- Dec 18, 2012
- 4,525
- 7,464
- 1,930
After more than 5,000 possibly related deaths, a Houston judge has tossed out a 170 plaintiff nurses lawsuit of refusers to take the experimental mRNA injections.
In December, British health officials of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, or MHRA, warned people with food allergies not to take the Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 experimental vaccine injection. The advice applied to “any person with a history of a significant allergic reaction to a vaccine, medicines or food.”
The health authority warned of “anaphylactoid reactions.”
CBS News reported:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...dist-hospital/
In a scathing ruling Saturday, U.S. District Judge Lynn Hughes of Houston deemed lead plaintiff Jennifer Bridges’ contention that the vaccines are “experimental and dangerous” to be false and otherwise irrelevant. He also found that her likening the vaccination requirement to the Nazis’ forced medical experimentation on concentration camp captives during the Holocaust to be “reprehensible.”
It is not debatable that the injections are experimental, as clinical safety and efficacy trials are still underway through the end of 2022.
Any coercion for medical experimentation is against the Nuremberg Code, a part of the Geneva Conventions to which the US is signatory.
24 Month Timeline for Moderna Safety and Efficacy Trials, Through End of 2022 (source: Moderna human clinical trials protocol filed with FDA)
24 Month Timeline for Moderna Safety and Efficacy Trials, Through End of 2022 (source: Moderna human clinical trials protocol filed with FDA)
Click for larger image
Below: Moderna protocol describing 2 years of study for medically attended adverse events, through end of 2022 (source)
Click for larger image
Hughes was once at the center of a controversy over racially insensitive remarks. As reported:
In December, British health officials of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, or MHRA, warned people with food allergies not to take the Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 experimental vaccine injection. The advice applied to “any person with a history of a significant allergic reaction to a vaccine, medicines or food.”
The health authority warned of “anaphylactoid reactions.”
CBS News reported:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...dist-hospital/
In a scathing ruling Saturday, U.S. District Judge Lynn Hughes of Houston deemed lead plaintiff Jennifer Bridges’ contention that the vaccines are “experimental and dangerous” to be false and otherwise irrelevant. He also found that her likening the vaccination requirement to the Nazis’ forced medical experimentation on concentration camp captives during the Holocaust to be “reprehensible.”
It is not debatable that the injections are experimental, as clinical safety and efficacy trials are still underway through the end of 2022.
Any coercion for medical experimentation is against the Nuremberg Code, a part of the Geneva Conventions to which the US is signatory.
24 Month Timeline for Moderna Safety and Efficacy Trials, Through End of 2022 (source: Moderna human clinical trials protocol filed with FDA)
24 Month Timeline for Moderna Safety and Efficacy Trials, Through End of 2022 (source: Moderna human clinical trials protocol filed with FDA)
Click for larger image
Below: Moderna protocol describing 2 years of study for medically attended adverse events, through end of 2022 (source)
Click for larger image
Hughes was once at the center of a controversy over racially insensitive remarks. As reported:
Hughes was getting his history mixed up and confusing Caucasian with Aryan. Hughes has been called the "most intemperate judge" and has been pulled off at least three cases by the appeals court.
