Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Depends on what you mean by need. They need him off the roster. They need the cap space. They need him away from the organization. They need the draft capital regardless of what that is. Does the franchise cease to exist if they don’t trade him? No. But they are in a significantly better spot if they do. You keep acting like the Packers are in the same spot whether they trade Rodgers or not and that’s not remotely true.Once again the Packers don't need to trade Rodgers.
Why are you so concerned with Rodgers? Are you a Jets fan?Depends on what you mean by need. They need him off the roster. They need the cap space. They need him away from the organization. They need the draft capital regardless of what that is. Does the franchise cease to exist if they don’t trade him? No. But they are in a significantly better spot if they do. You keep acting like the Packers are in the same spot whether they trade Rodgers or not and that’s not remotely true.
No. You're delusion about this trade is far more interesting to me than the actual trade. I don't think Rodgers is nearly as good as people tend to believe.Why are you so concerned with Rodgers? Are you a Jets fan?
If Rodgers isn't that good then why are the Jets pursuing him? Are they making a mistake?No. You're delusion about this trade is far more interesting to me than the actual trade. I don't think Rodgers is nearly as good as people tend to believe.
In a word yes. Though I guess it depends on what they have to give up. If it's their extra 2nd rder this year? Ok. The reality is having Rodgers doenst make the Jets good enough to win a SB or even get there. Not in the AFC.If Rodgers isn't that good then why are the Jets pursuing him? Are they making a mistake?
The Jets are a poorly run organization.In a word yes. Though I guess it depends on what they have to give up. If it's their extra 2nd rder this year? Ok. The reality is having Rodgers doenst make the Jets good enough to win a SB or even get there. Not in the AFC.
yeah. Doesn't mean they should give the Packers their 1st round pick this year, nor that the Packers have any leverage to demand it.The Jets are a poorly run organization.
The Jets could have signed either Jimmy Garoppolo or Derek Carr as free agents. Both are younger and more inexpensive than 40 year old Rodgers.yeah. Doesn't mean they should give the Packers their 1st round pick this year, nor that the Packers have any leverage to demand it.
ok. What's your point?The Jets could have signed either Jimmy Garoppolo or Derek Carr as free agents. Both are younger and more inexpensive than 40 year old Rodgers.
It’s a good question. They went after Carr but FAs get a vote. Carr took the Saints offer. Garappalo is a game manager who’s been been hurt a lot.My point is why pay for a one or two year rental on an old QB when there were younger and cheaper options available.
Lamar Jackson would be a logical target for the Jets. He is only 26 and a top five QB.It’s a good question. They went after Carr but FAs get a vote. Carr took the Saints offer. Garappalo is a game manager who’s been been hurt a lot.
If I were the Jets GM I’d be going after Lamar after the draft
