WillowTree
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2008
- 84,532
- 16,093
- 2,180
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yep, he covered all the bases bash, boosh, fox and talk iraq.
yep, he covered all the bases bash, boosh, fox and talk iraq.
Chavez may be an asshole... but man, in that clip he was my hero!
yep, he covered all the bases bash, boosh, fox and talk iraq.
Chavez may be an asshole... but man, in that clip he was my hero!
birds of a feather
Chavez may be an asshole... but man, in that clip he was my hero!
birds of a feather
He was calling Fox News liars... well, the only thing wrong about what Chavez said in that video was that he referred to Fox as a news network when it's mostly a platform for a bunch of right-wing pundits.
I'm willing to give people credit when it's due no matter where it comes from.
Careful there, Willow, all the Democrats might stop paying there taxes, and you welfare recipients in the red states would starve.
Careful there, Willow, all the Democrats might stop paying there taxes, and you welfare recipients in the red states would starve.
Yawn.
Georgia breaks about even historically. Texas consistently pays out more than it receives. Both considered bastions of Republicans
And on the flipside Hawaii reliably receives more than it pays, as do Maine and Rhode Island. All three considered Democratic strongholds.
And the biggest suckup of dollars received versus dollars earned was New Mexico. #1 from 1985 through 2005. And they went "blue" in '92, '96, 2000 and '08.
Doesn't seem to be any historical correlation between voting patterns and federal taxes paid vs taxes spent that is any sort of reliable indicator.
Careful there, Willow, all the Democrats might stop paying there taxes, and you welfare recipients in the red states would starve.
Yawn.
Georgia breaks about even historically. Texas consistently pays out more than it receives. Both considered bastions of Republicans
And on the flipside Hawaii reliably receives more than it pays, as do Maine and Rhode Island. All three considered Democratic strongholds.
And the biggest suckup of dollars received versus dollars earned was New Mexico. #1 from 1985 through 2005. And they went "blue" in '92, '96, 2000 and '08.
Doesn't seem to be any historical correlation between voting patterns and federal taxes paid vs taxes spent that is any sort of reliable indicator.
Here is the ranking from the last year on that report.
I'm not quite sure what can be drawn from this ranking except that richer states give more and poorer states receive more.
- New Mexico
- Mississippi
- Alaska
- Louisiana
- West Virginia
- North Dakota
- Alabama
- South Dakota
- Kentucky
- Virginia
- Montana
- Hawaii
- Maine
- Arkansas
- Oklahoma
- South Carolina
- Missouri
- Maryland
- Tennessee
- Idaho
- Arizona
- Kansas
- Wyoming
- Iowa
- Nebraska
- Vermont
- North Carolina
- Pennsylvania
- Utah
- Indiana
- Ohio
- Georgia
- Rhode Island
- Florida
- Texas
- Oregon
- Michigan
- Washington
- Wisconsin
- Massachusetts
- Colorado
- New York
- California
- Delaware
- Illinois
- Minnesota
- New Hampshire
- Connecticut
- Nevada
- New Jersey
- District of Columbia
I think the explanation for NM, AK, ND, and SD might be the high proportion of Native American or Eskimo populations, as well as the lack of large urban areas.
Also, when it comes to Alaska, nearly every bridge that is built is a bridge to nowhere, so the cost per person is high.