If it was good enough reason for Barry, it's good enough for Trump.

[easyt65]

He is a self-professed Constitutional Scholar and a NPP winner, so are we to disagree with his argument regarding the need to fill a USSC Justice vacancy 'immediately'?!

FIGURES: Now There's Video -- Obama Argued in 2016 on Need to Fill Open SCOTUS Slot IMMEDIATELY! (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Former President BarackObama issued a statement late Friday nighton the passing of Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[easyt65]

Barrett. A female conservative judge.

The usual Democrat tactic of ambushing a nominee with a hoard of women coming out of the baseboards to accuse them of sexual misconduct would not work.

Beating down a woman would look just as equally disgusting as the heinous attack on Kavanaugh.

A woman might ease concerns over Rowe-v-Wade...


And across the country the majority of Americans are chanting 'Fill The Seat', which Trump has both the Constitutional right and authority to do.

Giddy-up!

.

 

[BertramN]

If the Democrats win the White House and the Senate it won't matter who the impeached president trump and Moscow Mitch shove into the vacancy left by Ginsberg's death.

Since there is no limit set by the Constitution on the number of justices to serve on Supreme Court bench, the Democratic congressional majority need only increase the number from nine to thirteen. A liberal majority in the SCOTUS could then be appointed, and last for decades.

Op-Ed: Democrats have a secret weapon to thwart a rapid Ginsburg replacement. They should use it

If Republicans insist on replacing Ginsburg before a new president is in place, Democrats should vow to expand the court should they win the Senate and White House.

www.latimes.com

.

 

[easyt65]

If the Democrats win the White House and the Senate it won't matter who the impeached president trump and Moscow Mitch shove into the vacancy left by Ginsberg's death.

Since there is no limit set by the Constitution on the number of justices to serve on Supreme Court bench, the Democratic congressional majority need only increase the number from nine to thirteen. A liberal majority in the SCOTUS could then be appointed, and last for decades.

Op-Ed: Democrats have a secret weapon to thwart a rapid Ginsburg replacement. They should use it

If Republicans insist on replacing Ginsburg before a new president is in place, Democrats should vow to expand the court should they win the Senate and White House.

www.latimes.com

.

That's a helluva lot of 'If's...

 

[Care4all]

After an announced nomination for a Justice seat by a president, confirmation has taken weeks and months..... for the 8 justices on the Supreme Court.

Kagan. 87days
Kavanaugh 88 days
Gorsuch. 65 days
Thomas. 99 days
Breyer 73 days
Sotomayer. 66 days
Alito 82 days
Roberts 62 days

I don't think a lifetime position on something as important as sitting on the Supreme Court is something to rush through.... unless the person nominated had some superb lawyering achievements....
(like Ginsburg was notorious and famous for winning cases brought before the supreme court, prior to appointment, the Senate voted 97 to 3, to confirm her.)

-------

Scalia died in February, nearly a year before Obama's last day in office, Ginsburg died 4 months before the end of Trump' s first term with the election just 6 wks away. The timing, makes it slightly different circumstances.


But, ultimately, it is up to the President, to pick the replacement for Ginsburg... I just think the Senate should not cut corners and ram a justice through, without the proper hearings and evaluation, for this extremely important lifetime position....

All the other justices sitting now, had to go through the grueling process, and so should whomever is picked by President Trump.

 

[Moonglow]

He is a self-professed Constitutional Scholar and a NPP winner, so are we to disagree with his argument regarding the need to fill a USSC Justice vacancy 'immediately'?!

FIGURES: Now There's Video -- Obama Argued in 2016 on Need to Fill Open SCOTUS Slot IMMEDIATELY! (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Former President BarackObama issued a statement late Friday nighton the passing of Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

McConnell can deny Trump just like he did Oblama since if it's good enough for Oblama it's good enough for Trump.

 

[Mac1958]

I don't think a lifetime position on something as important as sitting on the Supreme Court is something to rush through....

Your mistake is in being logical. This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to (try to) drag America back to the 1950's. They will sacrifice anything, anything, to get this done.

 

[Obiwan]

He is a self-professed Constitutional Scholar and a NPP winner, so are we to disagree with his argument regarding the need to fill a USSC Justice vacancy 'immediately'?!

FIGURES: Now There's Video -- Obama Argued in 2016 on Need to Fill Open SCOTUS Slot IMMEDIATELY! (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Former President BarackObama issued a statement late Friday nighton the passing of Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

McConnell can deny Trump just like he did Oblama since they are one in the same..

There is a slight difference....

In the case of Garland, the Republicans controlled the Senate (so Obama expected the opposing party to OK his choice)....

That made it DOA.....

In this case, Trump will be sending the nomination to his own party...

Like Obutthole said, elections have consequences...

 

[Moonglow]

He is a self-professed Constitutional Scholar and a NPP winner, so are we to disagree with his argument regarding the need to fill a USSC Justice vacancy 'immediately'?!

FIGURES: Now There's Video -- Obama Argued in 2016 on Need to Fill Open SCOTUS Slot IMMEDIATELY! (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Former President BarackObama issued a statement late Friday nighton the passing of Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

McConnell can deny Trump just like he did Oblama since they are one in the same..

There is a slight difference....

In the case of Garland, the Republicans controlled the Senate (so Obama expected the opposing party to OK his choice)....

That made it DOA.....

In this case, Trump will be sending the nomination to his own party...

Like Obutthole said, elections have consequences...

The Senate leader said he doesn't like to nominate during campaign season.

 

[Moonglow]

He is a self-professed Constitutional Scholar and a NPP winner, so are we to disagree with his argument regarding the need to fill a USSC Justice vacancy 'immediately'?!

FIGURES: Now There's Video -- Obama Argued in 2016 on Need to Fill Open SCOTUS Slot IMMEDIATELY! (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Former President BarackObama issued a statement late Friday nighton the passing of Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

McConnell can deny Trump just like he did Oblama since they are one in the same..

There is a slight difference....

In the case of Garland, the Republicans controlled the Senate (so Obama expected the opposing party to OK his choice)....

That made it DOA.....

In this case, Trump will be sending the nomination to his own party...

Like Obutthole said, elections have consequences...

Have you been going down on black ex president that are Democrats for long?You never seems to agree with him before this...

 

[easyt65]

He is a self-professed Constitutional Scholar and a NPP winner, so are we to disagree with his argument regarding the need to fill a USSC Justice vacancy 'immediately'?!

FIGURES: Now There's Video -- Obama Argued in 2016 on Need to Fill Open SCOTUS Slot IMMEDIATELY! (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Former President BarackObama issued a statement late Friday nighton the passing of Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

McConnell can deny Trump just like he did Oblama since they are one in the same..

There is a slight difference....

In the case of Garland, the Republicans controlled the Senate (so Obama expected the opposing party to OK his choice)....

That made it DOA.....

In this case, Trump will be sending the nomination to his own party...

Like Obutthole said, elections have consequences...

The Senate leader said he doesn't like to nominate during campaign season.

Obama made the same argument for immediately filling a vacant position

 

[Moonglow]

He is a self-professed Constitutional Scholar and a NPP winner, so are we to disagree with his argument regarding the need to fill a USSC Justice vacancy 'immediately'?!

FIGURES: Now There's Video -- Obama Argued in 2016 on Need to Fill Open SCOTUS Slot IMMEDIATELY! (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Former President BarackObama issued a statement late Friday nighton the passing of Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

McConnell can deny Trump just like he did Oblama since they are one in the same..

There is a slight difference....

In the case of Garland, the Republicans controlled the Senate (so Obama expected the opposing party to OK his choice)....

That made it DOA.....

In this case, Trump will be sending the nomination to his own party...

Like Obutthole said, elections have consequences...

The Senate leader said he doesn't like to nominate during campaign season.

Obama made the same argument for immediately filling a vacant position

Yet, it didn't work just like it won't for Trump.

 

[easyt65]

I don't think a lifetime position on something as important as sitting on the Supreme Court is something to rush through.... unless....

Unless there is a Democrat in the WH...

Obama made the case for filling a vacancy immediately, & you seemed to be fine with it....

 

[LeftofLeft]

If the Democrats win the White House and the Senate it won't matter who the impeached president trump and Moscow Mitch shove into the vacancy left by Ginsberg's death.

Since there is no limit set by the Constitution on the number of justices to serve on Supreme Court bench, the Democratic congressional majority need only increase the number from nine to thirteen. A liberal majority in the SCOTUS could then be appointed, and last for decades.

Op-Ed: Democrats have a secret weapon to thwart a rapid Ginsburg replacement. They should use it

If Republicans insist on replacing Ginsburg before a new president is in place, Democrats should vow to expand the court should they win the Senate and White House.

www.latimes.com

.

Which will be a great catalyst to rally conservatives to get out and vote. Don’t forget abolishing the Electoral College as well. Change the rules, shift the goal posts.... it’s not like Democrats can win on ideas anymore.

 

[BluesLegend]

He is a self-professed Constitutional Scholar and a NPP winner, so are we to disagree with his argument regarding the need to fill a USSC Justice vacancy 'immediately'?!

FIGURES: Now There's Video -- Obama Argued in 2016 on Need to Fill Open SCOTUS Slot IMMEDIATELY! (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Former President BarackObama issued a statement late Friday nighton the passing of Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Obama has convinced Lindsey Graham chairman of the Senate Judiciary, he changed his mind yesterday and said we should fill the seat now.

 

[Manonthestreet]

After an announced nomination for a Justice seat by a president, confirmation has taken weeks and months..... for the 8 justices on the Supreme Court.

Kagan. 87days
Kavanaugh 88 days
Gorsuch. 65 days
Thomas. 99 days
Breyer 73 days
Sotomayer. 66 days
Alito 82 days
Roberts 62 days

I don't think a lifetime position on something as important as sitting on the Supreme Court is something to rush through.... unless the person nominated had some superb lawyering achievements....
(like Ginsburg was notorious and famous for winning cases brought before the supreme court, prior to appointment, the Senate voted 97 to 3, to confirm her.)

-------

Scalia died in February, nearly a year before Obama's last day in office, Ginsburg died 4 months before the end of Trump' s first term with the election just 6 wks away. The timing, makes it slightly different circumstances.


But, ultimately, it is up to the President, to pick the replacement for Ginsburg... I just think the Senate should not cut corners and ram a justice through, without the proper hearings and evaluation, for this extremely important lifetime position....

All the other justices sitting now, had to go through the grueling process, and so should whomever is picked by President Trump.

Many were appointed in less than 45 days too.....including RBG

 

[Manonthestreet]

What is wrong with libs neurotic need to maintain a majority on the Court? Grow up

 

[Care4all]

Nice ad in the op article link, from the Trump campaign,

Telling Trumpets to request their ballot to vote by mail, click here!

Forked tongue, slithering creeps!

I expect no better from the RNC Senate hypocrites on anything they do....including on this justice opening 6 weeks from the election.....lying is their natural tongue.

 

[Care4all]

I don't think a lifetime position on something as important as sitting on the Supreme Court is something to rush through.... unless....

Unless there is a Democrat in the WH...

Obama made the case for filling a vacancy immediately, & you seemed to be fine with it....

He made his twitter comments 9 MONTHS after Scalia died and his seat was still open.