Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There was never any proof, just speculation and a lot of allegsrion. If he was guilty, where are the indictments? Now that he's out of office, there should be nothing holding them back for handing indictments for the zelensky phone call....so...where are they?It was shown in both trials. Overwhelming evidence. Even some GOPers admitted Trump did that of which he was accused. Their excuse for acquittal was that it was not sufficient to remove him from office. So if you want to give CPR to that dead horse, knock yourself out.
That's a softball.
First, because impeachment is a political process, not a legal process.
Second, because the jury in the Trump impeachment was half made up of loyal partisans, many of who acquitted him not because he was not guilty, but because they didn't want him to face the penalty. That's not a guess. They said so.
Third, because -- and this is the most obvious one that you really should have puzzled out for yourself -- the "investigation" prior to impeachment was far from exhausting.
I could go on.
the "investigation" prior to impeachment was far from exhausting.
So what? They're so fucked in the head & bitch slapping each other that the process for picking Speaker is turning into a first class shitshow.The 1/6 gestapo doesn't have much time left. Republicans take over Jan 6.
Let them have their "investigation". That way the American people will continue to be reminded of Trump's coup attempt on Jan. 6 with cretins like Jordan leading the pack of nutjobs.There was never any proof, just speculation and a lot of allegsrion. If he was guilty, where are the indictments? Now that he's out of office, there should be nothing holding them back for handing indictments for the zelensky phone call....so...where are they?
And yet again, why the investigation after the impeachment for J6? Why won't you people answer that?
Will you PLEASE desist from your fiction.Really? A lawyer can make a determination without an investigation and determine what happened?
No, that's not how it works. If you haven't noticed by now, Mitch isn't exactly a solid republican. He kinda tries to appease both sides. He's wishy washy and always wants to "work with the other side" even when they stab the repubs in the back.
You claim they had all the evidence needed to show Trump was guilty enough to impeach him, but you still won't explain why, if that is the case, why they needed another investigation....you know the reason....
Your readiness to puke nonsense does not impose on me an obligation to decode it.No, charging someone with insurrection is not the reason to impeach....they need to PROVE that through and investigation to conduct the impeachment, which they did...AFTER they impeached him.
Please explain....
We will know on Monday.No, it means referrals have been issued.
In a constitutional democracy, sedition and insurrection refer to inciting or participating in rebellion against the constitutionally established government, its processes and institutions, or the rule of law.
Understanding Insurrection and Sedition
Sorry, stomping your feet and saying it louder isn't going to help you. Even GOPers admitted he was guilty as charged and that there was plenty of evidence. I don't have to entertain silly cult fantasies.There was never any proof, just speculation and a lot of allegsrion
Their was an insurrection based on the legal definition.
Their was seditious conspiracy based on convictions.
The whole world is laughing at you fucking idiots for being such whining crybabies.
Wahhhh....
Wahhhh...
What citation, exactly, are you looking for? That the J6 committee is a partisan witch hunt that used the second impeachment as a political tool against their political opposition? Look in the news, or here on USMB, it's been said....repeatedly.Will you PLEASE desist from your fiction.
Unless you can provide citations, I don't want to wade through it.
You are just avoiding the question, because you know I'm right. You know it was all a partisan hit job on the president.Your readiness to puke nonsense does not impose on me an obligation to decode it.
Sorry, stomping your feet and saying it louder isn't going to help you. Even GOPers admitted he was guilty as charged and that there was plenty of evidence. I don't have to entertain silly cult fantasies.
Bummer. Have you had your eyes and ears checked lately? Seems like everyone else gets it. But that's the old impeachment.I'm still trying to find any audio, or written text where Trump has admitted the phone call was for the purpose of getting dirt on a political opponent...
Bummer. Have you had your eyes and ears checked lately? Seems like everyone else gets it. But that's the old impeachment.
Let's get back to the federal felonies that could prohibit Trump from holding office.
Over/under until the first indictment? I will say 8 weeks and take the under.
You?
Seems like everyone else gets it.
Riiiiight. And that's why Vindman squealed, too. Just had a hard on for Trump. Yes, the whole world framing poor Donnie again. That garbage just isn't going to fly, sorry.You "get it" because you want to.
Not the world, just the democratic party with an axe to grind.Riiiiight. And that's why Vindman squealed, too. Just had a hard on for Trump. Yes, the whole world framing poor Donnie again. That garbage just isn't going to fly, sorry.
Over under 8 weeks?
