Israel faces mindboggling threat from 150,000 missiles

[protectionist]

If you read the Old Testament, you would know that Jews also are supposed to wear a turban to cover their head.

I don't read it. Couldn't care less what it says.

 

[protectionist]

Clearly it is the west that was always attacking Muslims.
The Muslims are not the guilty party.

Everyone knows that is NONSENSE. All you're doing is making yourself look ridiculous. Knock yourself out.

 

[protectionist]

No, the necessity was to show that the conflict with the west was successive nomadic horsemen off the Steppes and not Arabs.
Does the bust of Timor look Arab or Mongolian?

Who said anything about Arabs ? I didn't.

 

[protectionist]

Wrong again.
You can't take a single line out of context.
For example, 8:12 is about war, after you have been attacked.
It does not mean you are supposed to attack nonbelievers if they have not attacked you first.
The title of the 9th Surrah is Forgiveness and Redemption, which mean you are supposed to forgive those who turn traitor on you twice, and only slay them where ever you find them, after they do it a third time.

FALSE! 8:12 says nothing about "after you have been attacked"

All 3 of these verses are pure aggression. And there is nothing "out of context" (one of liberals" favorite catch phrases). Koran verses don't go in subject groupings. They change subjects from verse to verse.

YES, it means you are supposed to attack nonbelievers if they have not attacked you first. Thank you for putting me in position to point that out. Ha ha.

slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush

Yeah, that sure sounds like a lot of "Forgiveness and Redemption", doesn't it ?

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Wrong!

The Hebrew tribes were illegal invader from the beginning.

How can a people (Jews) who inhabited an area for thousands of years before another group (Muslims) existed, be an illegal invader in that area ? Of course that is preposterous, as is your bullshit presence in this forum.

So, White skinned, German Yiddish speakers are now the original Hebrews?

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

I can find agreements made between Jews who wished to emigrate to Palestine and the Ottoman rulers, but the Churchill Whitepaper of 1922 probably says it all best.
From the Avalon project at Yale:

The Avalon Project : British White Paper of June 1922

{...
The tension which has prevailed from time to time in Palestine is mainly due to apprehensions, which are entertained both by sections of the Arab and by sections of the Jewish population. These apprehensions, so far as the Arabs are concerned are partly based upon exaggerated interpretations of the meaning of the [Balfour] Declaration favouring the establishment of a Jewish National Home in Palestine, made on behalf of His Majesty's Government on 2nd November, 1917.

Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab delegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language, or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded `in Palestine.' In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at a meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organization, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of its peoples an undisturbed national development."

It is also necessary to point out that the Zionist Commission in Palestine, now termed the Palestine Zionist Executive, has not desired to possess, and does not possess, any share in the general administration of the country. Nor does the special position assigned to the Zionist Organization in Article IV of the Draft Mandate for Palestine imply any such functions. That special position relates to the measures to be taken in Palestine affecting the Jewish population, and contemplates that the organization may assist in the general development of the country, but does not entitle it to share in any degree in its government.

Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status. So far as the Jewish population of Palestine are concerned it appears that some among them are apprehensive that His Majesty's Government may depart from the policy embodied in the Declaration of 1917. It is necessary, therefore, once more to affirm that these fears are unfounded, and that that Declaration, re affirmed by the Conference of the Principle Allied Powers at San Remo and again in the Treaty of Sevres, is not susceptible of change.
...}

So then the massive and unregulated Jewish immigration was illegal, and they deliberately also smuggled in weapons and started murdering British soldiers. But at no time were Jews ever more than a third of the population.
Yet the UN then illegally took over 55% of Palestine and illegally gave it to the Israelis.
That is especially criminal since Jews had never purchased more than 5% of the land, and most of the Jews in Israel illegally live in stolen homes.

Useless, pointless, worthless "knowledge". Jews resided in the Middle Wast for thousands of years. Muslims started up and stole it from them. No territory anywhere should be Muslim.

Genocidal maniac, After thousands of years, I'm quite sure Palestinians are indigenous too.
BTW, not all Palestinians are Muslims, some are Christians too.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

It sounds like you think
genocide is acceptable, against Muslims, because you don't like them.
Wow, just wow.

Why did Irish Catholics, Irish Protestants, Jews, Italians, Germans, Basque, Cubans, all engage in far more terrorist activities than the Islamic Tatars, who look pretty White looking?

I tend to disagree, I think the Muslim problem is mostly racial, rather than religious.

NO, it does NOT "sound like" that at all. What it sounds like is that I think SELF-DEFENSE is acceptable against the #1 genocidal maniacs of world history (ie. Islamic lunatics).

The Muslim problem is neither racial nor religious. Muslims are of all race, and Islam is a vile, satanic cult, not a religion.

I thought the #1 genocidal maniacs per capita were Anglo-Saxon & Zydzi?

 

[Hollie]

I can find agreements made between Jews who wished to emigrate to Palestine and the Ottoman rulers, but the Churchill Whitepaper of 1922 probably says it all best.
From the Avalon project at Yale:

The Avalon Project : British White Paper of June 1922

{...
The tension which has prevailed from time to time in Palestine is mainly due to apprehensions, which are entertained both by sections of the Arab and by sections of the Jewish population. These apprehensions, so far as the Arabs are concerned are partly based upon exaggerated interpretations of the meaning of the [Balfour] Declaration favouring the establishment of a Jewish National Home in Palestine, made on behalf of His Majesty's Government on 2nd November, 1917.

Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab delegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language, or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded `in Palestine.' In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at a meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organization, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of its peoples an undisturbed national development."

It is also necessary to point out that the Zionist Commission in Palestine, now termed the Palestine Zionist Executive, has not desired to possess, and does not possess, any share in the general administration of the country. Nor does the special position assigned to the Zionist Organization in Article IV of the Draft Mandate for Palestine imply any such functions. That special position relates to the measures to be taken in Palestine affecting the Jewish population, and contemplates that the organization may assist in the general development of the country, but does not entitle it to share in any degree in its government.

Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status. So far as the Jewish population of Palestine are concerned it appears that some among them are apprehensive that His Majesty's Government may depart from the policy embodied in the Declaration of 1917. It is necessary, therefore, once more to affirm that these fears are unfounded, and that that Declaration, re affirmed by the Conference of the Principle Allied Powers at San Remo and again in the Treaty of Sevres, is not susceptible of change.
...}

So then the massive and unregulated Jewish immigration was illegal, and they deliberately also smuggled in weapons and started murdering British soldiers. But at no time were Jews ever more than a third of the population.
Yet the UN then illegally took over 55% of Palestine and illegally gave it to the Israelis.
That is especially criminal since Jews had never purchased more than 5% of the land, and most of the Jews in Israel illegally live in stolen homes.

Useless, pointless, worthless "knowledge". Jews resided in the Middle Wast for thousands of years. Muslims started up and stole it from them. No territory anywhere should be Muslim.

Genocidal maniac, After thousands of years, I'm quite sure Palestinians are indigenous too.
BTW, not all Palestinians are Muslims, some are Christians too.

“Pal’istanian” as a nationality was invented in late 1967 by the Egyptian Islamic terrorist Yassir Arafat. I checked my calendar an 1967 was a bit less than thousands of years ago.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

I can find agreements made between Jews who wished to emigrate to Palestine and the Ottoman rulers, but the Churchill Whitepaper of 1922 probably says it all best.
From the Avalon project at Yale:

The Avalon Project : British White Paper of June 1922

{...
The tension which has prevailed from time to time in Palestine is mainly due to apprehensions, which are entertained both by sections of the Arab and by sections of the Jewish population. These apprehensions, so far as the Arabs are concerned are partly based upon exaggerated interpretations of the meaning of the [Balfour] Declaration favouring the establishment of a Jewish National Home in Palestine, made on behalf of His Majesty's Government on 2nd November, 1917.

Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab delegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language, or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded `in Palestine.' In this connection it has been observed with satisfaction that at a meeting of the Zionist Congress, the supreme governing body of the Zionist Organization, held at Carlsbad in September, 1921, a resolution was passed expressing as the official statement of Zionist aims "the determination of the Jewish people to live with the Arab people on terms of unity and mutual respect, and together with them to make the common home into a flourishing community, the upbuilding of which may assure to each of its peoples an undisturbed national development."

It is also necessary to point out that the Zionist Commission in Palestine, now termed the Palestine Zionist Executive, has not desired to possess, and does not possess, any share in the general administration of the country. Nor does the special position assigned to the Zionist Organization in Article IV of the Draft Mandate for Palestine imply any such functions. That special position relates to the measures to be taken in Palestine affecting the Jewish population, and contemplates that the organization may assist in the general development of the country, but does not entitle it to share in any degree in its government.

Further, it is contemplated that the status of all citizens of Palestine in the eyes of the law shall be Palestinian, and it has never been intended that they, or any section of them, should possess any other juridical status. So far as the Jewish population of Palestine are concerned it appears that some among them are apprehensive that His Majesty's Government may depart from the policy embodied in the Declaration of 1917. It is necessary, therefore, once more to affirm that these fears are unfounded, and that that Declaration, re affirmed by the Conference of the Principle Allied Powers at San Remo and again in the Treaty of Sevres, is not susceptible of change.
...}

So then the massive and unregulated Jewish immigration was illegal, and they deliberately also smuggled in weapons and started murdering British soldiers. But at no time were Jews ever more than a third of the population.
Yet the UN then illegally took over 55% of Palestine and illegally gave it to the Israelis.
That is especially criminal since Jews had never purchased more than 5% of the land, and most of the Jews in Israel illegally live in stolen homes.

Useless, pointless, worthless "knowledge". Jews resided in the Middle Wast for thousands of years. Muslims started up and stole it from them. No territory anywhere should be Muslim.

Genocidal maniac, After thousands of years, I'm quite sure Palestinians are indigenous too.
BTW, not all Palestinians are Muslims, some are Christians too.

“Pal’istanian” as a nationality was invented in late 1967 by the Egyptian Islamic terrorist Yassir Arafat. I checked my calendar an 1967 was a bit less than thousands of years ago.

Palestinians didn't exist until 1967, but had collaborated witg Nazis in the 1940s
& did a pogrom against Jews in 1929.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Israel faces mindboggling threat from 150,000 missiles
⁜→ Rigby5, et al,

Your reading comprehension needs much work.
Clearly, the Jews were ONLY being given encouragement to develop an economic agency to coordinate Jewish economic activities.

(COMMENT)

Yes, the Mandate's biggest description of the Jewish Agency was → "an appropriate Jewish agency shall be recognized as a public body for the purpose of advising and co-operating with the Administration of Palestine in such economic, social and other matters." The Jewish Agency was an organization whose work is part of the process in the Government of Palestine but is not a government department.

History records that the "High Commissioner" governed Palestine with the aid of Councils consisting exclusively of British officials." But it should be understood that the "Jewish Agency" as a public body, represented a full third of the population in the territories.

Absolutely NO participation in government what so ever.
The entire point of the British Mandate for Palestine was the obligation of Britain to defend the Arab administration of Palestine until it could defend itself.
Gt. Britain was to have no sovereignty over Palestine, at all.

(COMMENT)

Nowhere was there a recognition of an entity known as the "Arab Administration of Palestine."

The big point in the "inequality of opportunity enjoyed by Arabs and Jews respectively in putting their case before Your Majesty’s Government, Parliament and public opinion in this country, and the Arab belief that the Jews can always get their way by means denied to the Arabs."

The British Government never expressed the need to acquire British Sovereignty over the territories. This topic is often raised to give the impression that the British wanted sovereignty, when in fact, it was never an issue brought to the table.

The word "Mandate" means an "obligation".
The British had to pay the Palestinians back for helping to defeat the Ottoman Empire.
Jews were owed no such obligation.

(COMMENT)

Well, this is very arguable. The bulk of the Irregular Arab Forces (COL TE Lawrence, et al) came from the Kingdom of Hejaz; NOT the Independent Sanjak of Jerusalem, or the three Sanjaks of Nablus, Acre, Beruit (which would become collectively known as territories under the Mandate of Palestine).

As a matter of fact, Mohammad Amin al-Husayni, later to be known as the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, had been a serving Officer in the Ottoman Army until its surrender (Armistice of Mudros) in 1918.

Similarly, → Ahmed Hilmi Pasha, the first Prime Minister of the All Palestine Government, was, prior to the surrender, a General Officer in the Ottoman Army.

And you seem to not know that the Balfour Declaration was at all.
It was in 1916, while the war was still ongoing, and England have not even captured any of the Ottoman Empire yet.
And all the Balfour Declaration said was that the government of Gt. Britain would look favorably on a Jewish homeland inside of an independent Arab Palestine.

(COMMENT)

Two Points:

◈ True... But this little nugget here has an impression behind it that the British were failing, when in fact, the British Expeditionary Forces had not even started their campaign yet. Having said that, the Armistice of Mudros, concluded on 30 October 1918, ended the hostilities between the Ottoman Empire and the Allied Powers.

◈ The Balfour Declaration does not make any reference at all to an "independent Arab Palestine." This is what I mean when I express my concern for the incideous implication.​

In 1923 the population was over 90% Muslim Arab, and the Jews were not at all an indigenous population, native, or the majority. It was and is criminal for them to try to rule.

(COMMENT)

Oh for heaven's sake! It is not at all unusual in the Arab countries for a minority entity to gain leadership control.

You imply a criminal component here. Where is this codified in law?

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[rylah]

What keeps you awake at night?

If you lived in Israel, it might be the arsenal of this terror group right across the border.

They haven't amassed those 150,000 surface-to-surface rockets for nothing. And they haven't improved their targeting ability without intending to use them.

Dudes: Why not just Hiroshima the scumbuckets and be done with them ?

Because one can return from diaspora, but still live as in it.
It's a mental conditioning.

When Egypt chased after Israel, they had only 600 chariots of the royal guard,
Israel were 600,000 men - they could just turn around, each one pick a stone and be done with it. But they kept running until reaching the sea, crying in desperation, which didn't open until one man with an unwavering confidence in Him jumped into deep waters.

That was just after some 200 years of enslavement, currently we're recovering from 10 times that period.

 

[rylah]

Is this worth a WW3 scenario, however?

The nations don't care about that bunch of savages,
all You want is Jerusalem and revenge for having to abandon the savage bliss of worshiping stone and wood, everything else are lies and excuses.

 

[rylah]

How dare people fight back against those stealing their lands, and massacring them.

Then you agree with me. Get rid of the Palestinian thieving murderers.

What?
Who was the victim in the Nakba?
Certainly not Israelis.

You don't call a racketeer who's been paid back his dept 'a victim'.

 

[rylah]

What?
Who was the victim in the Nakba?
Certainly not Israelis.

Israelis are the victims. Palestians are the imperialists. Jews were in place through all the Middle East for many centuries before Mo the Pedophile started conquering and stealing lands. No Muslim territory is valid. Not even in Saudi Arabia.

Over 4 times more Palestinians killed than Israelis since the conflict began.
Sure, the Israelis are greater victims, especially considering they have an official country, while Palestinians are kicked to the curb.

There's no correlation between the beginning of the conflict and the number of savages killed since then, Arabs are responsible for most of the deaths, damage and property loss in the conflict.

No to mention that they've murdered much more of their own than Israel could ever manage in the last and next 70 years.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

How dare people fight back against those stealing their lands, and massacring them.

Then you agree with me. Get rid of the Palestinian thieving murderers.

What?
Who was the victim in the Nakba?
Certainly not Israelis.

You don't call a racketeer who's been paid back his dept 'a victim'.

How dare people fight back against those stealing their lands.

 

[rylah]

What?
Who was the victim in the Nakba?
Certainly not Israelis.

Israelis are the victims. Palestians are the imperialists. Jews were in place through all the Middle East for many centuries before Mo the Pedophile started conquering and stealing lands. No Muslim territory is valid. Not even in Saudi Arabia.

Over 4 times more Palestinians killed than Israelis since the conflict began.
Sure, the Israelis are greater victims, especially considering they have an official country, while Palestinians are kicked to the curb.

Actually Arabs dominate 80% of the land intended for Israel,
they're just thirsty for complete domination over the entire middle east, and especially what the Jews have, as an appetizer.

Imagine what a fuss kill, to go to a beer party and break a tooth on the tiniest peanut.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

What?
Who was the victim in the Nakba?
Certainly not Israelis.

Israelis are the victims. Palestians are the imperialists. Jews were in place through all the Middle East for many centuries before Mo the Pedophile started conquering and stealing lands. No Muslim territory is valid. Not even in Saudi Arabia.

Over 4 times more Palestinians killed than Israelis since the conflict began.
Sure, the Israelis are greater victims, especially considering they have an official country, while Palestinians are kicked to the curb.

Actually Arabs dominate 80% of the land intended for Israel,
they're just thirsty for complete domination over the entire middle east, and especially what the Jews have, as an appetizer.

Imagine what a fuss kill, to go to a beer party and break a tooth on the tiniest peanut.

Hand over the loot you owe me Goy Boy.
You owe me land in Palestine, Poland,Germany, Hungary, Iran, Morroco, Romania, Slovakia, Iraq ect.

 

[USAF 2023]

Is this worth a WW3 scenario, however?

Translation; He expects the Israelis to do nothing

 

[rylah]

How dare people fight back against those stealing their lands, and massacring them.

Then you agree with me. Get rid of the Palestinian thieving murderers.

What?
Who was the victim in the Nakba?
Certainly not Israelis.

You don't call a racketeer who's been paid back his dept 'a victim'.

How dare people fight back against those stealing their lands.

The land which name Arabs can't even pronounce correctly?
C'mon You can do better than that.