constitutional muster

ROSEVILLE, CA -- In a rejection of California Attorney General Kamala Harris’ stance on the rights of law-abiding gun owners, Senior Federal District Court Judge Anthony W. Ishii denied Harris’ motion for summary judgement today in a federal civil rights lawsuit filed by The Calguns Foundation, indicating that California’s 10-day “waiting period” gun laws are likely unconstitutional.

“The fact that a federal judge saw these laws for what they are -- baseless restraints on the exercise of a fundamental civil right -- is monumental,” explained Gene Hoffman, Chairman of The Calguns Foundation. “California’s waiting period laws for those who own guns is not Constitutional and this order really underlines the point.”

In his order, Judge Ishii said that Harris has “not presented sufficient evidence to show that the [10-day waiting period laws] passes either intermediate or strict scrutiny.”

About the laws being challenged in the case, named plaintiff Jeff Silvester of Hanford, California, said, “I have a license to carry a loaded firearm across the State.It is ridiculous that I have to wait another 10 days to pick up a new firearm when I’m standing there in the gun store lawfully carrying one the whole time.”

You are the first person to start a thread on our next POTUS.

And the worst thing Republicans are saying about her is she slept her way to the top. Women will get pissed hearing Republicans bash her for this. Double standard. I hope they do it. She is going to win!!

Did you notice you bumped a 5 1/2 year old post?

-Geaux

Silly Boo Boo necros all kinds of old threads, the older the better for him.

 

[sealybobo]

ANother stupid anti-gun law in California is ruled Unconstitutional. Currently, law abiding gun owners have to wait 10 days before taking custody of a purchased firearm. It is intended as a 'cooling off' period. The buyer is cleared through NICS while still in the store, but has to come back after 10 days once he's 'cooled down'.

Liberal, communist stupidity at its best. Ig a buyer wanted to harm someone the 10 day wait on anything other than a first purchase, makes the intent moot. They could just go home and use one of their other guns to commit crimes if desired. So the 10 day wait is nothing but a road block to the execution of your second amendment rights. Slowly but surely, the courts are going to weed out the communist, socialist, anti-gun loon attacks on freedom loving Americans

So far, the lower court agrees.

-Geaux

*BREAKING* Federal Judge: California's 10-Day Gun Waiting Period Likely Unconstitutional

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Monday, December 9, 2013

Federal Judge Says California Attorney General Kamala Harris Wrong on Gun Control Laws

Court denies Harris’ arguments and agrees with gun rights group The Calguns Foundation, says state’s firearm waiting period laws fail to meet Constitutional muster

ROSEVILLE, CA -- In a rejection of California Attorney General Kamala Harris’ stance on the rights of law-abiding gun owners, Senior Federal District Court Judge Anthony W. Ishii denied Harris’ motion for summary judgement today in a federal civil rights lawsuit filed by The Calguns Foundation, indicating that California’s 10-day “waiting period” gun laws are likely unconstitutional.

“The fact that a federal judge saw these laws for what they are -- baseless restraints on the exercise of a fundamental civil right -- is monumental,” explained Gene Hoffman, Chairman of The Calguns Foundation. “California’s waiting period laws for those who own guns is not Constitutional and this order really underlines the point.”

In his order, Judge Ishii said that Harris has “not presented sufficient evidence to show that the [10-day waiting period laws] passes either intermediate or strict scrutiny.”

About the laws being challenged in the case, named plaintiff Jeff Silvester of Hanford, California, said, “I have a license to carry a loaded firearm across the State.It is ridiculous that I have to wait another 10 days to pick up a new firearm when I’m standing there in the gun store lawfully carrying one the whole time.”

You are the first person to start a thread on our next POTUS.

And the worst thing Republicans are saying about her is she slept her way to the top. Women will get pissed hearing Republicans bash her for this. Double standard. I hope they do it. She is going to win!!

Did you notice you bumped a 5 1/2 year old post?

-Geaux

Silly Boo Boo necros all kinds of old threads, the older the better for him.

I wanted to see when her name first popped up. Turns out it was this thread. 2013. Who knew in 7 years she would be president.

She should do the rebuttal to Trump's state of the union. It worked out for him and Obama but not these guys.

 

[Harry Dresden]

ANother stupid anti-gun law in California is ruled Unconstitutional. Currently, law abiding gun owners have to wait 10 days before taking custody of a purchased firearm. It is intended as a 'cooling off' period. The buyer is cleared through NICS while still in the store, but has to come back after 10 days once he's 'cooled down'.

Liberal, communist stupidity at its best. Ig a buyer wanted to harm someone the 10 day wait on anything other than a first purchase, makes the intent moot. They could just go home and use one of their other guns to commit crimes if desired. So the 10 day wait is nothing but a road block to the execution of your second amendment rights. Slowly but surely, the courts are going to weed out the communist, socialist, anti-gun loon attacks on freedom loving Americans

So far, the lower court agrees.

-Geaux

*BREAKING* Federal Judge: California's 10-Day Gun Waiting Period Likely Unconstitutional

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Monday, December 9, 2013

Federal Judge Says California Attorney General Kamala Harris Wrong on Gun Control Laws

Court denies Harris’ arguments and agrees with gun rights group The Calguns Foundation, says state’s firearm waiting period laws fail to meet Constitutional muster

ROSEVILLE, CA -- In a rejection of California Attorney General Kamala Harris’ stance on the rights of law-abiding gun owners, Senior Federal District Court Judge Anthony W. Ishii denied Harris’ motion for summary judgement today in a federal civil rights lawsuit filed by The Calguns Foundation, indicating that California’s 10-day “waiting period” gun laws are likely unconstitutional.

“The fact that a federal judge saw these laws for what they are -- baseless restraints on the exercise of a fundamental civil right -- is monumental,” explained Gene Hoffman, Chairman of The Calguns Foundation. “California’s waiting period laws for those who own guns is not Constitutional and this order really underlines the point.”

In his order, Judge Ishii said that Harris has “not presented sufficient evidence to show that the [10-day waiting period laws] passes either intermediate or strict scrutiny.”

About the laws being challenged in the case, named plaintiff Jeff Silvester of Hanford, California, said, “I have a license to carry a loaded firearm across the State.It is ridiculous that I have to wait another 10 days to pick up a new firearm when I’m standing there in the gun store lawfully carrying one the whole time.”

You are the first person to start a thread on our next POTUS.

And the worst thing Republicans are saying about her is she slept her way to the top. Women will get pissed hearing Republicans bash her for this. Double standard. I hope they do it. She is going to win!!

she wasnt that great of an AG in California....and woman wont get pissed if its the truth....

Bush wasn't that great of a GOV in Texas either.

well i did not live in Texas so i wouldnt know,and i dont believe you did either....but i did live in California when she was AG so i can have an opinion on her....

Women will get pissed off if you hold her to a higher standard than Trump. You're going to bash her for having an affair in the past? Didn't seem to bother you when you voted for Trump.

Here is a great story on how we hold black men and women to a much higher standard than we do rich white men.

Boris Johnson and Donald Trump Are Peak White Male Privilege | HuffPost

bobo get your posters correct before commenting....i never said she has to be held to a higher standard than trump,never even mentioned the guy....and did i say anything about her "affairs"? ....no i didnt,i said she was a half-assed AG in California.....and i never voted for trump,but i think you did....and now you want me to say i did so you wont feel alone......