J6 Committee Misleading Witnesses About Republican Staff Presence

[j-mac]

It didn't have to be "one sided" at all. The republicans wanted to talk about a host of unrelated side issues to distract from the focus of the investigation or they were not going to participate. A lack of good faith and due diligence is an excellent reason to deny a member a seat on any committee.

Are you freaking kidding me here? Look, Polosi's objection to Jordan, and Banks were disingenuous at best. She just didn't want any opposition to the narrative Democrats wanted to cement into the public's minds....And, she violated house rules to do it...Plus, she didn't want to testify about her actions that day, but the truth will come out, it always does.

But, you as much as confirm it right here in your post...Things you call "unrelated issues" are the epitome of not wanting the whole picture...You believe that Trump was the all evil, man child that couldn't take losing, and to some extent you're right about that....But, then again, Hillary told Biden if he lost not to concede...Would that have been a coup as well?

Today's progressive Democrats are doing what they always do, overplay their hand, and lying about events when they don't fit the narrative they want projected to the people...

 

[HandleTheTruth]

It is stunning to watch...Why any serious person would entertain 1 minute of this sham is beyond me...

The facts are coming out and Republicans are the ones telling on Trump.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The failure of Trump to send anyone at all up there willing to defend him can only mean one thing. They could have even had some friends on the panel but they picked people who it turns out were involved in some way.

Defense isn't allowed at the Nazi show trial.

Try a different lie, Herr Himmler.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

What bullshit. NO corroboration of Hutchinson’s perjury, there were NO deleted texts and it’s already come out that everything requested was turned over (oops). Why won’t the committee allow them to testify? Piggy Cheney’s only offer was to AMEND testimony. Read : LIE and say what she wants to hear. Next pile of shit......

Yeah..I think that ship sailed.
Nice try though.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/14/politics/trump-secret-service-january-6-metropolitan-police-officer/index.html

 

[occupied]

Are you freaking kidding me here? Look, Polosi's objection to Jordan, and Banks were disingenuous at best. She just didn't want any opposition to the narrative Democrats wanted to cement into the public's minds....And, she violated house rules to do it...Plus, she didn't want to testify about her actions that day, but the truth will come out, it always does.

But, you as much as confirm it right here in your post...Things you call "unrelated issues" are the epitome of not wanting the whole picture...You believe that Trump was the all evil, man child that couldn't take losing, and to some extent you're right about that....But, then again, Hillary told Biden if he lost not to concede...Would that have been a coup as well?

Today's progressive Democrats are doing what they always do, overplay their hand, and lying about events when they don't fit the narrative they want projected to the people...

Now would be a good time to say when any of the mostly republican witnesses have lied under oath.

 

[Seymour Flops]

If anyone involved in these events wants to come TRUTHFULLY testify the committee will get a chair and a microphone for them on very short order.

That's an absurd statement. Cassidy testified behind closed doors eight times before the Kangaroos decided that she had been coached well enough to appear in public.

Can you name a single witness who has testified publicly without going through that closed door process?

 

[occupied]

That's an absurd statement. Cassidy testified behind closed doors eight times before the Kangaroos decided that she had been coached well enough to appear in public.

Can you name a single witness who has testified publicly without going through that closed door process?

Investigators must be very careful to avoid letting persons of interest collaborate on getting their story straight. When the police or anyone conducts an investigation witnesses or suspects are interviewed separately with the aim of none of them being able to know what the others have said. This is not a trial. It's a public hearing to present evidence obtained so far. Should anyone get indicted by DOJ they will have their day in court.

 

[j-mac]

The facts are coming out and Republicans are the ones telling on Trump.

It’s all a neat little package isn’t it?

 

[j-mac]

Investigators must be very careful to avoid letting persons of interest collaborate on getting their story straight. When the police or anyone conducts an investigation witnesses or suspects are interviewed separately with the aim of none of them being able to know what the others have said. This is not a trial. It's a public hearing to present evidence obtained so far. Should anyone get indicted by DOJ they will have their day in court.

Court? You think any of this clown show would be suitable for court shows how brainwashed you are.

 

[Doc7505]

If anyone involved in these events wants to come TRUTHFULLY testify the committee will get a chair and a microphone for them on very short order.

~~~~~~

Report: Sham Jan 6th Committee Now Lying To Witnesses

The Jan 6th committee continues to be a sham. GOP Rep Jim Banks is now exposing that the committee has been lying to witnesses before they testify under oath.

thepalmierireport.com

**********​

Jan 6th Shammittee Caught Extorting Potential Witnesses… – Patriots Beacon

**********​

What the Jan. 6 probe found out about social media but didn’t report

The Jan. 6 committee’s 845-page report offered few details of social media’s role in the Capitol riot. Transcripts and an unreleased memo show the committee knew more.

www.stripes.com