You have to read the full text of Taqiyya the Liar’s speech to the United Nations to fully grasp just how devious he is. Nobody could be that naive or that stupid. The entire speech is a litany of doublespeak delivered by a street hustling preacher. There are a few places in the recital that I truly believe he was working the room for an “Amen brother! Amen!”
Taqiyya’s Sermon on the Mount is a matter of public record; so I originally intended to comment on every paragraph but decided against it. Talking heads and print journalists covered the obvious B.S. Instead, I will confine my observations to some things that I think are important.
The first thing that hit me was that Taqiyya the Liar preached religion while the Pope has been talking politics; economic justice and so on. Joseph Curl pointed out that Francis recently branched out into the politics of war:
Taqiyya wasn’t buying it.
In their own way both men are hustlers who would like to establish themselves as a theocratic world leader combining politics and religion. Taqiyya the Liar has to travel a tougher road to get there because his theocracy must be involuntary. In addition, Taqiyya has to transform the invented crimes of manmade global warming and racism into universally accepted sins.
The following excerpts are taken from his speech. The first one is a masterpiece of audacity. Taqiyya began preaching unity from the day he began campaigning for the presidency, yet his policies divided the country more than ever. His comments could have been written by Saul Alinsky:
Every divide was bridged by the very constitution Taqiyya the Liar and his kind are determined to abolish. Most especially, the first 16 words in the First Amendment were well on their way to eliminating the divide between religions:
Taqiyya’s religion of peace tolerates no other religion. It is Islam along with his other religion, Socialism/Communism, that divided the world into armed camps. In fact, every other religion sees no choice but to react to Islam and Communism. That reaction must end in permanent religious war or total victory for one side or the other.
NOTE: Islam is a Johnny-come-lately. Communist countries began arming themselves decades ago. The Soviet Union began arming back in the 1920s; Communist China in the 1950s; North Korea soon after China. And let me remind everyone that piss ant Communist Cuba sent troops to fight in Angola as well as sending troops throughout Latin America. My point: Taqiyya will never call Islam or Communism the enemy, yet both are determined to wipe America off the map. He certainly will not offend either in an institution that is controlled by both.
This next excerpt provides reason enough for everybody to call him Taqiyya:
One brief observation shoots that bull in the ass. The war would end in a second if Islam is a religion of peace.
This next one is an example of Taqiyya’s censorship. Substitute the word Muslim for the word terrorists to understand the intent behind Taqiyya’s method of identifying enemy combatants:
Muslims are the terrorists. The two words are interchangeable within the context of the war they started. To paraphrase Tweety: “I thought I saw a Muslim! I did! I did! I saw a Muslim!”
And no one perverted the religion of peace. In Muslim eyes brutal acts are not a perversion. Brutality has been a proselytizing tool for centuries.
This next one comes right of Saul Alinsky’s play book. Define the objective by saying the opposite of what you are really after:
The multicultural garbage that is being taught to children is pure Socialist brainwashing that will eliminate every culture, every thought, every expression of individuality. To Socialists, indeed, to every religious freak that ever lived, multicultural means complete submission to the one true religion.
This next one is really sneaky:
Taqiyya knows damn well that Muslims will continue to convert or kill every infidel. His goal is to convince non-Muslims to live by the Golden Rule while his religion of peace goes about the business of slaughtering infidels and apostates.
The last is the best. Quoting an Imam is an insult to the intelligence of every non-Muslim who heard about jihad:
Any Muslim cleric citing politics as the cause of hate, war, and strife means only one thing. Stop them by combining religion and government in a theocracy.
Incidentally, war is the only one that appears in both the Imam’s three and the original four:
Conquest War Famine Death
Interestingly, Socialists/Communists name religion (usually Christianity) as the cause of hate, war, and strife. It is amazing how priesthoods fail to agree on which God should be in charge, but they always agree on who causes the problems. It’s always the other guy’s religion.
Finally, Taqiyya the Liar’s hatred of the US Constitution —— the First Amendment specifically —— justifies transforming America into a Socialist/Communist or Islamic theocracy. He’ll settle for either one so long as he is the spiritual leader.
Here’s the link to the full text:
Taqiyya’s Sermon on the Mount is a matter of public record; so I originally intended to comment on every paragraph but decided against it. Talking heads and print journalists covered the obvious B.S. Instead, I will confine my observations to some things that I think are important.
The first thing that hit me was that Taqiyya the Liar preached religion while the Pope has been talking politics; economic justice and so on. Joseph Curl pointed out that Francis recently branched out into the politics of war:
A true man of peace worthy of the Nobel Prize, Pope Francis, said just the opposite this month in remarkably astute comments to commemorate the anniversary of World War I.
“Even today, after the second failure of another world war, perhaps one can speak of a third war, one fought piecemeal, with crimes, massacres, destruction,” the pope said, summing up the conflicts in Ukraine, Iraq, Syria, Israel, Gaza and much of northern Africa, including Libya and Tunisia, not to mention Somalia.
“Even today, after the second failure of another world war, perhaps one can speak of a third war, one fought piecemeal, with crimes, massacres, destruction,” the pope said, summing up the conflicts in Ukraine, Iraq, Syria, Israel, Gaza and much of northern Africa, including Libya and Tunisia, not to mention Somalia.
Taqiyya wasn’t buying it.
To Mr. Obama, there’s no global conflict of ideology, just “pervasive unease in our world.” To him, the strife is merely the “failure of our international system to keep pace with an interconnected world.” And to him, “it is one of the tasks of all great religions to accommodate devout faith with a modern, multicultural world.”
Obama’s breathtaking naivete at the United Nations
By Joseph Curl - - Wednesday, September 24, 2014
CURL Obama s breathtaking naivete at the United Nations - Washington Times
By Joseph Curl - - Wednesday, September 24, 2014
CURL Obama s breathtaking naivete at the United Nations - Washington Times
In their own way both men are hustlers who would like to establish themselves as a theocratic world leader combining politics and religion. Taqiyya the Liar has to travel a tougher road to get there because his theocracy must be involuntary. In addition, Taqiyya has to transform the invented crimes of manmade global warming and racism into universally accepted sins.
The following excerpts are taken from his speech. The first one is a masterpiece of audacity. Taqiyya began preaching unity from the day he began campaigning for the presidency, yet his policies divided the country more than ever. His comments could have been written by Saul Alinsky:
So we reject any suggestion of a clash of civilizations. Belief in permanent religious war is the misguided refuge of extremists who cannot build or create anything, and therefore peddle only fanaticism and hate. And it is no exaggeration to say that humanity’s future depends on us uniting against those who would divide us along fault lines of tribe or sect; race or religion.
Every divide was bridged by the very constitution Taqiyya the Liar and his kind are determined to abolish. Most especially, the first 16 words in the First Amendment were well on their way to eliminating the divide between religions:
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;. . .”
Taqiyya’s religion of peace tolerates no other religion. It is Islam along with his other religion, Socialism/Communism, that divided the world into armed camps. In fact, every other religion sees no choice but to react to Islam and Communism. That reaction must end in permanent religious war or total victory for one side or the other.
NOTE: Islam is a Johnny-come-lately. Communist countries began arming themselves decades ago. The Soviet Union began arming back in the 1920s; Communist China in the 1950s; North Korea soon after China. And let me remind everyone that piss ant Communist Cuba sent troops to fight in Angola as well as sending troops throughout Latin America. My point: Taqiyya will never call Islam or Communism the enemy, yet both are determined to wipe America off the map. He certainly will not offend either in an institution that is controlled by both.
This next excerpt provides reason enough for everybody to call him Taqiyya:
Islam teaches peace. Muslims the world over aspire to live with dignity and a sense of justice. And when it comes to America and Islam, there is no us and them – there is only us, because millions of Muslim Americans are part of the fabric of our country.
One brief observation shoots that bull in the ass. The war would end in a second if Islam is a religion of peace.
This next one is an example of Taqiyya’s censorship. Substitute the word Muslim for the word terrorists to understand the intent behind Taqiyya’s method of identifying enemy combatants:
But in this century, we have faced a more lethal and ideological brand of terrorists who have perverted one of the world’s great religions.
Muslims are the terrorists. The two words are interchangeable within the context of the war they started. To paraphrase Tweety: “I thought I saw a Muslim! I did! I did! I saw a Muslim!”
And no one perverted the religion of peace. In Muslim eyes brutal acts are not a perversion. Brutality has been a proselytizing tool for centuries.
This next one comes right of Saul Alinsky’s play book. Define the objective by saying the opposite of what you are really after:
It is the task of all great religions to accommodate devout faith with a modern, multicultural world. No children – anywhere – should be educated to hate other people. There should be no more tolerance of so-called clerics who call upon people to harm innocents because they are Jewish, Christian or Muslim. It is time for a new compact among the civilized peoples of this world to eradicate war at its most fundamental source: the corruption of young minds by violent ideology.
The multicultural garbage that is being taught to children is pure Socialist brainwashing that will eliminate every culture, every thought, every expression of individuality. To Socialists, indeed, to every religious freak that ever lived, multicultural means complete submission to the one true religion.
This next one is really sneaky:
All religions have been attacked by extremists from within at some point, and all people of faith have a responsibility to lift up the value at the heart of all religion: do unto thy neighbor as you would have done unto you.
Taqiyya knows damn well that Muslims will continue to convert or kill every infidel. His goal is to convince non-Muslims to live by the Golden Rule while his religion of peace goes about the business of slaughtering infidels and apostates.
The last is the best. Quoting an Imam is an insult to the intelligence of every non-Muslim who heard about jihad:
. . . listen to the Imam who said, “Politics try to divide the religious in our country, but religion shouldn’t be a cause of hate, war, or strife.”
Any Muslim cleric citing politics as the cause of hate, war, and strife means only one thing. Stop them by combining religion and government in a theocracy.
Incidentally, war is the only one that appears in both the Imam’s three and the original four:
Conquest War Famine Death
Interestingly, Socialists/Communists name religion (usually Christianity) as the cause of hate, war, and strife. It is amazing how priesthoods fail to agree on which God should be in charge, but they always agree on who causes the problems. It’s always the other guy’s religion.
Finally, Taqiyya the Liar’s hatred of the US Constitution —— the First Amendment specifically —— justifies transforming America into a Socialist/Communist or Islamic theocracy. He’ll settle for either one so long as he is the spiritual leader.
Here’s the link to the full text:
