Justice Department Completes Review of Errors in FISA Applications

berg80

Diamond Member
Oct 28, 2017
14,394
11,738
2,170
"In the first 14 applications it reviewed, the Justice Department’s Office of Intelligence identified 63 non-material errors or unsupported facts, and one misstatement or omission that it deemed material. Of the 63 non-material errors or unsupported facts, according to the filing, 29 reflected typographical errors or date discrepancies between an application and a source document. Of the remaining 34, according to the filing, “13 involve non-material factual assertions that may be accurate, but for which a supporting document could not be located in the FBI’s files, and 21 involve non-material deviations between a source document and an application and/or a misidentified source of information.” The number of errors per application ranged from zero to 15. The details of the errors, and the Justice Department’s analysis of their materiality, was censored from the report.

In the 15 remaining applications, the Office of Intelligence identified one material misstatement in an application for authorization to conduct electronic surveillance and carry out a physical search relating to an individual the FBI suspected might be an agent of a foreign power. The error “involved the difference between the statement in an application stating that the target had become sympathetic toward a particular terrorist group and the supporting documentation which established that a witness reported that this target had become more sympathetic to radical Muslim causes,” according to the filing."


Conclusion...........the waving of arms and pulling of hair by Trumpleton's turned out to be over...........as they would say..............a bunch of nothingburgers. Obviously, errors of any kind are not good. But the answer to the question of whether the errors were egregious or showed deficient reason to ask for and subsequently obtain the warrants is a resounding NO.
 
"In the first 14 applications it reviewed, the Justice Department’s Office of Intelligence identified 63 non-material errors or unsupported facts, and one misstatement or omission that it deemed material. Of the 63 non-material errors or unsupported facts, according to the filing, 29 reflected typographical errors or date discrepancies between an application and a source document. Of the remaining 34, according to the filing, “13 involve non-material factual assertions that may be accurate, but for which a supporting document could not be located in the FBI’s files, and 21 involve non-material deviations between a source document and an application and/or a misidentified source of information.” The number of errors per application ranged from zero to 15. The details of the errors, and the Justice Department’s analysis of their materiality, was censored from the report.

In the 15 remaining applications, the Office of Intelligence identified one material misstatement in an application for authorization to conduct electronic surveillance and carry out a physical search relating to an individual the FBI suspected might be an agent of a foreign power. The error “involved the difference between the statement in an application stating that the target had become sympathetic toward a particular terrorist group and the supporting documentation which established that a witness reported that this target had become more sympathetic to radical Muslim causes,” according to the filing."


Conclusion...........the waving of arms and pulling of hair by Trumpleton's turned out to be over...........as they would say..............a bunch of nothingburgers. Obviously, errors of any kind are not good. But the answer to the question of whether the errors were egregious or showed deficient reason to ask for and subsequently obtain the warrants is a resounding NO.

Does this mean I can stop watching and waiting for those indictments them rednecks been talking about for months?
 
Law fare blogg dot com....

A far left wing blogg...

Do you know what perjuery is? Its missstaments of facts to a court.. They found very massive failures and concerted efforts to decieve. Intersting that this is being pushed out right before Durham is set to release his report.. They are trying to blunt the damage that is aout to come crashing down on Biden and Democrats in general.
 
"In the first 14 applications it reviewed, the Justice Department’s Office of Intelligence identified 63 non-material errors or unsupported facts, and one misstatement or omission that it deemed material. Of the 63 non-material errors or unsupported facts, according to the filing, 29 reflected typographical errors or date discrepancies between an application and a source document. Of the remaining 34, according to the filing, “13 involve non-material factual assertions that may be accurate, but for which a supporting document could not be located in the FBI’s files, and 21 involve non-material deviations between a source document and an application and/or a misidentified source of information.” The number of errors per application ranged from zero to 15. The details of the errors, and the Justice Department’s analysis of their materiality, was censored from the report.

In the 15 remaining applications, the Office of Intelligence identified one material misstatement in an application for authorization to conduct electronic surveillance and carry out a physical search relating to an individual the FBI suspected might be an agent of a foreign power. The error “involved the difference between the statement in an application stating that the target had become sympathetic toward a particular terrorist group and the supporting documentation which established that a witness reported that this target had become more sympathetic to radical Muslim causes,” according to the filing."


Conclusion...........the waving of arms and pulling of hair by Trumpleton's turned out to be over...........as they would say..............a bunch of nothingburgers. Obviously, errors of any kind are not good. But the answer to the question of whether the errors were egregious or showed deficient reason to ask for and subsequently obtain the warrants is a resounding NO.

Does this mean I can stop watching and waiting for those indictments them rednecks been talking about for months?
:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :aug08_031:

Keep on believing... When this comes crashing down around you its going to be fun watching you all scream at the sky...
 
Because we should all take information from a leftwing blog and call this a day. Case closed.

I think I'll wait for those who have the actual documents and authority to do something with them to speak out.

Hopefully, through the courts. Though, I'll be honest (something the OP Never is) and say I don't think that the AG is going to do anything to anyone.

He is going to want to eat come the end of this admins term, be that 2021 or 2024.
 
"In the first 14 applications it reviewed, the Justice Department’s Office of Intelligence identified 63 non-material errors or unsupported facts, and one misstatement or omission that it deemed material. Of the 63 non-material errors or unsupported facts, according to the filing, 29 reflected typographical errors or date discrepancies between an application and a source document. Of the remaining 34, according to the filing, “13 involve non-material factual assertions that may be accurate, but for which a supporting document could not be located in the FBI’s files, and 21 involve non-material deviations between a source document and an application and/or a misidentified source of information.” The number of errors per application ranged from zero to 15. The details of the errors, and the Justice Department’s analysis of their materiality, was censored from the report.

In the 15 remaining applications, the Office of Intelligence identified one material misstatement in an application for authorization to conduct electronic surveillance and carry out a physical search relating to an individual the FBI suspected might be an agent of a foreign power. The error “involved the difference between the statement in an application stating that the target had become sympathetic toward a particular terrorist group and the supporting documentation which established that a witness reported that this target had become more sympathetic to radical Muslim causes,” according to the filing."


Conclusion...........the waving of arms and pulling of hair by Trumpleton's turned out to be over...........as they would say..............a bunch of nothingburgers. Obviously, errors of any kind are not good. But the answer to the question of whether the errors were egregious or showed deficient reason to ask for and subsequently obtain the warrants is a resounding NO.
Man lob out some occupy democrats next time. A little more credible.
 
Last edited:
"In the first 14 applications it reviewed, the Justice Department’s Office of Intelligence identified 63 non-material errors or unsupported facts, and one misstatement or omission that it deemed material. Of the 63 non-material errors or unsupported facts, according to the filing, 29 reflected typographical errors or date discrepancies between an application and a source document. Of the remaining 34, according to the filing, “13 involve non-material factual assertions that may be accurate, but for which a supporting document could not be located in the FBI’s files, and 21 involve non-material deviations between a source document and an application and/or a misidentified source of information.” The number of errors per application ranged from zero to 15. The details of the errors, and the Justice Department’s analysis of their materiality, was censored from the report.

In the 15 remaining applications, the Office of Intelligence identified one material misstatement in an application for authorization to conduct electronic surveillance and carry out a physical search relating to an individual the FBI suspected might be an agent of a foreign power. The error “involved the difference between the statement in an application stating that the target had become sympathetic toward a particular terrorist group and the supporting documentation which established that a witness reported that this target had become more sympathetic to radical Muslim causes,” according to the filing."


Conclusion...........the waving of arms and pulling of hair by Trumpleton's turned out to be over...........as they would say..............a bunch of nothingburgers. Obviously, errors of any kind are not good. But the answer to the question of whether the errors were egregious or showed deficient reason to ask for and subsequently obtain the warrants is a resounding NO.
Yep.... the so called "FISA abuses" were at the core of their argument and were supposed to be the smoking gun.
Per usual....barely a fizzle.
 
"In the first 14 applications it reviewed, the Justice Department’s Office of Intelligence identified 63 non-material errors or unsupported facts, and one misstatement or omission that it deemed material. Of the 63 non-material errors or unsupported facts, according to the filing, 29 reflected typographical errors or date discrepancies between an application and a source document. Of the remaining 34, according to the filing, “13 involve non-material factual assertions that may be accurate, but for which a supporting document could not be located in the FBI’s files, and 21 involve non-material deviations between a source document and an application and/or a misidentified source of information.” The number of errors per application ranged from zero to 15. The details of the errors, and the Justice Department’s analysis of their materiality, was censored from the report.

In the 15 remaining applications, the Office of Intelligence identified one material misstatement in an application for authorization to conduct electronic surveillance and carry out a physical search relating to an individual the FBI suspected might be an agent of a foreign power. The error “involved the difference between the statement in an application stating that the target had become sympathetic toward a particular terrorist group and the supporting documentation which established that a witness reported that this target had become more sympathetic to radical Muslim causes,” according to the filing."


Conclusion...........the waving of arms and pulling of hair by Trumpleton's turned out to be over...........as they would say..............a bunch of nothingburgers. Obviously, errors of any kind are not good. But the answer to the question of whether the errors were egregious or showed deficient reason to ask for and subsequently obtain the warrants is a resounding NO.
_______

What a dumb-ass you are.

These Fisa's were the ones the Court ordered randomly reviewed because of the disastrously illegal Fisa Warrants taken out on Carter Page, so they could spy on the Trump Campaign, and after that---his Presidency. No those are all Illegal. Rosenstein and Yates have testified to that before Congress.

You are talking out of your ass. You are talking about the ones reviewed at random, as a form of quality control---after the totally FRAUDULENT ones taken on Carter Page--those are Illegal, even most Democratic Dumb-Asses know that by now. What you are calling Nothingburgers were just that the first day they looked at them.

_________
 
Does this mean I can stop watching and waiting for those indictments them rednecks been talking about for months?

Yes!!!!! Coming soon to a theater near you....
e04444043b418bf465dcc32b32b99caf.jpeg
 

Forum List

Back
Top