Hillary Clinton, Conspiracy Queen

excalibur

Diamond Member
Mar 19, 2015
17,947
33,990
2,290
She is one evil, nasty individual. A true harpy.


There’s always been a kind of paranoid streak in American politics,” former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton told Jennifer Senior at The Atlantic Festival recently. “But it never was given such voice, such a platform, or had so much money behind it until we saw the rise of the right-wing radio voices like Rush Limbaugh, and we saw the rise of Fox News. And then, of course, the Internet just put it on steroids.”
It’s true, no doubt, that democratized media exacerbates the worst (and best) of human tendencies. Yet, it is quite jarring to hear this complaint coming from a person whose operatives were likely involved in birtherism and later were the driving force behind the Russian “collusion” hoax — two of modern political history’s most corrosive conspiracy theories
Even as Hillary was going on about the devastating role that paranoia plays in our political interactions, Senior somehow forgot to ask her a single question about an ongoing investigation by Special Counsel John Durham into her campaign’s role in concocting an oppo file and creating a narrative that the 2016 election was stolen by Putin. The week of the interview, Durham was reportedly handing down a new set of subpoenas on a law firm with ties to Clinton’s 2016 campaign. Last month, Hillary’s former lawyer Michael Sussmann was indicted for allegedly giving false statements to the FBI in connection to a Clinton-campaign deception that engulfed nearly the entire political world for nearly five years. There has now been one more indictment for allegedly lying about Russian “collusion” in 2016 than there was for any criminal conspiracy tied to the election. Has anyone even asked Hillary about these indictments?
Even if Clinton was kept in the dark about the oppo file that was filled with half-baked lies and unverified bar talk — and being kept in the dark is the excuse she’s heavily leaned on her entire scandal-ridden career — she wasn’t merely an innocent bystander, looking on while dirty tricksters damaged trust in the system for political gain. In 2019, for example, Clinton claimed that Donald Trump was an “illegitimate president,” one who “knows” that the 2016 election was stolen. Clinton suggested that Putin had kompromat on Trump, without ever offering any evidence. Of course, Democrats argued, preemptively, that 2020 would was as good as stolen if Trump won again. At one point, over 60 percent of Democrats believed that Russians had not only bought a smattering of Facebook ads to mislead gullible voters but also tampered with real-live vote totals.
...
Hillary can’t grouse about Republicans injecting “doubt” and causing “a loss of confidence” in our system and then complain about losing the “popular vote,” which “the system” unambiguously rejects as a means of electing a president. Certainly she’s in no moral position to lament the rise of paranoia in American politics when two of the most popular made-up conspiracies of the age lead right back to her.


 
Hillary Clinton is not far removed from these criminals.

Sean Berkowitz, a lawyer for Michael Sussmann, 57, a cybersecurity specialist who worked for the Perkins, Coie law firm, told U.S. Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui that he was entering "a plea of not guilty on behalf of Mr. Sussmann".

The indictment accused Sussmann of falsely telling Baker he did not represent any client when he met him to give the FBI white papers and other data files containing evidence of questionable cyber links between the Trump Organization and a Russian-based bank. Sources familiar with the investigation identified the bank to Reuters as Alfa Bank.

The indictment said Sussmann turned over that information to Baker not as a "good citizen" but as an attorney representing a U.S. technology executive, an internet company and Clinton’s presidential campaign.
 
It's OK, because Hillary is a Democrat.
The Yellow Press always protects greedy corrupt Democrats.
What is really amazing is that there are people who adore her.
She's the Queen of Mean.


hillaryposksdjcsdkjsdkjsdkjfnsdf.jpg
 
It's OK, because Hillary is a Democrat.
The Yellow Press always protects greedy corrupt Democrats.
What is really amazing is that there are people who adore her.
She's the Queen of Mean.


View attachment 547536
Best thoughts I have when I see this bitch is, "Everyone dies at some point." I think the same thoughts when I see Piglosi, Schumer, Schiff, Nadler, AOC, Tlaib, Omar, Booker, Fauxcahontas, Pressley, Waters----Oh what the hell, democrats in general.
 
The truth missing from your ignorance is that Trump is worth billions, because of his hard work before becoming a politician, a president. While Clinton, Gore, Obama, Biden became rich as politicians.

Obama is worth a $100 million in 4 years?
The Clintons are worth over $250 million.
Biden and his family are worth? $20 million?


We all see the democrats for what they are, and as you point out, the democrats use our government as their own, personal, ATM>
 
The truth missing from your ignorance is that Trump is worth billions, because of his hard work before becoming a politician, a president. While Clinton, Gore, Obama, Biden became rich as politicians.

Obama is worth a $100 million in 4 years?
The Clintons are worth over $250 million.
Biden and his family are worth? $20 million?


We all see the democrats for what they are, and as you point out, the democrats use our government as their own, personal, ATM>
Don't forget about AOC and Sanders...leftist use the taxpayers as their personal ATM.
 
The truth missing from your ignorance is that Trump is worth billions, because of his hard work before becoming a politician, a president. While Clinton, Gore, Obama, Biden became rich as politicians.

Obama is worth a $100 million in 4 years?
The Clintons are worth over $250 million.
Biden and his family are worth? $20 million?


We all see the democrats for what they are, and as you point out, the democrats use our government as their own, personal, ATM>
And Trump didn't take the salary.
 
She is one evil, nasty individual. A true harpy.


There’s always been a kind of paranoid streak in American politics,” former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton told Jennifer Senior at The Atlantic Festival recently. “But it never was given such voice, such a platform, or had so much money behind it until we saw the rise of the right-wing radio voices like Rush Limbaugh, and we saw the rise of Fox News. And then, of course, the Internet just put it on steroids.”
It’s true, no doubt, that democratized media exacerbates the worst (and best) of human tendencies. Yet, it is quite jarring to hear this complaint coming from a person whose operatives were likely involved in birtherism and later were the driving force behind the Russian “collusion” hoax — two of modern political history’s most corrosive conspiracy theories
Even as Hillary was going on about the devastating role that paranoia plays in our political interactions, Senior somehow forgot to ask her a single question about an ongoing investigation by Special Counsel John Durham into her campaign’s role in concocting an oppo file and creating a narrative that the 2016 election was stolen by Putin. The week of the interview, Durham was reportedly handing down a new set of subpoenas on a law firm with ties to Clinton’s 2016 campaign. Last month, Hillary’s former lawyer Michael Sussmann was indicted for allegedly giving false statements to the FBI in connection to a Clinton-campaign deception that engulfed nearly the entire political world for nearly five years. There has now been one more indictment for allegedly lying about Russian “collusion” in 2016 than there was for any criminal conspiracy tied to the election. Has anyone even asked Hillary about these indictments?
Even if Clinton was kept in the dark about the oppo file that was filled with half-baked lies and unverified bar talk — and being kept in the dark is the excuse she’s heavily leaned on her entire scandal-ridden career — she wasn’t merely an innocent bystander, looking on while dirty tricksters damaged trust in the system for political gain. In 2019, for example, Clinton claimed that Donald Trump was an “illegitimate president,” one who “knows” that the 2016 election was stolen. Clinton suggested that Putin had kompromat on Trump, without ever offering any evidence. Of course, Democrats argued, preemptively, that 2020 would was as good as stolen if Trump won again. At one point, over 60 percent of Democrats believed that Russians had not only bought a smattering of Facebook ads to mislead gullible voters but also tampered with real-live vote totals.
...
Hillary can’t grouse about Republicans injecting “doubt” and causing “a loss of confidence” in our system and then complain about losing the “popular vote,” which “the system” unambiguously rejects as a means of electing a president. Certainly she’s in no moral position to lament the rise of paranoia in American politics when two of the most popular made-up conspiracies of the age lead right back to her.


BWAHAHAHAHAHA

Why don't you and Hillary just get a room?

BWAHAHAHAHAHA
 
The truth missing from your ignorance is that Trump is worth billions, because of his hard work before becoming a politician, a president. While Clinton, Gore, Obama, Biden became rich as politicians.

Obama is worth a $100 million in 4 years?
The Clintons are worth over $250 million.
Biden and his family are worth? $20 million?


We all see the democrats for what they are, and as you point out, the democrats use our government as their own, personal, ATM>
And none of those Dimwingers ever had a real job.
 
WillHaftawaite
Of course he does. According to his feeble brain the only bad guys are on the right.

Of course he's a miserable POS so there you go. LOL
 
She is evil personified.

If it turned out she was a literal demon, I would not be the least bit surprised…

…ok, maybe a little bit.


Speaking of demons....did you see this?

“Pelosi's archbishop: Abortion bill is what you'd expect 'from a Satanist'

'Any reasonable person with a basic sense of morality and inkling of decency cannot but shudder in horror'


One Catholic Bishop has come out strongly against an abortion bill, and he’s not holding back, calling it “child sacrifice.”

The Archbishop did not mince words. “',” he said. “It is especially shameful that any self-professed Catholic would be implicated in such an evil, let alone advocate for it. […] This proposed legislation is nothing short of child sacrifice, and clearly in reaction, among other things, to the recently passed Texas Heartbeat bill. […] Indeed, HR 3755 is surely the type of legislation one would expect from a devout Satanist, not a devout Catholic.”

 

Forum List

Back
Top