Healthy 16-year-old boy dies during online class after second Pfizer jab: VAERS database. ( California )

It didn't happen to my kid who was 18.

It is not 100%.
The way it works is that the mRNA injection is much smaller than the covid virus.
So that means it can easily migrate.
And if it leaves the arm muscle site of injection, it can easly get into the blood stream, and travel anywhere.
But where ever it ends up, is going to be where the immune system attacks and causes inflammation.
If that is the brain or heart, you die.
If it is your feet or hands, they might have to amputate.


{...

Stamford man vows to battle back after losing his leg weeks after receiving AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccination​


By Andrea Scholes
-
[email protected]

Published: 06:00, 07 May 2021
...}
 
More like 15.

Regardless of political or legal bullshit, from a medical science standpoint, people become adults around age 15, give or take a few years.

If you are sending your 21 year old offspring to a pediatrician, both of you are ignorant idiots.

This has nothing to do with legalities.
The point is the nRMA vaccines are more much more deadly with those under 18.
 
This is happening everywhere COVID vaccines have been administered to young people. And yet governments 'round the world and our good old US of A continue to push for mass vaccination of children. That, in and of itself, should explain everything we need to know.
Politicians and big Pharma are making a KILLING $$$ off the vaccines...they apparently don't care about the people that they kill along the way.
 
I agree.

The motivation for disseminating disinformation seems to be that they are ideologues who object to the fact that human fetal experimentation was used as a cheap source of biological material during development of the mRNA vaccines.

I'm pro-life. I don't like abortion any more than anyone else. Similarly, I'm also opposed to performing the medical experiments that Nazi's and Japs performed on prisoners during WWII.

I am opposed to ignoring the scientific medical knowledge and data that was gained due to those terrific experiments.

No, it was not the use of fetal tissue during experimentation that people object to.
The actual manufacturing process uses fetal kidneys for all production.
But that is not why I object.
I am pro-abortion since our planet is vastly over populated in my opinion.
What I object to is according to the CDC, the mRNA injections are a synthetic virus essentially.
They have spike proteins in order to get into our cell's ACE2 receptors.
Once inside then they program our ribosomes to start our own cells growing more spike proteins, which they then hope will cause the appropriate immune system reaction.
But there is absolutely no quantity control of the spike protein production, so it is going to be common that with many, no spike proteins will result, while in other there will be fatal numbers produced.
 
No, it was not the use of fetal tissue during experimentation that people object to.
The actual manufacturing process uses fetal kidneys for all production.
But that is not why I object.
I am pro-abortion since our planet is vastly over populated in my opinion.
What I object to is according to the CDC, the mRNA injections are a synthetic virus essentially.
They have spike proteins in order to get into our cell's ACE2 receptors.
Once inside then they program our ribosomes to start our own cells growing more spike proteins, which they then hope will cause the appropriate immune system reaction.
But there is absolutely no quantity control of the spike protein production, so it is going to be common that with many, no spike proteins will result, while in other there will be fatal numbers produced.

Interesting. So you are against overpopulation, but don't believe the MRNA shots are a good means of reducing that population. But you DO think dismembering an unborn baby limb by limb while that baby's heart is beating, and then sucking the dismembered baby out of its mother's womb, is morally acceptable.

Huh. Okay.

I do not. I think contraception and education is the way to go. I think once a human being is created, at WHATEVER stage of life: unborn, born, elderly--we have no right to end that life because of "overpopulation".
 
Comparisons to WW2 Germany are a "no no" but there is at least one way in which such comparisons are apt. We are in a full on moral panic with accompanying propaganda not seen SINCE that era. When the smoke clears and the propaganda stops working for whatever reason---all this business is going to come out.

The truth ALWAYS outs, sooner or later.

And many, many people will have stories to tell. I really hope I live to see it.
 
Interesting. So you are against overpopulation, but don't believe the MRNA shots are a good means of reducing that population. But you DO think dismembering an unborn baby limb by limb while that baby's heart is beating, and then sucking the dismembered baby out of its mother's womb, is morally acceptable.

Huh. Okay.

I do not. I think contraception and education is the way to go. I think once a human being is created, at WHATEVER stage of life: unborn, born, elderly--we have no right to end that life because of "overpopulation".

I do not at all care if tissue is alive or not.
All I care about is consciousness, sentience, being self aware.
Tissue does not care if it is alive or dead, so neither should we.
We kill living tissue all the time, like liposuction kills living fat cells.
The fact human tissue is alive is totally irrelevant to me.
But there is a point when something different happens.
After the brain develops to some point, then there is a self aware, conscious, human entity.
 
I do not at all care if tissue is alive or not.
All I care about is consciousness, sentience, being self aware.
Tissue does not care if it is alive or dead, so neither should we.
We kill living tissue all the time, like liposuction kills living fat cells.
The fact human tissue is alive is totally irrelevant to me.
But there is a point when something different happens.
After the brain develops to some point, then there is a self aware, conscious, human entity.

So same with late stage Alzheimer's patients then?

And people in comas, etc?

Right?
 
Comparisons to WW2 Germany are a "no no" but there is at least one way in which such comparisons are apt. We are in a full on moral panic with accompanying propaganda not seen SINCE that era. When the smoke clears and the propaganda stops working for whatever reason---all this business is going to come out.

The truth ALWAYS outs, sooner or later.

And many, many people will have stories to tell. I really hope I live to see it.

What you are likely to see is the opposite of what you hope for.
The value of a human being is decreasing, not increasing.
Otherwise we could not have massacred over half a million innocent Iraqis.
And it is getting worse.
Israel is slowly trying to murder 12 million Palestinians.
We not only have our own illegal War on Drugs, but likely to disenfranchise the poor even more.
The lines are already being drawn.
We already are demonizing half the population.
Civil war is very likely.
Jobs are leaving, to China, and the ones left pay hardly enough to survive.
This can't continue.
 
So same with late stage Alzheimer's patients then?

And people in comas, etc?

Right?

Yes.
Everyone agrees that you pull the plug on a coma patient at some point.
Whether it is a month or a year, you don't just keep an empty body alive for no reason.
I assure you I am not going to let myself get put into an elderly care facility.
 
What you are likely to see is the opposite of what you hope for.
The value of a human being is decreasing, not increasing.
Otherwise we could not have massacred over half a million innocent Iraqis.
And it is getting worse.
Israel is slowly trying to murder 12 million Palestinians.
We not only have our own illegal War on Drugs, but likely to disenfranchise the poor even more.
The lines are already being drawn.
We already are demonizing half the population.
Civil war is very likely.
Jobs are leaving, to China, and the ones left pay hardly enough to survive.
This can't continue.

I agree with you on almost everything you type here.

Except that

What is the worth of a "human being" in your worldview? Just the sentience?
 
Yes.
Everyone agrees that you pull the plug on a coma patient at some point.
Whether it is a month or a year, you don't just keep an empty body alive for no reason.
I assure you I am not going to let myself get put into an elderly care facility.

You have a right to not "let yourself" be put in an elderly care facility

Tell me about your right to tell OTHER PEOPLE not to be put in an elderly care facility, won't you?
 
LifeSite News ^ | Oct 12, 2021 | Jack Bingham

A healthy 16-year-old boy in California reportedly died during a Zoom math class less than a month after receiving his second shot of Pfizer’s COIVD-19 injection, a VAERS entry shows.

On July 13, the boy’s mother filed a report with the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) — run by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) — indicating her son died 27 days after receiving his second dose of Pfizer’s experimental COVID-19 vaccine in April.

“My son died, while taking his math class on Zoom. We are waiting for the autopsy because the doctors did not find anything,” the mother wrote. “He was a healthy boy, he had a good academic index, he wanted to be a civil engineer. He was the best thing in my life.”

In the “Diagnostic Lab Data” section of the VAERS entry, the mother wrote, “He had no previous symptoms. I was with him one hour before and my assistant saw him 20 minutes prior and he did not show any irregularities.”

Per the report, the child’s second dose was administered on April 3, and the boy died on April 27.

The entry also indicates that the child had not been diagnosed with any allergies, pre-existing conditions, illnesses, disabilities, or birth defects, and had not been taking any medications prior to his death. He apparently stayed in the hospital for eight days, and it’s unclear how he participated in the Zoom class, or if he was released prior.

Incidences of children being severely harmed and even killed by the vaccines has been reported on at length since the vaccine was rolled out for young people earlier this year.

Back in June, Children’s Health Defense looked at the preliminary data surrounding the vaccination of children against COVID-19, and reported that “for those 12-17 years of age, the risk of developing myocarditis/pericarditis within 7 days of receiving the second dose is 32 times greater than expected for males and 9.5 times greater for females.”

For young adults aged 18-24 years, the increased risk of developing myocarditis and pericarditis was similarly elevated at 27 times greater than expected for males.

In the broader population, the World Health Organization’s own database includes over 2 million possible adverse reactions from the COVID-19 vaccines, with the highest proportion of them in young people aged 18-44.

Dr. Patrick Whelan, a pediatric specialist caring for children with the multisystem inflammatory syndrome, said the spike protein found in the vaccines is of special concern for young people, as it is a potentially lethal toxin that causes “microvascular injury to the brain, heart, liver, and kidneys in a way that does not currently appear to be assessed in safety trials of these potential drugs.”

Despite widespread and sometimes mandatory use, all the currently available COVID-19 so-called vaccines have yet to complete clinical trials, with the earliest completion date set for May of 2023.

Oxford-educated epidemiologist Dr. Paul Elias Alexander, a former COVID pandemic advisor to WHO-PAHO in Washington, D.C., found that children pose almost no statistical risk when it comes to the transmission of the virus, and even less risk when it comes to falling seriously ill as a result of contracting the virus.

Using the data and his extensive knowledge of epidemiology, Alexander determined that “under no circumstance should we expose children to the risk of the [COVID] injections.”

Attorney Thomas Renz said in August that analyzing the currently available data, in combination with the sworn testimony of government whistleblowers, his team has determined that vaccine injuries are “under-reported by a conservative factor of at least 5” in the VAERS database.

Renz, who is confident enough in his claim that he is seeking to prove it in a court of law, told LifeSiteNews that with the underreporting in mind, the jabs can easily be linked to a “conservative estimate” of 45,000 deaths in America alone.

Dr. Peter McCullough, a renowned Texas cardiologist, said in response to California Gov. Gavin Newsom mandating the vaccine for all students, “[The data] doesn’t equal mandatory vaccination for children. It mandates just the opposite: an unbelievable, relentless, and unbreakable resistance to having the children vaccinated. It is simply not safe under any conditions. Period. Full stop.”

-------------------

Damn all of you that believe this experimental drug should be mandated especially for our children. Damn you all.
Between 2% and 4% of COVID deaths are people without any underlying illness, so he falls into this bracket. And I imagine, even a lower percentage after being vaccinated.
 
I agree with you on almost everything you type here.

Except that

What is the worth of a "human being" in your worldview? Just the sentience?

Yes I think it is the sentience.
I think humans have inherent empathy, that makes us value and worry about others.
I think it is the similar but limited sentience that makes us like pets.
 
You have a right to not "let yourself" be put in an elderly care facility

Tell me about your right to tell OTHER PEOPLE not to be put in an elderly care facility, won't you?

If people want to go into elderly care facilities, that is fine with me.
I support them and the facilities.
I am just saying its not for me.
 
Let's just attribute every death to the vaccine and call it a day. Struck by lightning? It must have been attracted by all the vaccine magnets inside him, eaten by a shark? Yup, pfizer makes humans tastier, jumped from a building? Moderna pushed him. :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
 
Let's just attribute every death to the vaccine and call it a day. Struck by lightning? It must have been attracted by all the vaccine magnets inside him, eaten by a shark? Yup, pfizer makes humans tastier, jumped from a building? Moderna pushed him. :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

Clearly these mRNA injections ARE very dangerous.
Statistically they are at least 10 times more dangerous than any past vaccine.
These deaths after vaccinations are not car accidents or suicides.
They are heart attacks, strokes, etc., in healthy people with no history of problems, and clearly the thousands of non-lethal amputations show that there are huge problems with these mRNA injections.
And the science is easy to understand why they are so dangerous.
The mRNA injections are tiny molecules compared to the huge covid virus, so they do not stay a the injection site.
They easily migrate.
And if they migrate to the heart or brain, you die when the immune system attacks them and causes local inflammation.
If they migrate to the extremities before being attacked by the immune system, then you get gangrene and require amputations.
Nor is the risk likely worth it, since the recommendation for a 4th booster implies there is no T-cell memory from these mRNA injections.
They don't work after 3 months.
 

Forum List

Back
Top