Is there a ‘war’ against American culture perpetuated by politicians and multiculturalism?

 
Who and what is tearing the U.S. apart



 
Last edited:
Who and what is tearing the U.S. apart



 

Paul Sheehan is a hateful man who writes fake news.


The fantasies woven around angry Arab males and their apparent insatiable appetite for violence and rape are a time worn trope of racists and their tirades. It has taken many forms over the years, from an image of “Arab” men pulling at a white women on the front page of a Polish magazine to now Paul Sheehan making grandiose claims about “Middle Eastern Raping C***s”.

Unfortunately for him, though, Sheehan has now had to make a grovelling apology, back peddling on his writing after it was discovered the story of “Louise” was found to be not entirely true, if not completely false. Such extraordinary claims of incompetence within NSW Police and Health could never have flown under the radar in the way described by “Louise”.
 
Paul Sheehan is a hateful man who writes fake news.


The fantasies woven around angry Arab males and their apparent insatiable appetite for violence and rape are a time worn trope of racists and their tirades. It has taken many forms over the years, from an image of “Arab” men pulling at a white women on the front page of a Polish magazine to now Paul Sheehan making grandiose claims about “Middle Eastern Raping C***s”.

Unfortunately for him, though, Sheehan has now had to make a grovelling apology, back peddling on his writing after it was discovered the story of “Louise” was found to be not entirely true, if not completely false. Such extraordinary claims of incompetence within NSW Police and Health could never have flown under the radar in the way described by “Louise”.

 

From your link:

On 24 February 2016, Sheehan published a column in the Sydney Morning Herald titled, 'The story of Louise: we'll never know the scale of the rape epidemic in Sydney', which described the horrific rape of a nurse in the Inner City of Sydney in 2002. He subsequently published a retraction of this article on 25 February 2016 in the Sydney Morning Herald. Sheehan left the Sydney Morning Herald in April 2016 without having contributed any further articles.

He fabricated a story to smear Muslims. Totally shameless asshole.
 
The outrageous rate of muslim men in Australia raping white women is well known in Australia....also well know is the horrendous amount of political correctness which tries to deny it and they have some powerful forces that have covered up much truth in Australia.



 
The outrageous rate of muslim men in Australia raping white women is well known in Australia....also well know is the horrendous amount of political correctness which tries to deny it and they have some powerful forces that have covered up much truth in Australia.


If it is so bad and happens so often, confirmation bias boi, why did Sheehan have to manufacture a bullshit rape story?
 
If it is so bad and happens so often, confirmation bias boi, why did Sheehan have to manufacture a bullshit rape story?

Oh the level of muslim rape in Australia is more than bad it is horrendous.

He may have gotten one story wrong ...sometimes unfortunately journalists are given bad info.




 
Last edited:
Oh the level of muslim rape in Australia is more than bad it is horrendous.

He may have gotten one story wrong ...sometimes unfortunately journalists are given bad info.





 
Last edited:
He's a white nationalist. He even gave a thumbs up to the post where I informed you of that.
'
'And then in that last post: "invading beaners that were dropping litters of silver tooth filth in their laps" and "the presence of the brown cockroaches".

I would just be careful what side of the fence you stand, that's all.
Well, I stand where a thumbs up isn’t white supremacy and all of the illegals crossing pir border should be deported and put on a list to never be allowed in this country.
 
White Nationalism is not white supremacy....though liberals often conflate the two.

White Nationalism FAQ​

by Yggdrasil​

celt.gif

Q. What is White Nationalism?

A. The idea that Whites may need to create a separate nation as a means of defending themselves.

Q. Do White Nationalists feel they are superior to other races?

A. No. The desire of White Nationalists to form their own nation has nothing to do with superiority or inferiority.

Q. Do White Nationalists seek to dominate other races?

A. Not at all. In fact, formation of a White nation removes any possibility of White dominance of other races, as well as the plausibility of the accusation that Whites wish to dominate others.

Q. Do White Nationalists seek to insulate themselves from competition from other races?

A. No. A separate White nation would establish a policy of free trade with its new neighbors. Labor markets are global, and the formation of a White nation would not protect Whites from economic competition.

Q. Well if White Nationalists don't feel superior, don't want to dominate others, and don't seek protection from competition, then why would they want a separate nation?

A. To avoid exploitation.

Q. Exploitation? This is rich! So how is it that Whites are exploited?

A. It is a long list. Burdensome racial preference schemes in hiring, racial preference schemes in university admissions, racial preference schemes in government contracting and small business loans. Beyond quotas there is the denial of rights of free speech and of due process to Whites who are critical of these governmental policies. We have special punishments for assaults committed by Whites if the motives might be racial. In addition, Whites pay a proportion of the costs of the welfare state that is disproportionate to what they receive in benefits.

But the most exploitative aspect of the situation is that neither the racial quotas, the business preferences, the loss of freedom of speech, nor the disproportionate contributions to the welfare state have managed to sate the appetites of non-Whites living in the United States.

The more Whites sacrifice, the more non-Whites demand. Many Whites are beginning to believe that no amount of tribute, other than mass suicide, would satisfy the non-White demands.

If our presence stirs up that much hatred in the hearts of non-Whites, then the only sensible course of action is to separate ourselves from them.

Q. You claim that non-Whites are the aggressors and haters in race relations. Aren't you afraid that most Whites will think this is ridiculous?

A. Not in the slightest. For the past 30 years most Whites have taken part in a mass migration or "White flight" away from neighborhoods inhabited by non-Whites. Aggressors don't flee. For example, on a per-capita basis, Blacks are 49 times more likely to assault a White than a White is to assault a Black. Assaults by Whites against Blacks are approximately 40 times scarcer than they would be if races were randomly mixed and assault rates did not vary by race. The best measure of racism is the number of non-economically motivated attacks. White score low in this regard, non-Whites high.

The fact is that non-Whites are clamoring to enter this country in droves. Whites are fleeing en masse to formerly uninhabited areas to escape these new arrivals.

Q. But how can Whites be exploited when it is Whites who have enacted these racial preferences, the taxation, the welfare payments and set immigration quotas?

A. Excellent question! It is true that Whites are exploited by their fellow Whites. In fact, we do not expect any resistance by non-Whites to the formation of a separate nation. We expect White integrationist elites to resist. They are the ones who have a great deal to lose.

Q. If life in America is so bad for Whites why don't you just move back to Europe?

A. We are a majority. We do not have to move back. We can resolve to defend ourselves against this onslaught. We have the option of peacefully ceding lands already inhabited by non-Whites to separate non-White nations. We would save money, and could restore our civil liberties and free ourselves from constant threats of violence by so doing.

Q. What would your separate state look like?

A. The truth is we don't know yet. Our separate state would follow the geographic outlines of White flight. The model for this state would be the modern gerrymander created by the Voting Rights Act to create majority non-White congressional districts. We would simply cede these to a separate nation. The mechanics of this process will be explained more fully later in a post entitled "sweating the details."

Q. Would all Whites be welcome in your separate state?

A. Absolutely. There would be no restriction by country of origin, and no genetic tests, skin color or hair color tests or any nonsense like that. The only restriction would be that those who would wish to recreate the present system by importing non-Whites and then encouraging their hostility would not be welcome. They would have to remain in or move to the lands ceded to the non-Whites.

Q. You are proposing that inclusion and exclusion be based on ideology and feelings. Won't your act of nation splitting turn into a witch hunt?

A. For White liberals it is definitely going to feel like a witch hunt! When the time comes, those who are guilty of "integrationism" should do the sensible thing and flee. It will spare us all a lot of pain.

Q. Is this White nation something that you intend to pursue right away?

A. No. The White nation is, by most accounts, about 20 years off. When the rest of the U.S. begins to look like Southern California it will happen more or less automatically, without much of a push from us.

Q. Why do you use the term "European-American?"

A. All Whites are descended from European immigrants, and we are not actually "White." The term European-American has political significance for two reasons. First, it recognizes that most people in the U.S. of European extraction have intermarried to such an extent that it is no longer possible to identify American Whites as "Irish" or "German" or "Italian." But more important, use of the term "European-American" is intended to recognize that White elites in the United States have exploited differences based on religion and European national origin to divide European-Americans, with the intention of rendering us unable to defend ourselves against non-White demands.

Q. What is White separatism?

A White separatists will agree on most points with a White Nationalist, except that he may not see a need to establish a separate nation within the present territorial boundaries of the U.S.

Q. What is a White supremacist?

A. That is a White who wishes to subjugate other races by force, ordinarily by military conquest. White supremacists are very rare in 1997, and there is no visible trend or base of support which would allow them to carry such a political program into effect.
 
Last edited:
I find it so curious that a couple of contributors here---Persuader and Broke Loser --- have found a website chatroom that is not notably known as a Uber Right channel such as can be found with Daily Stormer, Bitchute, Rumble, Great Awakening, et al. Those venues seem to be more simpatico to the bigotry and racism that the two posters seemingly possess and most certainly display here.

Instead, they have found this 'Political' chatroom and now use it as a platform to give publicity to the most corrosive of American prejudices.
There has always been a very strong right-wing flavor to much of the posting activity here.
I ain't curious about their bigotry.
Why? To embrace it?
I am curious on the philosophy that allows such to be so openly publicized.
It's called the First Amendment... a.k.a. Free Speech... or so I've read...
 
There has always been a very strong right-wing flavor to much of the posting activity here.

Why? To embrace it?

It's called the First Amendment... a.k.a. Free Speech... or so I've read...
hehheh The libtards think they should be able to lie all day and all night but any truth presented by coservatives should be squashed.

Mostly that is what happens via censorship and the MSM not reporting the truth.


 
Last edited:
Doesn't make the slightest bit of difference.

Anti-Immigration sentiment has been on-the-rise for more than a decade now,.....
It's appropriate that you're a Know Nothing because you know nothing.
 
You are of course talking about the removal of statues celebrating the defenders of slavery
After watching blm opportunist baboonage burn and loot as 650,000 Americans were being eaten by the commie virus.
 
It's appropriate that you're a Know Nothing because you know nothing.
Can you keep your emotions together long enough to intelligently explain how/why you believe America and Americans should embrace those breaking into our nation from Mexico, Central and South America?
This is your chance to articulate how you arrive at the position you do.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top