I nominate the HON CLINT BOLICK to the SCOTUS

[Contumacious]

Clint Bolick (born December 26, 1957) is a current Justice on the Supreme Court of Arizona. Previously, he served as Vice President of Litigation at the Goldwater Institute, where he sued government bureaucrats on behalf of citizens rights. He co-founded the Institute for Justice, where he was the Vice President and Director of Litigation from 1991 until 2004. He led two cases that went before the Supreme Court of the United States. He has also defended state-based school choice programs in the Supreme Courts of Wisconsin and Ohio.

 

[Moonglow]

Don't like his last name...

 

[Contumacious]

Don't like his last name...

WE NEED SOMEONE WITH BOLICKS TO ATTEMPT TO RESTORE THE CONSTITUTION (1787).


.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Don't like his last name...

WE NEED SOMEONE WITH BOLICKS TO ATTEMPT TO RESTORE THE CONSTITUTION (1787).


.

Exactly how are we outside of the constitution? It is quite broad outside of the areas it says NOT TO DO and the supreme court has judicial review through case law to read a lot into it. What is funny is you believe you give a shit about it and yet want to totally throw away 230 years of case law that the high court has a right to do. All while you want to tell people who they can have sex with, marry and act in life...Hypocrite.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Clint Bolick (born December 26, 1957) is a current Justice on the Supreme Court of Arizona. Previously, he served as Vice President of Litigation at the Goldwater Institute, where he sued government bureaucrats on behalf of citizens rights. He co-founded the Institute for Justice, where he was the Vice President and Director of Litigation from 1991 until 2004. He led two cases that went before the Supreme Court of the United States. He has also defended state-based school choice programs in the Supreme Courts of Wisconsin and Ohio.

Excellent choice! Easy confirmation

 

[flacaltenn]

Moderation Note:

Cut out the personal and petty crap.. If you have no idea what the topic is --
go somewhere else..

 

[flacaltenn]

bump --

 

[Contumacious]

Don't like his last name...

WE NEED SOMEONE WITH BOLICKS TO ATTEMPT TO RESTORE THE CONSTITUTION (1787).


.

Exactly how are we outside of the constitution? It is quite broad outside of the areas it says NOT TO DO and the supreme court has judicial review through case law to read a lot into it. What is funny is you believe you give a shit about it and yet want to totally throw away 230 years of case law that the high court has a right to do. All while you want to tell people who they can have sex with, marry and act in life...Hypocrite.

Read the original Constitution (1787) when you get a chance.

The Founding Fathers never approved a gargantuan bankrupt welfare/warfare police state.


As indicated by Justice McReynolds, the original constitution was abolished in 1935.


Now we are on our own.

.

 

[Contumacious]

Republicans must use the LBJ Precedent


In June of 1968, when Chief Justice Earl Warren announced his retirement, President Lyndon Johnson nominated Associate Justice Abe Fortas to succeed him and Federal Judge Homer Thornberry to succeed Fortas.
“At age 58, Fortas, one of Johnson’s oldest and closest advisers, could be counted on to give the court democratic leadership far into the future, even if Republicans regained the presidency in 1968, as seemed likely,” reported the late columnists Rowland Evans and Robert Novak.

A combination of Republican and conservative Democratic senators charged that, with barely seven months left to his term, it was unfair for the lame duck President to make such a crucial appointment.

Led by the late Sen. Robert Griffin (R.-Mich.), Fortas opponents of both parties maintained a filibuster. Fortas eventually withdrew his nomination and the next President, Republican Richard Nixon, named Warren Burger the new chief justice to succeed Warren in 1969.
Fortas’ succession to Warren would have maintained liberal domination of the court in 1968.