If you've not watched this by now, you should.

[320 Years of History]

​

Obviously, if you've voted already, the video won't inform your choice if you've not seen it. It's value now is only as a bar or portent of what one might expect from either major party candidate once they become President. The video doesn't really introduce any ideas that haven't been addressed here as well as in the press; however, the content is very well organized and summarized. In that sense it makes for a good reference point of comparative evaluation in the years and months ahead.

 

[Jackson]

The talking heads are talking about how angry he was at the Press Conference dinner. The showed him many times and he is not angry! He is smiling and waving!

 

[Jackson]

This is such a biased piece, I refuse to watch the rest...MSM bias at its best.

 

[Iceweasel]

If you haven't decided yet, please, please do not vote. You either couldn't be bothered or don't want either. Don't vote for what you don't want.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

This is such a biased piece, I refuse to watch the rest...MSM bias at its best.

I don't watch propaganda to begin with.

 

[Jackson]

This is such a biased piece, I refuse to watch the rest...MSM bias at its best.

I don't watch propaganda to begin with.

IT was bad.

 

[320 Years of History]

This is such a biased piece, I refuse to watch the rest...MSM bias at its best.

??? Public broadcasting can hardly be called "mainstream media."

 

[320 Years of History]

The talking heads are talking about how angry he was at the Press Conference dinner. The showed him many times and he is not angry! He is smiling and waving!

???

 

[Iceweasel]

This is such a biased piece, I refuse to watch the rest...MSM bias at its best.

??? Public broadcasting can hardly be called "mainstream media."

They are the very definition of msm, propaganda done on our dime.

 

[320 Years of History]

This is such a biased piece, I refuse to watch the rest...MSM bias at its best.

It's a biographical story. Are you of the mind that the depicted events did not occur as depicted? Do you think the people who said what they are clearly shown saying did not say those things? Do you have any credible basis for disagreeing with the first hand accounts of historical circumstances and characters?

 

[jwoodie]

​

Obviously, if you've voted already, the video won't inform your choice if you've not seen it. It's value now is only as a bar or portent of what one might expect from either major party candidate once they become President. The video doesn't really introduce any ideas that haven't been addressed here as well as in the press; however, the content is very well organized and summarized. In that sense it makes for a good reference point of comparative evaluation in the years and months ahead.

Still waiting for a concise exposition of the point(s) you are trying to make...