Sorry bout that,
1. Can a low down murdering criminal be set free and *all is well*?
2. I for one, don't think so.
3. Is it lawful to reduce the sentence of a murderer, because other murderers have one of the good guys in a basement somewhere, held hostage?
4. I say its not *lawful*.
5. If you let out proven murderers because of terrorism, then you destroy law itself, laws being broken, tend to lose their meaning, and hold no threat, or meaning.
6. Anyone see where I'm going with this?
LINK:http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/18/us-palestinians-israel-prisoners-idUSTRE79E2YG20111018
"But, while leaders of Islamist Hamas and their secular rivals in President Mahmoud Abbas's Fatah movement made mildly conciliatory comments about each other's role in achieving the deal, there was no sign of warmth across the frontline of the struggle for land and security between Palestinians and Israel."
Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
1. Can a low down murdering criminal be set free and *all is well*?
2. I for one, don't think so.
3. Is it lawful to reduce the sentence of a murderer, because other murderers have one of the good guys in a basement somewhere, held hostage?
4. I say its not *lawful*.
5. If you let out proven murderers because of terrorism, then you destroy law itself, laws being broken, tend to lose their meaning, and hold no threat, or meaning.
6. Anyone see where I'm going with this?
LINK:http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/18/us-palestinians-israel-prisoners-idUSTRE79E2YG20111018
"But, while leaders of Islamist Hamas and their secular rivals in President Mahmoud Abbas's Fatah movement made mildly conciliatory comments about each other's role in achieving the deal, there was no sign of warmth across the frontline of the struggle for land and security between Palestinians and Israel."
Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
Last edited:
