Judge Ruling: Reasonable viewers skeptical of Tucker

[citygator]

Judge ruled for Fox that no reasonable viewer finds Tucker Carlson credible and thus he can say whatever he wants. Sounds about right. Anyone who believes a word out of his mouth is now legally a sucker and loser.

Judge tosses suit over Trump affair story after Fox News argues no "reasonable viewer" takes Tucker Carlson seriously

Judge rules that Karen McDougal failed to prove Tucker Carlson was accusing her of an actual crime by calling her payout "extortion."

www.cbsnews.com

A Manhattan judge has tossed out a defamation lawsuit against Fox News brought by the former Playboy model who took a $150,000 payoff to squelch her story of an affair with a pre-presidency Donald Trump. Karen McDougal had alleged in the suit filed late last year that Fox host Tucker Carlson slandered her by calling the payout "a classic case of extortion."

U.S. District Court Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ruled on Thursday that McDougal failed to prove that Carlson was accusing her of an actual crime in a way that would back up a defamation claim. The judge said that lawyers for Fox "persuasively" argued that "any reasonable viewer 'arrive with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statements" Carlson makes, according to a court filing.

 

[Blackrook]

It looks like extortion to me too.

 

[JoeMoma]

Somebody's jealous!

 

[JoeMoma]

It's extortion if McDougal said pay me $150K or I will tell the MSM about our affair.

It's not extortion if McDougal said I am going to tell the MSM about our affair.
And then Trump's lawyer says sign this nondisclosure agreement and you will get 150K to keep your mouth shut.

 

[Jimmy_Chitwood]

Judge ruled for Fox that no reasonable viewer finds Tucker Carlson credible and thus he can say whatever he wants. Sounds about right. Anyone who believes a word out of his mouth is now legally a sucker and loser.

Judge tosses suit over Trump affair story after Fox News argues no "reasonable viewer" takes Tucker Carlson seriously

Judge rules that Karen McDougal failed to prove Tucker Carlson was accusing her of an actual crime by calling her payout "extortion."

www.cbsnews.com

A Manhattan judge has tossed out a defamation lawsuit against Fox News brought by the former Playboy model who took a $150,000 payoff to squelch her story of an affair with a pre-presidency Donald Trump. Karen McDougal had alleged in the suit filed late last year that Fox host Tucker Carlson slandered her by calling the payout "a classic case of extortion."

U.S. District Court Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ruled on Thursday that McDougal failed to prove that Carlson was accusing her of an actual crime in a way that would back up a defamation claim. The judge said that lawyers for Fox "persuasively" argued that "any reasonable viewer 'arrive with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statements" Carlson makes, according to a court filing.

WYEHO?

 

[JoeMoma]

Judge ruled for Fox that no reasonable viewer finds Tucker Carlson credible and thus he can say whatever he wants. Sounds about right. Anyone who believes a word out of his mouth is now legally a sucker and loser.

Judge tosses suit over Trump affair story after Fox News argues no "reasonable viewer" takes Tucker Carlson seriously

Judge rules that Karen McDougal failed to prove Tucker Carlson was accusing her of an actual crime by calling her payout "extortion."

www.cbsnews.com

A Manhattan judge has tossed out a defamation lawsuit against Fox News brought by the former Playboy model who took a $150,000 payoff to squelch her story of an affair with a pre-presidency Donald Trump. Karen McDougal had alleged in the suit filed late last year that Fox host Tucker Carlson slandered her by calling the payout "a classic case of extortion."

U.S. District Court Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ruled on Thursday that McDougal failed to prove that Carlson was accusing her of an actual crime in a way that would back up a defamation claim. The judge said that lawyers for Fox "persuasively" argued that "any reasonable viewer 'arrive with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statements" Carlson makes, according to a court filing.

WYEHO?

I bet Karen McDougal would look great in a sweater.

 

[White 6]

Judge ruled for Fox that no reasonable viewer finds Tucker Carlson credible and thus he can say whatever he wants. Sounds about right. Anyone who believes a word out of his mouth is now legally a sucker and loser.

Judge tosses suit over Trump affair story after Fox News argues no "reasonable viewer" takes Tucker Carlson seriously

Judge rules that Karen McDougal failed to prove Tucker Carlson was accusing her of an actual crime by calling her payout "extortion."

www.cbsnews.com

A Manhattan judge has tossed out a defamation lawsuit against Fox News brought by the former Playboy model who took a $150,000 payoff to squelch her story of an affair with a pre-presidency Donald Trump. Karen McDougal had alleged in the suit filed late last year that Fox host Tucker Carlson slandered her by calling the payout "a classic case of extortion."

U.S. District Court Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ruled on Thursday that McDougal failed to prove that Carlson was accusing her of an actual crime in a way that would back up a defamation claim. The judge said that lawyers for Fox "persuasively" argued that "any reasonable viewer 'arrive with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statements" Carlson makes, according to a court filing.

That is hilarious the networks own lawyers admit tucker cannot be taken seriously.
McDougal doesn't deserve any more money on this deal. She looks OK, but that is not a $150,000 dollar piece of ass and Storm looked worse for ware and certainly was not worth $130,000. Which brings up the point, how can you have the head of our government, who is supposed to be watching how our money is spent, if he is hard d!ck stupid enough to pay $280,000 to get laid just twice? The man just don't give a f#ck. He buys them for an average of $140,000 dollars a piece. What a moron.

 

[Oddball]

An opinion journalist can't be sued because he has an opinion.

Wow....This is some big time breaking nooz!!

 

[Shelzin]

Judge ruled for Fox that no reasonable viewer finds Tucker Carlson credible and thus he can say whatever he wants. Sounds about right. Anyone who believes a word out of his mouth is now legally a sucker and loser.

Judge tosses suit over Trump affair story after Fox News argues no "reasonable viewer" takes Tucker Carlson seriously

Judge rules that Karen McDougal failed to prove Tucker Carlson was accusing her of an actual crime by calling her payout "extortion."

www.cbsnews.com

A Manhattan judge has tossed out a defamation lawsuit against Fox News brought by the former Playboy model who took a $150,000 payoff to squelch her story of an affair with a pre-presidency Donald Trump. Karen McDougal had alleged in the suit filed late last year that Fox host Tucker Carlson slandered her by calling the payout "a classic case of extortion."

U.S. District Court Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ruled on Thursday that McDougal failed to prove that Carlson was accusing her of an actual crime in a way that would back up a defamation claim. The judge said that lawyers for Fox "persuasively" argued that "any reasonable viewer 'arrive with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statements" Carlson makes, according to a court filing.

Well... of course they ruled that way. Can you IMAGINE what they would do to CNN if this actually worked?

 

[keepitreal]

Judge ruled for Fox that no reasonable viewer finds Tucker Carlson credible and thus he can say whatever he wants. Sounds about right. Anyone who believes a word out of his mouth is now legally a sucker and loser.

Judge tosses suit over Trump affair story after Fox News argues no "reasonable viewer" takes Tucker Carlson seriously

Judge rules that Karen McDougal failed to prove Tucker Carlson was accusing her of an actual crime by calling her payout "extortion."

www.cbsnews.com

A Manhattan judge has tossed out a defamation lawsuit against Fox News brought by the former Playboy model who took a $150,000 payoff to squelch her story of an affair with a pre-presidency Donald Trump. Karen McDougal had alleged in the suit filed late last year that Fox host Tucker Carlson slandered her by calling the payout "a classic case of extortion."

U.S. District Court Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ruled on Thursday that McDougal failed to prove that Carlson was accusing her of an actual crime in a way that would back up a defamation claim. The judge said that lawyers for Fox "persuasively" argued that "any reasonable viewer 'arrive with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statements" Carlson makes, according to a court filing.

That is hilarious the networks own lawyers admit tucker cannot be taken seriously.
McDougal doesn't deserve any more money on this deal. She looks OK, but that is not a $150,000 dollar piece of ass and Storm looked worse for ware and certainly was not worth $130,000. Which brings up the point, how can you have the head of our government, who is supposed to be watching how our money is spent, if he is hard d!ck stupid enough to pay $280,000 to get laid just twice? The man just don't give a f#ck. He buys them for an average of $140,000 dollars a piece. What a moron.

Oye vay...they won the case, that's what they were going for, whatever works
You know...like blow jobs aren't sexual relations and technically, I didn't lie
when I said I didn't have sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky...
I didn't participate...I was on the receiving end

Tucker Carlson Has Highest-Rated Program In Cable News History

Tucker Carlson just edged ahead of Fox News' Sean Hannity as the only two shows on cable TV to deliver more than four million viewers in 2Q 2020.

www.forbes.com

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Judge ruled for Fox that no reasonable viewer finds Tucker Carlson credible and thus he can say whatever he wants. Sounds about right. Anyone who believes a word out of his mouth is now legally a sucker and loser.

Judge tosses suit over Trump affair story after Fox News argues no "reasonable viewer" takes Tucker Carlson seriously

Judge rules that Karen McDougal failed to prove Tucker Carlson was accusing her of an actual crime by calling her payout "extortion."

www.cbsnews.com

A Manhattan judge has tossed out a defamation lawsuit against Fox News brought by the former Playboy model who took a $150,000 payoff to squelch her story of an affair with a pre-presidency Donald Trump. Karen McDougal had alleged in the suit filed late last year that Fox host Tucker Carlson slandered her by calling the payout "a classic case of extortion."

U.S. District Court Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ruled on Thursday that McDougal failed to prove that Carlson was accusing her of an actual crime in a way that would back up a defamation claim. The judge said that lawyers for Fox "persuasively" argued that "any reasonable viewer 'arrive with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statements" Carlson makes, according to a court filing.

This would be true of Fox ‘news’ as a whole, not just Carlson.

 

[two_iron]

And yet his ratings are exponentially better than the gender-confused sluts-with-nuts over at MSDNC..... funny how that works.... puts the entire media in perspective.

 

[Penelope]

Judge ruled for Fox that no reasonable viewer finds Tucker Carlson credible and thus he can say whatever he wants. Sounds about right. Anyone who believes a word out of his mouth is now legally a sucker and loser.

Judge tosses suit over Trump affair story after Fox News argues no "reasonable viewer" takes Tucker Carlson seriously

Judge rules that Karen McDougal failed to prove Tucker Carlson was accusing her of an actual crime by calling her payout "extortion."

www.cbsnews.com

A Manhattan judge has tossed out a defamation lawsuit against Fox News brought by the former Playboy model who took a $150,000 payoff to squelch her story of an affair with a pre-presidency Donald Trump. Karen McDougal had alleged in the suit filed late last year that Fox host Tucker Carlson slandered her by calling the payout "a classic case of extortion."

U.S. District Court Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ruled on Thursday that McDougal failed to prove that Carlson was accusing her of an actual crime in a way that would back up a defamation claim. The judge said that lawyers for Fox "persuasively" argued that "any reasonable viewer 'arrive with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statements" Carlson makes, according to a court filing.

That is hilarious the networks own lawyers admit tucker cannot be taken seriously.
McDougal doesn't deserve any more money on this deal. She looks OK, but that is not a $150,000 dollar piece of ass and Storm looked worse for ware and certainly was not worth $130,000. Which brings up the point, how can you have the head of our government, who is supposed to be watching how our money is spent, if he is hard d!ck stupid enough to pay $280,000 to get laid just twice? The man just don't give a f#ck. He buys them for an average of $140,000 dollars a piece. What a moron.

Oye vay...they won the case, that's what they were going for, whatever works
You know...like blow jobs aren't sexual relations and technically, I didn't lie
when I said I didn't have sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky...
I didn't participate...I was on the receiving end

Tucker Carlson Has Highest-Rated Program In Cable News History

Tucker Carlson just edged ahead of Fox News' Sean Hannity as the only two shows on cable TV to deliver more than four million viewers in 2Q 2020.

www.forbes.com

I don't see how, its all commentary and non factual and hyperbole.

 

[Penelope]

And yet his ratings are exponentially better than the gender-confused sluts-with-nuts over at MSDNC..... funny how that works.... puts the entire media in perspective.

Yes Cons like hyperbole and they why they clap at tramps rallies of lies.

 

[eagle1462010]

The right to lie on TV to the American people upheld............right decision............and what this nation has become......

Of course the MSM is worse.........but it is what it is.................The KGB is proud of the MSM ...............