Ivermectin: Could Population-Wide Distribution Have Prevented China’s Recent Mass COVID Outbreak?

[Doc7505]

No, its concrete proof that you're a fucking idiot.

~~~~~~

The Media Fell for a Viral Hoax About Ivermectin Overdoses Straining Rural Hospitals

Some people are self-medicating with a dubious COVID-19 treatment, but they aren't overwhelming doctors and nurses.

reason.com

**********​

The Undeniable Ivermectin Miracle in India’s 240m Populated Largest State, Uttar Pradesh – Horowitz - NewsRescue.com

Doctors advice that Ivermectin or Monoclonal antibodies should be used within the first 10 days of contact/infection; while the virus is still alive. After 10 days the virus is already dead and has left trillions of cascade-causing debris viral particles NewsRescue by DANIEL HOROWITZ, TheBlaze...

newsrescue.com

**********​

Uttar Pradesh is ivermectin’s best practice success story

(Conclusion) In last week’s column, we wrote about the amazing outcome many states in India like Uttar Pradesh and Delhi have attained with an ivermectin-based multidrug prevention and early treatm…

lifestyle.inquirer.net

**********​

India's Ivermectin Blackout - Part V: The Secret Revealed

On May 7, 2021, during the peak of India's Delta Surge, The World Health Organization reported, "Uttar Pradesh (is) going the last mile to stop COVID-19."

www.thedesertreview.com

**********​

Ivermectin: How false science created a Covid 'miracle' drug

Thousands worldwide have taken ivermectin to fight Covid. But what's the evidence?

www.bbc.com

 

[luiza]

I work in a hospital...surrounded by actual medical professionals. But if you want to rely on "biznews" for your health advice...feel free seabiscuit.

So you collect refuse bags .

Your complete lack of knowledge of facts and scientific research results makes you either a fantasy merchant or completely ignorant .
Which ?
Both ?

 

[DBA]

No, I didn't hear that. Do you have a credible link to a source that subscribes to journalistic standards of fact checking and verification????

I suggest you take your own advice. The same loons promoting ivermectin on the internet and in interviews, are SELLING you prescriptions. They're making millions of other sufferers from Oppositional Behaviour Disorder, Republicanism, or just plain gullibility.

God you people are so ignorant and dense. Google

A Pfizer director was caught on camera last week saying:

""We're exploring, like, you know how the virus keeps mutating? Well, one of the things we're exploring is like, why don't we just mutate it ourselves, so we could focus on, create, preemptively develop new vaccines, right?

"If we're going to do that though there's a risk of like, as you could imagine, no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating ******* viruses.

"So, we're like, 'Do we want to do this?' So that's like one of the things we're considering, for like, the future, like maybe we can like, create new versions of the vaccines and things like that."

The interviewer asks: "Okay. So, Pfizer ultimately is thinking about mutating COVID?"

The interviewee replies: "Well that is not what we say to the public, no. That's why it was, it was a thought that came up in a meeting and we were like: 'Why do we not?'

"It was like, we're going to consider that with more discussions. That exactly, actually. We're like: 'Wait a minute, like, people won't like that.'"

Fact Check: Does Project Veritas video show Pfizer is mutating COVID?

Of course, it is labled as "unverified" by Newsweek. The MSM and others want this swept under the rug and quickly.

Rubio Sends Letter to Pfizer CEO on Alleged Gain-of-Function Research

Ivermectin and HCL are both generics VERY cheap. That was the problem. Big Pharma needed to make huge profits on newly patentend drugs, not drug whose patents have long expired. You and many millions where tricked. Big pharma and many politicians profitted big time from the lab leak in Wuhan(yes, it was a lab leak by all reasonable accounts)

 

[DBA]

~~~~~~

The Media Fell for a Viral Hoax About Ivermectin Overdoses Straining Rural Hospitals

Some people are self-medicating with a dubious COVID-19 treatment, but they aren't overwhelming doctors and nurses.

reason.com

**********​

The Undeniable Ivermectin Miracle in India’s 240m Populated Largest State, Uttar Pradesh – Horowitz - NewsRescue.com

Doctors advice that Ivermectin or Monoclonal antibodies should be used within the first 10 days of contact/infection; while the virus is still alive. After 10 days the virus is already dead and has left trillions of cascade-causing debris viral particles NewsRescue by DANIEL HOROWITZ, TheBlaze...

newsrescue.com

**********​

Uttar Pradesh is ivermectin’s best practice success story

(Conclusion) In last week’s column, we wrote about the amazing outcome many states in India like Uttar Pradesh and Delhi have attained with an ivermectin-based multidrug prevention and early treatm…

lifestyle.inquirer.net

**********​

India's Ivermectin Blackout - Part V: The Secret Revealed

On May 7, 2021, during the peak of India's Delta Surge, The World Health Organization reported, "Uttar Pradesh (is) going the last mile to stop COVID-19."

www.thedesertreview.com

**********​

Ivermectin: How false science created a Covid 'miracle' drug

Thousands worldwide have taken ivermectin to fight Covid. But what's the evidence?

www.bbc.com

You will never convince these sheep. They will trust their herders until the day they die, no questions asked. The FBI literally pays a private company(Twitter) to "listen" to their opinions on who and what should be censored on their platform and the Democrats don't see a problem. They are THAT much in the tank for their Democratic religion.

 

[Dragonlady]

God you people are so ignorant and dense. Google

A Pfizer director was caught on camera last week saying:

""We're exploring, like, you know how the virus keeps mutating? Well, one of the things we're exploring is like, why don't we just mutate it ourselves, so we could focus on, create, preemptively develop new vaccines, right?

"If we're going to do that though there's a risk of like, as you could imagine, no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating ******* viruses.

"So, we're like, 'Do we want to do this?' So that's like one of the things we're considering, for like, the future, like maybe we can like, create new versions of the vaccines and things like that."

The interviewer asks: "Okay. So, Pfizer ultimately is thinking about mutating COVID?"

The interviewee replies: "Well that is not what we say to the public, no. That's why it was, it was a thought that came up in a meeting and we were like: 'Why do we not?'

"It was like, we're going to consider that with more discussions. That exactly, actually. We're like: 'Wait a minute, like, people won't like that.'"

Fact Check: Does Project Veritas video show Pfizer is mutating COVID?

Of course, it is labled as "unverified" by Newsweek. The MSM and others want this swept under the rug and quickly.

Rubio Sends Letter to Pfizer CEO on Alleged Gain-of-Function Research

Ivermectin and HCL are both generics VERY cheap. That was the problem. Big Pharma needed to make huge profits on newly patentend drugs, not drug whose patents have long expired. You and many millions where tricked. Big pharma and many politicians profitted big time from the lab leak in Wuhan(yes, it was a lab leak by all reasonable accounts)

So after denying credible sources on vaccines and cures, you glom onto every Questionable Source reporting on the profit motives of Big Pharma.

The people promoting the quack cure you claim would keep Big Pharma from making big bucks on their cures, are making millions of dollars themselves, selling internet prescriptions of the low cost drugs they're promoting.

Ivermectin: How false science created a Covid 'miracle' drug

Thousands worldwide have taken ivermectin to fight Covid. But what's the evidence?

www.bbc.com

Congress Is Looking Into Groups Profiting From Fake COVID-19 Drugs After TIME Investigation

Lawmakers are turning their attention to holding those who profit from COVID-19 misinformation accountable.

time.com

The Doctor Who Called Ivermectin a 'Wonder Drug' Caught Covid

The drug has been part of two unvaccinated celebrities' Covid "treatment plans."

www.menshealth.com

ETA: I read the Newsweek piece. Noting that questions and answered are not sequential, and the favourite PV trick of editing a different question before the answer to make it look like the Pfizer staffer was saying one thing, when he wasn't.

Newsweek also notes that all discussion of mutating the virus was based on hypotheticals, and the staffer himself said the that's not something they were doing or even discussing doing other than a hypothetical, and if you could do it how would you test it.

I have a friend who was a nuclear engineer. The first time he walked into a US nuclear plant, he had to go to a security clearance interview. The CIA guy asked him if he had ever considered blowing up a nuclear power plant, and his answer was "Yes. I think about how I'd blow it up, every time I go come through the door.". As a security consultant, that's his job. To anticipate how someone could blow up the building.

Development companies "what if" all of the time. What if we did this? Donald Trump asked why the cops couldn't just shoot the protestors in the legs or something. Even if someone comes up with an idea that's preposterous, or just plain wrong, it might get kicked around.

They might kick the idea of mutating the virus around to see if there was some way of adapting the idea to a more acceptable form, and from the quotes posted, it appears that on the surface it sounded like a bad idea but delving deeper it was an unworkable bad idea, and dismissed.

 

[DBA]

Noting that questions and answered are not sequential, and the fa

So after denying credible sources on vaccines and cures, you glom onto every Questionable Source reporting on the profit motives of Big Pharma.

The people promoting the quack cure you claim would keep Big Pharma from making big bucks on their cures, are making millions of dollars themselves, selling internet prescriptions of the low cost drugs they're promoting.

Ivermectin: How false science created a Covid 'miracle' drug

Thousands worldwide have taken ivermectin to fight Covid. But what's the evidence?

www.bbc.com

Congress Is Looking Into Groups Profiting From Fake COVID-19 Drugs After TIME Investigation

Lawmakers are turning their attention to holding those who profit from COVID-19 misinformation accountable.

time.com

The Doctor Who Called Ivermectin a 'Wonder Drug' Caught Covid

The drug has been part of two unvaccinated celebrities' Covid "treatment plans."

www.menshealth.com

ETA: I read the Newsweek piece. Noting that questions and answered are not sequential, and the favourite PV trick of editing a different question before the answer to make it look like the Pfizer staffer was saying one thing, when he wasn't.

Newsweek also notes that all discussion of mutating the virus was based on hypotheticals, and the staffer himself said the that's not something they were doing or even discussing doing other than a hypothetical, and if you could do it how would you test it.

I have a friend who was a nuclear engineer. The first time he walked into a US nuclear plant, he had to go to a security clearance interview. The CIA guy asked him if he had ever considered blowing up a nuclear power plant, and his answer was "Yes. I think about how I'd blow it up, every time I go come through the door.". As a security consultant, that's his job. To anticipate how someone could blow up the building.

Development companies "what if" all of the time. What if we did this? Donald Trump asked why the cops couldn't just shoot the protestors in the legs or something. Even if someone comes up with an idea that's preposterous, or just plain wrong, it might get kicked around.

They might kick the idea of mutating the virus around to see if there was some way of adapting the idea to a more acceptable form, and from the quotes posted, it appears that on the surface it sounded like a bad idea but delving deeper it was an unworkable bad idea, and dismissed.

Wow, just nuts.

Yeah, companies do bat ideas around. Thinking out of the box is encouraged, however, that is limited to ethical and lawful ideas. If in a meeting, I said "what if" we eliminated our competition by hacking into their systems, stealing their proprietary information and getting their customer base, I would immediately be put on the black list and my idea would be dismissed immediately. That is essentially what this director said happened, except the extremely unethical and illegal idea obviously didn't get immediately squashed, as it should have been, in fact, it seemed to have garnered some interest.

You like to stick up for your politics at all costs, but deep down, you know this is wrong.

 

[candycorn]

~~~~~~

The Media Fell for a Viral Hoax About Ivermectin Overdoses Straining Rural Hospitals

Some people are self-medicating with a dubious COVID-19 treatment, but they aren't overwhelming doctors and nurses.

reason.com

**********​

The Undeniable Ivermectin Miracle in India’s 240m Populated Largest State, Uttar Pradesh – Horowitz - NewsRescue.com

Doctors advice that Ivermectin or Monoclonal antibodies should be used within the first 10 days of contact/infection; while the virus is still alive. After 10 days the virus is already dead and has left trillions of cascade-causing debris viral particles NewsRescue by DANIEL HOROWITZ, TheBlaze...

newsrescue.com

**********​

Uttar Pradesh is ivermectin’s best practice success story

(Conclusion) In last week’s column, we wrote about the amazing outcome many states in India like Uttar Pradesh and Delhi have attained with an ivermectin-based multidrug prevention and early treatm…

lifestyle.inquirer.net

**********​

India's Ivermectin Blackout - Part V: The Secret Revealed

On May 7, 2021, during the peak of India's Delta Surge, The World Health Organization reported, "Uttar Pradesh (is) going the last mile to stop COVID-19."

www.thedesertreview.com

**********​

Ivermectin: How false science created a Covid 'miracle' drug

Thousands worldwide have taken ivermectin to fight Covid. But what's the evidence?

www.bbc.com

Well if "lifestyleinquirer.net" says so.

 

[MarathonMike]

Ivermectin: ​

Could Population​

-​

Wide Distribution Have Prevented China’s Recent Mass COVID Outbreak?​

Ivermectin: Could Population-Wide Distribution Have Prevented China’s Recent Mass COVID Outbreak?

www.theepochtimes.com

30 Jan 2023 ~~ By Dr. Sean Lin & Mingjia Jacky Guan

China’s state-run medicare program recently failed to reach an agreement with Pfizer to import more Paxlovid, claiming the COVID-19 treatment drug is too expensive. This is despite the drug being offered to the state at a reduced rate in comparison with that offered to other developed countries. Lack of Paxlovid will leave only Azvudine, an anti-HIV drug the Chinese communist regime rushed through development and re-branded as an anti-COVID drug, as a treatment option.
Given the recent explosive spread of COVID and the resulting skyrocketing rates of hospitalization, finding viable treatment options is paramount.
Ivermectin in India and Peru
When the Delta variant broke out in 2021 across India, many states offered ivermectin population-wide. The efficacy of ivermectin in treating early and mild COVID-19 infections was confirmed in large states such as Uttar Pradesh—home to 241 million residents—where the use of the prophylactic dramatically reduced both the infection rate and the death toll.

**********

**********

~Snip~
Repurposing drugs, if successful, is the best accelerator for prophylactic development because it can save developers anywhere from three to 12 years as experts can reuse the data from previous clinical trials and other experiments.
A “wonder drug” like ivermectin should be strongly considered as a defense against viruses given its success both in mechanism studies and clinical trials as well as applications in a variety of diseases and infections. The suppression of ivermectin usage during the COVID-19 pandemic by government agencies and Big Pharma is one of the world’s most tragic events in modern medicine.

Commentary:
Herr Doktor Fauxceee would never have allowed such a scandalous publication.

Huge study supporting ivermectin as Covid treatment withdrawn over ethical concerns

The preprint endorsing ivermectin as a coronavirus therapy has been widely cited, but independent researchers find glaring discrepancies in the data

www.theguardian.com

**********​

One moment, please...

**********​

Study claiming that ivermectin reduces COVID-19 mortality by 92% has important methodological problems

The antiparasitic drug ivermectin has been subjected to many studies attempting to determine if it is effective at preventing or treating COVID-19. Large, randomized controlled trials so far haven’t detected benefits from ivermectin treatment in COVID-19 patients.

healthfeedback.org

​

The anti-Ivermectin campaign waged by Big Pharma, Fauci and the CDC was essentially state sponsored genocide. All in the name of profit and control.

 

[Doc7505]

Well if "lifestyleinquirer.net" says so.

~~~~~~
Not so.....

“Gold-Standard” RCT from Gates-Funded Company Proves Ivermectin Works Against COVID​

“Gold-Standard” RCT from Gates-Funded Company Proves Ivermectin Works Against COVID

For nearly two years, Dr. Pierre Kory has been trying to tell the United States and the world that Ivermectin is highly e...

www.uncoverdc.com

10 Feb2023 ~~ By Michelle Edwards

For nearly two years, Dr. Pierre Kory has been trying to tell the United States and the world that Ivermectin is highly effective in preventing COVID-19. On January 5, following the release of “the 16th positive, statistically significant trial” reinforcing the effectiveness of the affordable drug, Kory reiterated that same message. Indeed, the latest study proving Ivermectin’s effectiveness was a gold-standard randomized clinical trial (RCT) conducted by MedinCell.
The study, conducted on 399 patients, met its primary efficacy endpoint with a reduction of 75 percent of COVID-19 infection in the group treated with daily oral administration of Ivermectin compared to the placebo group. All participants were unvaccinated adults and had been exposed to the virus within five days of screening after documented close contact with a person who had a PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. After administering Ivermectin for 28 days, the drug showed acceptable safety and tolerability with zero unforeseen safety signals.

​

~Snip~
Recognizing that Ivermectin does not need to be formulated into a profitable injectable, oral Ivermectin is readily available, extremely affordable, and, thanks to MedinCell’s recent RCT, proven to be a safe and effective treatment against COVID-19. Once and for all, it is time for the pleas of Dr. Kory and the other experts successfully using Ivermectin to treat COVID-19 to be heard.

Commentary:
How many billions of doses have been administered world-wide to millions of people since it was created in a laboratory? Of course it's safe.
India averted truly devastating pandemic deaths by using Ivermectin, hydroxy Chloroquine, and zinc.

 

[candycorn]

~~~~~~
Not so.....

“Gold-Standard” RCT from Gates-Funded Company Proves Ivermectin Works Against COVID​

“Gold-Standard” RCT from Gates-Funded Company Proves Ivermectin Works Against COVID

For nearly two years, Dr. Pierre Kory has been trying to tell the United States and the world that Ivermectin is highly e...

www.uncoverdc.com

10 Feb2023 ~~ By Michelle Edwards

For nearly two years, Dr. Pierre Kory has been trying to tell the United States and the world that Ivermectin is highly effective in preventing COVID-19. On January 5, following the release of “the 16th positive, statistically significant trial” reinforcing the effectiveness of the affordable drug, Kory reiterated that same message. Indeed, the latest study proving Ivermectin’s effectiveness was a gold-standard randomized clinical trial (RCT) conducted by MedinCell.
The study, conducted on 399 patients, met its primary efficacy endpoint with a reduction of 75 percent of COVID-19 infection in the group treated with daily oral administration of Ivermectin compared to the placebo group. All participants were unvaccinated adults and had been exposed to the virus within five days of screening after documented close contact with a person who had a PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. After administering Ivermectin for 28 days, the drug showed acceptable safety and tolerability with zero unforeseen safety signals.

​

~Snip~
Recognizing that Ivermectin does not need to be formulated into a profitable injectable, oral Ivermectin is readily available, extremely affordable, and, thanks to MedinCell’s recent RCT, proven to be a safe and effective treatment against COVID-19. Once and for all, it is time for the pleas of Dr. Kory and the other experts successfully using Ivermectin to treat COVID-19 to be heard.

Commentary:
How many billions of doses have been administered world-wide to millions of people since it was created in a laboratory? Of course it's safe.
India averted truly devastating pandemic deaths by using Ivermectin, hydroxy Chloroquine, and zinc.

Imagine that...taking a horse dewormer didn't protect the "doctor"

 

[Doc7505]

No, its concrete proof that you're a fucking idiot.

~~~~~~

Doctors Sue FDA For Prohibiting Ivermectin To Treat Covid-19​

Doctors Sue FDA For Prohibiting Use Of Ivermectin To Treat Covid

'For two weeks, all you heard was 'horse dewormer,'' Pierre Kory told The Federalist. 'And the effects were massive.'

thefederalist.com

21 Feb 2023 ~~ By Victoria Marshall

A group of doctors is suing the Food and Drug Administration and the Department of Health and Human Services for their various attempts at preventing ivermectin from being prescribed to treat Covid-19. Plaintiffs Robert L. Apter, Mary Talley Bowden, and Paul E. Marik argued the FDA tried to prohibit them from prescribing the drug, even though they have successfully used it in treating patients with the coronavirus.
“The FDA generally cannot ban particular uses of human drugs once they are otherwise approved and admitted to the market, even if such use differs from the labeling — commonly referred to as ‘off-label’ use,” the lawsuit argues. “The FDA also cannot advise whether a patient should take an approved drug for a particular purpose.”
But the FDA overstepped its authority by “directing the public, including health professionals and patients, not to use ivermectin to treat COVID-19, even though the drug remains fully approved for human use,” the lawsuit continues. The aim of the suit is to set aside “any FDA actions that direct or opine on whether ivermectin is an appropriate treatment for COVID-19, declare such actions unlawful, and issue permanent injunctive relief enjoining the FDA from further engaging in such actions.”
~Snip~
By prohibiting the use of “off-label” drugs to treat Covid, public health officials and federal bureaucrats put the interests of Big Pharma over patients. As such, physicians were scared to prescribe off-label drugs, a common practice within the medical community, for fear of losing their licenses. How many needless Covid deaths or severe infections might have been prevented if not for this false public intimidation campaign?



Commentary:
When a drug is approved for certain illnesses after extensive trials it is often discovered it is good for other illnesses. The drug companies often will not do the extensive and costly trials for a new indication and in particular if the drug is now generic and cheap as is Ivermectin and HCQ. Both are dirt cheap. However, licensed physicians are entitled to prescribe these drugs for indications that are off label.

Our Federal Government and some State Governments went after these physicians with legal actions when they were practicing medicine that was perfectly legal.
The data is clear that either one improved outcomes by over 50%. When used in combination I would expect it to be even higher.
Fact - these are very safe drugs with minuscule side effects in comparison to other top 10 drugs in the world. These docs have a great lawsuit and I am sure that our judiciary will throw it out immediately. Name one illness in the history of modern medicine where doctors were forbidden to try and treat it.
This was murder. There is way to sugarcoat it. In hindsight I think most will agree (now or eventually) that the vaccines were bad, but even putting yourself back in time to the point where the entire nation breathed a sigh of relief (after the election of course) with the vaccine, there was still no reason we could not have done an “all of the above approach” to the “pandemic”.
It is all about control.

 

[scruffy]

Ivermectin: ​

Could Population​

-​

Wide Distribution Have Prevented China’s Recent Mass COVID Outbreak?​

Ivermectin: Could Population-Wide Distribution Have Prevented China’s Recent Mass COVID Outbreak?

www.theepochtimes.com

30 Jan 2023 ~~ By Dr. Sean Lin & Mingjia Jacky Guan

China’s state-run medicare program recently failed to reach an agreement with Pfizer to import more Paxlovid, claiming the COVID-19 treatment drug is too expensive. This is despite the drug being offered to the state at a reduced rate in comparison with that offered to other developed countries. Lack of Paxlovid will leave only Azvudine, an anti-HIV drug the Chinese communist regime rushed through development and re-branded as an anti-COVID drug, as a treatment option.
Given the recent explosive spread of COVID and the resulting skyrocketing rates of hospitalization, finding viable treatment options is paramount.
Ivermectin in India and Peru
When the Delta variant broke out in 2021 across India, many states offered ivermectin population-wide. The efficacy of ivermectin in treating early and mild COVID-19 infections was confirmed in large states such as Uttar Pradesh—home to 241 million residents—where the use of the prophylactic dramatically reduced both the infection rate and the death toll.

**********

**********

~Snip~
Repurposing drugs, if successful, is the best accelerator for prophylactic development because it can save developers anywhere from three to 12 years as experts can reuse the data from previous clinical trials and other experiments.
A “wonder drug” like ivermectin should be strongly considered as a defense against viruses given its success both in mechanism studies and clinical trials as well as applications in a variety of diseases and infections. The suppression of ivermectin usage during the COVID-19 pandemic by government agencies and Big Pharma is one of the world’s most tragic events in modern medicine.

Commentary:
Herr Doktor Fauxceee would never have allowed such a scandalous publication.

Huge study supporting ivermectin as Covid treatment withdrawn over ethical concerns

The preprint endorsing ivermectin as a coronavirus therapy has been widely cited, but independent researchers find glaring discrepancies in the data

www.theguardian.com

**********​

One moment, please...

**********​

Study claiming that ivermectin reduces COVID-19 mortality by 92% has important methodological problems

The antiparasitic drug ivermectin has been subjected to many studies attempting to determine if it is effective at preventing or treating COVID-19. Large, randomized controlled trials so far haven’t detected benefits from ivermectin treatment in COVID-19 patients.

healthfeedback.org

​

The problem is, no one knows how ivermectin works against viruses.

We know how it works against parasites, it binds to a glutamate dependent chloride channel.

But ivermectin is a complex molecule and it's not a raw protease inhibitor "that we know of". What we know is there's a specific protein called importin that's involved in the movement of other proteins between the nucleus and the cytoplasm, and common to the viruses in the diagram is that they piggyback on importin, which ivermectin seems to inhibit somehow.

Ivermectin is a specific inhibitor of importin α/β-mediated nuclear import able to inhibit replication of HIV-1 and dengue virus

The movement of proteins between the cytoplasm and nucleus mediated by the importin superfamily of proteins is essential to many cellular processes, including differentiation and development, and is critical to disease states such as viral disease and oncogenesis. We recently developed a...

portlandpress.com

What is interesting if you look at the India chart, the single dose people seem to have done better than the double dose ones.

 

[candycorn]

The problem is, no one knows how ivermectin works against viruses.

Because it doesn't.

 

[candycorn]

~~~~~~

Doctors Sue FDA For Prohibiting Ivermectin To Treat Covid-19​

Doctors Sue FDA For Prohibiting Use Of Ivermectin To Treat Covid

'For two weeks, all you heard was 'horse dewormer,'' Pierre Kory told The Federalist. 'And the effects were massive.'

thefederalist.com

21 Feb 2023 ~~ By Victoria Marshall

A group of doctors is suing the Food and Drug Administration and the Department of Health and Human Services for their various attempts at preventing ivermectin from being prescribed to treat Covid-19. Plaintiffs Robert L. Apter, Mary Talley Bowden, and Paul E. Marik argued the FDA tried to prohibit them from prescribing the drug, even though they have successfully used it in treating patients with the coronavirus.
“The FDA generally cannot ban particular uses of human drugs once they are otherwise approved and admitted to the market, even if such use differs from the labeling — commonly referred to as ‘off-label’ use,” the lawsuit argues. “The FDA also cannot advise whether a patient should take an approved drug for a particular purpose.”
But the FDA overstepped its authority by “directing the public, including health professionals and patients, not to use ivermectin to treat COVID-19, even though the drug remains fully approved for human use,” the lawsuit continues. The aim of the suit is to set aside “any FDA actions that direct or opine on whether ivermectin is an appropriate treatment for COVID-19, declare such actions unlawful, and issue permanent injunctive relief enjoining the FDA from further engaging in such actions.”
~Snip~
By prohibiting the use of “off-label” drugs to treat Covid, public health officials and federal bureaucrats put the interests of Big Pharma over patients. As such, physicians were scared to prescribe off-label drugs, a common practice within the medical community, for fear of losing their licenses. How many needless Covid deaths or severe infections might have been prevented if not for this false public intimidation campaign?



Commentary:
When a drug is approved for certain illnesses after extensive trials it is often discovered it is good for other illnesses. The drug companies often will not do the extensive and costly trials for a new indication and in particular if the drug is now generic and cheap as is Ivermectin and HCQ. Both are dirt cheap. However, licensed physicians are entitled to prescribe these drugs for indications that are off label.

Our Federal Government and some State Governments went after these physicians with legal actions when they were practicing medicine that was perfectly legal.
The data is clear that either one improved outcomes by over 50%. When used in combination I would expect it to be even higher.
Fact - these are very safe drugs with minuscule side effects in comparison to other top 10 drugs in the world. These docs have a great lawsuit and I am sure that our judiciary will throw it out immediately. Name one illness in the history of modern medicine where doctors were forbidden to try and treat it.
This was murder. There is way to sugarcoat it. In hindsight I think most will agree (now or eventually) that the vaccines were bad, but even putting yourself back in time to the point where the entire nation breathed a sigh of relief (after the election of course) with the vaccine, there was still no reason we could not have done an “all of the above approach” to the “pandemic”.
It is all about control.

Horse dewormer (like aspirin or Tylenol) had, at best, therapeutic benefit for those who took it. For those foolish enough to believe that it was going to prevent infection, it's ingestion was often fatal.