Is There A ‘Truth’ Exemption From ‘Racism’?

The website brings up the concept of subsets and gene pools:

14 Jun 2021 Charles Murray’s Facing Reality
‘ Mean IQs. Europeans 103, Africans 91, Latins 94, Asians 108....he invariably treats races as collections of individuals among whom non-random patterns happen to be observable rather than as (roughly) constant gene pools which perpetuate themselves across the generations.’

CRT can’t answer the question: What if a subset of a gene pool was chosen and reified before it was exported from Africa?


He also said this:
"...overlap exists in the distributions. It is not a threatening picture. Yes, differences exist, but it is also true that millions of Africans and Latins have higher cognitive ability than millions of Europeans and Asians. "
 
11.The multiples of crimes by race:

“The African/European ratios in Table 2 are extremely large. The median African/ European ratio was 9.0, the simple mean was 9.6, and the mean weighted by population was 11.2. In the three megalopolises – New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago – the ratios were 11.6, 9.0, and 14.5 respectively. In the nation’s capital, the ratio was 19.9.[ 20 times more lawless than whites.]

Table 2 omits ratios involving Asians because very low Asian crime rates yielded absurdly large ratios in most of the thirteen cities. For example, Fort Lauderdale recorded just one arrest of an Asian for a violent offense from 2015 through 2019 among the 3,000 Asians who lived there during that period. But Asian arrest rates were exceptionally low even in most cities with large Asian populations. The lone exception to the rule was New York, where the Asian violent crime rate was marginally higher than the European one.



The Latin/European ratios were smaller than the African/European ratios, but usually big enough to be significant, with a weighted mean of 3.2 across all thirteen cities. As in the case of the African ratios, the Latin ratios were biggest in the largest and most important cities. In New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Washington, the ratios were 4.1, 2.4, 2.9, and 6.3 respectively. The Latin/European ratios look small only by comparison with the African/European ratios. If the arrest data accurately represent race differences in violent offenses, Table 2 makes the point of this chapter.” Charles Murray





Can we live together? Is it possible to alter these statistics, change them to produce that ‘equality ‘ of results that the Democrats claim that they desire.

Or is there a reason(s) why they will be maintained at these levels.

Purposely.





Don't forget....the Democrat LATimes says the Right has "repeatedly twisted crime statistics to portray Black people as more violent than whites — a theme for white supremacists."



Democrats lie about everything.
 
The website brings up the concept of subsets and gene pools:

14 Jun 2021 Charles Murray’s Facing Reality
‘ Mean IQs. Europeans 103, Africans 91, Latins 94, Asians 108....he invariably treats races as collections of individuals among whom non-random patterns happen to be observable rather than as (roughly) constant gene pools which perpetuate themselves across the generations.’

CRT can’t answer the question: What if a subset of a gene pool was chosen and reified before it was exported from Africa?


He also said this:
"...overlap exists in the distributions. It is not a threatening picture. Yes, differences exist, but it is also true that millions of Africans and Latins have higher cognitive ability than millions of Europeans and Asians. "
It still cannot answer the question of a reified subset with criminal tendencies that was a concentrated, deliberately imported subset with criminal tendencies that would eventually produce the 324,000. From the beginning this tendency, should it exist, excludes or not, IQ. Less credible are then also environmental and urban influences in the stats.
 
11.The multiples of crimes by race:

“The African/European ratios in Table 2 are extremely large. The median African/ European ratio was 9.0, the simple mean was 9.6, and the mean weighted by population was 11.2. In the three megalopolises – New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago – the ratios were 11.6, 9.0, and 14.5 respectively. In the nation’s capital, the ratio was 19.9.[ 20 times more lawless than whites.]

Table 2 omits ratios involving Asians because very low Asian crime rates yielded absurdly large ratios in most of the thirteen cities. For example, Fort Lauderdale recorded just one arrest of an Asian for a violent offense from 2015 through 2019 among the 3,000 Asians who lived there during that period. But Asian arrest rates were exceptionally low even in most cities with large Asian populations. The lone exception to the rule was New York, where the Asian violent crime rate was marginally higher than the European one.



The Latin/European ratios were smaller than the African/European ratios, but usually big enough to be significant, with a weighted mean of 3.2 across all thirteen cities. As in the case of the African ratios, the Latin ratios were biggest in the largest and most important cities. In New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Washington, the ratios were 4.1, 2.4, 2.9, and 6.3 respectively. The Latin/European ratios look small only by comparison with the African/European ratios. If the arrest data accurately represent race differences in violent offenses, Table 2 makes the point of this chapter.” Charles Murray





Can we live together? Is it possible to alter these statistics, change them to produce that ‘equality ‘ of results that the Democrats claim that they desire.

Or is there a reason(s) why they will be maintained at these levels.

Purposely.





Don't forget....the Democrat LATimes says the Right has "repeatedly twisted crime statistics to portray Black people as more violent than whites — a theme for white supremacists."



Democrats lie about everything.
Why haven’t the ratios been designed to de-reify blacks? Every time this reification happens, it happens at the expense of all other races. What percent of the U.S. population wants to reify itself as a race at the expense of the remainder percentage?
 
The website brings up the concept of subsets and gene pools:

14 Jun 2021 Charles Murray’s Facing Reality
‘ Mean IQs. Europeans 103, Africans 91, Latins 94, Asians 108....he invariably treats races as collections of individuals among whom non-random patterns happen to be observable rather than as (roughly) constant gene pools which perpetuate themselves across the generations.’

CRT can’t answer the question: What if a subset of a gene pool was chosen and reified before it was exported from Africa?


He also said this:
"...overlap exists in the distributions. It is not a threatening picture. Yes, differences exist, but it is also true that millions of Africans and Latins have higher cognitive ability than millions of Europeans and Asians. "
It still cannot answer the question of a reified subset with criminal tendencies that was a concentrated, deliberately imported subset with criminal tendencies that would eventually produce the 324,000. From the beginning this tendency, should it exist, excludes or not, IQ. Less credible are then also environmental and urban influences in the stats.

I have an belief and explanation that does not rely on genetics or immutable biological factors.


Consider in the heredity vs. environment controversy: females are several times as numerous as males among blacks with high IQs. Witty and Jenkins, "Educational Achievement of a Group of Gifted Negro Children," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 25, p. 593. They inherit the same genes, are raised in the same homes and neighborhoods......explanations rest on the culture, the excessively 'macho' roles of males associated with and emphasizing certain sociopathologies. Roles that the Left pretends are normal and acceptable, are not.

There is a pathology, abandoning families, that certainly holds some individuals back, and it is one that has been encouraged by the Liberals/Democrats.
“Baby momma” is not a substitute for “wife.”


The problems and lack of success of a particular group can be attributed to the Democrats.


  1. "It was the misfortune of black Americans that they were just on the verge of passing through the immigrant experience when damaging ideas about welfare and the lenient attitude about crime took hold. It could have happened to the Italians, Germans, Jews or Irish, but luckily for them, there were no Liberals around to “help” when they arrived." Coulter
  2. In fact, black Americans were doing better in individual pursuits than many immigrants. Barone compared their American journey to the Irish: “Both rise smartly in hierarchies (government bureaucracies, the military) but haven't fared as well in free-market commerce.” http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/941114/archive_013670.htm 3. “Like members of outsider groups before and since, this African-American elite considered education to be the key to full citizenship. They also embraced values of character and responsibility….Gains in terms of entrepreneurship, finding a trade, finding a profession, setting down roots, buying property, and feeling they were at last becoming a genuine part of city life. They would refer to ‘color-phobia’ as ‘fast disappearing in our city.’…Peterson's great grandfather owned a pharmacy in a largely Irish neighborhood. ” "Black Gotham," by University of Maryland Professor Carla Peterson.
 
The website brings up the concept of subsets and gene pools:

14 Jun 2021 Charles Murray’s Facing Reality
‘ Mean IQs. Europeans 103, Africans 91, Latins 94, Asians 108....he invariably treats races as collections of individuals among whom non-random patterns happen to be observable rather than as (roughly) constant gene pools which perpetuate themselves across the generations.’

CRT can’t answer the question: What if a subset of a gene pool was chosen and reified before it was exported from Africa?


He also said this:
"...overlap exists in the distributions. It is not a threatening picture. Yes, differences exist, but it is also true that millions of Africans and Latins have higher cognitive ability than millions of Europeans and Asians. "
It still cannot answer the question of a reified subset with criminal tendencies that was a concentrated, deliberately imported subset with criminal tendencies that would eventually produce the 324,000. From the beginning this tendency, should it exist, excludes or not, IQ. Less credible are then also environmental and urban influences in the stats.

I have an belief and explanation that does not rely on genetics or immutable biological factors.


Consider in the heredity vs. environment controversy: females are several times as numerous as males among blacks with high IQs. Witty and Jenkins, "Educational Achievement of a Group of Gifted Negro Children," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 25, p. 593. They inherit the same genes, are raised in the same homes and neighborhoods......explanations rest on the culture, the excessively 'macho' roles of males associated with and emphasizing certain sociopathologies. Roles that the Left pretends are normal and acceptable, are not.

There is a pathology, abandoning families, that certainly holds some individuals back, and it is one that has been encouraged by the Liberals/Democrats.
“Baby momma” is not a substitute for “wife.”


The problems and lack of success of a particular group can be attributed to the Democrats.


  1. "It was the misfortune of black Americans that they were just on the verge of passing through the immigrant experience when damaging ideas about welfare and the lenient attitude about crime took hold. It could have happened to the Italians, Germans, Jews or Irish, but luckily for them, there were no Liberals around to “help” when they arrived." Coulter
  2. In fact, black Americans were doing better in individual pursuits than many immigrants. Barone compared their American journey to the Irish: “Both rise smartly in hierarchies (government bureaucracies, the military) but haven't fared as well in free-market commerce.” http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/941114/archive_013670.htm 3. “Like members of outsider groups before and since, this African-American elite considered education to be the key to full citizenship. They also embraced values of character and responsibility….Gains in terms of entrepreneurship, finding a trade, finding a profession, setting down roots, buying property, and feeling they were at last becoming a genuine part of city life. They would refer to ‘color-phobia’ as ‘fast disappearing in our city.’…Peterson's great grandfather owned a pharmacy in a largely Irish neighborhood. ” "Black Gotham," by University of Maryland Professor Carla Peterson.
This is a most decent rebuttal to criminality claims, and should be further developed/debated.
 
6. ‘Crime rates per race’ is the subject, not the causes of same, as there are at least as many explanations as Baskin Robbins has flavors. An understanding and acceptance of “…the existence of large race differences in crime rates is a fact, and one that has sweeping social consequences.”

The reference will be “the annual report, Crime in the United States, a product of the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) program. The offenses in the violent crime index are murder, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault (“aggravated” meaning that the assault involved a serious injury, plausible threat of serious injury, or use of a deadly weapon).



When viewing the statistics, pay special attention to the Democrat house organ, the LATimes, and the definitive statement they make with respect to the group the Democrats need in order to win any national election:

Last week, this lie in the LATimes:

“I met Elder at his studio in 2019, while reporting my biography of Trump’s senior advisor Stephen Miller. Elder told me he believes his Blackness gives some listeners “confidence” to hold and share similar views. He has repeatedly twisted crime statistics to portray Black people as more violent than whites — a theme for white supremacists. He blames Black communities’ struggles on an alleged lack of self-determination. (A David Duke talking point).” Column: How recall candidate Larry Elder mentored Trumpism's top acolytes

Today’s thread….the facts, the gospel, on criminality by race. And, as a by-product, more proof that Democrats lie about everything.





And….perhaps, question whether there really are ‘white supremacists.’
There are white supremacists but collectively, they are no where near the threat the Left claims them to be. That is why the Left keeps overinflating the vandalism and trespassing a few of them did at the Capitol as “an insurrection”. This is a threat that is easily mitigated. Contrast that with the extreme Leftist who shoots up an open field of Congressional Republicans our the countless BLM and ANTIFA terrorists who destroy businesses and assault innocents through the US.
 
The website brings up the concept of subsets and gene pools:

14 Jun 2021 Charles Murray’s Facing Reality
‘ Mean IQs. Europeans 103, Africans 91, Latins 94, Asians 108....he invariably treats races as collections of individuals among whom non-random patterns happen to be observable rather than as (roughly) constant gene pools which perpetuate themselves across the generations.’

CRT can’t answer the question: What if a subset of a gene pool was chosen and reified before it was exported from Africa?


He also said this:
"...overlap exists in the distributions. It is not a threatening picture. Yes, differences exist, but it is also true that millions of Africans and Latins have higher cognitive ability than millions of Europeans and Asians. "
It still cannot answer the question of a reified subset with criminal tendencies that was a concentrated, deliberately imported subset with criminal tendencies that would eventually produce the 324,000. From the beginning this tendency, should it exist, excludes or not, IQ. Less credible are then also environmental and urban influences in the stats.

I have an belief and explanation that does not rely on genetics or immutable biological factors.


Consider in the heredity vs. environment controversy: females are several times as numerous as males among blacks with high IQs. Witty and Jenkins, "Educational Achievement of a Group of Gifted Negro Children," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 25, p. 593. They inherit the same genes, are raised in the same homes and neighborhoods......explanations rest on the culture, the excessively 'macho' roles of males associated with and emphasizing certain sociopathologies. Roles that the Left pretends are normal and acceptable, are not.

There is a pathology, abandoning families, that certainly holds some individuals back, and it is one that has been encouraged by the Liberals/Democrats.
“Baby momma” is not a substitute for “wife.”


The problems and lack of success of a particular group can be attributed to the Democrats.


  1. "It was the misfortune of black Americans that they were just on the verge of passing through the immigrant experience when damaging ideas about welfare and the lenient attitude about crime took hold. It could have happened to the Italians, Germans, Jews or Irish, but luckily for them, there were no Liberals around to “help” when they arrived." Coulter
  2. In fact, black Americans were doing better in individual pursuits than many immigrants. Barone compared their American journey to the Irish: “Both rise smartly in hierarchies (government bureaucracies, the military) but haven't fared as well in free-market commerce.” http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/941114/archive_013670.htm 3. “Like members of outsider groups before and since, this African-American elite considered education to be the key to full citizenship. They also embraced values of character and responsibility….Gains in terms of entrepreneurship, finding a trade, finding a profession, setting down roots, buying property, and feeling they were at last becoming a genuine part of city life. They would refer to ‘color-phobia’ as ‘fast disappearing in our city.’…Peterson's great grandfather owned a pharmacy in a largely Irish neighborhood. ” "Black Gotham," by University of Maryland Professor Carla Peterson.
This is a most decent rebuttal to criminality claims, and should be further developed/debated.



So very glad you said that!


Democrats would like to advance the view that they were out to protect our black population, and toward that end they make special rules and dispensations for black criminals.

Nothing could be further from reality, as blacks are the largest percent of victims of said criminals.

Carter-appointed judge Norma Shapiro “ is one of the worst offenders among that influential cadre of federal judges who have substituted the ACLU's prisoners' rights wish list for the Bill of Rights and have trifled with public safety concerns. …single-handedly decriminalized property and drug crimes in the City of Brotherly Love….And in the past 18 months alone, 9,732 arrestees, out on the streets on pre-trial release because of her prison cap, were arrested on second charges, including 79 murders, 90 rapes, 701 burglaries, 959 robberies, 1,113 assaults, 2,215 drug offenses and 2,748 thefts….Activist judges such as Shapiro and Justice assert that prison crowding violates the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishments. But there is no empirical evidence to substantiate this assertion. In every study of the subject, the widely believed negative effects of crowding - violence, program disruption, health problems and so on - are nowhere in evidence.”
Archives | The Philadelphia Inquirer

In 1992, black youths were nine times more likely to be murdered than white youths. Liberals lied, black kids died.

It is the Democrat Party that acts as though black folks are criminals and cannot be changed.


When you encourage criminality, you cannot help but get more of same.
 
6. ‘Crime rates per race’ is the subject, not the causes of same, as there are at least as many explanations as Baskin Robbins has flavors. An understanding and acceptance of “…the existence of large race differences in crime rates is a fact, and one that has sweeping social consequences.”

The reference will be “the annual report, Crime in the United States, a product of the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) program. The offenses in the violent crime index are murder, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault (“aggravated” meaning that the assault involved a serious injury, plausible threat of serious injury, or use of a deadly weapon).



When viewing the statistics, pay special attention to the Democrat house organ, the LATimes, and the definitive statement they make with respect to the group the Democrats need in order to win any national election:

Last week, this lie in the LATimes:

“I met Elder at his studio in 2019, while reporting my biography of Trump’s senior advisor Stephen Miller. Elder told me he believes his Blackness gives some listeners “confidence” to hold and share similar views. He has repeatedly twisted crime statistics to portray Black people as more violent than whites — a theme for white supremacists. He blames Black communities’ struggles on an alleged lack of self-determination. (A David Duke talking point).” Column: How recall candidate Larry Elder mentored Trumpism's top acolytes

Today’s thread….the facts, the gospel, on criminality by race. And, as a by-product, more proof that Democrats lie about everything.





And….perhaps, question whether there really are ‘white supremacists.’
There are white supremacists but collectively, they are no where near the threat the Left claims them to be. That is why the Left keeps overinflating the vandalism and trespassing a few of them did at the Capitol as “an insurrection”. This is a threat that is easily mitigated. Contrast that with the extreme Leftist who shoots up an open field of Congressional Republicans our the countless BLM and ANTIFA terrorists who destroy businesses and assault innocents through the US.


There are zero.....zero..... elected white supremacists.

There are bigots, but the numbers would fit in a Yugo.

Here is what the Democrats ignore:
And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
4 Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?
5 Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.
— Matthew 7:1–5 KJV (Matthew 7:1–5 other versions)


The are the racists.
Always were.
 
Baskin-Robbins flavors must include the fact that crime can be produced at both low- and high-IQ poles. The veneer on the IQ argument begins to peel.
 

Forum List

Back
Top