ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 51,685
- 51,425
- 3,615
Its too bad Fauci didnt experiment on John Wick’s dog. This shit would get handled.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
It Just Keeps Getting Worse For Fauci: Not Just Beagles & Monkeys - NIH Funded Medical Experiments On NY City Orphans
- Thread starter easyt65
- Start date
- Banned
- #22
If this doesn't help convince you to NEVER trust any government nothing will.View attachment 556548
It Wasn’t Just Beagles and Monkeys – Fauci’s NIH Also Funded
Medical Experiments on AIDS Orphans in NY City
- NPR: NIH Tested AIDS Drugs on Foster Children
Earlier this May, the Associated Press reported that National Institutes of Health researchers tested AIDS drugs on hundreds of foster children in the late 1980s and '90s. In many instances, the drugs were given without independent advocates who monitor the safety of these children. Ed Gordon explores the controversy with two AIDS experts: Dr. Jonathan Fishbein of the National Institutes of Health and Baylor College of Medicine's Dr. Mark Kline.
In August Gateway Pundit contributor Cassandra Fairbanks broke the story on Dr. Fauci’s use of taxpayer money to torture beagles in barbaric animal testing. Dr. Fauci funded a study in Tunisia where beagle dogs were eaten alive by parasite-infected flies.
Dr. Fauci also spent over $16 million in taxpayer funds on disturbing “toxic brain injection” experiments on monkeys in 2018.
And Dr. Fauci was more recently caught funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China laboratory blamed for the production and leak of the coronavirus.
Fauci lied about his funding of the lab under oath numerous times.
It's time for Dr. Franken-Fauci to be terminated / stopped.
NIH Tested AIDS Drugs on Foster Children
Earlier this May, the Associated Press reported that National Institutes of Health researchers tested AIDS drugs on hundreds of foster children in the late 1980s and '90s. In many instances, the drugs were given without independent advocates who monitor the safety of these children. Ed Gordon...www.npr.org
It Wasn't Just Beagles and Monkeys - Fauci's NIH Also Funded Medical Experiments on AIDS Orphans in NY City | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
In August Gateway Pundit contributor Cassandra Fairbanks broke the story on Dr.www.thegatewaypundit.com
- May 20, 2009
- 143,982
- 66,213
- 2,330
It's carrying on FDR Tuskegee ExperimentsView attachment 556548
It Wasn’t Just Beagles and Monkeys – Fauci’s NIH Also Funded
Medical Experiments on AIDS Orphans in NY City
- NPR: NIH Tested AIDS Drugs on Foster Children
Earlier this May, the Associated Press reported that National Institutes of Health researchers tested AIDS drugs on hundreds of foster children in the late 1980s and '90s. In many instances, the drugs were given without independent advocates who monitor the safety of these children. Ed Gordon explores the controversy with two AIDS experts: Dr. Jonathan Fishbein of the National Institutes of Health and Baylor College of Medicine's Dr. Mark Kline.
In August Gateway Pundit contributor Cassandra Fairbanks broke the story on Dr. Fauci’s use of taxpayer money to torture beagles in barbaric animal testing. Dr. Fauci funded a study in Tunisia where beagle dogs were eaten alive by parasite-infected flies.
Dr. Fauci also spent over $16 million in taxpayer funds on disturbing “toxic brain injection” experiments on monkeys in 2018.
And Dr. Fauci was more recently caught funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China laboratory blamed for the production and leak of the coronavirus.
Fauci lied about his funding of the lab under oath numerous times.
It's time for Dr. Franken-Fauci to be terminated / stopped.
NIH Tested AIDS Drugs on Foster Children
Earlier this May, the Associated Press reported that National Institutes of Health researchers tested AIDS drugs on hundreds of foster children in the late 1980s and '90s. In many instances, the drugs were given without independent advocates who monitor the safety of these children. Ed Gordon...
It Wasn't Just Beagles and Monkeys - Fauci's NIH Also Funded Medical Experiments on AIDS Orphans in NY City | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
In August Gateway Pundit contributor Cassandra Fairbanks broke the story on Dr.
- May 20, 2009
- 143,982
- 66,213
- 2,330
The Nazis were inspired by FDR's Tuskegee ExperimentsThe Nazis had the same notion, and so do The DemNazis. Science is their god, even their crappy pseudo junk science they deify.
From your link in op.
www.npr.org
Dr. MARK KLINE (Director, AIDS Program, Baylor College of Medicine): Thanks for having me.
GORDON: Few would argue the importance of testing, but there are those who are concerned that these foster children were taken advantage of and concern themselves with the idea that this could happen again. I know that you had, indeed, enrolled some foster kids in this testing. Talk to me about your feelings.
Dr. KLINE: Well, I think there are a couple of things that are important to emphasize. The first is that foster children were not targeted for this research. Rather, they were given the same access that was given to children who had more resources and parents. And those of us who were caring for these children at the time felt strongly that, because available therapies were not particularly powerful and children were continuing to die at a high rate, we had to make sure that foster children had access to this treatment.
The second point that I would like to make is that I believe, and our legal experts believe, even in hindsight, that all of the federal regulations were followed. The necessity for an independent advocate really applies to a specific class of studies that was not pertinent in this particular case. It applies to children who were in studies where there was more than minimal risk and where there was no potential for direct benefit. But all of the studies we're talking about here had the potential and, actually, the expectation for direct benefit for the children. And...
GORDON: That being said, Doctor, I would imagine you would understand the concern, particularly from the minority community, where we see a history of, quote, "experiments," research, done on a class of people who, at the time, weren't seen, quite frankly, as valuable.
Dr. KLINE: Well, that may be true for some. It certainly wasn't true for me or for my colleagues, I believe. In fact, from the beginning, this epidemic has disproportionately affected children of color and people without resources, and we fought hard to see that everyone gained access to these trials because, at the time, it was the best option for prolonging life. And, in fact, many of these children who participated in these trials in the late 1980s and early 1990s are alive today because they had access to the trials. Had we not provided that access, they no doubt would have died.
GORDON: Doctor, how many, if you could put a percentage on the people that you dealt with--the young people--were not, in fact, in foster care that participated in this research?
Dr. KLINE: Well, in my own studies here in Texas, I would say 95 percent of the children who were enrolled in trials actually had parents, so really a small percentage came from foster care. That number may have differed in other locations. I just simply don't know. But, again, we were not targeting foster children. We simply were giving them the same access that children with more resources and with parents happened to have.
GORDON: As we move forward here, Doctor--and, obviously and unfortunately, though we've made great gains, we have not eradicated AIDS or HIV in our time. And as we continue to research this, would you have an issue with the idea--do you believe it will slow the process down to a grinding halt if, in fact--further studies, each child participating would have to have an advocate, an overseer, involved?
Dr. KLINE: No, I don't think it would slow things down substantially. And--but I think today is a very different time. In the late '80s, early '90s, the time period we're talking about, there were very few options available for treatment by prescription. But today we have a large menu of options for treatment. And so when I see a child with HIV, I know that I have 15 or 17 medications to choose from. And so I think it would be an extraordinary circumstance today where I would propose enrolling a foster child in a clinical trial. I actually don't have any foster children in clinical trials any longer for that reason.
---------------------
GORDON: And, Doctor, much has been made, and I would suspect as this continues to broaden by virtue of more people reading about this research and also the investigation by the AP--and other government agencies are now looking into it. In your mind, do you believe this to be much ado about nothing?
Dr. KLINE: I do. I think the AP article has done a lot to educate all of us about independent advocates and when they are needed, but again, our legal experts are saying, even in hindsight, independent advocates were not required for the particular studies that we're talking about. There may be state laws that apply in some places, not in Texas, where there are additional protections that are provided. I don't know. But in most of the states, Texas included, the federal law just simply didn't apply in these cases.
NIH Tested AIDS Drugs on Foster Children
Earlier this May, the Associated Press reported that National Institutes of Health researchers tested AIDS drugs on hundreds of foster children in the late 1980s and '90s. In many instances, the drugs were given without independent advocates who monitor the safety of these children. Ed Gordon...
www.npr.org
Dr. MARK KLINE (Director, AIDS Program, Baylor College of Medicine): Thanks for having me.
GORDON: Few would argue the importance of testing, but there are those who are concerned that these foster children were taken advantage of and concern themselves with the idea that this could happen again. I know that you had, indeed, enrolled some foster kids in this testing. Talk to me about your feelings.
Dr. KLINE: Well, I think there are a couple of things that are important to emphasize. The first is that foster children were not targeted for this research. Rather, they were given the same access that was given to children who had more resources and parents. And those of us who were caring for these children at the time felt strongly that, because available therapies were not particularly powerful and children were continuing to die at a high rate, we had to make sure that foster children had access to this treatment.
The second point that I would like to make is that I believe, and our legal experts believe, even in hindsight, that all of the federal regulations were followed. The necessity for an independent advocate really applies to a specific class of studies that was not pertinent in this particular case. It applies to children who were in studies where there was more than minimal risk and where there was no potential for direct benefit. But all of the studies we're talking about here had the potential and, actually, the expectation for direct benefit for the children. And...
GORDON: That being said, Doctor, I would imagine you would understand the concern, particularly from the minority community, where we see a history of, quote, "experiments," research, done on a class of people who, at the time, weren't seen, quite frankly, as valuable.
Dr. KLINE: Well, that may be true for some. It certainly wasn't true for me or for my colleagues, I believe. In fact, from the beginning, this epidemic has disproportionately affected children of color and people without resources, and we fought hard to see that everyone gained access to these trials because, at the time, it was the best option for prolonging life. And, in fact, many of these children who participated in these trials in the late 1980s and early 1990s are alive today because they had access to the trials. Had we not provided that access, they no doubt would have died.
GORDON: Doctor, how many, if you could put a percentage on the people that you dealt with--the young people--were not, in fact, in foster care that participated in this research?
Dr. KLINE: Well, in my own studies here in Texas, I would say 95 percent of the children who were enrolled in trials actually had parents, so really a small percentage came from foster care. That number may have differed in other locations. I just simply don't know. But, again, we were not targeting foster children. We simply were giving them the same access that children with more resources and with parents happened to have.
GORDON: As we move forward here, Doctor--and, obviously and unfortunately, though we've made great gains, we have not eradicated AIDS or HIV in our time. And as we continue to research this, would you have an issue with the idea--do you believe it will slow the process down to a grinding halt if, in fact--further studies, each child participating would have to have an advocate, an overseer, involved?
Dr. KLINE: No, I don't think it would slow things down substantially. And--but I think today is a very different time. In the late '80s, early '90s, the time period we're talking about, there were very few options available for treatment by prescription. But today we have a large menu of options for treatment. And so when I see a child with HIV, I know that I have 15 or 17 medications to choose from. And so I think it would be an extraordinary circumstance today where I would propose enrolling a foster child in a clinical trial. I actually don't have any foster children in clinical trials any longer for that reason.
---------------------
GORDON: And, Doctor, much has been made, and I would suspect as this continues to broaden by virtue of more people reading about this research and also the investigation by the AP--and other government agencies are now looking into it. In your mind, do you believe this to be much ado about nothing?
Dr. KLINE: I do. I think the AP article has done a lot to educate all of us about independent advocates and when they are needed, but again, our legal experts are saying, even in hindsight, independent advocates were not required for the particular studies that we're talking about. There may be state laws that apply in some places, not in Texas, where there are additional protections that are provided. I don't know. But in most of the states, Texas included, the federal law just simply didn't apply in these cases.
easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,071
- 2,645
- Thread starter
- #26
I don't trust the government that much already; however, this story is more about an extremely sick fu@k who conducted unnecessary experiments on puppies, monkeys and orphans in NYC.If this doesn't help convince you to NEVER trust any government nothing will.
Some where along the way Fauci convinced 'the right people' he was a trusted 'expert', demonstrated he was willing to 'play politics', favoring 'politics' over science, and that at the core he was / is unethical and immoral.
Expert? Fauci has been wrong so many times about COVID-19 and has flip-flopped on predictions and projections so much that people have lost count.
He has lied so much he can't be believed. Lying is bad enough, but when the person doing so can't keep track of their lies, is stupid, and sucks at it, its a recipe for what we see now if Fauci - a NON-expert who not only lies but does so horribly. Fauci should never play poker - the times he has tried to 'bluff' have ended horribly for him. When busted for lying about Gain Of Function testing, he snapped at Paul and declared he wanted to put on the official record that Paul did not know what he was talking about. It was a desperation move - as the saying goes, 'The bit dog yelps the loudest'. Having been caught and on the defensive, Fauci went on the attack. Unfortunately for him, 2 days later the NIH confessed to funding Gain of Function research, shredding Fauci's testimony, proving he committed Perjury, and proved Fauci, not Paul, has no clue what he is talking about and / or is lying his ass off.
'A people should know when they are conquered.' - Gladiator
Paul nailed Fauci's hide to the wall of the barn when he read Fauci's own e-mail from a world renowned Virologist who wrote to Fauci and told him all evidence points to the virus coming from the Wuhan lab. Fauci had testified right before then that he NEVER received any evidence or communication suggesting the virus came from a lab. After having his lie debunked by Paul Fauci tried to squirm out of his Perjury by claiming that e-mail did not count because, even though he received it, he NEVER READ IT because he deemed the e-mail to be TOO LONG TO BOTHER READING.
...... 
Ah, the ol' 'The Dog Ate My Homework' excuse.
Ok, let's go with Fauci's lies for a minute.....Imagine you are the TOP United States Infectious Disease 'Expert' and advisor to the President of the United States for the pandemic....you get an e-mail from one of the world's top virologist explaining in great detail how COVID-19 came from the Wuhan Lab....and you choose not to read it because the e-mail is too long.
Holy shit, you are SO fired for dereliction of duty! The whole reason for your existence as advisor to the President and top US Infectious disease expert is to investigate, coordinate, find answers, discover where the virus came from, and how to defeat it.....and you blow off one of the world's top virologists.... Bullshit - didn't happen. There is no way Fauci did NOT read that e-mail.
Now skip forward to what was just exposed - Fauci spend millions of tax dollars torturing puppies and monkeys and experimenting on orphans in NY without proper supervision.
Trust the government? Not THIS administration...who have witnessed all of this, knows all of this, and yet they still defend, protect, and keep him in his current position.
Then again, it makes perfect sense. Biden has appointed / nominated an Eco-Terrorist, a self-identified Communist/Socialist, a woman who asked the FBI to consider parents 'Domestic Terrorists' and who helped hide the rape of a female student in a school bathroom, etc...
LET'S GO, BRANDON!
ColonelAngus
Diamond Member
- Feb 25, 2015
- 51,685
- 51,425
- 3,615
Ask a left wing communist, "IS PUPPY TORTURE BAD?"
They have to know who the President is before they answer.
These are deeply disturbed people.
They have to know who the President is before they answer.
These are deeply disturbed people.
Calypso Jones
Diamond Member
- Jul 11, 2020
- 19,334
- 23,076
- 2,288
What kind of freak EXPERIMENTS ON CHILDREN to the death?? Well...at least he waited till they were out of the womb, hey lefties? So they are good for something. Come on, where's your condemnation of the right that they don't care about children.. Fauci cares about children...for experimentation.
Calypso Jones
Diamond Member
- Jul 11, 2020
- 19,334
- 23,076
- 2,288
And another expose about using puppies for drug experimentation. what do they say about people who commit serial murders...they abuse, torture and kill animals. This guy is a criminal in an expensive suit with a title. THAT keeps this maniac out of prison and the electric chair.
uncanceled.news
sonofabitch
ANOTHER Fauci Dog Scandal: NIAID Approved $1.8 Million in Taxpayer Funds for Drug Experiments on Puppies
A division of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) run by Dr. Anthony Fauci allocated $1,836,453 in taxpayer dollars to test an
uncanceled.news
sonofabitch
Last edited:
Similar threads
- Replies
- 25
- Views
- 939
- Replies
- 18
- Views
- 723
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 60
- Views
- 265
- Replies
- 16
- Views
- 43
- Replies
- 22
- Views
- 121
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 7998
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 465
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-