If we're to celebrate diversity,

Whites have it so rough in this country. Everyone is picking on them

Can you name anyone or anything that is DEFENDING THEM?

Whites are a minority in 4 states and D.C. They are going to be a minority by mid-century. They are the victims of crime, illegal immigration, affirmative action, media bias, discrimination in funding, hiring, college admissions, job promotions, political office. They are bashed by everyone... it's "cool" to make fun of whites. They pay through the nose for the taxes to support the blacks and Hispanics.

To top it all off, WHITES THEMSELVES seem to relish bashing whites or selling them out... including even "Republicans" like Lindsay Graham.

So yeah, not only is everyone picking on them, they're picking on themselves. Time for a change.
 
Last edited:
☭proletarian☭;1842119 said:
Why is it those who celebrate the diversity of the White race, where the most diversity is to be found, are condemned? Why is it that 'white pridr' is deemed offensive and denied a copyright when 'brown power' ,'brown pride', and even 'black power' are not?

Why is it that every race is to be celebrated except the greatest race on Earth?

Putting other races down, claiming your race is superior or other such specific racist acts make one racist. And guess what? That applies to ALL races. One can be a minority and be quite racist. Regardless of the claims of that not being true by idiots and liberals.
We essentially agree on proletarian's status as a racist.

We can bicker about the finer points of "white embarrassment" or whatever the term is. Thanks to history I'm almost petrified anytime anyone in the majority shows any pride and would rather error on the other side.
 
Whites have it so rough in this country. Everyone is picking on them

Can you name anyone or anything that is DEFENDING THEM?

Whites are a minority in 4 states and D.C. They are going to be a minority by mid-century. They are the victims of crime, illegal immigration, affirmative action, media bias, discrimination in funding, hiring, college admissions, job promotions, political office. They are bashed by everyone... it's "cool" to make fun of whites. They pay through the nose for the taxes to support the blacks and Hispanics.

To top it all off, WHITES THEMSELVES seem to relish bashing whites or selling them out... including even "Republicans" like Lindsay Graham.

So yeah, not only is everyone picking on them, they're picking on themselves. Time for a change.

William, as usual I can't find the best graphs. Are you saying Whites may make up 40% of the population of Texas, Hispanics 30%, Blacks 25%, and "other" the rest? Or are whites a minority to any other one race in any state?
 
☭proletarian☭;1842363 said:
Blacks are the most genetically diverse group on the planet.
Yeah... they have no many different kinds of brown eyes and nappy black hair :rolleyes:

Why are the stupid the most smug?

We know though genetics that we all decended from Africa, the home of humanity. Small groups moved away to become Asians and Northern Europeans where they were changed by their envorinment over hundreds of thousand of years. It's not a guess. The record of human expansion is written in our DNA.

So a normal person would ask, "Well, why are the Africans the most genetically diverse?"

Well, we will let you try to figure that out. Hint: small group moves away from larger group.

Athena Review Recent Finds: Out of Africa at Least Three Times

But haplotype studies have continued to improve in focus, and expand in scope. Now Alan Templeton (2002), long a critic of the sweeping replacement scenario, has synthesized the data from ten different haplotype trees, combining those of the previously studied mtDNA and Y-chromosome DNA with eight new ones, including haplotypes from two X-linked DNA regions, and 6 autosomal DNA regions. His main conclusions (presented in the 7 March 2002 issue of Nature) are, first, that there were at least two major expansions of humans out of Africa after the initial spread by Homo erectus 1.7 myr ago (fig.1), and secondly, that there has been interbreeding, a “ubiquity of genetic interchange between human populations” throughout, not replacement. One of the major migration periods out of Africa occurred between 840,000 and 420,000 years ago (when Homo erectus were evolving into early archaic Homo types).
 
So a normal person would ask, "Well, why are the Africans the most genetically diverse?"

Your normal person is an idiot. Indigenous Africans will never give birth a White baby with green eyes and red hair- they don't possess those genes, which came about later in the evolution of what is now the White race.
 
☭proletarian☭;1842363 said:
Blacks are the most genetically diverse group on the planet.
Yeah... they have no many different kinds of brown eyes and nappy black hair :rolleyes:

Why are the stupid the most smug?

We know though genetics that we all decended from Africa, the home of humanity. Small groups moved away to become Asians and Northern Europeans where they were changed by their envorinment over hundreds of thousand of years. It's not a guess. The record of human expansion is written in our DNA.

So a normal person would ask, "Well, why are the Africans the most genetically diverse?"

Well, we will let you try to figure that out. Hint: small group moves away from larger group.

Athena Review Recent Finds: Out of Africa at Least Three Times

But haplotype studies have continued to improve in focus, and expand in scope. Now Alan Templeton (2002), long a critic of the sweeping replacement scenario, has synthesized the data from ten different haplotype trees, combining those of the previously studied mtDNA and Y-chromosome DNA with eight new ones, including haplotypes from two X-linked DNA regions, and 6 autosomal DNA regions. His main conclusions (presented in the 7 March 2002 issue of Nature) are, first, that there were at least two major expansions of humans out of Africa after the initial spread by Homo erectus 1.7 myr ago (fig.1), and secondly, that there has been interbreeding, a “ubiquity of genetic interchange between human populations” throughout, not replacement. One of the major migration periods out of Africa occurred between 840,000 and 420,000 years ago (when Homo erectus were evolving into early archaic Homo types).

A question I ponder every time I read one of your posts.:rolleyes:
 
Hey listen...if you want to celebrate your White Race status nobody's stopping you.

Seems a silly excuse to party on, but any excuse you can come up with to party works for me.
 
Whites have it so rough in this country. Everyone is picking on them

Can you name anyone or anything that is DEFENDING THEM?

Whites are a minority in 4 states and D.C. They are going to be a minority by mid-century. They are the victims of crime, illegal immigration, affirmative action, media bias, discrimination in funding, hiring, college admissions, job promotions, political office. They are bashed by everyone... it's "cool" to make fun of whites. They pay through the nose for the taxes to support the blacks and Hispanics.

To top it all off, WHITES THEMSELVES seem to relish bashing whites or selling them out... including even "Republicans" like Lindsay Graham.

So yeah, not only is everyone picking on them, they're picking on themselves. Time for a change.

Poor...poor White males

Everything is stacked against them in society. Poor guys can't get a break in this great society of ours. Its no wonder they are so downtrodden
 
☭proletarian☭;1842363 said:
Yeah... they have no many different kinds of brown eyes and nappy black hair :rolleyes:

Why are the stupid the most smug?

We know though genetics that we all decended from Africa, the home of humanity. Small groups moved away to become Asians and Northern Europeans where they were changed by their envorinment over hundreds of thousand of years. It's not a guess. The record of human expansion is written in our DNA.

So a normal person would ask, "Well, why are the Africans the most genetically diverse?"

Well, we will let you try to figure that out. Hint: small group moves away from larger group.

Athena Review Recent Finds: Out of Africa at Least Three Times

But haplotype studies have continued to improve in focus, and expand in scope. Now Alan Templeton (2002), long a critic of the sweeping replacement scenario, has synthesized the data from ten different haplotype trees, combining those of the previously studied mtDNA and Y-chromosome DNA with eight new ones, including haplotypes from two X-linked DNA regions, and 6 autosomal DNA regions. His main conclusions (presented in the 7 March 2002 issue of Nature) are, first, that there were at least two major expansions of humans out of Africa after the initial spread by Homo erectus 1.7 myr ago (fig.1), and secondly, that there has been interbreeding, a “ubiquity of genetic interchange between human populations” throughout, not replacement. One of the major migration periods out of Africa occurred between 840,000 and 420,000 years ago (when Homo erectus were evolving into early archaic Homo types).

A question I ponder every time I read one of your posts.:rolleyes:

Then you are probably not the MOST stupid. At least you can read.
 
☭proletarian☭;1846591 said:
So a normal person would ask, "Well, why are the Africans the most genetically diverse?"

Your normal person is an idiot. Indigenous Africans will never give birth a White baby with green eyes and red hair- they don't possess those genes, which came about later in the evolution of what is now the White race.

Actually, they probably do posess those genes whether or not they are used.
We carry a rich legacy of genetic instructions. The genes for eyes color and skin color are probably really difficult to "evolve" into unless the genes are already there.

I'm sure you read about scientists activating existing genes in chickens to grow teeth and tails. They wouldn't be able to do that unless those genes already existed.
 
Actually, they probably do posess those genes whether or not they are used...

The genes for eyes color and skin color are probably really difficult to "evolve" into unless the genes are already there.


Wow... that's like something JD would say between posts about her dog getting her pregnant and dead babies growing.

You need to brush on up on human evolution.
 

Forum List

Back
Top