What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

I know this is cliche but..

TNHarley

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2012
Messages
75,924
Reaction score
25,731
Points
2,250
I know this is cliche but around here every obama sign is in a poverty stricken yard. Boy, how backwards is that? They must like being poor. R & R 2012 baby!
 

zeke

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2012
Messages
8,272
Reaction score
1,114
Points
190
I know this is cliche but around here every obama sign is in a poverty stricken yard. Boy, how backwards is that? They must like being poor. R & R 2012 baby!


You need to read a few more threads on here. Obama is promising the poor people
perpetual welfare and food stamps and free health care and free housing and free everything without having to do anything. According to some on here anyways.

Of course the poor people are putting Obamas sign in their yards. You think they would put Mitts sign out? Why?
 

naturegirl

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
4,416
Reaction score
871
Points
153
Location
NW Georgia
I know this is cliche but around here every obama sign is in a poverty stricken yard. Boy, how backwards is that? They must like being poor. R & R 2012 baby!


You need to read a few more threads on here. Obama is promising the poor people
perpetual welfare and food stamps and free health care and free housing and free everything without having to do anything. According to some on here anyways.

Of course the poor people are putting Obamas sign in their yards. You think they would put Mitts sign out? Why?

No way would they put Mitt signs in their yards. He'll probably create lots of jobs, concentrate on the Federal Jobs training programs and expect them to work. Obama would prefer to keep the free stuff going to them so they remain "organized".
 

zeke

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2012
Messages
8,272
Reaction score
1,114
Points
190
I know this is cliche but around here every obama sign is in a poverty stricken yard. Boy, how backwards is that? They must like being poor. R & R 2012 baby!


You need to read a few more threads on here. Obama is promising the poor people
perpetual welfare and food stamps and free health care and free housing and free everything without having to do anything. According to some on here anyways.

Of course the poor people are putting Obamas sign in their yards. You think they would put Mitts sign out? Why?

No way would they put Mitt signs in their yards. He'll probably create lots of jobs, concentrate on the Federal Jobs training programs and expect them to work. Obama would prefer to keep the free stuff going to them so they remain "organized".



Isn't that what I said? I am curious now that you brought it up. Short of going on a massive federal hiring binge, what will Mitt do to create all these jobs.

And I know you will say; eliminate regulations. Which ones? And how does a "regulation" keep consumers from buying a product? How does a "regulation" reduce demand for consumer goods and services?

You do know that as much as 70% of our economy is based on consumers.

SO; hows Mitt create jobs and what regs gotta go? Just curious.
 

naturegirl

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
4,416
Reaction score
871
Points
153
Location
NW Georgia
You need to read a few more threads on here. Obama is promising the poor people
perpetual welfare and food stamps and free health care and free housing and free everything without having to do anything. According to some on here anyways.

Of course the poor people are putting Obamas sign in their yards. You think they would put Mitts sign out? Why?

No way would they put Mitt signs in their yards. He'll probably create lots of jobs, concentrate on the Federal Jobs training programs and expect them to work. Obama would prefer to keep the free stuff going to them so they remain "organized".



Isn't that what I said? I am curious now that you brought it up. Short of going on a massive federal hiring binge, what will Mitt do to create all these jobs.

And I know you will say; eliminate regulations. Which ones? And how does a "regulation" keep consumers from buying a product? How does a "regulation" reduce demand for consumer goods and services?

You do know that as much as 70% of our economy is based on consumers.

SO; hows Mitt create jobs and what regs gotta go? Just curious.

As a business owner who's forte' is reorganizing failing companies and growing others, I believe he'll start by eliminating a lot of redundancy in several "departments". I'm thinking that alone will save the (Feds) taxpayers a ton of $$$$$$$$$.

The guy we have now has no idea how to minimize losses. :eusa_hand:
 

zeke

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2012
Messages
8,272
Reaction score
1,114
Points
190
No way would they put Mitt signs in their yards. He'll probably create lots of jobs, concentrate on the Federal Jobs training programs and expect them to work. Obama would prefer to keep the free stuff going to them so they remain "organized".



Isn't that what I said? I am curious now that you brought it up. Short of going on a massive federal hiring binge, what will Mitt do to create all these jobs.

And I know you will say; eliminate regulations. Which ones? And how does a "regulation" keep consumers from buying a product? How does a "regulation" reduce demand for consumer goods and services?

You do know that as much as 70% of our economy is based on consumers.

SO; hows Mitt create jobs and what regs gotta go? Just curious.

As a business owner who's forte' is reorganizing failing companies and growing others, I believe he'll start by eliminating a lot of redundancy in several "departments". I'm thinking that alone will save the (Feds) taxpayers a ton of $$$$$$$$$.

The guy we have now has no idea how to minimize losses. :eusa_hand:


You call the above an answer to my most respectful question? LMAO..

Why didn't you just come out and say what is appantely the truth; you have no idea if Mitt can create jobs, other than going on a massive fed hiring binge.

btw, eliminating all the "redundancy" may be great. But it will cost people jobs. Not create jobs.

Please try again if you feel like it. And can do a better job. If not, thanks anyway.
 

Si modo

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2009
Messages
44,120
Reaction score
7,134
Points
1,830
Location
Fairfax, Virginia
Isn't that what I said? I am curious now that you brought it up. Short of going on a massive federal hiring binge, what will Mitt do to create all these jobs.

And I know you will say; eliminate regulations. Which ones? And how does a "regulation" keep consumers from buying a product? How does a "regulation" reduce demand for consumer goods and services?

You do know that as much as 70% of our economy is based on consumers.

SO; hows Mitt create jobs and what regs gotta go? Just curious.

As a business owner who's forte' is reorganizing failing companies and growing others, I believe he'll start by eliminating a lot of redundancy in several "departments". I'm thinking that alone will save the (Feds) taxpayers a ton of $$$$$$$$$.

The guy we have now has no idea how to minimize losses. :eusa_hand:


You call the above an answer to my most respectful question? LMAO..

Why didn't you just come out and say what is appantely the truth; you have no idea if Mitt can create jobs, other than going on a massive fed hiring binge.

btw, eliminating all the "redundancy" may be great. But it will cost people jobs. Not create jobs.

Please try again if you feel like it. And can do a better job. If not, thanks anyway.
To the bolded: Yes, let's keep jobs in non-producing and redundant areas. Great idea for the GNP. And, why not have the government employ everyone and we can produce nothing and crash even faster?

Awesome.
 

naturegirl

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
4,416
Reaction score
871
Points
153
Location
NW Georgia
Isn't that what I said? I am curious now that you brought it up. Short of going on a massive federal hiring binge, what will Mitt do to create all these jobs.

And I know you will say; eliminate regulations. Which ones? And how does a "regulation" keep consumers from buying a product? How does a "regulation" reduce demand for consumer goods and services?

You do know that as much as 70% of our economy is based on consumers.

SO; hows Mitt create jobs and what regs gotta go? Just curious.

As a business owner who's forte' is reorganizing failing companies and growing others, I believe he'll start by eliminating a lot of redundancy in several "departments". I'm thinking that alone will save the (Feds) taxpayers a ton of $$$$$$$$$.

The guy we have now has no idea how to minimize losses. :eusa_hand:


You call the above an answer to my most respectful question? LMAO..

Why didn't you just come out and say what is appantely the truth; you have no idea if Mitt can create jobs, other than going on a massive fed hiring binge.

btw, eliminating all the "redundancy" may be great. But it will cost people jobs. Not create jobs.

Please try again if you feel like it. And can do a better job. If not, thanks anyway.

Looks like we're trying to discuss something you truly don't understand.

Government does not create jobs.............minimizing losses creates additional opportunity in the private sector. Returning many programs to the States will create additional opportunities at state and local levels. Have you looked at the average income of the folks that live in the DC area??
 

zeke

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2012
Messages
8,272
Reaction score
1,114
Points
190
As a business owner who's forte' is reorganizing failing companies and growing others, I believe he'll start by eliminating a lot of redundancy in several "departments". I'm thinking that alone will save the (Feds) taxpayers a ton of $$$$$$$$$.

The guy we have now has no idea how to minimize losses. :eusa_hand:


You call the above an answer to my most respectful question? LMAO..

Why didn't you just come out and say what is appantely the truth; you have no idea if Mitt can create jobs, other than going on a massive fed hiring binge.

btw, eliminating all the "redundancy" may be great. But it will cost people jobs. Not create jobs.

Please try again if you feel like it. And can do a better job. If not, thanks anyway.

Looks like we're trying to discuss something you truly don't understand.

Government does not create jobs.............minimizing losses creates additional opportunity in the private sector. Returning many programs to the States will create additional opportunities at state and local levels. Have you looked at the average income of the folks that live in the DC area??



You are just making shit up now. btw, how is it the Federal government does not create jobs but the state government does. LMAO again.

You stupid.

So with you channeling mitt, you can't figure out how mitt will create jobs, except for the elimanation of some federal jobs which will then go to the state to create those jobs.

That about sum it up?

But back to the original question that you can't answer. What will Mitt do to create private sector jobs?
 

konradv

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2010
Messages
30,674
Reaction score
6,648
Points
1,130
Location
Baltimore
Mitt's going to create the jobs? I thought that was the job of the 1%, as long as we didn't raise their taxes. Well, we're waiting. :eusa_snooty:
 

zeke

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2012
Messages
8,272
Reaction score
1,114
Points
190
Also naturegirl.

If the federal guvmint doesn't "create" jobs, why are all those rethugs and dems complaining about all the job loss in the defense industry that MIGHT happen?

How could that be. The guvmint does not create defense industry jobs by ordering all that stuff the milirary needs. Does it? Or is that aok.

Its ok with me but then I am not so stupid to say the government does not create jobs. But you are that stupid. To bad.
 

zeke

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2012
Messages
8,272
Reaction score
1,114
Points
190
Mitt's going to create the jobs? I thought that was the job of the 1%, as long as we didn't raise their taxes. Well, we're waiting. :eusa_snooty:


Well, the reason Mitt can do this is because he is of the 1% and will get together with all the other 1%ers and go on a hiring binge. As long as they get a big tax cut first.

But we have to wait for 4 years.
 

Liberal

Libruhl! Libruhl!
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
1,259
Reaction score
182
Points
98
Location
Downtown Sarasota, FL
Mitt Romney:

"Government doesn't create jobs, Mr. President"

"I'm going to create 12 million jobs as president"

:lol:

I guess he didn't check with his puppet masters, Sununu and Rove before he said anything.
 
OP
TNHarley

TNHarley

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2012
Messages
75,924
Reaction score
25,731
Points
2,250

zeke

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2012
Messages
8,272
Reaction score
1,114
Points
190
You all just stay right here. Nature girly is coming back to explain how Mitt will create all those jobs.

Me, I gotta go to work at the job I created.
 

Dreamy

Silver Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2009
Messages
2,629
Reaction score
459
Points
98
Not sure about the placement of political signs but it is no big secret that hacks from all economic levels are bleeding the government/us dry.

The government, both Feds and State offer far too many jobs, some of them hack jobs and therein lies the problem. Also, how many millions of Americans are employed by companies that rely on government contracts?

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, approximately 2 million civilians work for the federal government. That is not even counting the military or the postal service.

Home : Occupational Outlook Handbook : U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Federal Resume | Government is Largest Employer
 

onecut39

VIP Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2008
Messages
1,527
Reaction score
142
Points
83
If you liked Bush you will love Romney!!
 
OP
TNHarley

TNHarley

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2012
Messages
75,924
Reaction score
25,731
Points
2,250

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$191.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top