How Can We Trust a Man Who Showed No Leadership When He Crumbled Under Pressure With Harris Decision?

Canadian website claims Soros arrested for election interference. Probably bullshit. But here it is.



George Soros ARRESTED for election interference, in federal custody
97c41ee7f5b59e4e916acd2d775aa5cd
conservativebeaver_skphjv Posted onNovember 23, 2020
PHILADELPHIA – George Soros has been arrested, and is currently in federal custody in Philadelphia. According to a recently unsealed indictment filed in the West District of Pennsylvania, Soros committed a slew of serious crimes prior to the US election.
The indictment focuses only on the criminal activity Soros participated in prior to the election, such as wire fraud, identity theft, and damage to computers...
Wait.............wut?

You can't arrest satan!

He looks like damn death.lol!

View attachment 420367

Hello!

Doctors can't afford to let the man die.

I feel he may die within the next year and the world will have a sigh of relief. He can go back to his Reptoid layer. :D
Negatory

He ain't going anywhere till he ushers in the anti-Christ and releases him to the eternal abyss.

Don't get me wrong, we almost there.

:D Fundamentalist much?
Just don't take the Mark of the Bill Gates there fella.

It won't go well for ya in the future.
 
Even liberals identified it as pandering to extreme left. How can anyone have confidence in an individual when faced with the most important decision in his life chose a "woman of color" because it was politically expedient?
Trump switched from pro-choice to pro-life because he thought it was politically expedient.
Trump shifted from pro-choice to pro-life as he planned a ...
qz.com › trump-shifted-from-pro-choice-to-pro-life-as-...

May 20, 2019 — For most of his adult life Trump was passionately pro-choice. Then he decided to run for president.

Biden chose the best person for the job. That she is a person of color, a woman, and very competent was a great choice so that people of color and women could be represented in the highest political arena of government.
Trump chose a lap-dog as his running mate.

Atleast Trump don't stutter. And he don't have a speaker in his ear and read the teleprompter.:D
 
How can anyone have confidence in an individual...
You're missing something here.

It's not important that obedient Trumpsters trust or have any confidence in Biden.

So don't worry. Think of him as you'd like.
How does it feel to be on the side of the victorious Brown shirts?

Which political opponents should Biden round up first?
Biden will not be rounding up any political opponents just because they are opponents. That is not the way our country operates unless your name is Trump, who insisted that his opponents be prosecuted for stuff they were not guilty of.
Right, he and Obama targeted his political opponents with things like IRS audits.

Will he do it again? After all, even though conservatives won a court victory over it nothing bad happened to either Obama or Biden over such illegal conduct.
Nothing of the sort happened. The IRS is independent, or trump's tax returns would have been released long ago.
Luckily, since Biden is not President yet, this is information is still on the internet

Justice Department settles with conservative groups over IRS scrutiny | Reuters


(Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department has reached a settlement with dozens of conservative groups that claimed the Internal Revenue Service unfairly scrutinized them based on their political leanings when they sought a tax-exempt status, court documents showed.

In a pair of lawsuits filed in federal court in 2013, the conservative groups accused the IRS of targeting organizations with such words as “Tea Party” or “patriots” when they applied to the agency for tax-exempt status starting in 2010.

The sides asked the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on Wednesday to issue a declarative judgment in one of the cases involving 41 plaintiffs that would say the IRS was wrong to apply the United States tax laws based on an entity’s name, position or association with a particular political movement.

“We hope that today’s settlement makes clear that this abuse of power will not be tolerated,” Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a statement on Thursday.

The IRS admitted it was wrong when it based screenings of the groups’ applications on their names or policy positions, subjected the groups to heightened scrutiny and delays and demanded unnecessary information from the groups, the agreement in the Washington case said.


The IRS “expresses its sincere apology,” it said.

Senior management within the IRS’s Exempt Organizations Division “was delinquent in its responsibility to provide effective control, guidance, and direction over the processing of applications for tax exempt status filed by Tea Party and other political advocacy organizations,” the settlement document said.

A request to halt the other case, a class action suit involving 428 members, was filed in a federal court in Ohio.

Republicans claimed the targeting of conservative groups showed political bias in the IRS under former Democratic President Barack Obama. House Republican investigators found no connection to the Obama administration, according to a 2014 report.

But the report did blame IRS officials for mistreating conservative organizations who sought tax-exempt status and that IRS officials covered up the misconduct and misled Congress.


The officials included former Commissioner Douglas Shulman, former acting Commissioner Steven Miller, and Lois Lerner, the former head of the unit overseeing applications for tax-exempt status.

Obama fired Miller after an internal 2013 IRS audit released found poor management - not partisan politics - led to an “inappropriate” focus on conservative groups.

No criminal charges were ever filed against IRS officials.

Groups seeking tax exemption under federal law may engage in limited amounts of political activity, depending on the type of exemption sought. That and the vagueness of the rules often make it difficult for IRS agents to tell which groups overstep and become ineligible for exemption.
 
How can anyone have confidence in an individual...
You're missing something here.

It's not important that obedient Trumpsters trust or have any confidence in Biden.

So don't worry. Think of him as you'd like.
How does it feel to be on the side of the victorious Brown shirts?

Which political opponents should Biden round up first?
Biden will not be rounding up any political opponents just because they are opponents. That is not the way our country operates unless your name is Trump, who insisted that his opponents be prosecuted for stuff they were not guilty of.

Biden just gets FB,YT and Twit to do it.
Wrong. That is not Biden's way. You have been inundated with trump's decrepit behavior for four years and nobody is like trump with demands for loyalty to him instead of the American people (or else you will be persecuted).
 
How can anyone have confidence in an individual...
You're missing something here.

It's not important that obedient Trumpsters trust or have any confidence in Biden.

So don't worry. Think of him as you'd like.
How does it feel to be on the side of the victorious Brown shirts?

Which political opponents should Biden round up first?
Biden will not be rounding up any political opponents just because they are opponents. That is not the way our country operates unless your name is Trump, who insisted that his opponents be prosecuted for stuff they were not guilty of.

Biden just gets FB,YT and Twit to do it.
Wrong. That is not Biden's way. You have been inundated with trump's decrepit behavior for four years and nobody is like trump with demands for loyalty to him instead of the American people (or else you will be persecuted).

And Biden don't plagiarize either right? :D :hyper:
 
Even liberals identified it as pandering to extreme left. How can anyone have confidence in an individual when faced with the most important decision in his life chose a "woman of color" because it was politically expedient?
Trump switched from pro-choice to pro-life because he thought it was politically expedient.
Trump shifted from pro-choice to pro-life as he planned a ...
qz.com › trump-shifted-from-pro-choice-to-pro-life-as-...

May 20, 2019 — For most of his adult life Trump was passionately pro-choice. Then he decided to run for president.

Biden chose the best person for the job. That she is a person of color, a woman, and very competent was a great choice so that people of color and women could be represented in the highest political arena of government.
Trump chose a lap-dog as his running mate.

Atleast Trump don't stutter. And he don't have a speaker in his ear and read the teleprompter.:D
Trump tells tall tales instead, does read the teleprompter, and sounds like a zombie. During his rallies, he sounds like a snake oil salesman as he spews unchecked rhetoric that his uninformed and uneducated minions swallow as gospel.
 
How can anyone have confidence in an individual...
You're missing something here.

It's not important that obedient Trumpsters trust or have any confidence in Biden.

So don't worry. Think of him as you'd like.
How does it feel to be on the side of the victorious Brown shirts?

Which political opponents should Biden round up first?
Biden will not be rounding up any political opponents just because they are opponents. That is not the way our country operates unless your name is Trump, who insisted that his opponents be prosecuted for stuff they were not guilty of.

Biden just gets FB,YT and Twit to do it.
Wrong. That is not Biden's way. You have been inundated with trump's decrepit behavior for four years and nobody is like trump with demands for loyalty to him instead of the American people (or else you will be persecuted).

And Biden don't plagiarize either right? :D :hyper:
Well, he didn't have someone take his college admissions test for him.
 
Even liberals identified it as pandering to extreme left. How can anyone have confidence in an individual when faced with the most important decision in his life chose a "woman of color" because it was politically expedient?

Meh, not really

In 1960, JFK took LBJ as a running mate because he wanted to shore himself up in the South. it worked.

In 1980, Ronald Reagan ignored Bush Sr. comments about "Voodoo Economics" and took him as a running mate.

In 2004, John Kerry took John Edwards as a running mate.

In 2008, Barack Obama took Joe Biden as a running mate.

This is really nothing new. You take a former rival to shore up parts of the party you want to do better with.
 
How can anyone have confidence in an individual...
You're missing something here.

It's not important that obedient Trumpsters trust or have any confidence in Biden.

So don't worry. Think of him as you'd like.
How does it feel to be on the side of the victorious Brown shirts?

Which political opponents should Biden round up first?
Biden will not be rounding up any political opponents just because they are opponents. That is not the way our country operates unless your name is Trump, who insisted that his opponents be prosecuted for stuff they were not guilty of.

Biden just gets FB,YT and Twit to do it.
Wrong. That is not Biden's way. You have been inundated with trump's decrepit behavior for four years and nobody is like trump with demands for loyalty to him instead of the American people (or else you will be persecuted).

And Biden don't plagiarize either right? :D :hyper:
Well, he didn't have someone take his college admissions test for him.

That's a new one.lol!
 
Even liberals identified it as pandering to extreme left. How can anyone have confidence in an individual when faced with the most important decision in his life chose a "woman of color" because it was politically expedient?

Meh, not really

In 1960, JFK took LBJ as a running mate because he wanted to shore himself up in the South. it worked.

In 1980, Ronald Reagan ignored Bush Sr. comments about "Voodoo Economics" and took him as a running mate.

In 2004, John Kerry took John Edwards as a running mate.

In 2008, Barack Obama took Joe Biden as a running mate.

This is really nothing new. You take a former rival to shore up parts of the party you want to do better with.

Are you saying both Democrypts and Reublicons do the same things? Maybe there is hope for you. :D
 
Canadian website claims Soros arrested for election interference. Probably bullshit. But here it is.



George Soros ARRESTED for election interference, in federal custody
97c41ee7f5b59e4e916acd2d775aa5cd
conservativebeaver_skphjv Posted onNovember 23, 2020
PHILADELPHIA – George Soros has been arrested, and is currently in federal custody in Philadelphia. According to a recently unsealed indictment filed in the West District of Pennsylvania, Soros committed a slew of serious crimes prior to the US election.
The indictment focuses only on the criminal activity Soros participated in prior to the election, such as wire fraud, identity theft, and damage to computers...
Why publish it if you think it is BS? Why not a good article based on facts?
Why is it a problem; as he said it's probably rubbish ...but...WHAT IF!!!!! lol

Greg
You ever heard the expression,” Fake News? If is is fake what is the point?
 
Even liberals identified it as pandering to extreme left. How can anyone have confidence in an individual when faced with the most important decision in his life chose a "woman of color" because it was politically expedient?

Meh, not really

In 1960, JFK took LBJ as a running mate because he wanted to shore himself up in the South. it worked.

In 1980, Ronald Reagan ignored Bush Sr. comments about "Voodoo Economics" and took him as a running mate.

In 2004, John Kerry took John Edwards as a running mate.

In 2008, Barack Obama took Joe Biden as a running mate.

This is really nothing new. You take a former rival to shore up parts of the party you want to do better with.
And trump chose a lap dog and that was the perfect choice.
 
How can anyone have confidence in an individual...
You're missing something here.

It's not important that obedient Trumpsters trust or have any confidence in Biden.

So don't worry. Think of him as you'd like.
How does it feel to be on the side of the victorious Brown shirts?

Which political opponents should Biden round up first?
Biden will not be rounding up any political opponents just because they are opponents. That is not the way our country operates unless your name is Trump, who insisted that his opponents be prosecuted for stuff they were not guilty of.

Biden just gets FB,YT and Twit to do it.
Wrong. That is not Biden's way. You have been inundated with trump's decrepit behavior for four years and nobody is like trump with demands for loyalty to him instead of the American people (or else you will be persecuted).

And Biden don't plagiarize either right? :D :hyper:
Well, he didn't have someone take his college admissions test for him.

That's a new one.lol!
Well, you learn something new every day, yes? Do your homework on trump and your viewpoint may change. Mine did.
 
Are you saying both Democrypts and Reublicons do the same things? Maybe there is hope for you.

Sure they do. In this case, it's not even a bad thing.

The real problem is you have these primary fights where the candidates are pretty much in agreement on 99% of the issues.. So taking a running mate who is a former rival isn't that crazy, actually.
 
Even liberals identified it as pandering to extreme left. How can anyone have confidence in an individual when faced with the most important decision in his life chose a "woman of color" because it was politically expedient?

You've had that and more the last four years. Up until January, 2020, his presidency wasn't tested. He was a corrupt incompetent fraud who didn't need to show any leadership until the pandemic hit. Then, he failed spectacularly...just as most of us who've been watching for four decades knew he would. Then you have his VP, who's just a cuck dressed in a suit and a tie. A yes man. A cheerleader. I don't think I've ever seen a more invisible VP.

Joe Biden is a career politician and a centrist. Kamala Harris is a centrist and competent politician. Sit back and learn. You'll see how things are supposed to function when you don't surround yourself with incompetent yes men and women.
 
Even liberals identified it as pandering to extreme left. How can anyone have confidence in an individual when faced with the most important decision in his life chose a "woman of color" because it was politically expedient?

The trouble is that Harris is not a part of the extreme left. She is left of center. Donald Trump accused her of being a moderate. The fact is that there are political calculations in every VP nominee. In 1976, Ronald Reagan said he would nominate Richard Schweiker as his VP if he won the nomination. Clearly this was a attempt to peel off Ford delegates. In 1980, George Bush was not Reagan's personal choice to be VP. Bill Clinton wanted a moderate for his VP which led him to Al Gore. Harris made a lot of sense for Biden.
 
Canadian website claims Soros arrested for election interference. Probably bullshit. But here it is.



George Soros ARRESTED for election interference, in federal custody
97c41ee7f5b59e4e916acd2d775aa5cd
conservativebeaver_skphjv Posted onNovember 23, 2020
PHILADELPHIA – George Soros has been arrested, and is currently in federal custody in Philadelphia. According to a recently unsealed indictment filed in the West District of Pennsylvania, Soros committed a slew of serious crimes prior to the US election.
The indictment focuses only on the criminal activity Soros participated in prior to the election, such as wire fraud, identity theft, and damage to computers...
Why publish it if you think it is BS? Why not a good article based on facts?
Why is it a problem; as he said it's probably rubbish ...but...WHAT IF!!!!! lol

Greg
What if...Martians landed.

Fucking stupidity
 
How can anyone have confidence in an individual...
You're missing something here.

It's not important that obedient Trumpsters trust or have any confidence in Biden.

So don't worry. Think of him as you'd like.
How does it feel to be on the side of the victorious Brown shirts?

Which political opponents should Biden round up first?
Biden will not be rounding up any political opponents just because they are opponents. That is not the way our country operates unless your name is Trump, who insisted that his opponents be prosecuted for stuff they were not guilty of.
Right, he and Obama targeted his political opponents with things like IRS audits.

Will he do it again? After all, even though conservatives won a court victory over it nothing bad happened to either Obama or Biden over such illegal conduct.
Nothing of the sort happened due to Obama or Biden.
Justice Department settles with conservative groups over IRS ...
www.reuters.com › article › us-usa-tax-conservative › j...

Oct 26, 2017 — Justice Department settles with conservative groups over IRS ... Republicans claimed the targeting of conservative groups showed political bias in the IRS ... Obama fired Miller after an internal 2013 IRS audit released found ...

The problem is that the IRS also targeted liberal groups as well. They used keywords such as progressive which is generally used by liberal groups.


"A federal watchdog has identified as many as 146 cases in which the Internal Revenue Service may have targeted liberal-leaning groups for extra scrutiny based on their names or political leanings, a finding that could undermine claims that conservatives were unfairly targeted under President Barack Obama.

The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration reviewed cases between 2004 and 2013, around the same period TIGTA previously examined in a 2013 report that faulted the IRS for using inappropriate political criteria to select groups for heightened scrutiny.

That earlier report found that 96 groups with names referencing "Tea Party," "Patriot" or "9/12" were selected for intensive review, and the House Ways and Means Committee later identified another 152 right-leaning groups that were subjected to scrutiny. Those findings fueled accusations by Republican lawmakers that the Obama administration engaged in politically motivated targeting of conservatives.

But Democrats have long challenged those claims, arguing that liberal-leaning groups were given close scrutiny alongside the conservative groups. The 2013 TIGTA report, they argued, was based on selective criteria that omitted numerous nonconservative groups that were also subjected to close IRS review.

The new TIGTA report examines a broader range of criteria used by the IRS at the time, including groups affiliated with the now-defunct Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, as well as others referencing "Progressive," "Green Energy," "Medical Marijuana" and "Occupy."

Together, the watchdog identified 146 cases in which the IRS examined left-leaning groups for suspicion of engaging in disallowed political activity. Eighty-three of those were definitively chosen for scrutiny because of the selection criteria, the inspector general found; the report could not definitively determine how the other cases were chosen."

 
Canadian website claims Soros arrested for election interference. Probably bullshit. But here it is.



George Soros ARRESTED for election interference, in federal custody
97c41ee7f5b59e4e916acd2d775aa5cd
conservativebeaver_skphjv Posted onNovember 23, 2020
PHILADELPHIA – George Soros has been arrested, and is currently in federal custody in Philadelphia. According to a recently unsealed indictment filed in the West District of Pennsylvania, Soros committed a slew of serious crimes prior to the US election.
The indictment focuses only on the criminal activity Soros participated in prior to the election, such as wire fraud, identity theft, and damage to computers...

Fact Check: George Soros NOT Arrested For Election Interference, NOT In Federal Custody | Lead Stories

Fact check: George Soros has not been taken into custody for “crimes against America” | Reuters
 
Last edited:
T
Canadian website claims Soros arrested for election interference. Probably bullshit. But here it is.



George Soros ARRESTED for election interference, in federal custody
97c41ee7f5b59e4e916acd2d775aa5cd
conservativebeaver_skphjv Posted onNovember 23, 2020
PHILADELPHIA – George Soros has been arrested, and is currently in federal custody in Philadelphia. According to a recently unsealed indictment filed in the West District of Pennsylvania, Soros committed a slew of serious crimes prior to the US election.
The indictment focuses only on the criminal activity Soros participated in prior to the election, such as wire fraud, identity theft, and damage to computers...
Wait.............wut?

You can't arrest satan!

He looks like damn death.lol!

View attachment 420367
his guy does not look so hot either.
Canadian website claims Soros arrested for election interference. Probably bullshit. But here it is.



George Soros ARRESTED for election interference, in federal custody
97c41ee7f5b59e4e916acd2d775aa5cd
conservativebeaver_skphjv Posted onNovember 23, 2020
PHILADELPHIA – George Soros has been arrested, and is currently in federal custody in Philadelphia. According to a recently unsealed indictment filed in the West District of Pennsylvania, Soros committed a slew of serious crimes prior to the US election.
The indictment focuses only on the criminal activity Soros participated in prior to the election, such as wire fraud, identity theft, and damage to computers...

Fact Check: George Soros NOT Arrested For Election Interference, NOT In Federal Custody | Lead Stories

Fact check: George Soros has not been taken into custody for “crimes against America” | Reuters
Common sense should have prevailed on that story. It would have been a 24 hour Breaking News on our Cable stations.:)
 

Forum List

Back
Top