Healthy 16-year-old boy dies during online class after second Pfizer jab: VAERS database. ( California )

[ClaireH]

Let's just attribute every death to the vaccine and call it a day. Struck by lightning? It must have been attracted by all the vaccine magnets inside him, eaten by a shark? Yup, pfizer makes humans tastier, jumped from a building? Moderna pushed him.

The current jabs are lowly products still in need for customers. Scientists know this at-large but not many will state it publicly, at least today. There are multiple, effective options in development if you want a real vaccine that is, that produce effective antibodies for around 17 years as opposed to 3 months protection. Over 200 pharmaceutical companies are working on them. Here is just one:

T cell-oriented strategies for controlling the COVID-19 pandemic - Nature Reviews Immunology

This Comment article proposes that T cell-oriented vaccine strategies should be considered to control the COVID-19 pandemic in the longer term, given declining levels of neutralizing antibodies with time after vaccination or infection and the emergence of viral escape variants.

www.nature.com

 

[ClaireH]

So, who prefers 17 year actual protection versus currently peddled “solution” for few months of potential protection? Yeah, me too! Just in case you missed the link:

T cell-oriented strategies for controlling the COVID-19 pandemic - Nature Reviews Immunology

This Comment article proposes that T cell-oriented vaccine strategies should be considered to control the COVID-19 pandemic in the longer term, given declining levels of neutralizing antibodies with time after vaccination or infection and the emergence of viral escape variants.

www.nature.com

 

[aaronleland]

Are we sure it wasn't the math class that killed him?

 

[francoHFW]

GOP base totally missinformed as usual...

 

[schmidlap]

LifeSite News ^ | Oct 12, 2021 | Jack Bingham

A healthy 16-year-old boy in California reportedly died during a Zoom math class less than a month after receiving his second shot of Pfizer’s COIVD-19 injection, a VAERS entry shows.

On July 13, the boy’s mother filed a report with the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) — run by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) — indicating her son died 27 days after receiving his second dose of Pfizer’s experimental COVID-19 vaccine in April.

“My son died, while taking his math class on Zoom. We are waiting for the autopsy because the doctors did not find anything,” the mother wrote. “He was a healthy boy, he had a good academic index, he wanted to be a civil engineer. He was the best thing in my life.”

In the “Diagnostic Lab Data” section of the VAERS entry, the mother wrote, “He had no previous symptoms. I was with him one hour before and my assistant saw him 20 minutes prior and he did not show any irregularities.”

Per the report, the child’s second dose was administered on April 3, and the boy died on April 27.

The entry also indicates that the child had not been diagnosed with any allergies, pre-existing conditions, illnesses, disabilities, or birth defects, and had not been taking any medications prior to his death. He apparently stayed in the hospital for eight days, and it’s unclear how he participated in the Zoom class, or if he was released prior.

Incidences of children being severely harmed and even killed by the vaccines has been reported on at length since the vaccine was rolled out for young people earlier this year.

Back in June, Children’s Health Defense looked at the preliminary data surrounding the vaccination of children against COVID-19, and reported that “for those 12-17 years of age, the risk of developing myocarditis/pericarditis within 7 days of receiving the second dose is 32 times greater than expected for males and 9.5 times greater for females.”

For young adults aged 18-24 years, the increased risk of developing myocarditis and pericarditis was similarly elevated at 27 times greater than expected for males.

In the broader population, the World Health Organization’s own database includes over 2 million possible adverse reactions from the COVID-19 vaccines, with the highest proportion of them in young people aged 18-44.

Dr. Patrick Whelan, a pediatric specialist caring for children with the multisystem inflammatory syndrome, said the spike protein found in the vaccines is of special concern for young people, as it is a potentially lethal toxin that causes “microvascular injury to the brain, heart, liver, and kidneys in a way that does not currently appear to be assessed in safety trials of these potential drugs.”

Despite widespread and sometimes mandatory use, all the currently available COVID-19 so-called vaccines have yet to complete clinical trials, with the earliest completion date set for May of 2023.

Oxford-educated epidemiologist Dr. Paul Elias Alexander, a former COVID pandemic advisor to WHO-PAHO in Washington, D.C., found that children pose almost no statistical risk when it comes to the transmission of the virus, and even less risk when it comes to falling seriously ill as a result of contracting the virus.

Using the data and his extensive knowledge of epidemiology, Alexander determined that “under no circumstance should we expose children to the risk of the [COVID] injections.”

Attorney Thomas Renz said in August that analyzing the currently available data, in combination with the sworn testimony of government whistleblowers, his team has determined that vaccine injuries are “under-reported by a conservative factor of at least 5” in the VAERS database.

Renz, who is confident enough in his claim that he is seeking to prove it in a court of law, told LifeSiteNews that with the underreporting in mind, the jabs can easily be linked to a “conservative estimate” of 45,000 deaths in America alone.

Dr. Peter McCullough, a renowned Texas cardiologist, said in response to California Gov. Gavin Newsom mandating the vaccine for all students, “[The data] doesn’t equal mandatory vaccination for children. It mandates just the opposite: an unbelievable, relentless, and unbreakable resistance to having the children vaccinated. It is simply not safe under any conditions. Period. Full stop.”

-------------------

Damn all of you that believe this experimental drug should be mandated especially for our children. Damn you all.

These crackpot fake claims from propaganda sites inject their ideologically-vulnerable dupes with massive overdoses of ignorance.

There is no shortage of this steaming poo poo being served for those who gorge on it.

LifeNews.com Right Biased and Questionable based on the use of poor sources,
promotion of pseudoscience, and numerous failed fact-checks.

Life News – Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

​

More such extremist scatological delicacies for science haters:​

​

Contrary to claim in Becker News article, not all cases of infection lead to immunity; falsely claims that most COVID-19 deaths weren't caused by COVID-19 but by comorbidities​

​

Fact check: Article falsely claims Fauci said COVID-19 vaccines are not working as advertised​

​

Kids '50 times more likely to be killed' by COVID-19 vaccines? Pants on Fire​

​

Fact check: Vaccines protect against contracting, spreading COVID-19​

​

etc., etc., etc.​

​

 

[Rigby5]

These crackpot fake claims from propaganda sites inject their ideologically-vulnerable dupes with massive overdoses of ignorance.

There is no shortage of this steaming poo poo being served for those who gorge on it.

LifeNews.com Right Biased and Questionable based on the use of poor sources,
promotion of pseudoscience, and numerous failed fact-checks.

Life News – Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

​

More such extremist scatological delicacies for science haters:​

​

Contrary to claim in Becker News article, not all cases of infection lead to immunity; falsely claims that most COVID-19 deaths weren't caused by COVID-19 but by comorbidities​

​

Fact check: Article falsely claims Fauci said COVID-19 vaccines are not working as advertised​

​

Kids '50 times more likely to be killed' by COVID-19 vaccines? Pants on Fire​

​

Fact check: Vaccines protect against contracting, spreading COVID-19​

​

etc., etc., etc.​

​

Wrong.

For example, the Fact Check claim:
{...
Fact check: Vaccines protect against contracting, spreading COVID-19
...}

The reality is that the mRNA injections just temporarily stimulate some antibody production.
All that does is reduce symptoms for up to 4 months.
It does not at all reduce infection, and only slightly reduces spread.
And provides not a single bit of immunity, since that would require an actual virus for the immune system to remember as a trigger.
Since these injections have no virus, then immunity is impossible.
If you think the immune system could trigger on spike proteins, you would be wrong because our own exosomes have to use the same spike proteins in order to access ACE2 receptors in our cells.

Sure it is likely kids are not going to be killed 50 times more by the vax than covid, but more for sure. Probably more than twice as much. So we should NOT be vaccinating children with these mRNA injections. They have lots of potential problems, and are a really bad idea, with very little good possible.

 

[francoHFW]

Wrong.

For example, the Fact Check claim:
{...
Fact check: Vaccines protect against contracting, spreading COVID-19
...}

The reality is that the mRNA injections just temporarily stimulate some antibody production.
All that does is reduce symptoms for up to 4 months.
It does not at all reduce infection, and only slightly reduces spread.
And provides not a single bit of immunity, since that would require an actual virus for the immune system to remember as a trigger.
Since these injections have no virus, then immunity is impossible.
If you think the immune system could trigger on spike proteins, you would be wrong because our own exosomes have to use the same spike proteins in order to access ACE2 receptors in our cells.

Sure it is likely kids are not going to be killed 50 times more by the vax than covid, but more for sure. Probably more than twice as much. So we should NOT be vaccinating children with these mRNA injections. They have lots of potential problems, and are a really bad idea, with very little good possible.

Try reading your link


"What we know is that individuals who are vaccinated are much less likely to be infected therefore much less likely to spread the virus," Dr. Amesh Adalja, a senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, said in an email.

 

[Rigby5]

Try reading your link


"What we know is that individuals who are vaccinated are much less likely to be infected therefore much less likely to spread the virus," Dr. Amesh Adalja, a senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, said in an email.

That is NOT my link, but the link I am laughing at.
It is wrong.
The odds of being infected is the same or even slightly greater after vaccination.
This has by now been admitted by everyone.
Vaccination in no way can effect infection at all, in any way.

 

[schmidlap]

Wrong.

For example, the Fact Check claim:
{...
Fact check: Vaccines protect against contracting, spreading COVID-19
...}

The reality is that the mRNA injections just temporarily stimulate some antibody production.
All that does is reduce symptoms for up to 4 months.
It does not at all reduce infection, and only slightly reduces spread.
And provides not a single bit of immunity, since that would require an actual virus for the immune system to remember as a trigger.
Since these injections have no virus, then immunity is impossible.
If you think the immune system could trigger on spike proteins, you would be wrong because our own exosomes have to use the same spike proteins in order to access ACE2 receptors in our cells.

Sure it is likely kids are not going to be killed 50 times more by the vax than covid, but more for sure. Probably more than twice as much. So we should NOT be vaccinating children with these mRNA injections. They have lots of potential problems, and are a really bad idea, with very little good possible.

For some, media entertainers who peddle ideological dogma are preferred to public health experts, epidemiologists, virologists, and other health professionals in matters of pandemics, just as the same media performers are revered by them in other scientific disciplines such as climatology.

Obviously, it's irrational, and demonizing competent people is a disturbing proclivity, but these are the same jamokes who venerate the most absurd conjurings, such as the articles of faith that their Cry Baby Loser regularly pulls out of his big, flabby tush.

There are fanatics irrationally in thrall to Trumpery who don't allow reason to interfere with their inexplicable emotional dependence upon the Cry Baby Loser.

Calmly note the absurdity of a stolen "Landslide!" with the reality of no investigations, no indictments, no suspects in a fantastical caper so widespread that it would have required thousands of dedicated coordinated conspirators, of both political parties, in high and low places, in at least several states, not one of whom has hinted at his complicity in such an enormous and consequential mugging of democracy.

Will Trump worshippers engage dispassionately in recognizing the absurdity?

It is far more likely that they will lash out viciously at the unspeakable sacrilege of desecrating their article of blind faith with profane logic.

Covid-19?

Who are you going to trust? CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walinsky, an MD from the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, and a Masters in Public Health from the Harvard School of Public Health, or Alex Jones who briefly attended Austin Community College but dropped out and became a radio performer?

CDC Directory Walensky endorses boosters for everyone​

​

Alex Jones' Coronavirus Vaccine Conspiracy Theories ​

​

 

[Rigby5]

For some, media entertainers who peddle ideological dogma are preferred to public health experts, epidemiologists, virologists, and other health professionals in matters of pandemics, just as the same media performers are revered by them in other scientific disciplines such as climatology.

Obviously, it's irrational, and demonizing competent people is a disturbing proclivity, but these are the same jamokes who venerate the most absurd conjurings, such as the articles of faith that their Cry Baby Loser regularly pulls out of his big, flabby tush.

There are fanatics irrationally in thrall to Trumpery who don't allow reason to interfere with their inexplicable emotional dependence upon the Cry Baby Loser.

Calmly note the absurdity of a stolen "Landslide!" with the reality of no investigations, no indictments, no suspects in a fantastical caper so widespread that it would have required thousands of dedicated coordinated conspirators, of both political parties, in high and low places, in at least several states, not one of whom has hinted at his complicity in such an enormous and consequential mugging of democracy.

Will Trump worshippers engage dispassionately in recognizing the absurdity?

It is far more likely that they will lash out viciously at the unspeakable sacrilege of desecrating their article of blind faith with profane logic.

Covid-19?

Who are you going to trust? CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walinsky, an MD from the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, and a Masters in Public Health from the Harvard School of Public Health, or Alex Jones who briefly attended Austin Community College but dropped out and became a radio performer?

CDC Directory Walensky endorses boosters for everyone​

View attachment 567533​

Alex Jones' Coronavirus Vaccine Conspiracy Theories ​

View attachment 567535​

Sure, everyone is trying to leverage the health fears, economic fears, etc.
But politics of manipulating fears should have nothing to do with science.
And science says you NEVER "flatten the curve" with any epidemic, ever.
That just stretches the epidemic out longer, preventing it from ending, and resulting with the largest possible death toll.
So then why and who is doing that?
Clearly the CDC has been taken over by big pharma, because not a single doctor or nurse I have talked to said "flattening the curve" is ever a good idea/
So then profits have taken over the CDC, and they are lying to us.
They are pushing a genetically manipulated set of proteins that they are calling a vaccine, that is nothing at all like a vaccine.
These mRNA injections do not prevent infection or spread, and only temporarily stimulate antibody production.
They do not and can not cause your immune system to store immunity information in long term T-cells in the bone marrow, because they do not contain any virus to trigger on.
They do cause your body to produce spike proteins, but that can't be used by your immune system because our own exosomes also have to use those same spike proteins for ACE2 receptor access.

So when you ask who the liar is between Walensky and Jones, the truth is they are both equally lying.

If you want to understand how our exosomes work, here is a link:

Exosome (vesicle) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Normal exosome activity is on the right, covid is in the middle, and regulatory drugs on the left.

 

[Rigby5]

CDC Directory Walensky endorses boosters for everyone

Most real vaccine are life long, or at least 30 years or so.
About the only exceptions are pertussis, which is about 5 years, and tetanus, which is about 10 years.
But with these mRNA injections they are saying boosters every 3 months.
And clearly that is crazy.
And when they say it is due to variants, they obviously have to be lying because the original injection had no virus in it anyway, so there is no way it could ever have been teaching the immune system anything.
If the original injection was using the spike proteins to trigger on, they have not changed with the variants.
The spike proteins can't change, because that is how they unlock the ACE2 receptors and sneak into our cells.

So then what is really happening?
The truth is these mRNA injections are nothing at all like vaccines, and instead just temporarily stimulate some antibody production.
But antibodies only last about 3 or 4 months.
So then these mRNA injections are just temporary treatments, and nothing at all even remotely similar to a vaccine.

 

[schmidlap]

...But with these mRNA injections they are saying boosters every 3 months....

Who is telling you that? Could you provide a link?

Dr. Patrick Jackson, an infectious disease expert at the University of Virginia: “I think it's not surprising that the COVID vaccines seem to require a boost to give the best response,” he said. “Obviously, we'd all prefer a one-and-done vaccine, but our experience with other vaccines is that it's fairly rare to be able to do that – and if we knew why a single dose worked so well for yellow fever, we'd understand more about the immune system than we currently do. The requirement for a booster just makes the COVID vaccines pretty normal vaccines.”​

​

Fact check: Booster shots are normal, not evidence of failed vaccine, experts say

Experts say it’s not out of the ordinary for vaccines to require a booster shot months after the first jab.

www.yahoo.com

Trump urges all Americans to get COVID vaccine:​

It's a safe vaccine and it works!:​

​

​

 

[francoHFW]

That is NOT my link, but the link I am laughing at.
It is wrong.
The odds of being infected is the same or even slightly greater after vaccination.
This has by now been admitted by everyone.
Vaccination in no way can effect infection at all, in any way.

Congratulations, you are a brainwashed functional moron. After the booster you are 95% effectively protected against infection. So only one out of 20 will get it. Change the goddamn channel and stop listening to internet crazies.

 

[francoHFW]

Most real vaccine are life long, or at least 30 years or so.
About the only exceptions are pertussis, which is about 5 years, and tetanus, which is about 10 years.
But with these mRNA injections they are saying boosters every 3 months.
And clearly that is crazy.
And when they say it is due to variants, they obviously have to be lying because the original injection had no virus in it anyway, so there is no way it could ever have been teaching the immune system anything.
If the original injection was using the spike proteins to trigger on, they have not changed with the variants.
The spike proteins can't change, because that is how they unlock the ACE2 receptors and sneak into our cells.

So then what is really happening?
The truth is these mRNA injections are nothing at all like vaccines, and instead just temporarily stimulate some antibody production.
But antibodies only last about 3 or 4 months.
So then these mRNA injections are just temporary treatments, and nothing at all even remotely similar to a vaccine.

Funny how flu shots are annual, isn't it? Everything you know is wrong. Check out reality with real journalists and what court rooms have decided. You are a brainwashed functional moron. I have to the booster, 95% effective and probably for at least a year. But don't worry about science, Sean hannity knows the truth lol.

 

[Ghost1776]

LifeSite News ^ | Oct 12, 2021 | Jack Bingham

A healthy 16-year-old boy in California reportedly died during a Zoom math class less than a month after receiving his second shot of Pfizer’s COIVD-19 injection, a VAERS entry shows.

On July 13, the boy’s mother filed a report with the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) — run by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) — indicating her son died 27 days after receiving his second dose of Pfizer’s experimental COVID-19 vaccine in April.

“My son died, while taking his math class on Zoom. We are waiting for the autopsy because the doctors did not find anything,” the mother wrote. “He was a healthy boy, he had a good academic index, he wanted to be a civil engineer. He was the best thing in my life.”

In the “Diagnostic Lab Data” section of the VAERS entry, the mother wrote, “He had no previous symptoms. I was with him one hour before and my assistant saw him 20 minutes prior and he did not show any irregularities.”

Per the report, the child’s second dose was administered on April 3, and the boy died on April 27.

The entry also indicates that the child had not been diagnosed with any allergies, pre-existing conditions, illnesses, disabilities, or birth defects, and had not been taking any medications prior to his death. He apparently stayed in the hospital for eight days, and it’s unclear how he participated in the Zoom class, or if he was released prior.

Incidences of children being severely harmed and even killed by the vaccines has been reported on at length since the vaccine was rolled out for young people earlier this year.

Back in June, Children’s Health Defense looked at the preliminary data surrounding the vaccination of children against COVID-19, and reported that “for those 12-17 years of age, the risk of developing myocarditis/pericarditis within 7 days of receiving the second dose is 32 times greater than expected for males and 9.5 times greater for females.”

For young adults aged 18-24 years, the increased risk of developing myocarditis and pericarditis was similarly elevated at 27 times greater than expected for males.

In the broader population, the World Health Organization’s own database includes over 2 million possible adverse reactions from the COVID-19 vaccines, with the highest proportion of them in young people aged 18-44.

Dr. Patrick Whelan, a pediatric specialist caring for children with the multisystem inflammatory syndrome, said the spike protein found in the vaccines is of special concern for young people, as it is a potentially lethal toxin that causes “microvascular injury to the brain, heart, liver, and kidneys in a way that does not currently appear to be assessed in safety trials of these potential drugs.”

Despite widespread and sometimes mandatory use, all the currently available COVID-19 so-called vaccines have yet to complete clinical trials, with the earliest completion date set for May of 2023.

Oxford-educated epidemiologist Dr. Paul Elias Alexander, a former COVID pandemic advisor to WHO-PAHO in Washington, D.C., found that children pose almost no statistical risk when it comes to the transmission of the virus, and even less risk when it comes to falling seriously ill as a result of contracting the virus.

Using the data and his extensive knowledge of epidemiology, Alexander determined that “under no circumstance should we expose children to the risk of the [COVID] injections.”

Attorney Thomas Renz said in August that analyzing the currently available data, in combination with the sworn testimony of government whistleblowers, his team has determined that vaccine injuries are “under-reported by a conservative factor of at least 5” in the VAERS database.

Renz, who is confident enough in his claim that he is seeking to prove it in a court of law, told LifeSiteNews that with the underreporting in mind, the jabs can easily be linked to a “conservative estimate” of 45,000 deaths in America alone.

Dr. Peter McCullough, a renowned Texas cardiologist, said in response to California Gov. Gavin Newsom mandating the vaccine for all students, “[The data] doesn’t equal mandatory vaccination for children. It mandates just the opposite: an unbelievable, relentless, and unbreakable resistance to having the children vaccinated. It is simply not safe under any conditions. Period. Full stop.”

-------------------

Damn all of you that believe this experimental drug should be mandated especially for our children. Damn you all.

And they still don’t get it.

 

[Ghost1776]

LifeSite News ^ | Oct 12, 2021 | Jack Bingham

A healthy 16-year-old boy in California reportedly died during a Zoom math class less than a month after receiving his second shot of Pfizer’s COIVD-19 injection, a VAERS entry shows.

On July 13, the boy’s mother filed a report with the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) — run by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) — indicating her son died 27 days after receiving his second dose of Pfizer’s experimental COVID-19 vaccine in April.

“My son died, while taking his math class on Zoom. We are waiting for the autopsy because the doctors did not find anything,” the mother wrote. “He was a healthy boy, he had a good academic index, he wanted to be a civil engineer. He was the best thing in my life.”

In the “Diagnostic Lab Data” section of the VAERS entry, the mother wrote, “He had no previous symptoms. I was with him one hour before and my assistant saw him 20 minutes prior and he did not show any irregularities.”

Per the report, the child’s second dose was administered on April 3, and the boy died on April 27.

The entry also indicates that the child had not been diagnosed with any allergies, pre-existing conditions, illnesses, disabilities, or birth defects, and had not been taking any medications prior to his death. He apparently stayed in the hospital for eight days, and it’s unclear how he participated in the Zoom class, or if he was released prior.

Incidences of children being severely harmed and even killed by the vaccines has been reported on at length since the vaccine was rolled out for young people earlier this year.

Back in June, Children’s Health Defense looked at the preliminary data surrounding the vaccination of children against COVID-19, and reported that “for those 12-17 years of age, the risk of developing myocarditis/pericarditis within 7 days of receiving the second dose is 32 times greater than expected for males and 9.5 times greater for females.”

For young adults aged 18-24 years, the increased risk of developing myocarditis and pericarditis was similarly elevated at 27 times greater than expected for males.

In the broader population, the World Health Organization’s own database includes over 2 million possible adverse reactions from the COVID-19 vaccines, with the highest proportion of them in young people aged 18-44.

Dr. Patrick Whelan, a pediatric specialist caring for children with the multisystem inflammatory syndrome, said the spike protein found in the vaccines is of special concern for young people, as it is a potentially lethal toxin that causes “microvascular injury to the brain, heart, liver, and kidneys in a way that does not currently appear to be assessed in safety trials of these potential drugs.”

Despite widespread and sometimes mandatory use, all the currently available COVID-19 so-called vaccines have yet to complete clinical trials, with the earliest completion date set for May of 2023.

Oxford-educated epidemiologist Dr. Paul Elias Alexander, a former COVID pandemic advisor to WHO-PAHO in Washington, D.C., found that children pose almost no statistical risk when it comes to the transmission of the virus, and even less risk when it comes to falling seriously ill as a result of contracting the virus.

Using the data and his extensive knowledge of epidemiology, Alexander determined that “under no circumstance should we expose children to the risk of the [COVID] injections.”

Attorney Thomas Renz said in August that analyzing the currently available data, in combination with the sworn testimony of government whistleblowers, his team has determined that vaccine injuries are “under-reported by a conservative factor of at least 5” in the VAERS database.

Renz, who is confident enough in his claim that he is seeking to prove it in a court of law, told LifeSiteNews that with the underreporting in mind, the jabs can easily be linked to a “conservative estimate” of 45,000 deaths in America alone.

Dr. Peter McCullough, a renowned Texas cardiologist, said in response to California Gov. Gavin Newsom mandating the vaccine for all students, “[The data] doesn’t equal mandatory vaccination for children. It mandates just the opposite: an unbelievable, relentless, and unbreakable resistance to having the children vaccinated. It is simply not safe under any conditions. Period. Full stop.”

-------------------

Damn all of you that believe this experimental drug should be mandated especially for our children. Damn you all.

And you were right to decide that too.

Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs

The mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were brought to market in response to the public health crises of Covid-19. The utilization of mRNA vaccines in the conte…

www.sciencedirect.com

 

[Rigby5]

Who is telling you that? Could you provide a link?

Dr. Patrick Jackson, an infectious disease expert at the University of Virginia: “I think it's not surprising that the COVID vaccines seem to require a boost to give the best response,” he said. “Obviously, we'd all prefer a one-and-done vaccine, but our experience with other vaccines is that it's fairly rare to be able to do that – and if we knew why a single dose worked so well for yellow fever, we'd understand more about the immune system than we currently do. The requirement for a booster just makes the COVID vaccines pretty normal vaccines.”​

​

Fact check: Booster shots are normal, not evidence of failed vaccine, experts say

Experts say it’s not out of the ordinary for vaccines to require a booster shot months after the first jab.

www.yahoo.com

Trump urges all Americans to get COVID vaccine:​

View attachment 567585​

It's a safe vaccine and it works!:​

​

​

I could link lots of sites saying that the mRNA injections to not work on long term immunity, but there are so many lies out there that there would not really be much point.
Better to simply understand simple facts.
The immune system works by storing information about the attacking pathogen and what cured it, in long term T-cell memory in bone marrow.
But how can mRNA injections produce that when they don't contain any pathogen?
What they will try to claim is that the immune system can just store the spike protein information, and trigger on that.
But that has to be false, because the whole point of the covid spike proteins is that the virus is trying to pretend to be an exosome.
Exosomes are organelles that leave the cell and enter other cells, to convey info.
All cells contain DNA, but DNA is for the entire body, and is not differentiated by what kind of cell a cell is supposed to be.
That is what exosome are for.
If the cell is in a muscle, then the other muscle cells tell the new cell to be a muscle cell also.
Exosomes leave and enter cells through ACE2 receptor sites.
The exosomes each have a single spike protein they push into a site on the ACE2 receptor, and the receptor than surrounds the exosome and lets it in or out.
So the whole point of covid spike proteins, is to mimic the exosome spike proteins.
They are essentially identical.
Otherwise they would not work to let the coronavirus in.
So you can see that anyone claiming the spike protein can be used to identify a pathogen, is lying.
That is because our own exosomes have to use the exact same spike protein.

If you want to read more without my interpretation, I can easily provide more links about how exosomes work.

 

[Rigby5]

Congratulations, you are a brainwashed functional moron. After the booster you are 95% effectively protected against infection. So only one out of 20 will get it. Change the goddamn channel and stop listening to internet crazies.

You are wrong.
After 6 months, the mRNA injections leave zero protection.

 

[Rigby5]

Funny how flu shots are annual, isn't it? Everything you know is wrong. Check out reality with real journalists and what court rooms have decided. You are a brainwashed functional moron. I have to the booster, 95% effective and probably for at least a year. But don't worry about science, Sean hannity knows the truth lol.

Wrong.
The reason they make different flu shots each years is NOT because last year's shot lost any efficacy.
It is because there are over 300 different pathogens that we collectively call "flu".
Last year's flu shot was not likely for this years pathogen.

You are the one who does not know the science.
The only things you need boosters for is tetanus, but even that lasts about 12 years before losing efficacy.

 

[francoHFW]

Wrong.
The reason they make different flu shots each years is NOT because last year's shot lost any efficacy.
It is because there are over 300 different pathogens that we collectively call "flu".
Last year's flu shot was not likely for this years pathogen.

You are the one who does not know the science.
The only things you need boosters for is tetanus, but even that lasts about 12 years before losing efficacy.

And Covid duh...

Wrong.
The reason they make different flu shots each years is NOT because last year's shot lost any efficacy.
It is because there are over 300 different pathogens that we collectively call "flu".
Last year's flu shot was not likely for this years pathogen.

You are the one who does not know the science.
The only things you need boosters for is tetanus, but even that lasts about 12 years before losing efficacy.

I DIDN'T SAY IT WAS LOL...