Hillary To Have a 'Cell-Mate'?!

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,049
2,645
'FBI director would like to indict Clinton and Abedin'

"California Congressman Darrell Issa, who previously led an investigation into Benghazi as former chairman of the House Oversight Committee, says the FBI "would like to indict both Huma [Abedin] and Hillary Clinton" for conducting sensitive government business on an unsecure, private email server.

"I think the FBI director would like to indict both Huma and Hillary as we speak," the Republican heavyweight told the Washington Examiner Thursday...

Issa suggested Clinton's wrongdoing is obvious."

--------

Issa THINKS the FBI would like to indict both. He may be right, but you know what they say about opinions. Her wrongdoing is 'obvious'? The only exception being 'to a liberal' / 'Hillary-Apologist'. Of course, time will tell. The only people Liberals say are guilty without having to be charged / convicted are the Oregon militiamen. :p
 
Or this one....

15.jpg
 
This will have no good ending for the Democrats.

If The Bitch of Benghazi gets indicted no way in hell will she get a large turnout of Moon Bats or very many Independent or voters. Only the hard core mentally challenged morally bankrupted Libtards will vote for her. She will never make it to the Moon Bat Convention. She will have to drop out.

If President Shit for Brains uses his dictatorial powers to curtail the indictment with a cover up there will be hell to pay and it will destroy the FBI and still cause the Bitch to lose.

You Moon Bats better get use to that silly clown Sanders being your candidate because that is all you are going to have shortly.

This is a screwed up country. That was proven when all the despicable greedy special interest groups elected Shit for Brains as President in 2008 and 2012. However, as crewed up as the country is there is no way Silly Communist is going to be President.

You can start your crying now.
 
'FBI director would like to indict Clinton and Abedin'

"California Congressman Darrell Issa, who previously led an investigation into Benghazi as former chairman of the House Oversight Committee, says the FBI "would like to indict both Huma [Abedin] and Hillary Clinton" for conducting sensitive government business on an unsecure, private email server.

"I think the FBI director would like to indict both Huma and Hillary as we speak," the Republican heavyweight told the Washington Examiner Thursday...

Issa suggested Clinton's wrongdoing is obvious."

--------

Issa THINKS the FBI would like to indict both. He may be right, but you know what they say about opinions. Her wrongdoing is 'obvious'? The only exception being 'to a liberal' / 'Hillary-Apologist'. Of course, time will tell. The only people Liberals say are guilty without having to be charged / convicted are the Oregon militiamen. :p
Alas. The definition of obvious wrongdoing seems to have evolved.
 
Last edited:
Just think Moon Bats. When The Bitch of Benghazi gets indicted and convicted she will be the Second Clinton to have her law license taken away.

Lawyers are like the biggest scumbags on the planet and when they determine that you are too sleazy to be in their ambulance chasing club you have really hit the bottom of the barrel, especially when it is the whole family.
 
If I were Abein, I'd pull a John Dean and go to the Feds for an agreement. Information for less time/ no time in jail..
 
The State Department just announced that information . documents just found in Hillary's possession / on her server are SO HIGHLY CLASSIFIED that their release has the potential to cause serious damage to our national security, that they are SO HIGHLY CLASSIFIED that they can't even redact them ENOUGH to release ANY part of them!
-- LINK: Official: Some Clinton emails 'too damaging' to release | Fox News

1. Hillary declared she had no classified on her server, that she did not even send or receive any. They how did something so classified...and unmarked get on her server / in her possession? How did she NOT know such information was not classified, let alone THAT classified?

2. When anyone who works with classified, especially anyone who works with on / with COMPARTMENTALIZED programs/Info, which it has been proven that she did, they are 'READ OUT' of the program. Their ACCESS to that information is taken away. They can't see it, can't hear about it, and they certainly can't have it in their possession! Her having this information in her possession is ILLEGAL. Considering her dealings with national governments and entities, the fact that she has / is taking money from foreign government, especially those Islamic nations that fund and support terrorism, her having this information COULD be ground for charges of treason / espionage, not just 'negligence' under the Espionage Act.

3. When you leave an agency / job - when she left the State department she was legally required to turn over ALL Classified information / material in her possession. THAT means the e-mails, the documents, THE SERVER, and everything they are finding. She was required by law to sign a document saying she understood this and complied with it. The fact that they have found and are finding all of this is PROOF SHE BROKE THE LAW.

When you leave the State Department you can keep your name plate / plaque, you can keep the coffee mug, take your personal photos and mementos...but THE CLASSIFIED HAS TO BE TURNED IN / HAS TO STAY!

Much like she tried to take everything that wasn't nailed down in the WH when she and Slick Willey left office, it seems Hillary tried to keep more than she was allowed to keep again when she left the State Dept!

:lmao:

"That's the sound of Hillary
Working on the Chain...Gaaaang!"

I love that song! :p
 

Forum List

Back
Top