Is it ever ok to have an Abortion?

It's a cheap and common argument among abortion advocates to see how far pro lifers will go in the abortion debate. On the other hand how casual are reasonable abortion advocates when it comes to killing viable 2nd term fetuses who don't satisfy the current demand for genetic excellence?
There is another good test
1w0mys1uqop41.jpg
 
It's a cheap and common argument among abortion advocates to see how far pro lifers will go in the abortion debate. On the other hand how casual are reasonable abortion advocates when it comes to killing viable 2nd term fetuses who don't satisfy the current demand for genetic excellence?
There is another good test
1w0mys1uqop41.jpg

I'm down for that.

However, I think the requirements are that the child has been already claimed on your taxes at least once. And, for now you can not do that PRE parturition.
 
With the GOP so intent on taking people's health insurance away, there could be a very good reason to abort a Down Syndrome child.

You are acknowledging the fact that it is a child now?

I call that progress.

Not even worthy of a serious response.

Like a serious response from the likes of you was ever expected or ever will be.



Thanks for being such a great foil.

Take your time, looking it up.
 
Last edited:
...and, of course, nobody ever had an abortion before Roe, and if Roe is overturned, then nobody will ever have an abortion again, right? You need to put away your outdated self rightouse [sic] moral views, and learn to mind your own business.

I happen to very much disagree with you, that opposing the senseless slaughter of innocent human beings constitutes “outdated self rightouse [sic] moral views”.

Thousands of innocents are being brutally murdered, every day. It takes a soulless sociopath to be OK with that. And it is society's business, and the business of every decent member of society, to oppose such murder, and to wish that those who have any willing part in it are properly brought to justice.
 
Last edited:
Abortion has nothing to do with assault and molestation. But, you know that already.

Abortion •IS• assault. It is murder. And our society bears a deep shame, a deep evil, in our failure to recognize this horrendous evil for what it truly is, and to treat it and those who participate in it accordingly.

Every one of you murderous pieces of subhuman shit who defend this practice have the blood of innocent children in your hands.
 
What if it was determined that the baby would most likely be Down's Syndrome? That's a far more likely scenario. Down's Syndrome kids often live productive lives but some parents would prefer not to be bothered.

Before the Nazis started their mass murders of Jews, and other ethnic groups, they began with those who were handicapped, killing them in organized ways, albeit on a smaller scale than their later “Final Solution”.

Iceland is now boasting about having nearly eliminated Down's Syndrome. They've started down the same path that Nazism started down.
 
Easy. Was the fallopian tube removed? If so, it was an ectopic. Surgical excision of an ectopic pregnancy is abdominal surgery. Abortions are performed through the vaginal canal without incision.

Do you think this can't be proved? You weren't thinking.

You're playing stupid, dishonest, irrelevant semantic games with the definition of “Abortion”.

Such semantic game prove nothing, other than your own talent for twisting words to deceitful purposes.
 
I think self-absorbed pro-lifers should go eat some eggs.

Thanks for illustrating just how shallow your thinking really is.

Especially, given that the vast majority of eggs that people eat are not fertilized and therefore are not in any way a baby chicken in the first days of its life.

The ones that ARE fertilized?

They taste about the same. . . Unless they develop too long.
 
Last edited:
Especially, given that the vast majority of eggs that people eat are not fertilized and therefore are not in any way a baby chicken in the first days of its life.

The ones that ARE fertilized?

They taste about the same. . . Unless they develop too long.

In some Asian cultures, Balut is popular.

Yep.

I tried one on a dare, in the Philippines.
 
Last edited:
So, if after giving birth, the mother doesn't want the child, should she be able to just send the child out on the streets, to fend for himself?

It isn't just up until birth that a child needs his parents' support and care to survive. It is for quite a few years beyond that point.

There is nothing special about birth, that suddenly makes the child more human than he was before, or particularly more able to survive completely on his own.

Thing is, our laws recognize a newborn as a person. A fetus isn't.

It's why the government is giving out $500 checks for children under the Trump Socialist Giveaway, but nobody is getting money for a fetus.
 
I happen to very much disagree with you, that opposing the senseless slaughter of innocent human beings constitutes “outdated self rightouse [sic] moral views”.

Thousands of innocents are being brutally murdered, every day. It takes @a soulless sociopath to be OK with that. And it is society's business, and the business of every decent member of society, to oppose such murder, and to wish that those who have any willing part in it are properly brought to justice.

Mormon Bob, still waiting for you to tell me how you are going to enforce these laws.

If the woman the fetus is inside doesn't want it, it's getting aborted, no matter what the law is. Now, I realize you belong to a misogynistic cult that believes in the subordination of women, but 21st Century women aren't going to put up with that shit.
 

Forum List

Back
Top