Iran 'dangerous' for world peace by targeting Israel, Bush says, warning 2-state solution 'very difficult’

what lie?

The lie about Iraqi having their own WMD in addition to the ones we gave them.
And the lie about terrorist ties, when the only terrorists in Iraq were the ones we were protecting from Saddam, with our illegal no-fly-zones.
 
what lie? At no time did Bush claim that Iraq did 9-11-01
and at no time did he claim that Iraq had nuclear bombs. The
lie is-----that he did. The fact that there were people who believed
that he made such claims-----is absolutely true-----lots of very stupid
people. WMD is not a synonym for NUCLEAR BOMB

As a matter of fact, Bush did deliberately infer Saddam was behind the 9/11 attack.
And in fact, most of the country believed Saddam was behind the 9/11 attack.

{...

The impact of Bush linking 9/11 and Iraq​

American attitudes about a connection have changed, firming up the case for war.

March 14, 2003
WASHINGTON
In his prime-time press conference last week, which focused almost solely on Iraq, President Bush mentioned Sept. 11 eight times. He referred to Saddam Hussein many more times than that, often in the same breath with Sept. 11.
Bush never pinned blame for the attacks directly on the Iraqi president. Still, the overall effect was to reinforce an impression that persists among much of the American public: that the Iraqi dictator did play a direct role in the attacks. A New York Times/CBS poll this week shows that 45 percent of Americans believe Mr. Hussein was "personally involved" in Sept. 11, about the same figure as a month ago.
Sources knowledgeable about US intelligence say there is no evidence that Hussein played a role in the Sept. 11 attacks, nor that he has been or is currently aiding Al Qaeda. Yet the White House appears to be encouraging this false impression, as it seeks to maintain American support for a possible war against Iraq and demonstrate seriousness of purpose to Hussein's regime.
...}

And I distinctly remember Cheney claiming that Saddam was "only weeks away from developing nuclear weapons".
 
what was a "LIE" -----Saddam murdered MASSIVELY and was well into ATTEMPTING
to develope biologicals for MASSIVE WARFARE ----to wit WMD. your link does not work

Wrong.
Saddam never showed biological or chemical weapons interest.
It was the US that gave Saddam biological and chemical weapons, which Saddam then used in the war with Iraq.
By Desert Storm, there were no significant biological or chemical weapons left in Iraq.
There was no research, production, or stockpiles.
Anthrax has proven to be useless for biological warfare, and the chemical weapons have a very short self life.
 
Wrong.
Saddam never showed biological or chemical weapons interest.
It was the US that gave Saddam biological and chemical weapons, which Saddam then used in the war with Iraq.
By Desert Storm, there were no significant biological or chemical weapons left in Iraq.
There was no research, production, or stockpiles.
Anthrax has proven to be useless for biological warfare, and the chemical weapons have a very short self life.

^^^^ all 100% bullshit
 
Saddam didn't have squat as far as biological weapons and we killed the very same people we condemned him for killing but it's obvious as to why you are not able to comprehend the lies.
Interestingly, surada agrees with this idiotic post despite the fact that is vitually IMPOSSIBLE that she
does not KNOW. Saddam, in the typical islamo-
nazi Baathist manner, did use both nitrogen mustard gas and oganophophates-----the stuff that so easily snuffs out the lives of civilians---ESPECIALLY children with gay abandon on shiites to the south, kurds to the north and also against Iranians. He had huge stock piles of the nefarious stuff. Nitrogen mustard
gas is a german recipe---happily transferred to
Gamal Abdul Nasser by his escapee nazi war criminal
friends who fled the Nuremburg trials. Gamal was
Saddam's fellow Baathist pig murderer. He used the vile stuff in South Yemen. People who enjoy dancing on the dead bodies of children LOVE IT AND LIE ABOUT IT
 
Interestingly, surada agrees with this idiotic post despite the fact that is vitually IMPOSSIBLE that she
does not KNOW. Saddam, in the typical islamo-
nazi Baathist manner, did use both nitrogen mustard gas and oganophophates-----the stuff that so easily snuffs out the lives of civilians---ESPECIALLY children with gay abandon on shiites to the south, kurds to the north and also against Iranians. He had huge stock piles of the nefarious stuff. Nitrogen mustard
gas is a german recipe---happily transferred to
Gamal Abdul Nasser by his escapee nazi war criminal
friends who fled the Nuremburg trials. Gamal was
Saddam's fellow Baathist pig murderer. He used the vile stuff in South Yemen. People who enjoy dancing on the dead bodies of children LOVE IT AND LIE ABOUT IT

He once had gas that we gave him which is why we accused him of having it but after invading we didn't find squat.

Also on top of that, dead is dead. As I noted, we killed the very same groups of people we condemned Saddam for killing.
 
the few preceding posts bring me back to my
youth when I witnessed several khutbah jumaat
feces flings -----somethings never change
 
He once had gas that we gave him which is why we accused him of having it but after invading we didn't find squat.

Also on top of that, dead is dead. As I noted, we killed the very same groups of people we condemned Saddam for killing.
in which mosque did you hear that? We did not
"give him gas" What we did supply included some of the components used in MEDICINE AND
INDUSTRY and AGRICULTURE ----that he used to manufacture Nitrogen mustard gas and Organophosphate battle grade POISONS---
---try to grow a brain and get your head out of islamo nazi lies. "WE" killed shiites in southern
Iraq and Kurds in northern Iraq? sorry---you IMAM LIED
 
As a matter of fact, Bush did deliberately infer Saddam was behind the 9/11 attack.
And in fact, most of the country believed Saddam was behind the 9/11 attack.

{...

The impact of Bush linking 9/11 and Iraq​

American attitudes about a connection have changed, firming up the case for war.

March 14, 2003
WASHINGTON
In his prime-time press conference last week, which focused almost solely on Iraq, President Bush mentioned Sept. 11 eight times. He referred to Saddam Hussein many more times than that, often in the same breath with Sept. 11.
Bush never pinned blame for the attacks directly on the Iraqi president. Still, the overall effect was to reinforce an impression that persists among much of the American public: that the Iraqi dictator did play a direct role in the attacks. A New York Times/CBS poll this week shows that 45 percent of Americans believe Mr. Hussein was "personally involved" in Sept. 11, about the same figure as a month ago.
Sources knowledgeable about US intelligence say there is no evidence that Hussein played a role in the Sept. 11 attacks, nor that he has been or is currently aiding Al Qaeda. Yet the White House appears to be encouraging this false impression, as it seeks to maintain American support for a possible war against Iraq and demonstrate seriousness of purpose to Hussein's regime.
...}

And I distinctly remember Cheney claiming that Saddam was "only weeks away from developing nuclear weapons".
try again----Bush NEVER stated or "inferred" that
saddam did 9-11. If you thought so----that's your
stupidity. There is no question that Saddam was
getting into the development of Nuclear energy---
for nefarious purposes. Cheney said WHAT?
 
in which mosque did you hear that? We did not
"give him gas" What we did supply included some of the components used in MEDICINE AND
INDUSTRY and AGRICULTURE ----that he used to manufacture Nitrogen mustard gas and Organophosphate battle grade POISONS---
---try to grow a brain and get your head out of islamo nazi lies. "WE" killed shiites in southern
Iraq and Kurds in northern Iraq? sorry---you IMAM LIED

Godwin
 
He once had gas that we gave him which is why we accused him of having it but after invading we didn't find squat.

Also on top of that, dead is dead. As I noted, we killed the very same groups of people we condemned Saddam for killing.
"WE" gave saddam no "gas"----as to finding "squat" it is fact that saddam transferred lots of his
stockpiled filth to Syria----to his fellow islamo nazi
baathist murdering pig----ASSAD
 
he had plenty more than "squat" including Botulinin toxin and Anthrax spores. Your statement
that "WE" killed the hundreds of thousands of Kurds and SHIITES that were murdered by
SADAAM is a very sick LIE. Who is "we"? Is "we" the people who stockpiled and USED
nitrogen mustard gas?

Wrong.
Saddam did not kill hundreds of thousands of Kurds or Shiites.
The poison gas attack on Hallabjah has been proven to have been by Iran, not Saddam.
And in fact during the Iran/Iraq war, the Kurds were on Saddam's side.
This was researched and proven by Peltier of the US Army College.
Nor did Saddam massacre Shiites.
He only executed those in assassination plots.
 
As a matter of fact, Bush did deliberately infer Saddam was behind the 9/11 attack.
And in fact, most of the country believed Saddam was behind the 9/11 attack.

{...

The impact of Bush linking 9/11 and Iraq​

American attitudes about a connection have changed, firming up the case for war.

March 14, 2003
WASHINGTON
In his prime-time press conference last week, which focused almost solely on Iraq, President Bush mentioned Sept. 11 eight times. He referred to Saddam Hussein many more times than that, often in the same breath with Sept. 11.
Bush never pinned blame for the attacks directly on the Iraqi president. Still, the overall effect was to reinforce an impression that persists among much of the American public: that the Iraqi dictator did play a direct role in the attacks. A New York Times/CBS poll this week shows that 45 percent of Americans believe Mr. Hussein was "personally involved" in Sept. 11, about the same figure as a month ago.
Sources knowledgeable about US intelligence say there is no evidence that Hussein played a role in the Sept. 11 attacks, nor that he has been or is currently aiding Al Qaeda. Yet the White House appears to be encouraging this false impression, as it seeks to maintain American support for a possible war against Iraq and demonstrate seriousness of purpose to Hussein's regime.
...}

And I distinctly remember Cheney claiming that Saddam was "only weeks away from developing nuclear weapons".
for american ATTITUDES and "BELIEFS" --try to
RECALL Jay Leno's JAY WALKS
 
Wrong.
Saddam did not kill hundreds of thousands of Kurds or Shiites.
The poison gas attack on Hallabjah has been proven to have been by Iran, not Saddam.
And in fact during the Iran/Iraq war, the Kurds were on Saddam's side.
This was researched and proven by Peltier of the US Army College.
Nor did Saddam massacre Shiites.
He only executed those in assassination plots.
right---the good man emulated AL NABI----only
they "GUILTY" died
 
"WE" gave saddam no "gas"----as to finding "squat" it is fact that saddam transferred lots of his
stockpiled filth to Syria----to his fellow islamo nazi
baathist murdering pig----ASSAD

Wrong.
It is well documented the US gave Saddam many types of WMD for use against Iran.
Saddam transferred NOTHING to Assad, as he was Sunni and Assad was Shiite.
They were both Baathists, but that did not get to the level of sharing weapons.
And in fact, the inspectors found nothing significant in Syria either.
 
you are rejecting historic fact with an islamo-
nazi bussword. Who invented and USED
nitrogen mustard gas---GENIUS?
knopp "disagreed" -----That is----he cannot
answer the simple history question-----anyone?
 
knopp "disagreed" -----That is----he cannot
answer the simple history question-----anyone?

There is no way to rationally discuss anything with anyone who believes "Nazi's" is a proper rebuttal.
 

Forum List

Back
Top