How 'Suspicious' Plane Crashes and Assassinations Benefit the Right Wing

Octoldit

Gold Member
Sep 8, 2008
1,003
174
130
"When these “strange” plane crashes occur the first question is who of political significance was on board? The plane crash over Buffalo NY was no mere accident. One who was intent on reopening the 9-11 investigation died along with more than 40 other innocent people. These high tech terrorist must be stopped. How long do these mass murders have to go on before the people and device used to bring down aircraft is made public." Zeb.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/www.existentialistcowboy.blogspot...ashes-and.html

Monday, December 22, 2008

Sometime in the early Fifties someone wrote, 'assassination became an instrument of U.S. national policy.' More recently, the 'weapon' of choice is the small aircraft. The most recent assassination by plane may turn out to be that of Michael Connell, the Bush IT guru who may have helped the GOP rig Bush's 'elections' of 2000 and 2004. He was a man who knew too much. That's always been sufficient to get you murdered.

Michael Connell, the Bush IT expert who has been directly implicated in the rigging of George Bush's 2000 and 2004 elections, was killed last night when his single engine plane crashed three miles short of the Akron airport. Velvet Revolution ("VR"), a non-profit that has been investigating Mr. Connell's activities for the past two years, can now reveal that a person close to Mr. Connell has recently been discussing with a VR investigator how to tell all about his work for George Bush. Mr. Connell told a close associate that he was afraid that the George Bush and Dick Cheney would "throw [him] under the bus."

A tipster close to the McCain campaign disclosed to VR in July that Mr. Connell's life was in jeopardy and that Karl Rove had threatened him and his wife, Heather. VR's attorney, Cliff Arnebeck, notified the United States Attorney General , Ohio law enforcement and the federal court about these threats and insisted that Mr. Connell be placed in protective custody. VR also told a close associate of Mr. Connell's not to fly his plane because of another tip that the plane could be sabotaged. Mr. Connell, a very experienced pilot, has had to abandon at least two flights in the past two months because of suspicious problems with his plane. On December 18, 2008, Mr. Connell flew to a small airport outside of Washington DC to meet some people. It was on his return flight the next day that he crashed.

On October 31, Mr. Connell appeared before a federal judge in Ohio after being subpoenaed in a federal lawsuit investigating the rigging of the 2004 election under the direction of Karl Rove. The judge ordered Mr. Connell to testify under oath at a deposition on November 3rd, the day before the presidential election. Velvet Revolution received confidential information that the White House was extremely concerned about Mr. Connell talking about his illegal work for the White House and two Bush/Cheney 04 attorneys were dispatched to represent him.

--Bush Insider Who Planned To Tell All Killed In Plane Crash: Non-Profit Demands Full Federal Investigation
Connell was a 'source' for lots of 'dirt' involving the names George W. Bush, Karl Rove, perhaps the leadership of the GOP. Motive enough to 'off' him. I think that's precisely what they did. By 'they' I mean those GOP elites, 'world leaders', politicos that he was prepared to finger. That's the way the mob works. The GOP is a mob.

One of my sources died in a plane crash last night.

I don't usually reveal sources, but I think this is incredibly important! Michael Connell died in a plane crash last night. He was a key witness in the Ohio election fraud case that I have been reporting on. More importantly, however, he had information that he was ready to share.

You see, Mike Connell set-up the alternate email and communications system for the White House. He was responsible for creating the system that hosted the infamous GWB43.com accounts that Karl Rove and others used. When asked by Congress to provide these emails, the White House said that they were destroyed. But in reality, what Connell is alleged to have done is move these files to other servers after having allegedly scrubbed the files from all "known" Karl Rove accounts.

In addition, I have reason to believe that the alternate accounts were used to communicate with US Attorneys involved in political prosecutions, like that of Don Siegelman. This is what I have been working on to prove for over a year. In fact, it was through following the Siegelman-Rove trail that I found evidence leading to Connell. That is how I became aware of him. Mike was getting ready to talk. He was frightened.


--One of my sources died in a plane crash last night
My advice to anyone daring to dissent in this country is this: DON'T FLY! This is no 'conspiracy theory', it's the mathematically calculable odds. In Vegas, the 'odds' are always with the house and that is by design. No 'conspiracy theory' is required. It's the way Las Vegas stays in business. By the way, Las Vegas began as a mobster's dream. 'Bugsy' Seigel himself was 'offed' by the 'mob'. Another thing the GOP has in common with the MOB. It eats its own.

In politics, the GOP is playing the odds you won't ever figure out what they're really up to! The GOP has placed its bet that you are too stupid to figure out that the odds against so many strange deaths happening by accident are astronomical, or that the odds are always with the GOP whenever it comes to suspicious vote recounts and dubious Diebold voting machines. In Vegas, no one beats the house, no one beats the odds against him. But in the GOP mob, the GOP always beats the odds because it is the GOP which rigs the 'game'.

Here's a note to the GOP and its 'muscle' --the CIA: we have computers now. We can load up software that can figure the odds that a primordial singularity would expand into what we call the universe. Working out the stats against a string of obvious murders from which ONLY the right wing benefits doesn't really require an Einstein or a super computer. You don't have to have access to a Cray in order to smell a rat.


By the time a suspicious airplane crash claimed Sen. Paul Wellstone, it should have been clear: Sen. Paul Wellstone and innumerable other 'liberals' could not possibly be the victims of a perverse turn in the laws of probability. Only the gullible and stupid think so. Wellstone was a 60s still radical, the first to have been elected to the US Senate. The Bush White House 'targeted' Wellstone for defeat. Karl Rove, himself, hand-picked Norm Coleman --conservative Republican --to run against Wellstone. The motive for 'death by plane crash' was the fact that despite seemingly unlimited spending by the GOP, Wellstone's lead over Coleman was increasing daily. The election was but two weeks away. Powerful forces would do anything to sweep Wellstone out of the Senate. Who's agenda was most threatened by Wellstone? Answer: Bush!

On the morning of 25 October 2002, Wellstone was killed after an apparent loss of communication and control that led to the crash of his small plane. He died alongside his wife Sheila, their daughter Marcia, three staff members, and the two pilots, while trying to land at Minnesota’s Eveleth-Virginia airport.

CNN’s Wolf Blitzer insisted to his reporter at the scene that foul weather was the lethal factor in the crash, despite statements to the contrary from the CNN correspondent who was actually there. To this day, the public tends to blame the weather. First reports convey enduring impressions but are not always right.

Ph.D. Professors James Fetzer and Don "Four Arrows" Jacobs present the harrowing truth. The plane was not responsible. The weather didn’t cause it to crash. Nor were the pilots incompetent, as the report of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) would eventually maintain.

--American Assassination
The story that you are supposed to believe is that an 'accidental tragedy' occurred on the morning of October 25, 2002 when Sen. Wellstone lost 'communication and control' while trying to land at Minnesota’s Eveleth-Virginia airport. Also killed in the crash were his wife Sheila, daughter Marcia, three staff members, and the two pilots.

Despite contrary statements from CNN reporters on the scene, it was Wolf Blitzer --not surprisingly --who insisted that it was foul weather alone that was responsible for the crash. the public believes the first cover story to have been rolled out: the weather is the culprit. In fact, the crash was highly, improbably convenient to Bush Jr's legislative agenda.
The balance in the Senate for years 2002 to 2004 was 51 Republicans, 48 Democrats, and one independent. If both Wellstone and Carnahan had not been killed, and Wellstone had gone on as projected to win his race, the balance would have been 50 Democrats, 49 Republicans, and one independent. This would have significantly changed what happened in Congress and in the US, where the presidency and both houses of Congress were Republican controlled over those two years.

Isn't it quite a coincidence that these two Democratic candidates both died in plane crashes only two years apart, both just weeks before the elections? It's even more of a coincidence that both were very progressive Democrats. Wellstone was often labeled the most progressive member of Senate. As a National Review article stated, "Probably no other member of the Senate had been on the losing side of more 99-1 or 98-2 votes. None had voted more consistently against the Bush administration."

--National Review
The 'Bush' reaction to Paul Wellstone's opposition in the Senate is instructive, suspicious, incriminating, shameful, abominable and --given that it is a 'Bush' reaction --completely predictable, coming as it does from a family that has conspired to betray the nation, the Constitution and the American people.
Wellstone, who ran on a progressive platform, did not think Bush 41 cared one wit about education, health care, and workers' safety issues. [my comment: Bush didn't care 'one wit' about education. See: the Houston Miracle]


So when Wellstone met Bush in a typical White House pro forma reception line, he used the occasion to urge Bush on three different occasions to spend more time on issues like education and cautioning him against the Persian Gulf War. Of course, Bush was more concerned about fighting the war against Iraq (sound familiar?) and could care less about Wellstone's issues. After Wellstone violated Bush 41's sanctimonious White House protocol, Bush was overheard saying, "Who is this chicken shit?"

Now after Senator Wellstone was tragically killed in a plane crash and "General" Karl Rove is obviously busy trying to figure out how the tragedy can benefit the GOP's chances of winning control of the Senate, I think it's time to answer old man Bush's question. Far from being a chicken shit, Wellstone actually cared for people, unlike your pathetic son who could not even find a few minutes to attend one or two funerals of his Washington, DC area neighbors who were tragically shot and killed by a couple of snipers. No, Mr. Bush 41, Paul Wellstone was not a chicken shit, that epitaph is better reserved for you and your moronic son.

--WAYNE MADSEN, Pappy Bush on Paul Wellstone: "Who Is This Chickenshit?"
Plane crashes are now obviously the preferred method of political assassination.

Even a cursory Google search will turn up hundreds, if not thousands of cases. The traitors at the CIA 'School of Assassination' find cover in absurd 'scenario' that easily fool the stupid and gullible. They also hope to find cover in the shrinking American attention span.
On April 3, 1996, Commerce Secretary Ron Brown and 34 others were killed when their Air Force Boeing 737 crashed into a mountainside in Croatia. One day after the crash, before any real investigation had begun, Defense Secretary William Perry told the Associated Press that the plane crash was "a classic sort of accident that good instrumentation should be able to prevent." The Air Force soon agreed and, in its ensuing investigation, determined that the tragic event was due to navigational error. Since that time, certain anomalies and evidence have come to light regarding the crash:
Ron Brown was found with a .45-inch inwardly beveling circular hole in the top of his head, which resembled a gunshot wound. Despite this suspicious wound, the Air Force medical examiners decided not to order an autopsy.
Normally in plane crash investigations there is a two step process. The Air Force first determines whether the crash was the result of an accident, hostile fire, sabotage, or mechanical failure. In Ron Brown's case, this determination (called a safety board) was skipped. Instead, the Air Force immediately proceeded to the second part of the investigation, where only accident and legal issues are considered.
The Air Force reported that a navigation beacon had been stolen from the airport sometime before the crash. This led some to speculate that the pilot may have been intentionally drawn off course and into the mountainside by a spurious beacon.

Three days after the crash, Niko Jerkic--the man who was responsible for maintaining the airport's navigational aids--died by gunshot. This was ruled a suicide. Jerkic's untimely death meant that investigators did not have a chance to question him.

--Did CIA Hawks Assassinate Ron Brown?
Plane crashes are very nearly the perfect vehicle of murder. The crash itself often destroys the evidence of sabotage. The public is conditioned to believe that 'plane crashes' happen. It is also true that murders happen and plane crashes may be the preferred method taught by the experts at the CIA school of assassination. Indeed, airplanes may crash all by themselves but CIA assassins preferred to rig the wheel. They prefer to bet on a sure thing. Certainly --sufficient expertise can ensure that airplanes may explode and/or crash due on cue.

There are some indications that Americas are, at last, awakening to the harsh and grim reality: agencies of the US government are either tasked or have taken it upon themselves a program of political assassination the objectives of which are:
Advance an increasingly militaristic, imperialistic, dictatorial right wing agenda;
Subvert the Bill of Rights, primarily freedoms of speech and dissent;
Protect and defend an increasingly tiny monied, ruling elite;
Subvert indigenous 'Democratic' movements abroad;
Conspire with 'reactionary' forces abroad to seize and/or exploit the natural resources of 'nations' like Iraq, earlier Iran via the Shah, et al
The US became a 'banana republic' on November 22, 1963. According to a 2001 Gallup poll, 81 percent of the American public does not believe the Warren Commission's cover story that 'a lone nut' --Lee Harvey Oswald --was the lone gunmen in Dealy Plaza that day. Of that 81 percent, many believe what Oswald himself told reporters: "I am a patsy"! They believe that he was set up to 'take the fall'. There is evidence --some of it incontrovertible --of right wing planning and involvement by elements of the CIA.

A few years ago, a British forensic scientist stated that at least two gunmen were certainly involved in the JFK assassination. In a peer-reviewed paper in the British Forensic Science Society's journal, "Science and Justice, scientist D.B.Thomas added much weight to the so-called 'grassy knoll theory' that a 'second gunman' fired at JFK. The Zapruder film supports that conclusion; it is, in fact, proof that the fatal shot was fired from the 'grassy knoll'.

There is common-sense support as well as forensic evidence:
A 'grassy knoll' shooter was about one third the distance to his target at the time the 'fatal shot' was fired!

A 'grassy knoll' shooter had a completely unobstructed view; A sixth story shooter would have been obstructed at the time the fatal shot was fired by a large tree that was fully 'leaved' as photographs taken that very day prove![check the B and W photo posted. All the cars depicted are outside the shooters extremely limited 'window of opportunity'. The tree poorly depicted. It obstructs any shots a sixth floor shooter might have had.]
A 'grassy knoll' shooter had a target whose lateral motion relative to his own position was minimized, perhaps to zero, at the time of the shot.
A 'grassy knoll' shooter had 'secure' and, as we now know, unobserved egress. A sixth floor shooter would have had to run down six flights of stairs. A 'grassy knoll' shooter, by contrast and, in fact, just broke down his .222, returned it to a briefcase and walked away!
At last --the Zapruder film indicates without any doubt whatsoever that the 'fatal shot' struck JFK was the front. The 'flack' with regard to the 'magic bullet' is a lie, invented full cloth by Republican Arlen Specter. It is not only impossible, it is completely irrelevant, a red herring. It was not the 'fatal' shot! It was said to have defied the laws of physics --yet it failed to inflict a single, mortal wound. The 'magic bullet' can be seen at JFK Lancer. It remains pristine and completely undamaged by its having shattered flesh and bone in two human beings.


Whoever fired the fatal shot should have been prosecuted for first degree murder. Had it gone to trial, this shooter, a 'man' with connections to both mob and CIA, might have fingered the mastermind, the man who co-ordinated the whole thing for the CIA. That 'co-ordinator' was photographed 'hanging around' the front entrance to the school book depository building just prior to the arrival of the JFK motorcade. Later, that man would ask this of Paul Wellstone: 'who is this chicken shit?'

It is amazing that the 'cover story' and cover up was so ham-fisted, so utterly incompetent. The murder itself was a simple matter of placing 'hired guns' in positions giving them a clear shot at the JFK motorcade which was re-routed to go down Elm toward the underpass. One of the 'hired guns' did his job, firing but one shot, in fact, the fatal shot that came from the front. That is the only scenario that is supported, indeed, proven by the single most important piece of evidence ever recovered in the case: the Zapruder film.

Always skeptical, I became convinced that the FBI, itself, was involved. What cinched it was my interview with a witness to this historic murder --the so-called 'Girl in the Red Dress' --Rosemary Willis. Her father took numerous photos that day, though none are as famous as that short sequence by Zapruder.

She had grown up by the time I met her. She was concerned about how best to archive a large collection of aging, fading slides that her father had taken many years ago. I placed the slides on a "light-table" to assess their density --I was stunned! The photos literally placed me in Dealy Plaza, right on the edge of Downtown Dallas --a location that I know very, very well.

I looked up at her with what must have been a dumb struck expression.


Rosemary Willis can be seen clearly in the famous Zapruder film. She is running merrily along the south side of Elm Street and --for some reason --pulls up short and looks back, presumably at her father whose vantage point was on the south-side of Elm Street looking north and -- as the motorcade neared the overpass --the northwest. There, in the pictures, was the motorcade in front of the School Book Depository building; here was the President's limousine with the north pergola and the famous grassy knoll behind it; then there was the First Lady climbing out onto the trunk. The individual frames were large and sharp compared to the tiny 8mm frames of the Zapruder film.

Looking at Rosemary's father's pictures, I had become an eye-witness to one of the pivotal events of this century.


I lingered over a photograph of the President --the pergola clearly identifiable in the background. Not having a copy of the Zapruder film at my disposal for comparison at the time, I can only estimate that Phil Willis's picture may have been taken at approximately frame 190 of the Zapruder film. My estimate is based entirely on Phil Willis' known position as marked on accurate maps of Dealy Plaza and drawing a straight line to the Pergola on the Grassy Knoll which is clearly seen directly behind the Presidential limousine.

Now —here is the interesting part: Rosemary showed me a well-thumbed issue of Look Magazine. Look had borrowed her father's photos and published the very slide that I lingered over. I compared the slide with the published version.


"Notice anything unusual?", she asked me. Yes! In the published version, a freight train was visible behind the pergola. There was no train in the slide. Since the original slide preceded the published version, where did the train come from?

"The train was in the original slide," Rosemary explained. "After the Look story, the FBI borrowed the pictures and kept them for several years. When we got them back, the train was gone." But the original picture, the one depicting the train, had already been published. the FBI was too late to shut the story down.


Certainly --there is a railroad track which runs behind the picket fence, the Pergola, and the grassy knoll. Anyone getting out of a freight train has ready access to cover behind the picket fence. That person --or persons --would also have an unobstructed view of the Presidential limousine. If certain experts are correct and the fatal shot coincides with frames 312/313 of the Zapruder film, then anyone behind the picket fence would have been at one third Osweld's distance to the President. A shooter so placed would also have a much longer window of opportunity. A sixth floor shooter would have, at most, two or three seconds of close, unobstructed view --if that!


Anyone behind the picket fence would have had the best shot, the best chance to change history for the worst. By frames 312/313, the view from the sixth floor of the School Book Depository was obstructed by a tree. Photos taken of that very tree on the day of the murder, indicate that within minutes of the assassination, the tree was fully 'leafed'. Reenactments, even the famous CBS reenactment, leave out that fact.

Some credible persons have interpreted the Zapruder films as indicating a "hit" on both frames 313 AND 319. The difference between frames 313 and 319 is a matter of only six frames. Zapruder's home movie camera was most likely shooting twelve frames per second. At 12 frames per second, the amount of time between the two frames is only one half of a second. If that assessment is correct that means that Oswald shooting alone in the book depository would have had to shoot through a liveoak tree and not only get off two shots with a cumbersome Mannlicher-Carcano and HIT his moving target within a period of less than one second. Impossible!


Finally, due to the angle that Elm street takes from the corner with the book depository to the overpass, there is simply no unobstructed view of the motorcade route from the book depository for more than a few frames at a time. Keep in mind that a 'frame' is 1/12 of a second. Yet -- we are expected to believe that Oswald managed to get off three shots in a matter of a few seconds. One of them --we are expected to believe is the magic bullet that did the work of four or more bullets. Yet --it was found unscathed at Parkland Hospital but on the WRONG gurney!

At last, there is only one reason anyone would have felt compelled to remove a train from a slide and that is this: there was something incriminating about the presence of that 'train'. Knowing 'why' they would wish to remove the train would most certainly reveal the culprit. Clue: it was not Oswald. No one would remove a train in order to convict or protect Oswald. Oswald was never said to have either arrived or tried to depart by train. Why was the train important enough to cover up, indeed, remove?


There is no innocent explanation for attempts to alter evidence in such a blatant manner. The destruction of this evidence is, itself, a crime in any context for any reason. In this case, the FBI may have obstructed justice at the very least. If the FBIs involvement in the cold-blooded murder of JFK extends no further than this, this act alone may amount to complicity after-the-fact, aiding and abetting.


If I should ever learn the specific reason, the precise motive that the FBI might have had in tampering so overtly with evidence in the JFK murder case, I will most probably learn who it was who ordered, planned and coordinated the murder of John F. Kennedy. By their act, the FBI has limited the list of 'usual suspects' to the government itself. The FBI and CIA top the list.


Almost everyone has seen the photos of tramps arrested near the tracks. Certainly --Frank Sturgis, Jeb Magruder, and E. Howard Hunt, were among them.
His connection to the JFK assassination came about almost serendipitously, when in 1974 a researcher stumbled across a photo of three tramps standing in Dallas' Dealey Plaza. It was taken on November 22nd, 1963, the day of Kennedy's shooting, and one of the tramps looked pretty much like E. Howard. In early inquiries, official and otherwise, he always denied any involvement. In later years, he'd offer a curt "No comment." And then, earlier this year, at the age of eighty-eight, he died -- though not before writing an autobiography, American Spy: My Secret History in the CIA, Watergate & Beyond, published last month. Not surprisingly, those things he wrote down about JFK's death and gave to his eldest son don't make an appearance in the book, at least not in any definitive way. E. Howard had apparently decided to take them to the grave. But St. John still has the memo -- "It has all this stuff in it," he says, "the chain of command, names, people, places, dates. He wrote it out to me directly, in his own handwriting, starting with the initials 'LBJ' " -- and he's decided it's time his father's last secrets finally see some light, for better or for worse.
...

But then he starts talking about what it was like growing up the eldest son of Everette Howard Hunt, and a different picture emerges. "He loved the glamorous life, cocktail parties, nightclubbing, flirting, all that," Saint says. "He was unfaithful to my mom, but she stayed with him. He was a swinger. He thought of himself as a cool dude, suave, sophisticated, intellectual. He was Mr. Smooth. A man of danger. He was perfect for the CIA. He never felt guilt about anything."

--ERIK HEDEGAARD, The Last Confessions of E. Howard Hunt, Rolling Stone

Given the involvement that these men and George Bush Sr had with Richard Nixon and the CIA, I find increasingly credible what was once told me by an acquaintance who, when he learned of my involvement in the media, represented himself as a 'former' CIA operative. He told me flatly that the Kennedy assassination was a mob hit with CIA complicity. The fatal shot, he said, came from the front. Oswald was a patsy.

If he is correct, then what are the motives? Kennedy had pledged to "smash the CIA into a thousand pieces". His brother Robert, as Attorney General, had gone after the "cosa nostra". Exiled cubans, the CIA and the mafia had felt betrayed by Kennedy following the Bay of Pigs. See also my previous article: Three Reasons JFK was Murdered.


Who Killed JFK? The evidence points to a right-wing faction of the CIA with some help from its friends. In CIA lingo, friends are referred to as "assets." CIA assets, including media assets, were employed to help cover-up the crime. This CIA faction was angry at JFK for his refusal to commit to a full-scale invasion of Cuba at the Bay of Pigs, and for his efforts to seek an accommodation with the Soviet Union and Fidel Castro. High-level CIA officers are implicated. They include: Richard Helms, James Angleton, David Phillips, E. Howard Hunt, Theodore Shackley, William Harvey, David Morales, Edward Lansdale, and George Joannides. Typing any of these CIA officer's names into an Internet search engine, along with the words "JFK assassination," will uncover a network of conspirators.

To see evidence that Lee Oswald was framed by CIA operatives click here: The Patsy

--Did CIA Hawks Assassinate Ron Brown?
"Sometime in the early Fifties ... assassination became an instrument of U.S. national policy. It also became an important branch of our invisible government, a sizable business, and a separate technology involving weapons and devices the ordinary taxpayer paid billions for but was never permitted to see, except perhaps in the technicolor fantasies of James Bond flicks."

--Andrew St. George, journalist for Life magazine, Gaeton Fonzi, The Last Investigation

JFK predicting 911 and the truth about it

Additional resources:
Steve Kangas: The Origins of the Overclass
The CIA's School of Assassination at Fort Bragg
Part 1 - Political Prisoner
Part 2 - Siegelman's Daughter Speaks Out
Part 5 - Justice Diaz Speaks
 
Last edited:
Octoldit is absolutely right. Michael Connell WAS assinated to keep him from spilling the beans about the rigging of both Bush elections. They werent going to simply let this man ruin all their plans, so they silenced him, permanently. What most of you dont know, is WHO actually performed the assasination...

On Dec 17th, 2008, the Bush team had a meeting where they went over their options for a hitman. It wasnt long before everyone unanimously agreed on the man for the job. Bigfoot had already performed over 250 successful assasinations for the bush adminstration without a hitch, so it was a no brainer.

Bigfoot is the greatest assasin in world history, but its not because of the way he can summon animals with his mind, or his uncanny ability to blend in with a crowd. Its the technology he employs that gives him an edge over everyone else. On the southern shore of Groom Lake in Nevada, theres a large secretive military airfield where he keeps his spaceship. Some call it area 51, but Bigfoot calls it home. Here he is able to work on his experiments with gravity and time, and this is where he outfits his flying saucer with some of the latest technologies, even though human technology is very limited.

Fortunately for Bigfoot, he had done alot of piloting work for "Xenu", the overlord of the Galactic Confederacy, during the "Interstellar Rebellion Wars" 75 million years ago, which put him in Xenu's favor, so he was rewarded with a Type7 Particle Beam Cannon which they installed on his flying saucer. For those who dont know, Type7 Particle Beam Cannons completely disintigrate anything they hit, so its pretty cool when you can get your hands on one of these.

Anyway, after the flightline crew fueled his flying saucer up with the super secret fuel they call "Element X", he donned his flight suit and gave one final salute to his comrades before he embarked on the secretive and vital mission. Bigfoot knew exactly where to find Michael Connell, because N.O.R.A.D. had been tracking him since his plane took off. With the flick of his wrist, he throttled his twin hyperdrive engines and he crossed the country in 1/1000th of a second, ending up right next to Michael Connells aircraft, at which point the automatic targeting systems activated and fired on Mr Connell. Of course nothing was left of Micheals aircraft after getting hit by a Type7 Particle Beam Cannon, which meant they needed to plant evidence of a plane crash, but that was someone elses job.


...in Loch Ness, Scotland, deep beneath the cold waters, lies a hidden base where the Loch Ness Monster has spent centuries honing his mind powers. He actually developed the means to create matter, using only his mind, and he can also teleport at will. On February 1, 1973, British intelligence made first contact with Nessie, and they have been working closely together ever since.

Dec 18th, 2008, Nessie recieved a call on the emergency red phone, and he was debriefed about the Michael
Connell situation. After taking a few minutes to aquaint himself with the schematics of Michael Connells single-engine Piper Saratoga, Nessie teleported to the US and he created the false wreckage, including the body.

Nessie was later given the "Goerge Cross" by the Queen of England herself, the highest medal awarded to a British civilian, and Bush gave Bigfoot the Presidential Medal of Freedom in a secret ceremony which included every member of the Skull and Bones, the Illuminati and the Freemasons.

Im outraged that medals were given to these two! They should be tried and executed for their crimes, NOT GIVEN MEDALS!!! Someday the truth will come out about this incident, and me and Octoldit will be right there laughing at all of you for not believing.
 
Last edited:
Kind of pathetic to type that much bullshit to try and make a joke.
 
kinda pathetic that your in denial of who really killed kennedy that you wont read his thread and automatically dismiss it as bullshit because of that.
 
kinda pathetic that your in denial of who really killed kennedy that you wont read his thread and automatically dismiss it as bullshit because of that.

I was talking about the second poster. He was the one trying to make a joke, was he not?
 
It's Reginald's fault.

$conspiracy.jpg
 
Kind of pathetic to type that much bullshit to try and make a joke.

Yes i know, it is kind of pathetic, yet its nowhere near as long as the fairy tale in the first post, and that one was meant to be serious, which makes it twice as pathetic.

Why is it that the conspiracy freaks who believe 9/11 was an inside job, also believe that over the past 8 years every person involved has been able to remain tight lipped about it, yet we are supposed to believe that Bush had this Michael Connel guy killed because they were afraid of him talking? Why is it you believe secrets can be kept, so long as people arent asked in a court of law? That is the assumption right...that its no problem for Michael to lie, so long as he isnt asked under oath?

Its all absurd and laughable.
 
Last edited:
I was talking about the second poster. He was the one trying to make a joke, was he not?

Oh.sorry about that.my apologies.Yeah he is pathetic.He cant deal with the truth about conspiracys.consider that post to him and not to you.again sorry about that.yeah I never read his posts anymore cause he is so much denial about conspiracys such as the clinton body count,the deaths he is behind,the CIA killing kennedy and being behind 9/11.He constantly ignores facts.
 
Last edited:
Kind of pathetic to type that much bullshit to try and make a joke.

Yes i know, it is kind of pathetic, yet its nowhere near as long as the fairy tale in the first post, and that one was meant to be serious, which makes it twice as pathetic.

Why is it that the conspiracy freaks who believe 9/11 was an inside job, also believe that over the past 8 years every person involved has been able to remain tight lipped about it, yet we are supposed to believe that Bush had this Michael Connel guy killed because they were afraid of him talking? Why is it you believe secrets can be kept, so long as people arent asked in a court of law? That is the assumption right...that its no problem for Michael to lie, so long as he isnt asked under oath?

Its all absurd and laughable.

Like the absurd laughable posts you make since your in denial of conspiracys? Everytime I challenged you on that 9/11 thread to debunk those 47 videos from that canada wants the truth site, you proved you never watched them cause you didnt even bother to address the videos like all the 9/11 apologists do cause you know you cant debunk them.THAT is really pathetic.
 
Kind of pathetic to type that much bullshit to try and make a joke.

Yes i know, it is kind of pathetic, yet its nowhere near as long as the fairy tale in the first post, and that one was meant to be serious, which makes it twice as pathetic.

Why is it that the conspiracy freaks who believe 9/11 was an inside job, also believe that over the past 8 years every person involved has been able to remain tight lipped about it, yet we are supposed to believe that Bush had this Michael Connel guy killed because they were afraid of him talking? Why is it you believe secrets can be kept, so long as people arent asked in a court of law? That is the assumption right...that its no problem for Michael to lie, so long as he isnt asked under oath?

Its all absurd and laughable.

Like the absurd laughable posts you make since your in denial of conspiracys? Everytime I challenged you on that 9/11 thread to debunk those 47 videos from that canada wants the truth site, you proved you never watched them cause you didnt even bother to address the videos like all the 9/11 apologists do cause you know you cant debunk them.THAT is really pathetic.

If i watched every consipracy video you wack jobs posted, i wouldnt have time to do anything else. You want me to read your posts? Then dont do cut and paste jobs from your looney websites and actually use your own words. I dont read ANY cut and paste posts, ever.
 
Why does it bother you that people believe in conspiracy threories?

Who the fuck cares?
 
Why does it bother you that people believe in conspiracy threories?

Who the fuck cares?

Dude, those are real people they are talkiing about. These clowns have no qualms about dragging the names of innocent people through the mud, based on absolutely no facts at all. THATS why it bothers me.

Also, ignorance is a pet peeve of mine, and i like putting ignorant people in their place. I know, its a little twisted.
 
Last edited:
Why does it bother you that people believe in conspiracy threories?

Who the fuck cares?

Dude, those are real people they are talkiing about. These clowns have no qualms about dragging the names of innocent people through the mud, based on absolutely no facts at all. THATS why it bothers me.

Also, ignorance is a pet peeve of mine, and i like putting ignorant people in their place. I know, its a little twisted.

You ought to just be thankful you live in a country where you can freely state those beliefs.
 
Why does it bother you that people believe in conspiracy threories?

Who the fuck cares?

Dude, those are real people they are talkiing about. These clowns have no qualms about dragging the names of innocent people through the mud, based on absolutely no facts at all. THATS why it bothers me.

Also, ignorance is a pet peeve of mine, and i like putting ignorant people in their place. I know, its a little twisted.

You ought to just be thankful you live in a country where you can freely state those beliefs.

Yes, you are correct. I AM thankful i can do this.
 
Why does it bother you that people believe in conspiracy threories?

Who the fuck cares?

Dude, those are real people they are talkiing about. These clowns have no qualms about dragging the names of innocent people through the mud, based on absolutely no facts at all. THATS why it bothers me.

Also, ignorance is a pet peeve of mine, and i like putting ignorant people in their place. I know, its a little twisted.

again just because you dont want to look at the facts doesnt mean they are not true.No what bothers you is the truth.well you need to look at the mirror then when talking about someone ignorant thats been put in their place.:lol:
 
Last edited:
I just glimpsed through it before,finally read through the whole thing now.great stuff there.thanks for posting that for us.the ones who actually read what you had to say cause were not in denial here.I have researched the kennedy assassination for years.I have read over 40 books on the assassination and have met several witnesses that were there that day including oswalds wife Marina Oswald.I have been to many of their yearly November in dallas conferences they have down there every year so I know a lot about it.the evidence for anyone who has looked into it like I have is overwhelming the CIA was behind it all.

They killed kennedy cause he was going to pull out of vietnam and their fake and phony war could not continue for these big corporations to profit from.LBJ and Dick Nixon were in on it up to their ears. That was a great article,it talked about E Howard Hunt.A CIA operative who many researchers by looking at the photos of the 3 tramps there said one was E Howard Hunt.

The photos clearly show it is him also.What really proved it though that the CIA was behind it all though was like that article said,His son taped him confessing that he was in dallas that day and was involved.He confessed and bragged about it cause he wanted his place in history.

They talked about how the CIA who Clinton had them get rid of Ron Brown for him in rigging a plane crash.as anybody who done any research into clinton knows,that evil bastard who like Bush SR,also has CIA connections, was seen at Ron Browns funeral being taped leaving the funeral laughing his ass off.Obviously someone who is hardly broken up about his death.Strange considering he was supposedly his friend.

Then when Clinton looks sideways and only then,notices he is being filmed,he all of a sudden does an about face and pretends he is all broken up about Browns death and stops laughing his butt of with the people he is walking with,and then pretends to start crying.What a great actor.:lol:I got that classic moment on tape of mine at home.its priceless entertainment watching Clinton show off the true hypocrite he is.
 
Last edited:
No what bothers you is the truth.

If i thought for a moment the crap you spew had any truth, why on earth would i be argueing with you about it? This is what im talking about, you guys just say stupid shit that makes no sense.
 
I just glimpsed through it before,finally read through the whole thing now.great stuff there.thanks for posting that for us.the ones who actually read what you had to say cause were not in denial here.I have researched the kennedy assassination for years.I have read over 40 books on the assassination and have met several witnesses that were there that day including oswalds wife Marina Oswald.I have been to many of their yearly November in dallas conferences they have down there every year so I know a lot about it.the evidence for anyone who has looked into it like I have is overwhelming the CIA was behind it all.

They killed kennedy cause he was going to pull out of vietnam and their fake and phony war could not continue for these big corporations to profit from.LBJ and Dick Nixon were in on it up to their ears. That was a great article,it talked about E Howard Hunt.A CIA operative who many researchers by looking at the photos of the 3 tramps there said one was E Howard Hunt.

The photos clearly show it is him also.What really proved it though that the CIA was behind it all though was like that article said,His son taped him confessing that he was in dallas that day and was involved.He confessed and bragged about it cause he wanted his place in history.

They talked about how the CIA who Clinton had them get rid of Ron Brown for him in rigging a plane crash.as anybody who done any research into clinton knows,that evil bastard who like Bush SR,also has CIA connections, was seen at Ron Browns funeral being taped leaving the funeral laughing his ass off.Obviously someone who is hardly broken up about his death.Strange considering he was supposedly his friend.

Then when Clinton looks sideways and only then,notices he is being filmed,he all of a sudden does an about face and pretends he is all broken up about Browns death and stops laughing his butt of with the people he is walking with,and then pretends to start crying.What a great actor.:lol:I got that classic moment on tape of mine at home.its priceless entertainment watching Clinton show off the true hypocrite he is.

Sorry, but none of these so-called facts are true. Those are just words typed on a computer, nothing more. If there was any truth to it, you could provide proof of it, and if you dont have proof of it, why the fuck do you believe it in the first place? You will of course go on believing in it because youve already invested so much into the conspiracy.

Ive never understood people who believe in something wholeheartedly without any proof whatsoever to back it up. The more outrageous the claim, the more proof is required to back that claim up. Even a little proof isnt enough in a situation like this. You see this strange phenomena every day, with these off the wall conspiracies, people who believe in magic underwear and talking bushes, wizards who can part the Red Sea, alien abductions, men who come back to life after dying, galactic overlords named Xenu, and a whole host of bizzare beliefs. Is it possible that any of this stuff could be true? Maybe, but i dont see why i should think its a probability, let alone base my life around those claims until they can be proven.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, but none of these so-called facts are true. Those are just words typed on a computer, nothing more. If there was any truth to it, you could provide proof of it, and if you dont have proof of it, why the fuck do you believe it in the first place? You will of course go on believing in it because youve already invested so much into the conspiracy.

Ive never understood people who believe in something wholeheartedly without any proof whatsoever to back it up. The more outrageous the claim, the more proof is required to back that claim up. Even a little proof isnt enough in a situation like this. You see this strange phenomena every day, with these off the wall conspiracies, people who believe in magic underwear and talking bushes, wizards who can part the Red Sea, alien abductions, men who come back to life after dying, galactic overlords named Xenu, and a whole host of bizzare beliefs. Is it possible that any of this stuff could be true? Maybe, but i dont see why i should think its a probability, let alone base my life around those claims until they can be proven.[/QUOTE]

sorry but just because the truth scares you doesnt mean its not true.you have proven in spades you have no interest in the truth of 9/11 countless of times by never looking at those 47 videos from that canada wants the truth site i posted for you many times.you never ONCE commented about ANY of them frady cat.seeing how I just got to keep repeating the same thing over and over again to you all the time cause you ignore it Im done with you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top