Hillary refuses to answer indictment question at debate

If you see a recent interview with Bill and then see Hilary, she looks much younger, yet they are the same age. IMHO the medical reason opt out may not be too far fetched, even if she's not indicted. If she knows all of the opposition research about to get dumped on her, that she won't be able to dodge, an FBI indictment being the most serious. If the moderators were up on the facts, this is the correct follow-up to her comparing her email server to Powell's private email account:

First, "tens of thousands of emails…passed through the private server Clinton used while in office." Powell did not have a private server for his State Department emails. It is simply not reasonable to compare a small number of now classified emails – and by small, again, we mean two -- forwarded to Powell's private email account with Clinton's decision to circumvent the use of a government server entirely.

Second, Clinton's predecessors have had far, far fewer emails retroactively classified than Clinton. The Post reports that "1,600 Clinton emails" have been "retroactively classified all or in part, according to a senior congressional aide with access to the material, with the vast majority in the lowest-level category of 'confidential.' " 22 of these 1,600 emails contained "top secret" information.
 
The OP is likely either very young or hasn't had much post high school education.

No innocent person would ever answer a question that was built on the hypothetical assumption that they were guilty.

If she says that she would resign if indicted, than she tacitly admits that it's possible she is guilty.

If she says she wouldn't resign if indicted, than it makes her look even dumber.

Google "Leading Question"
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #4
The OP is likely either very young or hasn't had much post high school education.

No innocent person would ever answer a question that was built on the hypothetical assumption that they were guilty.

If she says that she would resign if indicted, than she tacitly admits that it's possible she is guilty.

If she says she wouldn't resign if indicted, than it makes her look even dumber.

Google "Leading Question"
The idiot from London speaks............
 
The OP is likely either very young or hasn't had much post high school education.

No innocent person would ever answer a question that was built on the hypothetical assumption that they were guilty.

If she says that she would resign if indicted, than she tacitly admits that it's possible she is guilty.

If she says she wouldn't resign if indicted, than it makes her look even dumber.

Google "Leading Question"
The idiot from London speaks............
And makes you look like the fool that you are.
 
Would trump answer a question like that?

And she did answer that the department knew about it, and her predecessors did the same thing without issue .
 

Forum List

Back
Top