Insurrection?

A bunch of leftwing loons keep claiming the riot on 6 January was an insurrection.

Be specific those that claim it is an insurrection and cite anyone CHARGED with treason or insurrection. A bunch of people have been arrested and charged in the riot, name those charged with insurrection.

Today's right wing talking point. Deny there was a insurrection. I expect a flood of this half assed threads today.


Exactly. They're trying to re-write history. God forbid if their tribe ever does anything bad! They'd still be frothing at the mouth if BLM/Antifa had done the same thing. FFS, they're so gullible, some believe it actually was BLM/Antifa.

The white grievance in the Trump cult is strong.

From your article

Instead of an attempt to overturn the election by radicalized Donald Trump supporters, it was a choreographed attack staged by antifa provocateurs. Rather than an armed insurrection, it was a good-natured protest spoiled by a few troublemakers.​
And instead of a deadly event that put the lives of hundreds of lawmakers, police officers and others at risk, the riot was no big deal at all.​
A legion of conservative activists, media personalities and elected officials are seeking to rewrite the story of what happened at the Capitol on Jan. 6, hoping to undermine the clear picture of the attack that has emerged from video and photo evidence, law enforcement officials, journalistic accounts and the testimonials of the rioters themselves: that a pro-Trump mob, mobilized by the former president’s false claims of a stolen election, stormed the seat of American government to keep Trump in power through violent means.​
This is why no one takes WaPo seriously.

On the one hand, they tell some truths. . . OTH? They tell wildly ridiculous lies to support the narrative of the Deep State.

NO. . . . it was not a "good-natured protest." Of that, most sane folks can agree. Something very foul went on. . .

OTH,. . . . WaPo is clearly lying, and pushing a false paradigm. . .

"armed insurrection?!"

Seriously? Who is rewriting history now? There wasn't anybody that was armed there. No one had any guns. If they had been serious, we would be under authoritarian rule right now, with Trump at the helm. This was NOT organized, it was not seriously planned to overthrow the power substructure of the ruling class, it is a false narrative. Sane thinking folks can see right through such a ridiculous narrative. Repeating, "armed insurrection," over and over again, doesn't make it true.


maxresdefault.jpg

I'm not seeing a lot of violent gun toting militias here. . .

Capitol-Meemaw-PERC1-758x397.jpg

Nope. . . if anything, the corporate media is the one trying to spin here. . .
By presenting the most innocuous pictures you can find and pretending them to be the norm or the issue, you are far more dishonest than WAPO calling it an armed insurrection.

There were many kinds of weapons used that day to smash through Capitol doors and windows and injure LE including the MOB itself.

Now post a pic of a puppy and claim the insurrection wasn't that because of a puppy.
The point is. . . if you have actually SEEN pictures of armed insurrections in other nations? You would never find innocuous pictures of civilians mixed in with the "insurrectionists."

This is just a fact of political violence world wide. It is like you live in a bubble and have never witnessed coups before.

What sort of fantasy world do you live in?

:dunno:

These photos weren't taken in the periphery, they were taken in the "center of the storm," as it were.

I do not doubt that there were bad actors inciting the mob, as I said, there was certainly something very foul going on. . . but to characterize what went on as an "armed insurrection,' rather than a riot that got out of control?

When Americans are propagandized to believe in such nonsense? :45:

 
A bunch of leftwing loons keep claiming the riot on 6 January was an insurrection.

Be specific those that claim it is an insurrection and cite anyone CHARGED with treason or insurrection. A bunch of people have been arrested and charged in the riot, name those charged with insurrection.
View attachment 463304
Perhaps then you should close your mouth.
View attachment 463314
Read My signature.
 
The point is. . . if you have actually SEEN pictures of armed insurrections in other nations? You would never find innocuous pictures of civilians mixed in with the "insurrectionists."
You never heard of the Bastille?
 
Insurrection would be the BLM Negroes looting, burning, rioting, murdering and destroying government facilities for months on end.

Abetting an insurrection would be the Democrats that supported the BLM insurrectionists.
 
the investigations aren't over yet. it's standard procedure to levy charges that are obvious, with the option of upping any charges if the evidence presents itself. some initial charges were for the obvious - unlawful entry/trespassing. you think that was it? that was all anybody was gonna get charged with? lol....

those that are being investigated for being involved in a coordinated, planned attack against the capital to gain access & the literal hunting down of congress critters, will most likely be charged further - - - perhaps with insurrection against the gov't of the USA.
[/QUO
So the debate is over the meaning of the word “insurrection”?
It is obvious you have no idea how it works as it pertains to investigations and charges.

But please, spew your ignorance all you want.
 
A bunch of leftwing loons keep claiming the riot on 6 January was an insurrection.

Be specific those that claim it is an insurrection and cite anyone CHARGED with treason or insurrection. A bunch of people have been arrested and charged in the riot, name those charged with insurrection.

Today's right wing talking point. Deny there was a insurrection. I expect a flood of this half assed threads today.


Exactly. They're trying to re-write history. God forbid if their tribe ever does anything bad! They'd still be frothing at the mouth if BLM/Antifa had done the same thing. FFS, they're so gullible, some believe it actually was BLM/Antifa.

The white grievance in the Trump cult is strong.

From your article

Instead of an attempt to overturn the election by radicalized Donald Trump supporters, it was a choreographed attack staged by antifa provocateurs. Rather than an armed insurrection, it was a good-natured protest spoiled by a few troublemakers.​
And instead of a deadly event that put the lives of hundreds of lawmakers, police officers and others at risk, the riot was no big deal at all.​
A legion of conservative activists, media personalities and elected officials are seeking to rewrite the story of what happened at the Capitol on Jan. 6, hoping to undermine the clear picture of the attack that has emerged from video and photo evidence, law enforcement officials, journalistic accounts and the testimonials of the rioters themselves: that a pro-Trump mob, mobilized by the former president’s false claims of a stolen election, stormed the seat of American government to keep Trump in power through violent means.​
This is why no one takes WaPo seriously.

On the one hand, they tell some truths. . . OTH? They tell wildly ridiculous lies to support the narrative of the Deep State.

NO. . . . it was not a "good-natured protest." Of that, most sane folks can agree. Something very foul went on. . .

OTH,. . . . WaPo is clearly lying, and pushing a false paradigm. . .

"armed insurrection?!"

Seriously? Who is rewriting history now? There wasn't anybody that was armed there. No one had any guns. If they had been serious, we would be under authoritarian rule right now, with Trump at the helm. This was NOT organized, it was not seriously planned to overthrow the power substructure of the ruling class, it is a false narrative. Sane thinking folks can see right through such a ridiculous narrative. Repeating, "armed insurrection," over and over again, doesn't make it true.


maxresdefault.jpg

I'm not seeing a lot of violent gun toting militias here. . .

Capitol-Meemaw-PERC1-758x397.jpg

Nope. . . if anything, the corporate media is the one trying to spin here. . .
By presenting the most innocuous pictures you can find and pretending them to be the norm or the issue, you are far more dishonest than WAPO calling it an armed insurrection.

There were many kinds of weapons used that day to smash through Capitol doors and windows and injure LE including the MOB itself.

Now post a pic of a puppy and claim the insurrection wasn't that because of a puppy.
The point is. . . if you have actually SEEN pictures of armed insurrections in other nations? You would never find innocuous pictures of civilians mixed in with the "insurrectionists."

This is just a fact of political violence world wide. It is like you live in a bubble and have never witnessed coups before.

What sort of fantasy world do you live in?

:dunno:

These photos weren't taken in the periphery, they were taken in the "center of the storm," as it were.

I do not doubt that there were bad actors inciting the mob, as I said, there was certainly something very foul going on. . . but to characterize what went on as an "armed insurrection,' rather than a riot that got out of control?

When Americans are propagandized to believe in such nonsense? :45:



IT WAS AN ARMED INSURRECTION. LYING ABOUT IT WON'T CHANGE THINGS:

 
A bunch of leftwing loons keep claiming the riot on 6 January was an insurrection.

Be specific those that claim it is an insurrection and cite anyone CHARGED with treason or insurrection. A bunch of people have been arrested and charged in the riot, name those charged with insurrection.

Today's right wing talking point. Deny there was a insurrection. I expect a flood of this half assed threads today.


Exactly. They're trying to re-write history. God forbid if their tribe ever does anything bad! They'd still be frothing at the mouth if BLM/Antifa had done the same thing. FFS, they're so gullible, some believe it actually was BLM/Antifa.

The white grievance in the Trump cult is strong.

From your article

Instead of an attempt to overturn the election by radicalized Donald Trump supporters, it was a choreographed attack staged by antifa provocateurs. Rather than an armed insurrection, it was a good-natured protest spoiled by a few troublemakers.​
And instead of a deadly event that put the lives of hundreds of lawmakers, police officers and others at risk, the riot was no big deal at all.​
A legion of conservative activists, media personalities and elected officials are seeking to rewrite the story of what happened at the Capitol on Jan. 6, hoping to undermine the clear picture of the attack that has emerged from video and photo evidence, law enforcement officials, journalistic accounts and the testimonials of the rioters themselves: that a pro-Trump mob, mobilized by the former president’s false claims of a stolen election, stormed the seat of American government to keep Trump in power through violent means.​
This is why no one takes WaPo seriously.

On the one hand, they tell some truths. . . OTH? They tell wildly ridiculous lies to support the narrative of the Deep State.

NO. . . . it was not a "good-natured protest." Of that, most sane folks can agree. Something very foul went on. . .

OTH,. . . . WaPo is clearly lying, and pushing a false paradigm. . .

"armed insurrection?!"

Seriously? Who is rewriting history now? There wasn't anybody that was armed there. No one had any guns. If they had been serious, we would be under authoritarian rule right now, with Trump at the helm. This was NOT organized, it was not seriously planned to overthrow the power substructure of the ruling class, it is a false narrative. Sane thinking folks can see right through such a ridiculous narrative. Repeating, "armed insurrection," over and over again, doesn't make it true.


maxresdefault.jpg

I'm not seeing a lot of violent gun toting militias here. . .

Capitol-Meemaw-PERC1-758x397.jpg

Nope. . . if anything, the corporate media is the one trying to spin here. . .
By presenting the most innocuous pictures you can find and pretending them to be the norm or the issue, you are far more dishonest than WAPO calling it an armed insurrection.

There were many kinds of weapons used that day to smash through Capitol doors and windows and injure LE including the MOB itself.

Now post a pic of a puppy and claim the insurrection wasn't that because of a puppy.
The point is. . . if you have actually SEEN pictures of armed insurrections in other nations? You would never find innocuous pictures of civilians mixed in with the "insurrectionists."

This is just a fact of political violence world wide. It is like you live in a bubble and have never witnessed coups before.

What sort of fantasy world do you live in?

:dunno:

These photos weren't taken in the periphery, they were taken in the "center of the storm," as it were.

I do not doubt that there were bad actors inciting the mob, as I said, there was certainly something very foul going on. . . but to characterize what went on as an "armed insurrection,' rather than a riot that got out of control?

When Americans are propagandized to believe in such nonsense? :45:



IT WAS AN ARMED INSURRECTION. LYING ABOUT IT WON'T CHANGE THINGS:


50350n.jpg
 
A bunch of leftwing loons keep claiming the riot on 6 January was an insurrection.

Be specific those that claim it is an insurrection and cite anyone CHARGED with treason or insurrection. A bunch of people have been arrested and charged in the riot, name those charged with insurrection.

Today's right wing talking point. Deny there was a insurrection. I expect a flood of this half assed threads today.


Exactly. They're trying to re-write history. God forbid if their tribe ever does anything bad! They'd still be frothing at the mouth if BLM/Antifa had done the same thing. FFS, they're so gullible, some believe it actually was BLM/Antifa.

The white grievance in the Trump cult is strong.

From your article

Instead of an attempt to overturn the election by radicalized Donald Trump supporters, it was a choreographed attack staged by antifa provocateurs. Rather than an armed insurrection, it was a good-natured protest spoiled by a few troublemakers.​
And instead of a deadly event that put the lives of hundreds of lawmakers, police officers and others at risk, the riot was no big deal at all.​
A legion of conservative activists, media personalities and elected officials are seeking to rewrite the story of what happened at the Capitol on Jan. 6, hoping to undermine the clear picture of the attack that has emerged from video and photo evidence, law enforcement officials, journalistic accounts and the testimonials of the rioters themselves: that a pro-Trump mob, mobilized by the former president’s false claims of a stolen election, stormed the seat of American government to keep Trump in power through violent means.​
This is why no one takes WaPo seriously.

On the one hand, they tell some truths. . . OTH? They tell wildly ridiculous lies to support the narrative of the Deep State.

NO. . . . it was not a "good-natured protest." Of that, most sane folks can agree. Something very foul went on. . .

OTH,. . . . WaPo is clearly lying, and pushing a false paradigm. . .

"armed insurrection?!"

Seriously? Who is rewriting history now? There wasn't anybody that was armed there. No one had any guns. If they had been serious, we would be under authoritarian rule right now, with Trump at the helm. This was NOT organized, it was not seriously planned to overthrow the power substructure of the ruling class, it is a false narrative. Sane thinking folks can see right through such a ridiculous narrative. Repeating, "armed insurrection," over and over again, doesn't make it true.


maxresdefault.jpg

I'm not seeing a lot of violent gun toting militias here. . .

Capitol-Meemaw-PERC1-758x397.jpg

Nope. . . if anything, the corporate media is the one trying to spin here. . .
By presenting the most innocuous pictures you can find and pretending them to be the norm or the issue, you are far more dishonest than WAPO calling it an armed insurrection.

There were many kinds of weapons used that day to smash through Capitol doors and windows and injure LE including the MOB itself.

Now post a pic of a puppy and claim the insurrection wasn't that because of a puppy.
The point is. . . if you have actually SEEN pictures of armed insurrections in other nations? You would never find innocuous pictures of civilians mixed in with the "insurrectionists."

This is just a fact of political violence world wide. It is like you live in a bubble and have never witnessed coups before.

What sort of fantasy world do you live in?

:dunno:

These photos weren't taken in the periphery, they were taken in the "center of the storm," as it were.

I do not doubt that there were bad actors inciting the mob, as I said, there was certainly something very foul going on. . . but to characterize what went on as an "armed insurrection,' rather than a riot that got out of control?

When Americans are propagandized to believe in such nonsense? :45:



IT WAS AN ARMED INSURRECTION. LYING ABOUT IT WON'T CHANGE THINGS:


50350n.jpg


STUPID MEMES MAKE A BAD POINT!

That's the job for the police. WE don't have to show YOU jack shit. Not our jobs. Police arrested a number of people with weapons, and the Capital is sprayed with bullet holes. Not to mention you can clearly hear gunfire in many of the videos of the day.

You don't see the weapons because you don't want to see them.

 
Failed Insurrection. Failed attempt at reproducing a 'Reichstag Fire' level event for the Trumpenfurher!

NaziHawley.jpg
 
So the Dim election swindle was an insurrection?
Given that the “swindle” exists in your mind and not in reality, no.
Texas judge and three others arrested on 150 counts of voter fraud
Ok, throw Texas' results out. Biden now won 306-194
That's only one example out of thousands.
You couldn’t even come up with an example from the current election.
 

Forum List

Back
Top