Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You're wrong and he IS a hypocrite...or at least a dick. You guys oughta love him.Bezos knows how mail-in ballots are susceptible to fraud. He doesn't want fraudulent ballots in his unionization vote but doesn't care if there are fraudulent ballots in the presidential election.Bezos wants a public vote so they can see who to fire when the move is defeated.If you believe the GOP, Bezos got it half right.
.
The RWNJs are easily confused... and fooled.No one is getting elected at Amazon it is an election to unionize.You really have to love that one of the stated reasons for their opposition is election security. Maybe they think it's easier to, well you know, CHEAT if you vote by mail.
I don't know do they?What does a union vote at a private corporation have in common with a presidential election, not a damn thing.
Don't they both use the Postal service?
They also seem to think that they should be able to tell the owner of a corporation how to run his corporation.The RWNJs are easily confused... and fooled.No one is getting elected at Amazon it is an election to unionize.You really have to love that one of the stated reasons for their opposition is election security. Maybe they think it's easier to, well you know, CHEAT if you vote by mail.
.
Bezos can do as he pleases since he is the owner.I don't think the numbers matter with respect to the goal. The goal is effectively a standard. When one deviates from the standard they should expect predictable surprises.Yet, there is a very small number of voters at Amazon compared to the US and Amazon is a private corporation that doesn't want everyone in the US voting on their issues.Right. That's the point of the thread. It's kind of hard to argue against the goal of encouraging more voter participation.Except that the state legislatures allowed people to do mail in voting, Bezos has not.I don't see a major difference between the two. There is an issue or a candidate and a vote. The issue or the candidate that gets the most votes win. That's the purpose.and yet the purpose is not the same.You mean besides the one who gets the most votes wins?What does a union vote at a private corporation have in common with a presidential election, not a damn thing.
He owns ~11% of a publicly traded company.Bezos can do as he pleases since he is the owner.I don't think the numbers matter with respect to the goal. The goal is effectively a standard. When one deviates from the standard they should expect predictable surprises.Yet, there is a very small number of voters at Amazon compared to the US and Amazon is a private corporation that doesn't want everyone in the US voting on their issues.Right. That's the point of the thread. It's kind of hard to argue against the goal of encouraging more voter participation.Except that the state legislatures allowed people to do mail in voting, Bezos has not.I don't see a major difference between the two. There is an issue or a candidate and a vote. The issue or the candidate that gets the most votes win. That's the purpose.and yet the purpose is not the same.You mean besides the one who gets the most votes wins?What does a union vote at a private corporation have in common with a presidential election, not a damn thing.
I don't know do they?What does a union vote at a private corporation have in common with a presidential election, not a damn thing.
Don't they both use the Postal service?
The white, working class conservatives, are opposed to U.S. corporations paying workers a living wage. Their opposition to a living wage, safe working conditions, overtime pay, and every possible benefit other developed nations require, is a form of religion.They also seem to think that they should be able to tell the owner of a corporation how to run his corporation.The RWNJs are easily confused... and fooled.No one is getting elected at Amazon it is an election to unionize.You really have to love that one of the stated reasons for their opposition is election security. Maybe they think it's easier to, well you know, CHEAT if you vote by mail.
.
and yet has the most blue chips to be at the helm.He owns ~11% of a publicly traded company.Bezos can do as he pleases since he is the owner.I don't think the numbers matter with respect to the goal. The goal is effectively a standard. When one deviates from the standard they should expect predictable surprises.Yet, there is a very small number of voters at Amazon compared to the US and Amazon is a private corporation that doesn't want everyone in the US voting on their issues.Right. That's the point of the thread. It's kind of hard to argue against the goal of encouraging more voter participation.Except that the state legislatures allowed people to do mail in voting, Bezos has not.I don't see a major difference between the two. There is an issue or a candidate and a vote. The issue or the candidate that gets the most votes win. That's the purpose.and yet the purpose is not the same.You mean besides the one who gets the most votes wins?What does a union vote at a private corporation have in common with a presidential election, not a damn thing.
Is this your final answer?
He called for mail-in in the presidential election, but opposes them in Amazon's unionizing vote!
Hypocritical Jeff Bezos Demands Amazon’s Unionizing Vote Be In-Person NOT Via Mail - The Lid (lidblog.com)
Everything works itself out eventually.and yet has the most blue chips to be at the helm.He owns ~11% of a publicly traded company.Bezos can do as he pleases since he is the owner.I don't think the numbers matter with respect to the goal. The goal is effectively a standard. When one deviates from the standard they should expect predictable surprises.Yet, there is a very small number of voters at Amazon compared to the US and Amazon is a private corporation that doesn't want everyone in the US voting on their issues.Right. That's the point of the thread. It's kind of hard to argue against the goal of encouraging more voter participation.Except that the state legislatures allowed people to do mail in voting, Bezos has not.I don't see a major difference between the two. There is an issue or a candidate and a vote. The issue or the candidate that gets the most votes win. That's the purpose.and yet the purpose is not the same.You mean besides the one who gets the most votes wins?What does a union vote at a private corporation have in common with a presidential election, not a damn thing.
Is this your final answer?
Read slowly. The issue is that his WaPo argued that mail in voting is great and secure, and now that he wants a fraud free election, Amazon worries about the security of mail in voting.You seem to think Bezos is some liberal hero who will be defended at all costs by evil liberals.
Wrong. He was defended where he was wrongly attacked but he is no friggin hero. He's wrong here and not for the reason you think. He's union busting. You oughtta love him.
You folks need to start looking at issues rather than who is or isn't a good or bad guy. That's childish Trumper shit
Hey dumfuk...I know you have your grievance thing going and all but THIS is about union busting and that's all.Read slowly. The issue is that his WaPo argued that mail in voting is great and secure, and now that he wants a fraud free election, Amazon worries about the security of mail in voting.
And in my minds eye I can literally see Trumpers read that and like a slot machine screen...just roll on to the next SPIN.Hey dumfuk...I know you have your grievance thing going and all but THIS is about union busting and that's all.Read slowly. The issue is that his WaPo argued that mail in voting is great and secure, and now that he wants a fraud free election, Amazon worries about the security of mail in voting.
It's not that he thinks absentee voting is inherently fraudulent...union busters Always WANT TO INTIMIDATE THOSE VOTING AND MAIL IN PREVENTS THAT.
And oh yea...until about six months ago Republicans LOVED absentee voting. In fact big chunks of Republicans in Florida USED absentee voting.
Oddly no challenges there. Oh that's right...no need to challenge a state Trump won.
Fucking dishonest hypocrisy
He’s a psychopath too.He called for mail-in in the presidential election, but opposes them in Amazon's unionizing vote!
Hypocritical Jeff Bezos Demands Amazon’s Unionizing Vote Be In-Person NOT Via Mail - The Lid (lidblog.com)
The very irony of you accusing others of fucking dishonest hypocrisy.Hey dumfuk...I know you have your grievance thing going and all but THIS is about union busting and that's all.Read slowly. The issue is that his WaPo argued that mail in voting is great and secure, and now that he wants a fraud free election, Amazon worries about the security of mail in voting.
It's not that he thinks absentee voting is inherently fraudulent...union busters Always WANT TO INTIMIDATE THOSE VOTING AND MAIL IN PREVENTS THAT.
And oh yea...until about six months ago Republicans LOVED absentee voting. In fact big chunks of Republicans in Florida USED absentee voting.
Oddly no challenges there. Oh that's right...no need to challenge a state Trump won.
Fucking dishonest hypocrisy
This is another case of 'what is good for thee is not good for me. Btw dipstick, there is a difference between absentee ballots and mail in voting. You really should read more outside of your liberal indoctrination sites.
Libs just can't stay on topic because their positions don't survive logical inspection.Hey dumfuk...I know you have your grievance thing going and all but THIS is about union busting and that's all.Read slowly. The issue is that his WaPo argued that mail in voting is great and secure, and now that he wants a fraud free election, Amazon worries about the security of mail in voting.
It's not that he thinks absentee voting is inherently fraudulent...union busters Always WANT TO INTIMIDATE THOSE VOTING AND MAIL IN PREVENTS THAT.
And oh yea...until about six months ago Republicans LOVED absentee voting. In fact big chunks of Republicans in Florida USED absentee voting.
Oddly no challenges there. Oh that's right...no need to challenge a state Trump won.
Fucking dishonest hypocrisy
Yup!He called for mail-in in the presidential election, but opposes them in Amazon's unionizing vote!
Hypocritical Jeff Bezos Demands Amazon’s Unionizing Vote Be In-Person NOT Via Mail - The Lid (lidblog.com)
