Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yes, you want only the cops you claim are murdering black people to have guns. You've mentioned that.
Note you never did say how you were going to take guns from criminals. So far you've only tried to disarm victims
Have you considered moving oversees ?
Yes, you want only the cops you claim are murdering black people to have guns. You've mentioned that.
Note you never did say how you were going to take guns from criminals. So far you've only tried to disarm victims
Actually, it's pretty easy to take guns from Criminals... Hold the gun industry financially responsible for gun crimes.
You can bet, they will control the sale of guns the way they control the sale of anything else they can be held liable for.
You see, the reason why the gun laws are so lax and it's so easy for criminals to get them is the gun industry wants it that way. You can't get someone to chuck out hundreds of bucks for something they don't need unless they are scared.
No lawsNobody gives a flying fuck about Garland. His nomination went as far as it could. A nice cordial no thanks.Dems treated Barrett better than Republicans treated Garland
Can you imagine the left today if Sotomayor was asked if she ever sexually assaulted someone? Holy shit you’d lose your fucking minds. And you’re the party of rape.
The ghost of Merrick Garland hangs over Republicans. republicans know what they did and now just want it to go away.
Let’s just make up and pretend it didnt happen.
But that act and the hypocrisy of rushing through the Barrett nomination has permanently burned all bridges between the parties.
Dems will not forget.Those lyin cheatin scum bastard dems wouldn't even give her a hearing. SO UNFAIR#MAGAThe Democrats were absolutely vicious and disgusting and rude and mansplaining and accusatory and just awful to Barrett.
If the parties were flipped, the M5M would have lost their Goddamn minds and would have called the Republicans every name in the book.
But she is conservative, and she is Catholic....so ots ok to treat her like shit.
How is not giving Garland a hearing "cheating"?
what procedures or laws were broken?
A sitting President was denied the chance to fill a Supreme Court vacancy for the first time.
It caused bad blood and a rift between the parties that will not be easily settled
There are also no laws against adding seats to the courts or ending the Senate filibuster.
We shall see how Dems react to the Republican power play.
Fake news. The President doesn't get to "fill" a SCOTUS vacancy. They only get to make a nomination, which Obama did.
You really don't understand our system of government, do you?
No lawsNobody gives a flying fuck about Garland. His nomination went as far as it could. A nice cordial no thanks.Dems treated Barrett better than Republicans treated Garland
Can you imagine the left today if Sotomayor was asked if she ever sexually assaulted someone? Holy shit you’d lose your fucking minds. And you’re the party of rape.
The ghost of Merrick Garland hangs over Republicans. republicans know what they did and now just want it to go away.
Let’s just make up and pretend it didnt happen.
But that act and the hypocrisy of rushing through the Barrett nomination has permanently burned all bridges between the parties.
Dems will not forget.Those lyin cheatin scum bastard dems wouldn't even give her a hearing. SO UNFAIR#MAGAThe Democrats were absolutely vicious and disgusting and rude and mansplaining and accusatory and just awful to Barrett.
If the parties were flipped, the M5M would have lost their Goddamn minds and would have called the Republicans every name in the book.
But she is conservative, and she is Catholic....so ots ok to treat her like shit.
How is not giving Garland a hearing "cheating"?
what procedures or laws were broken?
A sitting President was denied the chance to fill a Supreme Court vacancy for the first time.
It caused bad blood and a rift between the parties that will not be easily settled
There are also no laws against adding seats to the courts or ending the Senate filibuster.
We shall see how Dems react to the Republican power play.
Fake news. The President doesn't get to "fill" a SCOTUS vacancy. They only get to make a nomination, which Obama did.
You really don't understand our system of government, do you?
And Republicans said they would not confirm anyone Obama nominated. McConnell pronounced it before Scalias body was even cold
They already lost their minds when Trump was elected in 2016. Pitiful bunch, especially that evil witch Pelosi.The Democrats were absolutely vicious and disgusting and rude and mansplaining and accusatory and just awful to Barrett.
If the parties were flipped, the M5M would have lost their Goddamn minds and would have called the Republicans every name in the book.
But she is conservative, and she is Catholic....so ots ok to treat her like shit.
That's just a different way to ban guns. Obviously gun companies have no control over guns than car companies can control how you drive. This is just a back door way to just make them illegal and shut them down.
That's just a different way to ban guns. Obviously gun companies have no control over guns than car companies can control how you drive. This is just a back door way to just make them illegal and shut them down.
Quite the contrary, car companies do a lot to make sure that they are safer.... and background check people before they buy them. We have licensing, insurance and strict regulation. I would love to have guns regulated like cars.
The problem is, every time we have a mass shooting, we find out two things.
1) Everyone in the shooter's life knew he was crazy.
2) He was still able to easily get a high-powered gun and lots of ammo.
Now imagine if we held the gun makers responsible... that they had to convince 12 jurors they weren't negligent.
You betcha a few times of doing that, they'd create background checks far better than the one the government established after they watered it down.
Have you considered moving oversees ?So does this mean we need to eliminate rope, sky scrapers, etc... ?
Asking for a friend
Naw, man, if you want to off yourself, no one will want to stop you.
We can do very fine without guns... or maybe just limit who can own them... like any sensible country does.
That's just a different way to ban guns. Obviously gun companies have no control over guns than car companies can control how you drive. This is just a back door way to just make them illegal and shut them down.
Quite the contrary, car companies do a lot to make sure that they are safer.... and background check people before they buy them. We have licensing, insurance and strict regulation. I would love to have guns regulated like cars.
How have car companies stopped hit and runs? What bull shit. You're talking about car companies making them safer for the drivers. Totally different subject
The problem is, every time we have a mass shooting, we find out two things.
1) Everyone in the shooter's life knew he was crazy.
2) He was still able to easily get a high-powered gun and lots of ammo.
And you have no plan to stop them. You're only taking guns from law abiding citizens
Now imagine if we held the gun makers responsible... that they had to convince 12 jurors they weren't negligent.
You betcha a few times of doing that, they'd create background checks far better than the one the government established after they watered it down.
They aren't negligent any more than a car company is negligent for a hit and run.
Again, all you're doing is shutting them down one way over another. Obviously gun companies can't control where their guns go, it's just totally stupid.
And again you show repeatedly you're a liar about your experience with guns. You think the danger is from law abiding citizens and that the goal in defense is to start shooting people. Total ignorance, you have obviously no experience with guns at all
How have car companies stopped hit and runs? What bull shit. You're talking about car companies making them safer for the drivers. Totally different subject
And you have no plan to stop them. You're only taking guns from law abiding citizens
Again, all you're doing is shutting them down one way over another. Obviously gun companies can't control where their guns go, it's just totally stupid.
And again you show repeatedly you're a liar about your experience with guns. You think the danger is from law abiding citizens and that the goal in defense is to start shooting people. Total ignorance, you have obviously no experience with guns at all
Suicides, and that's them just choosing the easiest method, not having a gun won't stop them. Most other gun crime is criminal on criminal.
One out of sixteen is a useless number is 99% of them are justified by the stupidity of the criminals resisting the police.
Yet, oddly cops in the UK kill only a handful of people a year... Hmmmm...
Speaking of the UK, when they UK banned coal gas (used in suicides by sticking your head in an oven) with natural gas, the suicide rate in the UK went down.
Yes, you eliminate a method of suicide, the suicide rate goes down.
There’s no requirement to have a license to buy a car. WTF are you talking about?How have car companies stopped hit and runs? What bull shit. You're talking about car companies making them safer for the drivers. Totally different subject
Well, they won't sell one to a person who has lost his license, to start with. So there's that.... They also push for a lot of laws to make driving safer, increased road safety, and so on.
Unlike the Gun industry, that sells ever more dangerous guns to ever more dangerous people.
And you have no plan to stop them. You're only taking guns from law abiding citizens
I've just laid out my plan... Hold Gun makers responsible, limit who can get guns.
"Law-abiding Citizens" are only law abiding until they aren't. Most gun deaths are domestic violence and suicide, not crooks shooting people.
Again, all you're doing is shutting them down one way over another. Obviously gun companies can't control where their guns go, it's just totally stupid.
Again, look at the marketing... Do you think THIS ad was designed for a person who is mentally stable?
View attachment 405996
And again you show repeatedly you're a liar about your experience with guns. You think the danger is from law abiding citizens and that the goal in defense is to start shooting people. Total ignorance, you have obviously no experience with guns at all
Again, 11 years in the army, and my MOS was 76Y. You should look that up, as to what the duties of a 76Y include.
Actually, the danger IS from law abiding citizens...
How is it the UK has only 500 homicides a year, and we have 16,000, most of them with guns? Because a gun turns a domestic dispute into a domestic tragedy.
That's just a different way to ban guns. Obviously gun companies have no control over guns than car companies can control how you drive. This is just a back door way to just make them illegal and shut them down.
Quite the contrary, car companies do a lot to make sure that they are safer.... and background check people before they buy them. We have licensing, insurance and strict regulation. I would love to have guns regulated like cars.
How have car companies stopped hit and runs? What bull shit. You're talking about car companies making them safer for the drivers. Totally different subject
The problem is, every time we have a mass shooting, we find out two things.
1) Everyone in the shooter's life knew he was crazy.
2) He was still able to easily get a high-powered gun and lots of ammo.
And you have no plan to stop them. You're only taking guns from law abiding citizens
Now imagine if we held the gun makers responsible... that they had to convince 12 jurors they weren't negligent.
You betcha a few times of doing that, they'd create background checks far better than the one the government established after they watered it down.
They aren't negligent any more than a car company is negligent for a hit and run.
Again, all you're doing is shutting them down one way over another. Obviously gun companies can't control where their guns go, it's just totally stupid.
And again you show repeatedly you're a liar about your experience with guns. You think the danger is from law abiding citizens and that the goal in defense is to start shooting people. Total ignorance, you have obviously no experience with guns at all
More often then not, there are simple questions that destroy the Liberal worldview, and stop 'em dead in their propaganda tracks.
In this case...."which are the gun laws that criminals will obey?"
That's just a different way to ban guns. Obviously gun companies have no control over guns than car companies can control how you drive. This is just a back door way to just make them illegal and shut them down.
Quite the contrary, car companies do a lot to make sure that they are safer.... and background check people before they buy them. We have licensing, insurance and strict regulation. I would love to have guns regulated like cars.
How have car companies stopped hit and runs? What bull shit. You're talking about car companies making them safer for the drivers. Totally different subject
The problem is, every time we have a mass shooting, we find out two things.
1) Everyone in the shooter's life knew he was crazy.
2) He was still able to easily get a high-powered gun and lots of ammo.
And you have no plan to stop them. You're only taking guns from law abiding citizens
Now imagine if we held the gun makers responsible... that they had to convince 12 jurors they weren't negligent.
You betcha a few times of doing that, they'd create background checks far better than the one the government established after they watered it down.
They aren't negligent any more than a car company is negligent for a hit and run.
Again, all you're doing is shutting them down one way over another. Obviously gun companies can't control where their guns go, it's just totally stupid.
And again you show repeatedly you're a liar about your experience with guns. You think the danger is from law abiding citizens and that the goal in defense is to start shooting people. Total ignorance, you have obviously no experience with guns at all
More often then not, there are simple questions that destroy the Liberal worldview, and stop 'em dead in their propaganda tracks.
In this case...."which are the gun laws that criminals will obey?"
Yep. Joe proves he's a liar, yet again. He says he has all sorts of experience with guns. But then he thinks guns are useless as protection and that the goal of a gun defense is to start shooting people. Every gun owner I know prays we never shoot anyone. The goal of defense is to NOT shoot people. Shooting someone is the last resort.
But Joe ONLY measures how many people you kill defending yourself. He literally thinks that's the goal, to kill the bad guy
How have car companies stopped hit and runs? What bull shit. You're talking about car companies making them safer for the drivers. Totally different subject
Well, they won't sell one to a person who has lost his license, to start with. So there's that.... They also push for a lot of laws to make driving safer, increased road safety, and so on.
Unlike the Gun industry, that sells ever more dangerous guns to ever more dangerous people.
And you have no plan to stop them. You're only taking guns from law abiding citizens
I've just laid out my plan... Hold Gun makers responsible, limit who can get guns.
"Law-abiding Citizens" are only law abiding until they aren't. Most gun deaths are domestic violence and suicide, not crooks shooting people.
Again, all you're doing is shutting them down one way over another. Obviously gun companies can't control where their guns go, it's just totally stupid.
Again, look at the marketing... Do you think THIS ad was designed for a person who is mentally stable?
View attachment 405996
And again you show repeatedly you're a liar about your experience with guns. You think the danger is from law abiding citizens and that the goal in defense is to start shooting people. Total ignorance, you have obviously no experience with guns at all
Again, 11 years in the army, and my MOS was 76Y. You should look that up, as to what the duties of a 76Y include.
Actually, the danger IS from law abiding citizens...
How is it the UK has only 500 homicides a year, and we have 16,000, most of them with guns? Because a gun turns a domestic dispute into a domestic tragedy.
Yep. Joe proves he's a liar, yet again. He says he has all sorts of experience with guns. But then he thinks guns are useless as protection and that the goal of a gun defense is to start shooting people. Every gun owner I know prays we never shoot anyone. The goal of defense is to NOT shoot people. Shooting someone is the last resort.
There is no way that gun companies could track the guns they sell or even do their own background checks on gun owners. You know that, you're lying. Your goal is to shut them down by burying them with lawsuits over actions they had nothing to do with.
And you know all about guns, but they can't be used properly for self defense. More of your stupid shit. As is your belief that the goal of self defense is shooting people, which couldn't be more wrong
Yep. Joe proves he's a liar, yet again. He says he has all sorts of experience with guns. But then he thinks guns are useless as protection and that the goal of a gun defense is to start shooting people. Every gun owner I know prays we never shoot anyone. The goal of defense is to NOT shoot people. Shooting someone is the last resort.
You know what, Guy, all I see from you gun nuts is you all WANKING about wanting to shoot people, about thinking a mutant like Geo. Zimmerman won the superbowl when he did.
The reality- DGU's are a myth.... According to the FBI, there are only 200 cases of DGU's by Civilians that result in a body on teh floor. But the National Rampage Association would have you think that there are a million DGU's a year.
That means, 99.9998% of the time, a criminal backed down, and a racist with a gun was able to contain his wank fantasy of shooting him a darkie. It's just not plausible.
There is no way that gun companies could track the guns they sell or even do their own background checks on gun owners. You know that, you're lying. Your goal is to shut them down by burying them with lawsuits over actions they had nothing to do with.
Sure they can. Guns have serial numbers... They can be tracked and traced. They can be matched by ballistics.
Oh, I really don't care if they go out of business or not... I'm concerned about their irresponsible thinking that saw Adam Lanza's mom as someone who needed enough guns to fight off the Zombies.
And you know all about guns, but they can't be used properly for self defense. More of your stupid shit. As is your belief that the goal of self defense is shooting people, which couldn't be more wrong
As stated, given the Gun Wank fantasies I hear every day on here, you guys couldn't show that much restraint.
You know what, Guy, all I see from you gun nuts is you all WANKING about wanting to shoot people
...
As stated, given the Gun Wank fantasies I hear every day on here, you guys couldn't show that much restraint.
