Hutchinson's bombshell Jan. 6 testimony sways legal experts and conservative media

They are all struggling to understand that this is a media story and not news. The papers that are condemning trump were only printed today.

The point is that they are not the target audience. The target audience is people who could vote either way.and they are appalled.

John Bolton has just told Britain that Trump will not even get the GOP nomination.

Bolton's an idiot and a never-Trumper.
 
Like sand through the sieve, so are the days of our lives.

To any sort of logician, this testimony is FULL of sand. Consider this:
  1. The story from Hutchinson is that the driver wouldn't take Trump up to the Capitol because it wasn't a secured area. The Capitol on the day the congress was meeting inside to certify the electors for Biden which was highly contested WASN'T a secure area?
  2. Hutchinson claims Trump wanted magnetometers disabled at the Ellipse because he KNEW the crowd was carrying weapons.
  • HOW would Trump KNOW they were carrying weapons?
  • I've got dozens of photos of the crowd at the rally and walking the 2 miles to the capitol. Not one weapon seen among the children and baby carriages!
  • DC is a gun-free zone. So the SS, FBI and capitol police knew this large crowd was carrying weapons and made no arrests? And they risked the president's life letting armed people near the president, then kept him from the Capitol "for his safety?" :smoke:
If they had done that, every one of these people: A). Would not have complied. B). Would have been fired and charged for both risking the President's like AND violating DC gun law. C). Had Trump caused some big event in the Beast that day wanting to go to the Capitol, Hutchinson would have been the LAST person in the WH to hear about it, everyone would have known about it, it couldn't have remained secret until now, there would have been a hundred pictures of the event from all of the media around the event, and it would have been a big news story 2 years ago.
 
Last edited:
This is good news.

You think it good news that "legal experts" are swayed by disproven, conflicting, uncorroborated hearsay evidence?

OK: Here's some more: YOU PLAY WITH DOLLS AND FEEL THEM UP UNDER THEIR DRESSES!

That is a FACT until you can provide a witness who can testiofy to the contrary! :21:
 
America is still in trouble. Are there enough honest people left in the gop to save it ? You need an opposition, even if it is those crazy fucks..
An opposition to what though?

We have two conservative parties.
 
The point is that they are not the target audience. The target audience is people who could vote either way.and they are appalled.

Thanks. You just admitted this entire shit show is designed only to influence and sway voter opinion. In other words, the party that was so afraid a few FB ads in 2016 cost Hillary the election due to Russia Russia Russia are at it again trying to steal an election by saturating the media with hearsay and propaganda that they refuse to let anyone question or challenge!
 
Thats a different problem. Both parties are owned by donors. Its the same over here.
But the Dems are less evil than the GOP.
Right, so what's the opposition?

Unless you're saying there's no opposition to this country's hard shift to the far right over the last 5 decades or so.

That I'd agree with.
 
The Jan 6 committee needs to be placed under oath and questioned...
Live on TV since they themselves made it a TV show....
Lets see the final season....Buuuaaahahahahaha
 

The more info that comes out and it seems that only the Jap snipers still believe in Trump. These people are traitors.
Got sucked in again ay Tommy? There is no evidence only hearsay. It's not a trial it's an inquisition. No counsel, no discovery, no cross examination, no real evidence, no nothing. Just a bunch of 'never Trumpers' desperately trying to smear Trump in hopes he will not run. If Trump were not so popular, this kangaroo court would have never been convined in the first place. These people led by Cheney ('Miss Piggy') are nothing but a bunch of liars.
 
Really?
FFS - all three people WHO WERE THERE - said they would testify that none of what she said happened.
Then the man she cited as telling her... also came out saying he would testify that not only did he not say this to her, but he wasn't even there. Which is verified.
Then she said she handwrote a note prior to Jan 6... and a person came forward saying they would testify - WITH COROBORATION than he wrote the note on Jan 6..and other law officials can testify to back him up.

What more do you want?
So is this "believe all women" or something?
The Dominoes are falling like popcorn one after another in her testimony. At this point she should be criminally charged with lying to Congress.

Great, quote any one of those three people...
 

Forum List

Back
Top