How did whether a vaccine works become a political issue?

[candycorn]

The moron who started the thread 12 minutes ago is complaining there are no responses. He needs a friend. And a life.

Where to begin?

Hydroxy is not a vaccine. Its an anti malaria drug. Malaria is caused by a parasite. Covid is caused by a virus.

Almost by definition, Hydroxy is not going to make anyone suffering from a virus well by itself. Even more dubious is that science has rejected the use of the drug to treat covid.

That is not to say that there may not be therapeutic benefits to taking Hydroxy. Much like taking Tylenol could make a cancer patient feel better. Its not going to cure anything but there are benefits.

You don't know what you are talking about........there is lots of research showing that in the early stages of the Chinese Flu Hydroxy and Zinc it can keep people from getting worse....it has nothing to do with parasites it has to do with the bodies reaction to the chinese flu....and Hydroxy and zinc work to keep the body from reacting to the virus......

Here is an interview with an actual doctor talking about Hydroxy...he goes through the research too.....and how morons like you have politicized medical research...

A chiropactor? LOL

 

[candycorn]

The moron who started the thread 12 minutes ago is complaining there are no responses. He needs a friend. And a life.

Where to begin?

Hydroxy is not a vaccine. Its an anti malaria drug. Malaria is caused by a parasite. Covid is caused by a virus.

Almost by definition, Hydroxy is not going to make anyone suffering from a virus well by itself. Even more dubious is that science has rejected the use of the drug to treat covid.

That is not to say that there may not be therapeutic benefits to taking Hydroxy. Much like taking Tylenol could make a cancer patient feel better. Its not going to cure anything but there are benefits.

You are apparently a medical doctor who has done extensive research to back your medical conclusions.

Too bad you failed to provide any citations or proof of your M.D.

No dingus; I just happen to know that a drug that eradicates a parasite is going to be useless against a virus.

You don't know what you are talking about...lives can be saved with these drugs...but....Trump has to be beaten in November, so they become eggs to your socialist omellete...

Amid the ongoing coronavirus pandemic Yale School of Public Health epidemiology professor Harvey Risch is asserting that the drug hydroxychloroquine, in conjunction with zinc and appropriate antibiotics, can help high-risk patients recover from COVID-19.

Risch draws a distinction between two stages of the illness, noting that while the treatment will likely work quickly during the first stage, it is not effective in helping people who have advanced to the more serious second stage.

"At the first stage, it is a flu-like illness. That illness will not kill you. If you are a high-risk patient and begin treatment immediately, you will almost certainly be done with it in a few days. When not treated, high-risk patients may progress. The virus then causes severe pneumonia and attacks many organs, including the heart. In this second stage, hydroxychloroquine is not effective," he explains in a Washington Examiner opinion piece.

Risch says that people in the high-risk category should be provided treatment even before they receive the results of their coronavirus test.

"The second thing to know is that most low-risk patients survive without treatment. Low risk means you are under age 60 and have no chronic conditions such as diabetes, obesity, and hypertension, have no past treatment for cancer, are not immunocompromised, etc. High risk means you are over 60 or you have one or more of those chronic conditions. High-risk patients need immediate treatment when they first show symptoms," he said.

"It is a serious and unconscionable mistake that the FDA has used inpatient data to block emergency use petitions for outpatient use. Further, already back in March, the FDA approved the emergency use of hydroxychloroquine for hospitalized patients, for whom it is demonstrably less effective than for outpatients," he said. "If hydroxychloroquine satisfied the FDA criteria for emergency inpatient use in March, it should more than satisfy those criteria now for outpatient use, where the evidence is much stronger."

Yale professor: Feds making 'unconscionable mistake' blocking hydroxychloroquine for COVID patients

Harvey Risch says treatment effective in helping people in early stages of disease, especially those with higher risks.

justthenews.com

Like everyone else, I didn't bother to read it but I did see where whomever you're quoting is ragging on the FDA--which is run by your blob. If the FDA isn't approving this drug...blame the guy who runs it; your blob.

 

[2aguy]

The moron who started the thread 12 minutes ago is complaining there are no responses. He needs a friend. And a life.

Where to begin?

Hydroxy is not a vaccine. Its an anti malaria drug. Malaria is caused by a parasite. Covid is caused by a virus.

Almost by definition, Hydroxy is not going to make anyone suffering from a virus well by itself. Even more dubious is that science has rejected the use of the drug to treat covid.

That is not to say that there may not be therapeutic benefits to taking Hydroxy. Much like taking Tylenol could make a cancer patient feel better. Its not going to cure anything but there are benefits.

You are apparently a medical doctor who has done extensive research to back your medical conclusions.

Too bad you failed to provide any citations or proof of your M.D.

No dingus; I just happen to know that a drug that eradicates a parasite is going to be useless against a virus.

You don't know what you are talking about...lives can be saved with these drugs...but....Trump has to be beaten in November, so they become eggs to your socialist omellete...

Amid the ongoing coronavirus pandemic Yale School of Public Health epidemiology professor Harvey Risch is asserting that the drug hydroxychloroquine, in conjunction with zinc and appropriate antibiotics, can help high-risk patients recover from COVID-19.

Risch draws a distinction between two stages of the illness, noting that while the treatment will likely work quickly during the first stage, it is not effective in helping people who have advanced to the more serious second stage.

"At the first stage, it is a flu-like illness. That illness will not kill you. If you are a high-risk patient and begin treatment immediately, you will almost certainly be done with it in a few days. When not treated, high-risk patients may progress. The virus then causes severe pneumonia and attacks many organs, including the heart. In this second stage, hydroxychloroquine is not effective," he explains in a Washington Examiner opinion piece.

Risch says that people in the high-risk category should be provided treatment even before they receive the results of their coronavirus test.

"The second thing to know is that most low-risk patients survive without treatment. Low risk means you are under age 60 and have no chronic conditions such as diabetes, obesity, and hypertension, have no past treatment for cancer, are not immunocompromised, etc. High risk means you are over 60 or you have one or more of those chronic conditions. High-risk patients need immediate treatment when they first show symptoms," he said.

"It is a serious and unconscionable mistake that the FDA has used inpatient data to block emergency use petitions for outpatient use. Further, already back in March, the FDA approved the emergency use of hydroxychloroquine for hospitalized patients, for whom it is demonstrably less effective than for outpatients," he said. "If hydroxychloroquine satisfied the FDA criteria for emergency inpatient use in March, it should more than satisfy those criteria now for outpatient use, where the evidence is much stronger."

Yale professor: Feds making 'unconscionable mistake' blocking hydroxychloroquine for COVID patients

Harvey Risch says treatment effective in helping people in early stages of disease, especially those with higher risks.

justthenews.com

Like everyone else, I didn't bother to read it but I did see where whomever you're quoting is ragging on the FDA--which is run by your blob. If the FDA isn't approving this drug...blame the guy who runs it; your blob.

The FDA is filled with james comey's just like the rest of the federal government...anything to win the election.

 

[kiwiman127]

All doctors and medical professionals here take a minute to check out this drug an Australian doctor is prescribing. He was on Fox yesterday with some recovered near death patients. I looked it up and found it to be a virus killer.

Ivermectin


Australian Professor: Ivermectin 'Amazingly Successful' in ...
www.newsmax.com/health/health-news/australia...
An Australian drug known as Ivermectin, which is already in use throughout the world to treat parasitic conditions, is showing great results in killing coronavirus in studies involving patients, according to Sky News."Because I'm involved in developing these in the U.S.... Australia, Ivermectin, coronavirus, covid 264

Newsmax? Trump propaganda.
Oxford did a study using a large number of participants which clearly showed

The moron who started the thread 12 minutes ago is complaining there are no responses. He needs a friend. And a life.

Where to begin?

Hydroxy is not a vaccine. Its an anti malaria drug. Malaria is caused by a parasite. Covid is caused by a virus.

Almost by definition, Hydroxy is not going to make anyone suffering from a virus well by itself. Even more dubious is that science has rejected the use of the drug to treat covid.

That is not to say that there may not be therapeutic benefits to taking Hydroxy. Much like taking Tylenol could make a cancer patient feel better. Its not going to cure anything but there are benefits.

You are apparently a medical doctor who has done extensive research to back your medical conclusions.

Too bad you failed to provide any citations or proof of your M.D.

No dingus; I just happen to know that a drug that eradicates a parasite is going to be useless against a virus.

You don't know what you are talking about...lives can be saved with these drugs...but....Trump has to be beaten in November, so they become eggs to your socialist omellete...

Amid the ongoing coronavirus pandemic Yale School of Public Health epidemiology professor Harvey Risch is asserting that the drug hydroxychloroquine, in conjunction with zinc and appropriate antibiotics, can help high-risk patients recover from COVID-19.

Risch draws a distinction between two stages of the illness, noting that while the treatment will likely work quickly during the first stage, it is not effective in helping people who have advanced to the more serious second stage.

"At the first stage, it is a flu-like illness. That illness will not kill you. If you are a high-risk patient and begin treatment immediately, you will almost certainly be done with it in a few days. When not treated, high-risk patients may progress. The virus then causes severe pneumonia and attacks many organs, including the heart. In this second stage, hydroxychloroquine is not effective," he explains in a Washington Examiner opinion piece.

Risch says that people in the high-risk category should be provided treatment even before they receive the results of their coronavirus test.

"The second thing to know is that most low-risk patients survive without treatment. Low risk means you are under age 60 and have no chronic conditions such as diabetes, obesity, and hypertension, have no past treatment for cancer, are not immunocompromised, etc. High risk means you are over 60 or you have one or more of those chronic conditions. High-risk patients need immediate treatment when they first show symptoms," he said.

"It is a serious and unconscionable mistake that the FDA has used inpatient data to block emergency use petitions for outpatient use. Further, already back in March, the FDA approved the emergency use of hydroxychloroquine for hospitalized patients, for whom it is demonstrably less effective than for outpatients," he said. "If hydroxychloroquine satisfied the FDA criteria for emergency inpatient use in March, it should more than satisfy those criteria now for outpatient use, where the evidence is much stronger."

Yale professor: Feds making 'unconscionable mistake' blocking hydroxychloroquine for COVID patients

Harvey Risch says treatment effective in helping people in early stages of disease, especially those with higher risks.

justthenews.com

How about the large study by Oxford using 11,000 patients?

No clinical benefit from use of hydroxychloroquine in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 | University of Oxford

A new statement has been released from the Chief Investigators of the Randomised Evaluation of COVid-19 thERapY (RECOVERY) Trial on hydroxychloroquine.

www.ox.ac.uk

Face reality for a change, instead of the ideological crap the Little Trumpsters seem to suck down regularly?

No clinical benefit from use of hydroxychloroquine in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 | University of Oxford

A new statement has been released from the Chief Investigators of the Randomised Evaluation of COVid-19 thERapY (RECOVERY) Trial on hydroxychloroquine.

www.ox.ac.uk

 

[Hossfly]

All doctors and medical professionals here take a minute to check out this drug an Australian doctor is prescribing. He was on Fox yesterday with some recovered near death patients. I looked it up and found it to be a virus killer.

Ivermectin


Australian Professor: Ivermectin 'Amazingly Successful' in ...
www.newsmax.com/health/health-news/australia...
An Australian drug known as Ivermectin, which is already in use throughout the world to treat parasitic conditions, is showing great results in killing coronavirus in studies involving patients, according to Sky News."Because I'm involved in developing these in the U.S.... Australia, Ivermectin, coronavirus, covid 264

Newsmax? Trump propaganda.
Oxford did a study using a large number of participants which clearly showed

The moron who started the thread 12 minutes ago is complaining there are no responses. He needs a friend. And a life.

Where to begin?

Hydroxy is not a vaccine. Its an anti malaria drug. Malaria is caused by a parasite. Covid is caused by a virus.

Almost by definition, Hydroxy is not going to make anyone suffering from a virus well by itself. Even more dubious is that science has rejected the use of the drug to treat covid.

That is not to say that there may not be therapeutic benefits to taking Hydroxy. Much like taking Tylenol could make a cancer patient feel better. Its not going to cure anything but there are benefits.

You are apparently a medical doctor who has done extensive research to back your medical conclusions.

Too bad you failed to provide any citations or proof of your M.D.

No dingus; I just happen to know that a drug that eradicates a parasite is going to be useless against a virus.

You don't know what you are talking about...lives can be saved with these drugs...but....Trump has to be beaten in November, so they become eggs to your socialist omellete...

Amid the ongoing coronavirus pandemic Yale School of Public Health epidemiology professor Harvey Risch is asserting that the drug hydroxychloroquine, in conjunction with zinc and appropriate antibiotics, can help high-risk patients recover from COVID-19.

Risch draws a distinction between two stages of the illness, noting that while the treatment will likely work quickly during the first stage, it is not effective in helping people who have advanced to the more serious second stage.

"At the first stage, it is a flu-like illness. That illness will not kill you. If you are a high-risk patient and begin treatment immediately, you will almost certainly be done with it in a few days. When not treated, high-risk patients may progress. The virus then causes severe pneumonia and attacks many organs, including the heart. In this second stage, hydroxychloroquine is not effective," he explains in a Washington Examiner opinion piece.

Risch says that people in the high-risk category should be provided treatment even before they receive the results of their coronavirus test.

"The second thing to know is that most low-risk patients survive without treatment. Low risk means you are under age 60 and have no chronic conditions such as diabetes, obesity, and hypertension, have no past treatment for cancer, are not immunocompromised, etc. High risk means you are over 60 or you have one or more of those chronic conditions. High-risk patients need immediate treatment when they first show symptoms," he said.

"It is a serious and unconscionable mistake that the FDA has used inpatient data to block emergency use petitions for outpatient use. Further, already back in March, the FDA approved the emergency use of hydroxychloroquine for hospitalized patients, for whom it is demonstrably less effective than for outpatients," he said. "If hydroxychloroquine satisfied the FDA criteria for emergency inpatient use in March, it should more than satisfy those criteria now for outpatient use, where the evidence is much stronger."

Yale professor: Feds making 'unconscionable mistake' blocking hydroxychloroquine for COVID patients

Harvey Risch says treatment effective in helping people in early stages of disease, especially those with higher risks.

justthenews.com

How about the large study by Oxford using 11,000 patients?

No clinical benefit from use of hydroxychloroquine in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 | University of Oxford

A new statement has been released from the Chief Investigators of the Randomised Evaluation of COVid-19 thERapY (RECOVERY) Trial on hydroxychloroquine.

www.ox.ac.uk

Face reality for a change, instead of the ideological crap the Little Trumpsters seem to suck down regularly?

No clinical benefit from use of hydroxychloroquine in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 | University of Oxford

A new statement has been released from the Chief Investigators of the Randomised Evaluation of COVid-19 thERapY (RECOVERY) Trial on hydroxychloroquine.

www.ox.ac.uk

What does your spiel about hydroxychloroquine have to do with Ivermectin?