Joe Biden Talks Gun Grab, Wants to Limit the Number of Bullets in a Cartridge- WTH Does That Mean?

All of the circuit courts which addressed the matter held that the magazines are protected under the 2nd as an integral part of the right to keep and bear arms - there's no question on this issue.

If you say so.
 
So no matter what gun bans are instituted, how will they be carried out?
Will the feds start in LA taking Uzi's from the gangs first?
Will the feds start by reviewing a list of legally registered guns by law abiding people?
 
So no matter what gun bans are instituted, how will they be carried out?
Will the feds start in LA taking Uzi's from the gangs first?
Will the feds start by reviewing a list of legally registered guns by law abiding people?

Just the same as the bump stock ban. No one is enforcing it.
 
So no matter what gun bans are instituted, how will they be carried out?
Will the feds start in LA taking Uzi's from the gangs first?
Well, no.

See, CA forces lawful gun owners to register their guns. Criminals are under no such requirement.
So, when CA decides to seize the guns, they have a list - and that list is of law abiding gun owners.
Not the criminals. they get to keep their guns.

Working as intended.
 
Here, several highly trained men with guns were sent by the government and emptied their magazines into a homeless veteran.

If these highly trained men require this much hardware to extinguish what they observed as a threat to their safety by a single individual, then why would government not want our families to have that same opportunity to defend themselves against what they foresee as a threat? Why would government go out of its way to expend so much energy in depriving the electorate of this same opportunity? Hm? Why? Tell me.

 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top