Intel Dem: No reason for White House to defy subpoena unless Trump is 'guilty'

[keepitreal]

What other explanation is there?


Intel Dem: No reason for White House to defy subpoena unless Trump is 'guilty'
.
House Intelligence Committee member Rep. Denny Heck (D-Wash.) said Friday that there is no reason for the White House to defy a congressional subpoena for Ukraine-related documents unless President Trump is "guilty."



Asked what would happen if the White House doesn't comply with the subpoena, Heck told CNN, "Defiance of this act constitutes obstruction of a legitimate congressional inquiry in pursuit of impeachment, and as a consequence of that we will presume or infer that he is not innocent of whatever it is that we're out to verify with the documentation."

"There is no other reason for him to withhold it, to hide it, unless of course he's guilty," he added, referring to Trump.


Intel Dem: No reason for White House to defy subpoena unless Trump is 'guilty'

There is no reason why Biden shouldn't welcome
an investigation into Burisma, if there is nothing to hide

 

[Sun Devil 92]

What other explanation is there?


Intel Dem: No reason for White House to defy subpoena unless Trump is 'guilty'
.
House Intelligence Committee member Rep. Denny Heck (D-Wash.) said Friday that there is no reason for the White House to defy a congressional subpoena for Ukraine-related documents unless President Trump is "guilty."



Asked what would happen if the White House doesn't comply with the subpoena, Heck told CNN, "Defiance of this act constitutes obstruction of a legitimate congressional inquiry in pursuit of impeachment, and as a consequence of that we will presume or infer that he is not innocent of whatever it is that we're out to verify with the documentation."

"There is no other reason for him to withhold it, to hide it, unless of course he's guilty," he added, referring to Trump.


Intel Dem: No reason for White House to defy subpoena unless Trump is 'guilty'

We know he’s guilty. He admitted it and did it again openly. I’m not sure what’s so confusing to imbecile vile trumpkins.

The house should proceed.

Pelosi needs to put her people on record.

The senate will never convict.

End of game.

End of democrats.

End of the moronic leftwingers on this board (massive head explosions).

 

[Lysistrata]

What other explanation is there?


Intel Dem: No reason for White House to defy subpoena unless Trump is 'guilty'
.
House Intelligence Committee member Rep. Denny Heck (D-Wash.) said Friday that there is no reason for the White House to defy a congressional subpoena for Ukraine-related documents unless President Trump is "guilty."



Asked what would happen if the White House doesn't comply with the subpoena, Heck told CNN, "Defiance of this act constitutes obstruction of a legitimate congressional inquiry in pursuit of impeachment, and as a consequence of that we will presume or infer that he is not innocent of whatever it is that we're out to verify with the documentation."

"There is no other reason for him to withhold it, to hide it, unless of course he's guilty," he added, referring to Trump.


Intel Dem: No reason for White House to defy subpoena unless Trump is 'guilty'

There is no reason why Biden shouldn't welcome
an investigation into Burisma, if there is nothing to hide

Biden is a private citizen who has entered the 2020 presidential race. On the other hand, the orange whore is now heading the executive branch, and he is suspected of using his office to force other countries to collect dirt on a political opponent for his own personal gain rather than anything to do with the interests of the United States. It doesn't matter who the orange whore wanted to get dirt on, whether Biden or someone else, the fact of his conduct in office remains.

 

[MeBelle]

This is nothing less than political grandstanding. The WH is using obstruction as a justification for the HoR opening an pre impeachment inquiry.

There is no constitutional mandate required. Want proof, just ask Merrick Garland.

No, just no.


Acting on a nomination for the supreme court is vastly different than
attempting to impeach a sitting president.

You are smarter than this.

 

[Jets]

This is nothing less than political grandstanding. The WH is using obstruction as a justification for the HoR opening an pre impeachment inquiry.

There is no constitutional mandate required. Want proof, just ask Merrick Garland.

No, just no.


Acting on a nomination for the supreme court is vastly different than
attempting to impeach a sitting president.

You are smarter than this.

That’s irrelevant. From Article 1 Section 5

Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behavior, and, with the Concurrence of two-thirds, expel a Member.

 

[Obiwan]

Eric holder and the Democrats taught us to ignore Congress and nothing will happen

And the idiot Democrats don't seem to realize that, according to their argument, the entire Obama administration is guilty.

 

[DBA]

What other explanation is there?


Intel Dem: No reason for White House to defy subpoena unless Trump is 'guilty'
.
House Intelligence Committee member Rep. Denny Heck (D-Wash.) said Friday that there is no reason for the White House to defy a congressional subpoena for Ukraine-related documents unless President Trump is "guilty."



Asked what would happen if the White House doesn't comply with the subpoena, Heck told CNN, "Defiance of this act constitutes obstruction of a legitimate congressional inquiry in pursuit of impeachment, and as a consequence of that we will presume or infer that he is not innocent of whatever it is that we're out to verify with the documentation."

"There is no other reason for him to withhold it, to hide it, unless of course he's guilty," he added, referring to Trump.


Intel Dem: No reason for White House to defy subpoena unless Trump is 'guilty'

Yeah sure kind of like when Trump denies he is a racist, he must really be a racist because of this denial. I refuse to believe 1/2 of the American people are stupid enough to believe the crap thrown out by the left.

Trump knows they can get the documents if they vote on an impeachment inquiry...something the White House has encouraged if they want to pursue this. In other words, they have no problem providing the information but why on earth would they give it to them without requiring House Democrats to go on the record first? Democrats want to be able to look through all documents in private, spinning what they find to the media, fooling the ingorant masses that watch CNN and MSNBC and causing as many distractions as possible before the election. They want all of these things WITHOUT going on the record because they know they will lose. When they lose, House Democrats want to be able to claim they didn't pursue impeachment, particualry ones in purple states. Notice the ones that have come out in public for impeachment are largely in solidly blue states...states that would vote for literally anyone other than Trump. Pelosi obviously doesn't have the votes at this point, but she is all for creating a distraction.

 

[BrokeLoser]

What other explanation is there?


Intel Dem: No reason for White House to defy subpoena unless Trump is 'guilty'
.
House Intelligence Committee member Rep. Denny Heck (D-Wash.) said Friday that there is no reason for the White House to defy a congressional subpoena for Ukraine-related documents unless President Trump is "guilty."



Asked what would happen if the White House doesn't comply with the subpoena, Heck told CNN, "Defiance of this act constitutes obstruction of a legitimate congressional inquiry in pursuit of impeachment, and as a consequence of that we will presume or infer that he is not innocent of whatever it is that we're out to verify with the documentation."

"There is no other reason for him to withhold it, to hide it, unless of course he's guilty," he added, referring to Trump.


Intel Dem: No reason for White House to defy subpoena unless Trump is 'guilty'

“What other explanation is there?”
At some point good people get sick and fucking tired of wasting their time with filth.

“I believe survivors”
“Kavanaugh is a rapist”
“RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA!”
“Mueller has him right where he wants him”
“The walls are closing in all around him”

 

[M14 Shooter]

Biden is a private citizen who has entered the 2020 presidential race.

The investigation in question involves actions Biden took re: Ukraine while he was VP.
How is it inappropriate/illegal/impeachable for the President to discuss with the President of the Ukraine an investigation of actions Biden took while he was VP?

 

[Wry Catcher]

LOL.

Have fun.

The democrats last days on Earth

18 U.S. Code Sec. 1505

"Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years*** or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.

Which makes Trump's last days in the White House and hopefully first days in the Superior Court in the Southern District of New York, and in the District of Columbia, where he rightly belongs.

***Which makes Sec 1505 a felony, that is a high crime in any penal code and in particular in COTUS.

Biden's guilty, no doubt. Laundering taxpayer money through the Ukraine.

Of topic Frank, and a violation of the Commandment by God that you not bear false witness. You are going down, Frank.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Eric holder and the Democrats taught us to ignore Congress and nothing will happen

And the idiot Democrats don't seem to realize that, according to their argument, the entire Obama administration is guilty.

LOL The idiot Trump supporters have yet to realize Trump is the leader of the Trump Mob.

 

[Dana7360]

Prison is a cruel place. People suffer there. Surely you don't want Trump there do you?

What makes him any different from all the other criminals in our nation who have been found guilty and sentenced to prison?

Yes I want him in prison. Send a message to the politicians that you can't get away from the crimes you commit in office. None of them are above the law.

If we can put people in prison for years for having some marijuana we can put trump in prison where he belongs.

trump put himself in this position. No one made him break so many laws.

He belongs in prison with the rest of the criminals in America.

 

[M14 Shooter]

trump put himself in this position. No one made him break so many laws.

 

[anotherlife]

Prison is a cruel place. People suffer there. Surely you don't want Trump there do you?

What makes him any different from all the other criminals in our nation who have been found guilty and sentenced to prison?

Yes I want him in prison. Send a message to the politicians that you can't get away from the crimes you commit in office. None of them are above the law.

If we can put people in prison for years for having some marijuana we can put trump in prison where he belongs.

trump put himself in this position. No one made him break so many laws.

He belongs in prison with the rest of the criminals in America.

Isn't there a saying in Washington, "don't criminalize politics"?

 

[boedicca]

The House hasn't issued valid subpeonas as they haven't voted on the Impeachment Inquiry. All we are seeing now is their Kabuki Impeachment-like Theater. It's all bogus.

Congressional subpoenas are valid regardless.

No, they are not. Subpoenas are only valid when related to legislative issues or for a formal inquiry process, which this is not.

The Bluffpeachment is just a political process, and the Bluffpoenas are just Kabuki Theater props.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

What other explanation is there?


Intel Dem: No reason for White House to defy subpoena unless Trump is 'guilty'
.
House Intelligence Committee member Rep. Denny Heck (D-Wash.) said Friday that there is no reason for the White House to defy a congressional subpoena for Ukraine-related documents unless President Trump is "guilty."



Asked what would happen if the White House doesn't comply with the subpoena, Heck told CNN, "Defiance of this act constitutes obstruction of a legitimate congressional inquiry in pursuit of impeachment, and as a consequence of that we will presume or infer that he is not innocent of whatever it is that we're out to verify with the documentation."

"There is no other reason for him to withhold it, to hide it, unless of course he's guilty," he added, referring to Trump.


Intel Dem: No reason for White House to defy subpoena unless Trump is 'guilty'

Why are these threads even allowed? They kill more brain cells than alcohol. Hold a vote to impeach, give the other side their right to call their witnesses and subpoenas will be answered. If the Executive Branch and the Legislative Branch have a disagreement then have the Judicial Branch break the tie. This is how our constitution works. The OP is an uneducated coward.

 

[BS Filter]

Trump and supporters are giving the left the finger, and it's way past time. There's nothing you can do about it.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

What other explanation is there?


Intel Dem: No reason for White House to defy subpoena unless Trump is 'guilty'
.
House Intelligence Committee member Rep. Denny Heck (D-Wash.) said Friday that there is no reason for the White House to defy a congressional subpoena for Ukraine-related documents unless President Trump is "guilty."



Asked what would happen if the White House doesn't comply with the subpoena, Heck told CNN, "Defiance of this act constitutes obstruction of a legitimate congressional inquiry in pursuit of impeachment, and as a consequence of that we will presume or infer that he is not innocent of whatever it is that we're out to verify with the documentation."

"There is no other reason for him to withhold it, to hide it, unless of course he's guilty," he added, referring to Trump.


Intel Dem: No reason for White House to defy subpoena unless Trump is 'guilty'

We know he’s guilty. He admitted it and did it again openly. I’m not sure what’s so confusing to imbecile vile trumpkins.

Guilty by inference and conjecture. Only in your Leftist world.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication

I noticed you left out the word THREATENING with your big black crayon.

As in THREATENING COMMUNICATION because COMMUNICATION on it's own is not a crime.

But you, being a disingenuous retarded old man, are expected to lie and make shit up.


Dismissed asshat

 

[Wry Catcher]

The House hasn't issued valid subpeonas as they haven't voted on the Impeachment Inquiry. All we are seeing now is their Kabuki Impeachment-like Theater. It's all bogus.

Congressional subpoenas are valid regardless.

No, they are not. Subpoenas are only valid when related to legislative issues or for a formal inquiry process, which this is not.

The Bluffpeachment is just a political process, and the Bluffpoenas are just Kabuki Theater props.

Look up Title 18, Obstruction of Justice.

"Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years

Now, lick you wounds and offer a well earned mea culpa for lying.