If you want “less” government involvement

[LilOlLady]

IF YOU WANT “LESS” GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT…

Golly Gee that is what you will get. Less Government, smaller Government, less government spending means less. Simple as that. GOP Tea Party Congress has tied Obama’s hand by demanding less and smaller. Don’t expect Obama to create any jobs, healthcare or immigration enforcement or homeland security because his spending has been cut off or limited. Look to your Governor and state representatives to create jobs, provide healthcare, provide education, make their own immigration laws and enforcement and homeland security.
Mass and Texas both has created jobs and healthcare. So why can’t other states do the same and stop depending on federal Government. If that is what you want. You cannot “have your cake and eat it too.”

If you want less Government involvement you will get less and not expect more.

“Be careful what you wish for.”

 

[WatertheTree]

IF YOU WANT “LESS” GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT…

Golly Gee that is what you will get. Less Government, smaller Government, less government spending means less. Simple as that. GOP Tea Party Congress has tied Obama’s hand by demanding less and smaller. Don’t expect Obama to create any jobs, healthcare or immigration enforcement or homeland security because his spending has been cut off or limited. Look to your Governor and state representatives to create jobs, provide healthcare, provide education, make their own immigration laws and enforcement and homeland security.
Mass and Texas both has created jobs and healthcare. So why can’t other states do the same and stop depending on federal Government. If that is what you want. You cannot “have your cake and eat it too.”

If you want less Government involvement you will get less and not expect more.

“Be careful what you wish for.”

Look, your venting frustraition saying that the tea party is to blame on governments failure, and that is simply not true. Yes, the republican party is saying no to more spending, which is a reasonable argument. What is not a reasonable argument is saying that the government cant afford a spending bill to get people to work. Its simply not true. If obama wants to get a jobs bill passed he just has to pay for it with spending cuts.

I say he gets some balls and pays for it entirely out of military spending cuts. Every fucking cent.

But he wont, cause the democrats are just as corrupt as the republicans. And a policy of fear doesnt bode well with cutting military spending.

 

[toxicmedia]

Small government has never existed in huge countries.