What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Jury Refuses to Convict Participants in Bundy Ranch Standoff

Pepe

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2010
Messages
168
Reaction score
38
Points
46
Location
Tennessee
No matter how much power the federal government may have, when a jury refuses to side with it, the feds lose.

In what was effectively a case of jury nullification, jurors declined to return any guilty verdicts against four men involved in the 2014 Bundy Ranch standoff.

The Arizona Republic called the verdict “a stinging defeat” for government prosecutors. After deliberating for four days, jurors did not return a single guilty verdict. It acquitted Richard Lovelien of Oklahoma and Steven Stewart of Idaho on all counts. The jury also returned “not guilty” verdicts on the most serious charges of conspiracy and extortion against Idahoans Eric Parker and O. Scott Drexler. The jury hung on weapons and assault charges against the two men.

This was the second time federal prosecutors failed to get a conviction in the case. In the most recent trial, the federal government sought convictions on conspiracy, extortion, assault and obstruction charges stemming from the “Battle of Bunkerville.”

During the standoff, armed protesters faced down heavily armed federal agents, along with state and local police, as the Bureau of Land Management attempted to round up cattle belonging to rancher Cliven Bundy.

The dispute dates back to the early 1990s when Bundy refused to renew his permit for grazing cattle on federally owned land near Bunkerville, Nevada. According to the BLM, Bundy continued to graze cattle on the “public” lands without a permit. On March 27, 2014, the feds shut down 145,604 acres for the “capture, impound, and removal of trespass cattle.” Agents began the roundup on April 5. Seven days later, protesters, some of them armed, advanced on what the BLM described as a “cattle gather.” After a tense standoff, and negotiations brokered by Sheriff Doug Gillespie, BLM director Neil Kornze agreed to release the cattle and deescalate the situation.

Federal prosecutors began charging people in connection with the standoff nearly two years later, after protesters took over the Oregon Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in January 2016.

The Bundys argue, and rightfully so, that the federal government lacks the constitutional authority to own and manage large swaths of land within the border of a state.

U.S. District Court Judge Gloria Navarro wouldn’t allow defense attorneys to bring up the constitutional issues in the four men’s defense and rejected testimony from five defense witnesses. Ironically, she was trying to avoid “jury nullification,” according to the Arizona Republic report.

Navarro’s rulings, aimed at trying to avoid jury nullification, severely limited defense arguments. Jury nullification occurs when a jury returns a verdict based on its shared belief rather than on the evidence in a case. Navarro barred defendants from discussing why they traveled thousands of miles to join protesters at the Bundy Ranch. She did not allow them to testify about perceived abuses by federal authorities during the cattle roundup that might have motivated them to participate. Navarro also restricted defendants from raising constitutional arguments, or mounting any defense based on their First Amendment rights to free speech and their Second Amendment rights to bear arms. In her rulings, Navarro said those were not applicable arguments in the case.

The judge went as far as ordering Parker off the stand for bringing up forbidden topics as he tried to testify in his own defense. According to the Republic, Defense attorney Jess Marchese said the limitations placed on the defense had an impact on the jury.

Marchese said jurors were sympathetic to the defendants and their inability to mount a cogent defense in light of restrictions that prevented them from talking about why they participated in the standoff and what they were thinking while they were there.

The judge apparently thought allowing the defense to raise the constitutional issues or to bring up the defendants’ belief that they were fighting federal tyranny could possibly lead the jury to reject the prosecutors case, even if the government could prove the protesters broke the letter of the law. Despite hearing those arguments, the jury effectively engaged in jury nullification. Jurors seem to have made their decision based on their impression that the prosecution was unjust, or at least unfairly carried out. Defense attorney Shawn Perez said jurors knew the government had tied the defense team’s hands.

“By the time the government laid it all out for them, they had already made up their minds … They knew there was no reason for us to go farther.”

This verdict is reminiscent of many fugitive slave cases in the 1850s. Federal prosecutors found it very difficult to convict people under the Fugitive Slave Act. For instance, in Syracuse, N.Y., the federal government attempted to prosecute 26 people in connection with the rescue of a recaptured runaway slave known as Jerry. The feds only got one conviction. They simply couldn’t seat juries willing to convict.

We don’t know what went through the minds of jurors in Bundy Ranch standoff case. It may not have been a conscious assertion of a jury’s right to nullify. But it was clearly jury nullification in effect. The jurors used their discretion. They smelled something fishy. They refused to convict. And it illustrates the tremendous power of the jury.

Tenth Amendment Center
 

Race Burley

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2015
Messages
93,445
Reaction score
35,040
Points
2,290
Justice. Now prosecute the murderers that killed Bundy. And the scum that murdered Randy weavers wife, Lon Horiuchi.
 

Dale Smith

Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
23,964
Reaction score
8,750
Points
910
Location
Dallas, Texas
The jury was republican.


Because if they had been good commies such as yourself they would have been convicted? Let me guess, you don't have a fucking clue about what the stand-off in Nevada or Oregon was about.
 

IsaacNewton

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2015
Messages
17,309
Reaction score
3,672
Points
290
Sactuary cities, ILLEGAL -
People that ignore federal law and have a weak militia show up to defend them and threaten law enforcement, LEGAL -
Sheriff Arpaio treating prisoners like cattle because they were convicted, TOUGH ON CRIME -
Sheriff Arpaio convicted of a crime but gets a pardon, ALSO TOUGH ON CRIME because 'he doesn't deserve to serve his sentence like those he forced to serve their sentence.

The thoughts of a brain that is sputtering on 5 cylinders.
 

Dale Smith

Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
23,964
Reaction score
8,750
Points
910
Location
Dallas, Texas
Sactuary cities, ILLEGAL -
People that ignore federal law and have a weak militia show up to defend them and threaten law enforcement, LEGAL -
Sheriff Arpaio treating prisoners like cattle because they were convicted, TOUGH ON CRIME -
Sheriff Arpaio convicted of a crime but gets a pardon, ALSO TOUGH ON CRIME because 'he doesn't deserve to serve his sentence like those he forced to serve their sentence.

The thoughts of a brain that is sputtering on 5 cylinders.


WTF is a "Sactuary cities"??????

BTW, the Bundys didn't disobey "Federal Law", dumb ass.
 

Luddly Neddite

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
63,904
Reaction score
9,940
Points
2,040
The jury was republican.


Because if they had been good commies such as yourself they would have been convicted? Let me guess, you don't have a fucking clue about what the stand-off in Nevada or Oregon was about.

You silly twit.

If YOU knew anything about either incident, you would not have said this. In both case, the Bundy's stole from you once and they stole from you again. And, you are just too damn dumb to understand that.

Commies?

Puh-lese.
 

Luddly Neddite

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
63,904
Reaction score
9,940
Points
2,040


NOTE to RWNJs -

Send Snacks.





~~~~~


Seriously, these idiots really didn't seem to know what they were doing. In both cases, they just kind of went along with the crowd.

This guy was just seeking fame and the idiots in Oregon thought their fellow nutters would support them WAY more than they did.

Bottom line is, why should I pay higher taxes so they get a break on "cost of doing business". Anyone here own a business? How much does the US govt help you out? Who do you believe pays for that?
 

Luddly Neddite

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
63,904
Reaction score
9,940
Points
2,040
Sactuary cities, ILLEGAL -
People that ignore federal law and have a weak militia show up to defend them and threaten law enforcement, LEGAL -
Sheriff Arpaio treating prisoners like cattle because they were convicted, TOUGH ON CRIME -
Sheriff Arpaio convicted of a crime but gets a pardon, ALSO TOUGH ON CRIME because 'he doesn't deserve to serve his sentence like those he forced to serve their sentence.

The thoughts of a brain that is sputtering on 5 cylinders.


WTF is a "Sactuary cities"??????

BTW, the Bundys didn't disobey "Federal Law", dumb ass.


This is the problem.

RWNJs are clueless and make no effort to educate themselves.

Instead, they demand that left wingers spoon feed them. Dale Smith is the poster child of the weak minded right.

:rolleyes:
 

Dale Smith

Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
23,964
Reaction score
8,750
Points
910
Location
Dallas, Texas
Sactuary cities, ILLEGAL -
People that ignore federal law and have a weak militia show up to defend them and threaten law enforcement, LEGAL -
Sheriff Arpaio treating prisoners like cattle because they were convicted, TOUGH ON CRIME -
Sheriff Arpaio convicted of a crime but gets a pardon, ALSO TOUGH ON CRIME because 'he doesn't deserve to serve his sentence like those he forced to serve their sentence.

The thoughts of a brain that is sputtering on 5 cylinders.


WTF is a "Sactuary cities"??????

BTW, the Bundys didn't disobey "Federal Law", dumb ass.


This is the problem.

RWNJs are clueless and make no effort to educate themselves.

Instead, they demand that left wingers spoon feed them. Dale Smith is the poster child of the weak minded right.

:rolleyes:


Luddy Leftard, if you lived another 60 years, you still wouldn't have the knowledge I have. You are part of the dumbed down masses. You can take your beloved corporate federal "gubermint" and shove it up your ass.. I simply spit on it every chance I get and I get a lot of those chances.


(snicker)
 

Dale Smith

Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
23,964
Reaction score
8,750
Points
910
Location
Dallas, Texas
The jury was republican.


Because if they had been good commies such as yourself they would have been convicted? Let me guess, you don't have a fucking clue about what the stand-off in Nevada or Oregon was about.

You silly twit.

If YOU knew anything about either incident, you would not have said this. In both case, the Bundy's stole from you once and they stole from you again. And, you are just too damn dumb to understand that.

Commies?

Puh-lese.



ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!! You are a fucking IDIOT. Go use the search engine and put in my ID and "Oregon stand-off" and you will get plenty of my commentary because I run circles around you in the knowledge department.
 

Dale Smith

Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
23,964
Reaction score
8,750
Points
910
Location
Dallas, Texas
The jury was republican.


Because if they had been good commies such as yourself they would have been convicted? Let me guess, you don't have a fucking clue about what the stand-off in Nevada or Oregon was about.

You silly twit.

If YOU knew anything about either incident, you would not have said this. In both case, the Bundy's stole from you once and they stole from you again. And, you are just too damn dumb to understand that.

Commies?

Puh-lese.


You were saying, dipshit? Sure sucks to be a stupid little commie sack of shit like you, doesn't it? (snicker)

Oregon militia leaders acquitted in wildlife refuge standoff (Bundy's)

FBI agent indicted in Finicum shooting. Yup, they were shooting at the car and at him as he exited.
 

Tax Man

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2015
Messages
5,529
Reaction score
889
Points
170
The jury was republican.


Because if they had been good commies such as yourself they would have been convicted? Let me guess, you don't have a fucking clue about what the stand-off in Nevada or Oregon was about.

You silly twit.

If YOU knew anything about either incident, you would not have said this. In both case, the Bundy's stole from you once and they stole from you again. And, you are just too damn dumb to understand that.

Commies?

Puh-lese.



ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!! You are a fucking IDIOT. Go use the search engine and put in my ID and "Oregon stand-off" and you will get plenty of my commentary because I run circles around you in the knowledge department.
I feel bad for you. You are accusing me for that which you are guilty of, so republican.
 

Dale Smith

Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
23,964
Reaction score
8,750
Points
910
Location
Dallas, Texas
The jury was republican.


Because if they had been good commies such as yourself they would have been convicted? Let me guess, you don't have a fucking clue about what the stand-off in Nevada or Oregon was about.

You silly twit.

If YOU knew anything about either incident, you would not have said this. In both case, the Bundy's stole from you once and they stole from you again. And, you are just too damn dumb to understand that.

Commies?

Puh-lese.



ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!! You are a fucking IDIOT. Go use the search engine and put in my ID and "Oregon stand-off" and you will get plenty of my commentary because I run circles around you in the knowledge department.
I feel bad for you. You are accusing me for that which you are guilty of, so republican.


I gave you a link to the posts, moron. I know and understand more than you....infinitely more and never forget that.
 
OP
P

Pepe

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2010
Messages
168
Reaction score
38
Points
46
Location
Tennessee
Some of the comments on this thread certainly lack syntax. I do hope the discourse here improves.

41Qs3M%2BCbGL._SX214_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg



This book was published some 20 years past in 1997.

Its predictions are pretty much "spot on."

For further elucidation try this site: Forward Observer
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$350.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top