It’s the sun and it’s coming for us

Yes, this will happen, it is only a matter of time. Will it take down the power grid? It depends on two factors, the strength of the CME, and the strength of the Earth's own magnetic field.


I notice, when you were asked to link your thread, you did not. I remember when you posted that thread. I personally did not mock you. IN fact, I personally, thought you were entirely too optimistic about our potential outcome, should one hit. You, as usual, were using it as a platform to push your green energy agenda.

There is something far more dangerous, and sinister related to this issue, than just, "energy," which most folks are not even aware. It is more, about, survival, IMO.


There is more here to this issue, than just CME ejections. As long as the Earth's Magnetic field strength remains strong? We will probably be able to withstand, or indeed, recover from most CMEs. We had learned some valuable lessons from the Carrington Event, and the CME of 1989.

What we are not prepared for, and will never, EVER be prepared for, is a CME event, when the Earth's magnetic field strength is disorganized or completely weakened.



Agreed.


Electricity, or the continuation of human civilization, is, IMO, the least of humankind's problems, IMO. What we are talking about, should a CME occur, while the Earth's magnetic field is weakened or in a state of reorganization?

magnetic-flelds-during-reversal.gif


I always watch with amusement, the heated discussions around the origins of humans, and those who don't believe in the "theory," of evolution. "Where are these transitional species," is always the question asked. Which is, after all, a good question. Folks that have studied evolution, would have heard of "punctuated evolution," but then? That leaves us with the question, what major event caused such widespread mutations in flora and fauna, creating mass spectacular evolutionary events, all at once, and then, a stabilization of the all species afterward? Leaving little, to no, "transitory," species in the fossil record? What could do that?


What indeed?

And? They always tend to happen, at somewhat regular intervals. :eusa_think:

Reviews of Geophysics
Review Article
Open Access

The Role of Geomagnetic Field Intensity in Late Quaternary Evolution of Humans and Large Mammals​


So. . . if "we," as a species survive, maybe those who do, will be a little less. . . well, combative, power hungry, and selfish. But who knows. It will probably be the elites in Deep Underground bases, and those up top that will evolve into something else?

:dunno:

Maybe, as HG Wells foresaw, we will branch into two different species? Perhaps the global elites have foreseen this for some time?

Human species 'may split in two'
Humanity may split into two sub-species in 100,000 years' time as predicted by HG Wells, an expert has said
The Third World War Will Be Against the Third World

The "human race" has already split into more than one species and it's been that way for thousands of years. These "races" are incompatible now and have been since 1945.
 
The Third World War Will Be Against the Third World

The "human race" has already split into more than one species and it's been that way for thousands of years. These "races" are incompatible now and have been since 1945.


Monotypic and polytypic species​

"In biological terms, rather than in relation to nomenclature, a polytypic species has two or more genetically and phenotypically divergent subspecies, races, or more generally speaking, populations that differ from each other so that a separate description is warranted.[15] These distinct groups do not interbreed as they are isolated from another, but they can interbreed and have fertile offspring, e.g. in captivity. These subspecies, races, or populations, are usually described and named by zoologists, botanists and microbiologists.[citation needed]

In a monotypic species, all populations exhibit the same genetic and phenotypical characteristics. Monotypic species can occur in several ways:[citation needed]

  • All members of the species are very similar and cannot be sensibly divided into biologically significant subcategories.
  • The individuals vary considerably, but the variation is essentially random and largely meaningless so far as genetic transmission of these variations is concerned.
  • The variation among individuals is noticeable and follows a pattern, but there are no clear dividing lines among separate groups: they fade imperceptibly into one another. Such clinal variation always indicates substantial gene flow among the apparently separate groups that make up the population(s). Populations that have a steady, substantial gene flow among them are likely to represent a monotypic species, even when a fair degree of genetic variation is obvious. . . "
 

Forum List

Back
Top