Interesting comparison, man holds BLM sign in white area..and then holds All lives matter in black...quite the difference.

Not surprised of course.
Man takes a BLM sign and goes to a mostly white area and shows response he gets.
Then takes a "All lives Matter" is a black neighborhood... and absolutely risked his life in the process.

Why do you think this is?



Because the "All lives matter" sign is racist, and inflammatory, and Black Lives Matter is not, and he knew that before he did it. He wanted that reaction so he could claim that blacks are more racist than white. He would have had the same result if he had carried a sign saying the "N" word, through both neighbourhoods.

How is "All lives matter" racist?
 
Not surprised of course.
Man takes a BLM sign and goes to a mostly white area and shows response he gets.
Then takes a "All lives Matter" is a black neighborhood... and absolutely risked his life in the process.

Why do you think this is?



Because the "All lives matter" sign is racist, and inflammatory, and Black Lives Matter is not, and he knew that before he did it. He wanted that reaction so he could claim that blacks are more racist than white. He would have had the same result if he had carried a sign saying the "N" word, through both neighbourhoods.

How is "All lives matter" racist?


It's not.
 
Not surprised of course.
Man takes a BLM sign and goes to a mostly white area and shows response he gets.
Then takes a "All lives Matter" is a black neighborhood... and absolutely risked his life in the process.

Why do you think this is?



Because the "All lives matter" sign is racist, and inflammatory, and Black Lives Matter is not, and he knew that before he did it. He wanted that reaction so he could claim that blacks are more racist than white. He would have had the same result if he had carried a sign saying the "N" word, through both neighbourhoods.

How is "All lives matter" racist?


All Lives Matter is anti-virtue signaling. They hate it because it contradicts the false BLM narrative they LOOOOVE to virtue signal about.
 
Not surprised of course.
Man takes a BLM sign and goes to a mostly white area and shows response he gets.
Then takes a "All lives Matter" is a black neighborhood... and absolutely risked his life in the process.

Why do you think this is?



Because the "All lives matter" sign is racist, and inflammatory, and Black Lives Matter is not, and he knew that before he did it. He wanted that reaction so he could claim that blacks are more racist than white. He would have had the same result if he had carried a sign saying the "N" word, through both neighbourhoods.

any kind of support for white people is racist naturally...
 
Not surprised of course.
Man takes a BLM sign and goes to a mostly white area and shows response he gets.
Then takes a "All lives Matter" is a black neighborhood... and absolutely risked his life in the process.

Why do you think this is?


If you have to put a skin color in front of "Lives Matter," you are the racist.

blm07.jpg


f9d0652016a3ec674a886d5afc45d168a574758f3eb5c110cac6de828d2ab96f.png


blm03.jpg
 
Not surprised of course.
Man takes a BLM sign and goes to a mostly white area and shows response he gets.
Then takes a "All lives Matter" is a black neighborhood... and absolutely risked his life in the process.

Why do you think this is?



Because the "All lives matter" sign is racist, and inflammatory, and Black Lives Matter is not, and he knew that before he did it. He wanted that reaction so he could claim that blacks are more racist than white. He would have had the same result if he had carried a sign saying the "N" word, through both neighbourhoods.

So Asian lives don’t matter.
D50D29BF-1B0B-4703-84B4-21635C3A4063.jpeg
 
Yes, an experiment in democracy, because stating “black lives matter” is preemptively racist and by default, violent, for it to be said in a vibrant democracy.
 
Not surprised of course.
Man takes a BLM sign and goes to a mostly white area and shows response he gets.
Then takes a "All lives Matter" is a black neighborhood... and absolutely risked his life in the process.

Why do you think this is?



Cuz leftists are cunz and project their filth on others maybe?
 
Because the "All lives matter" sign is racist, and inflammatory, and Black Lives Matter is not, and he knew that before he did it.
That is a narrative of many supporters of BLM, but is it true? Is it factual? Is it logical?

I personally think it is a very sad day when "All lives matter" is considered racist and inflammatory. It should not . It is not.
It is not, it is not it is not.

Oh btw, Black Lives Matter is included in all lives matter, stupid fking demofks
 
Further proof leftists have the maturity of spoiled young children. Just the BLM cry alone sounds like something you'd hear Kindergarteners say for PRETEND.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: DBA
Why do you think this is?
Because cops aren't shooting white people in broad daylight. have a good day.
Cops abuse their power all the time, and it matters not who you are. Stop believing the propaganda.

You think because it doesn't make the national media, that it doesn't happen? :dunno:




header.jpg

 
My wild guess having read nothing is BLM sign drew 30% negative response and ALM drew 50% negative trspobse.
 
Not surprised of course.
Man takes a BLM sign and goes to a mostly white area and shows response he gets.
Then takes a "All lives Matter" is a black neighborhood... and absolutely risked his life in the process.

Why do you think this is?



Because the "All lives matter" sign is racist, and inflammatory, and Black Lives Matter is not, and he knew that before he did it. He wanted that reaction so he could claim that blacks are more racist than white. He would have had the same result if he had carried a sign saying the "N" word, through both neighbourhoods.

BLM---is terroristic, racist, and extortionist in reality...thought you should know.
 

Forum List

Back
Top