House Republican Comes Out And Says It. Facing Tax Cheats To Pay Up Will "Cost" Us Billions

[skews13]

See, our problem here is that we're taking a Republican message literally instead of treating as the propagandistic word salad it is intended as. It’s not meant to make sense. Mace may or may not distance herself from the premise of her own self-promoted statement after she's gotten sufficient mockery for it, but it was crafted not to make an actual argument but to burp scary-sounding words at Republican base members primed to react to them without thought. "At the cost of billions" is meant to invoke the notion that it will be costing the nation money, rather than bringing it in. "Stabilize" is meant to invoke the notion that the nation's economy is currently not stable, when all the facts and figures suggest that the economy is now actually in pretty darn good shape.

Things are so good, in fact, that ports are being clogged with the stuff Americans are now wanting to buy and (mostly anti-labor) economic grumps are warning that if we keep raising wages and recovering from pandemics then we'll summon the Inflation Monster, so central banks need to start taking a few good golf swings at worker knees before things get out of hand. And that’s all while the pandemic is still raging around us.

House Republican comes out and says it: Forcing tax cheats to pay up would 'cost' them billions

Republican Congresswoman Nancy Mace, inflicted on us by the state of South Carolina, has been running a bold new online ad condemning Democratic plans to boost funding for the Internal Revenue Service. Why, you might ask? "Biden's policy will double...

www.dailykos.com

So it could cost us?

Define us.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

See, our problem here is that we're taking a Republican message literally instead of treating as the propagandistic word salad it is intended as. It’s not meant to make sense. Mace may or may not distance herself from the premise of her own self-promoted statement after she's gotten sufficient mockery for it, but it was crafted not to make an actual argument but to burp scary-sounding words at Republican base members primed to react to them without thought. "At the cost of billions" is meant to invoke the notion that it will be costing the nation money, rather than bringing it in. "Stabilize" is meant to invoke the notion that the nation's economy is currently not stable, when all the facts and figures suggest that the economy is now actually in pretty darn good shape.

Things are so good, in fact, that ports are being clogged with the stuff Americans are now wanting to buy and (mostly anti-labor) economic grumps are warning that if we keep raising wages and recovering from pandemics then we'll summon the Inflation Monster, so central banks need to start taking a few good golf swings at worker knees before things get out of hand. And that’s all while the pandemic is still raging around us.

House Republican comes out and says it: Forcing tax cheats to pay up would 'cost' them billions

Republican Congresswoman Nancy Mace, inflicted on us by the state of South Carolina, has been running a bold new online ad condemning Democratic plans to boost funding for the Internal Revenue Service. Why, you might ask? "Biden's policy will double...

www.dailykos.com

So it could cost us?

Define us.

Wow, so you believe that waiters/waitresses and bartenders are not paying their fare share? While bums on the street paying nothing in taxes while pan handling 10s of thousands of dollars a year? I knew people like you hate real tax payers, is it because you are a pan handling pajama boy faggot?

 

[BrokeLoser]

See, our problem here is that we're taking a Republican message literally instead of treating as the propagandistic word salad it is intended as. It’s not meant to make sense. Mace may or may not distance herself from the premise of her own self-promoted statement after she's gotten sufficient mockery for it, but it was crafted not to make an actual argument but to burp scary-sounding words at Republican base members primed to react to them without thought. "At the cost of billions" is meant to invoke the notion that it will be costing the nation money, rather than bringing it in. "Stabilize" is meant to invoke the notion that the nation's economy is currently not stable, when all the facts and figures suggest that the economy is now actually in pretty darn good shape.

Things are so good, in fact, that ports are being clogged with the stuff Americans are now wanting to buy and (mostly anti-labor) economic grumps are warning that if we keep raising wages and recovering from pandemics then we'll summon the Inflation Monster, so central banks need to start taking a few good golf swings at worker knees before things get out of hand. And that’s all while the pandemic is still raging around us.

House Republican comes out and says it: Forcing tax cheats to pay up would 'cost' them billions

Republican Congresswoman Nancy Mace, inflicted on us by the state of South Carolina, has been running a bold new online ad condemning Democratic plans to boost funding for the Internal Revenue Service. Why, you might ask? "Biden's policy will double...

www.dailykos.com

So it could cost us?

Define us.

Will auditing more of Americas best most productive get you lowlife degenerates to start contributing?
Will it get you to want to stop wetbacks from fucking us over?

 

[Oddball]

See, our problem here is that we're taking a Republican message literally instead of treating as the propagandistic word salad it is intended as. It’s not meant to make sense. Mace may or may not distance herself from the premise of her own self-promoted statement after she's gotten sufficient mockery for it, but it was crafted not to make an actual argument but to burp scary-sounding words at Republican base members primed to react to them without thought. "At the cost of billions" is meant to invoke the notion that it will be costing the nation money, rather than bringing it in. "Stabilize" is meant to invoke the notion that the nation's economy is currently not stable, when all the facts and figures suggest that the economy is now actually in pretty darn good shape.

Things are so good, in fact, that ports are being clogged with the stuff Americans are now wanting to buy and (mostly anti-labor) economic grumps are warning that if we keep raising wages and recovering from pandemics then we'll summon the Inflation Monster, so central banks need to start taking a few good golf swings at worker knees before things get out of hand. And that’s all while the pandemic is still raging around us.

House Republican comes out and says it: Forcing tax cheats to pay up would 'cost' them billions

Republican Congresswoman Nancy Mace, inflicted on us by the state of South Carolina, has been running a bold new online ad condemning Democratic plans to boost funding for the Internal Revenue Service. Why, you might ask? "Biden's policy will double...

www.dailykos.com

So it could cost us?

Define us.

It's a concept known as "diminishing returns", dumbfuck.

 

[blackhawk]

You really need to come up with some other far left partisan websites to link using the Daily Kook has gotten old the least you can do is add a little variety to your partisan nonsense.

 

[lantern2814]

So go after middle class workers (and spy on people’s bank accounts) while letting people like Al Sharpton who owe millions just skate free. The IRS needs to be cut, not expanded.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

See, our problem here is that we're taking a Republican message literally instead of treating as the propagandistic word salad it is intended as. It’s not meant to make sense. Mace may or may not distance herself from the premise of her own self-promoted statement after she's gotten sufficient mockery for it, but it was crafted not to make an actual argument but to burp scary-sounding words at Republican base members primed to react to them without thought. "At the cost of billions" is meant to invoke the notion that it will be costing the nation money, rather than bringing it in. "Stabilize" is meant to invoke the notion that the nation's economy is currently not stable, when all the facts and figures suggest that the economy is now actually in pretty darn good shape.

Things are so good, in fact, that ports are being clogged with the stuff Americans are now wanting to buy and (mostly anti-labor) economic grumps are warning that if we keep raising wages and recovering from pandemics then we'll summon the Inflation Monster, so central banks need to start taking a few good golf swings at worker knees before things get out of hand. And that’s all while the pandemic is still raging around us.

House Republican comes out and says it: Forcing tax cheats to pay up would 'cost' them billions

Republican Congresswoman Nancy Mace, inflicted on us by the state of South Carolina, has been running a bold new online ad condemning Democratic plans to boost funding for the Internal Revenue Service. Why, you might ask? "Biden's policy will double...

www.dailykos.com

So it could cost us?

Define us.

Of 35 countries who have reported so far, the USA is ranked 27th in real GDP growth. So 77% are performing better than we are. All major countries short of Russia are reported.

If you ask nicely I'll tell you where we left off with POTUS Trump.

I'll do it anyway, we were 20th of 55, top 36%. In fact we ranked 18th of 55 first quarter of 2021, and it's dropped every quarter since.

Maybe I'll tell you where Obama left off? Sure I will, 44th of 55, 80% performed better.

 

[Lesh]

This isn't about middle class or poor folks moron.

It's about rich tax cheats that Republicans are protecting

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

So go after middle class workers (and spy on people’s bank accounts) while letting people like Al Sharpton who owe millions just skate free. The IRS needs to be cut, not expanded.

We have computers, we dont need any IRS with people in it anymore. Just like a automatic teller at walmart...

 

[Lesh]

We have computers, we dont need any IRS with people in it anymore. Just like a automatic teller at walmart...

Someone has to run those computers stupid

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

This isn't about middle class or poor folks moron.

It's about rich tax cheats that Republicans are protecting

It's about unnecessarily expanding the size of the federal government. 87,000 new IRS agents means at least 80,000 Democrat voters.

So tell us, how much overtime are the IRS agents working these days? How many Saturdays are they working? This has nothing to do with catching tax cheats. The IRS constantly goes towards big money earners to find mistakes and questionable tax deductions. This is about giving the Communist party an arm into the lives of small town America.

 

[busybee01]

Will auditing more of Americas best most productive get you lowlife degenerates to start contributing?
Will it get you to want to stop wetbacks from fucking us over?

You racists are the ones fucking us over.
If they are cheating on their taxes then they should be jailed.

 

[easyt65]

Has Biden paid te $500 million he reportedlyowes from the money he failed to adequately hide?

 

[Oddball]

You really need to come up with some other far left partisan websites to link using the Daily Kook has gotten old the least you can do is add a little variety to your partisan nonsense.

He regularly posts commie dreck from Raw Sewage....For what that's worth.

 

[busybee01]

It's a concept known as "diminishing returns", dumbfuck.

View attachment 569856

You are the dumbfuck. There are no diminishing returns. It sends a message to people who are major tax cheats.

Gomez Addams is not a good choice. In one episode of the Addams Family, Gomez thought his taxes should have been higher.

 

[busybee01]

Has Biden paid te $500 million he reportedlyowes from the money he failed to adequately hide?

One of the biggest liars on this board. We know where Biden's income comes from.

 

[busybee01]

You really need to come up with some other far left partisan websites to link using the Daily Kook has gotten old the least you can do is add a little variety to your partisan nonsense.

They are quoting what Mace put out. They are 100% right in this case. Why should the rich be able to cheat on their taxes when ordinary people cannot.

 

[busybee01]

So go after middle class workers (and spy on people’s bank accounts) while letting people like Al Sharpton who owe millions just skate free. The IRS needs to be cut, not expanded.

No one is going after middle classa workers. Middle class workers cannot pull the shenanigans the rich can. The IRS needs to be expanded.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

No one is going after middle classa workers. Middle class workers cannot pull the shenanigans the rich can. The IRS needs to be expanded.

Of course that was the plan. That's why they wanted to look into every transaction every American made past $600.00. You know how those rich are always depositing or withdrawing $600.00 from their accounts.